Determination of the optimum porosity for 2-CEES adsorption by activated carbon fiber from various precursors
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, we prepared ACFs with a high specific surface area from various precursors (rayon, pitch, and oxidized polyacrylonitrile-based fibers) by a steam-activation technique and investigated the effects of the micropore and mesopore fraction on 2-CEES adsorption behaviors. The activation time was precisely controlled so that the activation yield was in the range of 35–40% to ensure the mechanical properties of the ACFs. The N2 adsorption isotherm characteristics at 77K were confirmed by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller, Barrett–Joyner–Halenda and non-local density functional theory equations. The adsorption capacities of the ACF were measured by breakthrough experiments in the gas phase (750 μg/mL of 2-CEES in N2 flow). The removal efficiency of the ACFs was evaluated and compared with that of AC. From the results, specific surface areas and total pore volume of the ACF were determined to be 1380–1670 m2/g and 0.61–0.82 cm3/g, respectively. It was also observed that various pore characteristics of ACF were found to be dependent on crystallite structure of each precursor. The break through time (C/C0 = 0.10) was in the order of Oxi-Pan-H-9-2 < Saratoga AC < Rayon-H-9-3 < Pitch-H-9-4. This indicates that 2-CEES adsorption capacity could be a function not only of specific surface area or total pore volume, but also of sub-mesopore volume fraction in the range of 1.5–2.5 nm of adsorbents.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Chauhan S, Chauhan S, D’Cruz R, Faruqi S, Singh KK, Varma S, Singh M, Karthik V (2008) Chemical warfare agents. Environ Toxicol Phar 26:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2008.03.00310.1016/j.etap.2008.03.003 ↗
2. Eckert WG (1991) Mass death by gas or chemical poisoning. A historical perspective. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 12:119–125. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000433-199106000-0000710.1097/00000433-199106000-00007 ↗
3. Razavi SM, Salamati P, Saghafinia M, Abdollahi M (2012) A review on delayed toxic effects of sulfur mustard in Iranian veterans. DARU 20:51. https://doi.org/10.1186/2008-2231-20-5110.1186/2008-2231-20-51 ↗
4. Kanyi CW, Doetschman DC, Schulte JT (2009) Nucleophilic chemistry of X-type Faujasite zeolites with 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (CEES), a simulant of common mustard gas. Micropor Mesopor Mat 124:232–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.05.01210.1016/j.micromeso.2009.05.012 ↗
5. Bartelt-Hunt SL, Knappe DRU, Barlaz MA (2008) A review of chemical warfare agent simulants for the study of environmental behavior. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 38:112–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064338070164365010.1080/10643380701643650 ↗
6. Marszałek A, Bartkowiak G, Łężak K (2009) Physiological effects of a modification of the construction of impermeable protective clothing. Int J Occup Saf Ergo 15:61–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2009.1107678910.1080/10803548.2009.11076789 ↗
7. Tripathi NK, Singh VV, Sathe M, Thakare VB, Singh B (2018) Activated carbon fabric: an adsorbent material for chemical protective clothing. Def Sci J 68:83–90. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.68.1173410.14429/dsj.68.11734 ↗
8. Truong Q, Wilusz E (2013) Advances in chemical and biological protective clothing. Smart textiles for protection. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857097620.2.36410.1533/9780857097620.2.364 ↗
9. Boopathi M, Singh B, Vijayaraghavan R (2008) A review on NBC body protective clothing. Open Textil J 1:1–8. https://doi.org/10.2174/187652030080101000110.2174/1876520300801010001 ↗
10. Huynh K, Holdren S, Hu J, Wang L, Zachariah MR, Elchhorn BW (2017) Dimethyl methylphosphonate adsorption capacities and desorption energies on ordered mesoporous carbons. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:40638–40644. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b1203310.1021/acsami.7b12033 ↗
11. Giannakoudakis DA, Barczak M, Florent M, Bandosz TJ (2019) Analysis of interactions of mustard gas surrogate vapors with porous carbon textiles. Chem Eng J 362:758–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.06410.1016/j.cej.2019.01.064 ↗
12. Shmidt JL, Pimenov AV, Lieberman AI, Cheh HY (1997) Kinetics of adsorption with granular, powdered, and fibrous activated carbon. Sep Sci Technol 32:2105–2114. https://doi.org/10.1080/0149639970800075810.1080/01496399708000758 ↗
13. Jung JY, Lee YS (2018) Electrochemical properties of KOH-activated lyocell-based carbon fibers for EDLCs. Carbon Lett 27:112–116. https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2018.27.11210.5714/CL.2018.27.112 ↗
14. Kang DH, Jo H, Jung MJ, Kim KH, Lee YS (2018) Anatase TiO2-doped activated carbon fibers prepared by ultrasonication and their capacitive deionization characteristics. Carbon Lett 27:64–71. https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2018.27.06410.5714/CL.2018.27.064 ↗
15. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multi molecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60:309–319. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01269a02310.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
16. Kierlik E, Rosinberg ML (1990) Free-energy density functional for the in homogeneous hard-sphere fluid: application to interfacial adsorption. Phys Rev A 42:3382–3387. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.42.338210.1103/PhysRevA.42.3382 ↗
17. Barrett EP, Joyner LG, Halenda PP (1951) The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances. I. Computations from nitrogen isotherms. J Am Chem Soc 73:373–380. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01145a12610.1021/ja01145a126 ↗
18. Sing KSW, Everett DH, Haul RAW, Moscou L, Pierotto RA, Rouquerol J (1985) Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl Chem 57:603–619. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac19855704060310.1351/pac198557040603 ↗
19. Edie DD, Fox NK, Barnett BC, Fain CC (1986) Melt-spun non-circular carbon fibers. Carbon 24:477–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(86)90271-X10.1016/0008-6223(86)90271-X ↗
20. Edie DD (1998) The effect of processing on the structure and properties of carbon fibers. Carbon 36:345–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00185-110.1016/S0008-6223(97)00185-1 ↗
21. Knibbs RH (1971) The use of polarized light microscopy in examining the structure of carbon fibres. J Microsc-Oxford 94:273–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1971.tb02377.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.1971.tb02377.x ↗
22. Dumanlı AG, Windle AH (2012) Carbon fibres from cellulosic precursors: a review. J Mater Sci 47:4236–4250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-6081-810.1007/s10853-011-6081-8 ↗
23. Röder T, Moosbauer J, Kliba G, Schlader S, Zuckerstätter G, Sixta H (2009) Comparative characterisation of man-made regenerated cellulose fibres. Lenzing Ber 87:98–105
24. Smole MS, Peršin Z, Kreže T, Kleinschek KS, Ribitsch V, Neumayer S (2003) X-ray study of pre-treated regenerated cellulose fibres. Mater Res Innov 7:275–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10019-003-0264-010.1007/s10019-003-0264-0 ↗
25. Baek J, Lee HM, Roh JS, Lee HS, Kang HS, Kim BJ (2016) Studies on preparation and applications of polymeric precursor-based activated hard carbons: I. Activation mechanism and microstructure analyses. Micropor Mesopor Mat 219:258–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.07.00310.1016/j.micromeso.2015.07.003 ↗
26. Baek J, Shin HS, Chung DC, Kim BJ (2017) Studies on the correlation between nanostructure and pore development of polymeric precursor-based activated hard carbons: II. Transmission electron microscopy and Raman spectroscopy studies. J Ind Eng Chem 54:324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.06.00710.1016/j.jiec.2017.06.007 ↗
27. Lee HM, Chung DC, Jung SC, An KH, Park SJ, Kim BJ (2019) A study on pore development mechanism of activated carbons from polymeric precursor: effects of carbonization temperature and nano crystallite formation. Chem Eng J 10:21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.115 (in press)10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.115 ↗
28. Dumanlı AG, Windle AH (2012) Carbon fibres from cellulosic precursors: a review. J Mater Sci 47:4236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-6081-810.1007/s10853-011-6081-8 ↗
29. Woellner M, Hausdorf S, Klein N, Mueller P, Smith MW, Kaskel S (2018) Adsorption and detection of hazardous trace gases by metal–organic frameworks. Adv Mater 30:1704679. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170467910.1002/adma.201704679 ↗