journal article·2010-08

Response-time improved hydrothermal-method-grown ZnO scintillator for XFEL timing-observation

Kohei Yamanoi, Kohei Sakai, Tomoharu Nakazato, Elmer Estacio, Toshihiko Shimizu, Nobuhiko Sarukura, Dirk Ehrentraut, Tsuguo Fukuda, Mitsuru Nagasono, Tadashi Togashi, Shinichi Matsubara, Kensuke Tono, Makina Yabashi, Hiroaki Kimura, Haruhiko Ohashi, Tetsuya Ishikawa

Optical Materials· Volume 32· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract An iron doped, hydrothermal method-grown, zinc oxide (ZnO) scintillator was demonstrated to exhibit an over 10 times faster response time of its excitonic fluorescence compared with an undoped-ZnO crystal. For X-ray free electron laser (XFEL) excitation, the fluorescence rise and decay time constants were measured to be 2.1 ps and 70 ps, respectively. Accurate timing control of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) femtosecond pulses necessitate temporal jitters to be evaluated. Results suggest that this scintillator’s response time is sufficient to allow the evaluation of sub 100-ps jitter in XFEL measurement systems and will be crucial in pump and probe experiments in the future.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques · Spectroscopy and Laser Applications · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Shimada · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 05150110.1063/1.1856697 ↗
2. Shintake · Nat. Photon. · 2008 · 2 · 55510.1038/nphoton.2008.134 ↗
3. Kirz · Nat. Phys. · 2006 · 2 · 79910.1038/nphys474 ↗
4. Cao · J. Luminesc. · 2007 · 124 · 26010.1016/j.jlumin.2006.03.011 ↗
5. Hauschild · Phys. Stat. Solid. C · 2006 · 3 · 97610.1002/pssc.200564643 ↗
6. Qian · Opt. Mater. · 2007 · 30 · 9110.1016/j.optmat.2006.11.054 ↗
7. Zhang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 01310710.1063/1.2429019 ↗
8. Electrical transport
9. Ohta · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 47510.1063/1.127015 ↗
10. McCluskey · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 380710.1063/1.1520703 ↗
11. Jen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 25211710.1063/1.2150277 ↗
12. Xu · J. Luminesc. · 2007 · 16 · 64110.1016/j.jlumin.2006.10.030 ↗
13. Ichimiya · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2006 · 18 · 196710.1088/0953-8984/18/6/012 ↗
14. Tanaka · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 23111710.1063/1.2815920 ↗
15. Furukawa · J. Opt. Soc. Am. · 2008 · 25 · B11810.1364/JOSAB.25.00B118 ↗
16. Nakazato · J. Cryst. Growth · 2009 · 311 · 87510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.09.106 ↗
17. Ohshima · J. Cryst. Growth · 2004 · 260 · 16610.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.08.019 ↗
18. Södertröm · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 70 · 337410.1063/1.119175 ↗
19. Saito · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 15410310.1063/1.2911742 ↗
20. Chen · Mater. Sci. Eng. B · 2000 · 75 · 19010.1016/S0921-5107(00)00372-X ↗
21. Wilkinson · Radiat. Meas. · 2004 · 38 · 50110.1016/j.radmeas.2004.01.022 ↗
22. Shimizu · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2010 · 81 · 03310210.1063/1.3310276 ↗