A relationship for crystal field strength along the lanthanide series; application to the prediction of the maximum splitting
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Using the scalar field parameter Nv, calculated from the respective Bkq parameters given in the literature for 115 different crystals, we show that a simple linear relationship between the number of f electrons and the crystal field strength can be found. From this result we derive the maximum splitting of 2 F 7/2 ground state of Yb3+ assuming a knowledge of the maximum splitting of the Nd 3+ 4 I 9/2 ground state. Because Nd3+ is less prone than Yb3+ to mix with vibronics, this approach helps to distinguish the highest Stark level of 2 F 7/2 from vibronics, using the following prediction: The maximum splitting of the 2 F 7/2 Yb 3+ ground state in a given host site cannot be less than the one of Nd 3+ 4 I 9/2 in the same crystal host site.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Rare-earth and actinide compounds
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. DeLoach · IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE · 1993 · 29 · 117910.1109/3.214504 ↗
2. Ellens · Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 55 · 17310.1103/PhysRevB.55.173 ↗
3. Payne · IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE · 1994 · 30 · 17010.1109/3.272077 ↗
4. DeLoach · J. Lumin. · 1994 · 62 · 8510.1016/0022-2313(94)90013-2 ↗
5. Becker · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 45 · 502710.1103/PhysRevB.45.5027 ↗
6. Auzel · Mater. Res. Bull. · 1979 · 14 · 22310.1016/0025-5408(79)90122-3 ↗
7. Auzel · 1980 · vol. 2 · 619
8. Auzel · J. Phys. · 1983 · 44 · 20110.1051/jphys:01983004402020100 ↗
9. W.T. Carnall, H. Crosswhite, H.M. Crosswhite, Energy level structure and transition probabilities of trivalent Lanthanide in LaF3, Argonne National Lab., Argonne, IL 4493, USA, 197710.2172/6417825 ↗
10. Wybourne · 1965 · 200
11. Morrison · 1982 · vol. 5 · 461
12. Becker · J. Chem. Phys. · 1984 · 81 · 287210.1063/1.448060 ↗
13. Hüfner · 1978 · 64
14. Nekvasil · Phys. Status Solidi · 1978 · 87 · 31710.1002/pssb.2220870137 ↗
15. Nielson · 1963
16. Judd · 1963 · 58
17. Buchanan · Phys. Rev. · 1967 · 159 · 24510.1103/PhysRev.159.245 ↗
18. Lupei · J. Alloys Compd. · 1998 · 275/277 · 19610.1016/S0925-8388(98)00302-8 ↗
19. Horrell · Phys. Rev. · 1968 · 173 · 85110.1103/PhysRev.173.851 ↗
20. Barthem · J. Chem. Phys. · 1989 · 91 · 62710.1063/1.457167 ↗
21. Goldner · J. Lumin. · 1997 · 71 · 13710.1016/S0022-2313(96)00128-7 ↗
22. Xueyuan · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 1998 · 10 · 514710.1088/0953-8984/10/23/015 ↗
23. Wang · J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 1999 · 16 · 6310.1364/JOSAB.16.000063 ↗
24. Kuleshov · Opt. Lett. · 1997 · 22 · 131710.1364/OL.22.001317 ↗
25. Mougel · Opt. Mater. · 1997 · 8 · 16110.1016/S0925-3467(97)00019-0 ↗
26. Mougel · J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 1999 · 16 · 16410.1364/JOSAB.16.000164 ↗
27. Gabrielyan · Phys. Status Solidi A · 1970 · 3 · K3710.1002/pssa.19700030141 ↗
28. Montoya · J. Lumin. · 2000 · 87–89 · 103610.1016/S0022-2313(99)00531-1 ↗
29. Schaffers · IEEE Quantum Electron. QE · 1996 · 32 · 74110.1109/3.492995 ↗
30. Kaminskii · 1981 · 146
31. Materials for ionic solid state lasers
32. Auzel · J. Lumin. · 2001 · 93 · 12910.1016/S0022-2313(01)00183-1 ↗