journal article·2024-01

Effect of beryllium topography on BRDF measurements

Hiroki Natsume, Mickaël Le Bohec, Roland Steiner, Marwa Ben Yaala, Marie-Hélène Aumeunier, Laurent Marot, Shin Kajita, Hirohiko Tanaka

Optical Materials· Volume 147
Publisher page

Abstract

The Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) of beryllium is important for a ray-tracing simulation to evaluate the effect of reflected light on optical diagnostics in the fusion device ITER. However, the BRDF for beryllium has not been investigated yet and is currently lacking. To fill this gap, this study measured BRDFs of beryllium specimens with different topographies using goniophotometers and optimized optical reflection models. Additionally, various surface topographic parameters were computed, and their correlation with parameters for the optical reflection models was explored. As a result, it was found that topographic parameters related to slope offer a certain correlation with the parameters of the reflection model. This can be useful for determining the optical reflection properties of materials for which direct BRDF measurements are not possible.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Physics and Applications · Fusion materials and technologies · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Kitazawa · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2016 · 112 · 7410.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.07.016 ↗
2. Natsume · Plasma Fusion Res. · 2021 · 1610.1585/pfr.16.2405019 ↗
3. Kajita · J. Instrum. · 2020 · 1510.1088/1748-0221/15/11/P11035 ↗
4. Aumeunier · IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2012 · 40 · 75310.1109/TPS.2012.2183621 ↗
5. Takeuchi · Plasma Fusion Res. · 2013 · 810.1585/pfr.8.2402147 ↗
6. Ushiki · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2021 · 16810.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112665 ↗
7. Kirienko · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2021 · 16910.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112392 ↗
8. Kajita · Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion · 2013 · 5510.1088/0741-3335/55/8/085020 ↗
9. Aumeunier · Nucl. Mater. Energy · 2021 · 26
10. Carr · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2018 · 8910.1063/1.5031087 ↗
11. Carr · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2019 · 9010.1063/1.5092781 ↗
12. Kajita · Contrib. Plasma Phys. · 2016 · 56 · 83710.1002/ctpp.201500124 ↗
13. Neverov · Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion · 2020 · 6210.1088/1361-6587/abb53b ↗
14. Ben Yaala · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2021 · 9210.1063/5.0046140 ↗
15. M. Le Bohec et al., “Relationship Between Topographic Parameters and Brdf for Tungsten Surfaces in the Visible Spectrum,” submitted to Optik.
16. Natsume · Plasma Fusion Res. · 2022 · 1710.1585/pfr.17.2405041 ↗
17. Natsume · Nucl. Mater. Energy · 2022 · 33
18. Fukuda · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2020 · 54210.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152509 ↗
19. Kajita · Nucl. Mater. Energy · 2020 · 25
20. Gaspar · Nucl. Fusion · 2022 · 6210.1088/1741-4326/ac6f68 ↗
21. Philipps · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2010 · 85 · 158110.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.04.048 ↗
22. Riccardo · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2013 · 88 · 58510.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.01.084 ↗
23. Palik · 1998 · vol. 3
24. Biliouris · Sensors · 2007 · 7 · 184610.3390/s7091846 ↗
25. Iwama · J. Plasma Fusion Res. SERIES · 2009 · 8
26. Hopfield · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA · 1984 · 81 · 308810.1073/pnas.81.10.3088 ↗
27. Hunt · 1971
28. Phong · Commun. ACM · 1975 · 1810.1145/360825.360839 ↗
29. Walter · 2007 · 195
30. Bennett · J. Opt. Soc. Am. · 1961 · 51 · 12310.1364/JOSA.51.000123 ↗
31. Gong · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2016 · 120 · 2235810.1021/acs.jpcc.6b06635 ↗
32. Sanchez · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2023 · 58110.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154382 ↗