journal article·2016-12

Sub-nanometer linewidth perfect absorption in visible band induced by Bloch surface wave

Jiawei Cong, Wenxing Liu, Zhiqiang Zhou, Naifei Ren, Guilin Ding, Mingyang Chen, Hongbing Yao

Optical Materials· Volume 62
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract We demonstrate the unity absorption of visible light with an ultra-narrow 0.1 nm linewidth. It arises from the Bloch surface wave resonance in alternating TiO2/SiO2 multilayers. The total absorption and narrow linewidth are explained from the radiative and absorptive damping, which are quantitatively determined by the temporal coupled mode theory. When a silver film with proper thickness is added to the absorber, the perfect absorption is achieved with only 3 structural bilayers, in contrast with 8 bilayers required without Ag. Furthermore, significant field enhancement and an ultrahigh 2600/RIU sensing figure-of-merit are simultaneously obtained at resonance, which might facilitate applications in nonlinear optical devices and high resolution refractive index sensing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Zoysa · Nat. Photonics · 2012 · 6 · 53510.1038/nphoton.2012.146 ↗
2. Liu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 04590110.1103/PhysRevLett.107.045901 ↗
3. Lu · Opt. Express · 2015 · 23 · 193
4. Lu · Opt. Express · 2015 · 23 · 2071510.1364/OE.23.020715 ↗
5. Luo · Opt. Express · 2016 · 24 · 928810.1364/OE.24.009288 ↗
6. Cui · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 144310.1021/nl204118h ↗
7. Ding · Laser Phot. Rev. · 2013 · 8 · 94610.1002/lpor.201400157 ↗
8. Yang · ACS Photonics · 2016 · 3 · 59010.1021/acsphotonics.5b00689 ↗
9. Cong · Opt. Lett. · 2016 · 41 · 196510.1364/OL.41.001965 ↗
10. Zhong · Opt. Express · 2016 · 24 · 83210.1364/OE.24.00A832 ↗
11. Li · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 824210.1021/nn502617t ↗
12. Qu · Adv. Opt. Mater. · 2016 · 4 · 48010.1002/adom.201500651 ↗
13. Yong · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2406310.1038/srep24063 ↗
14. Wang · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 758110.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03330 ↗
15. Ho · IEEE Photonic Tech. Lett. · 2014 · 26 · 197910.1109/LPT.2014.2344011 ↗
16. Zhao · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 22110710.1063/1.4881267 ↗
17. Meng · Opt. Lett. · 2014 · 39 · 113710.1364/OL.39.001137 ↗
18. Zhang · Appl. Opt. · 2016 · 55 · 317610.1364/AO.55.003176 ↗
19. Sharon · J. Opt. Soc. Am. A · 1997 · 14 · 58810.1364/JOSAA.14.000588 ↗
20. Nelson · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 108910.1063/1.1600841 ↗
21. Menotti · J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 2015 · 32 · 43110.1364/JOSAB.32.000431 ↗
22. Koju · Opt. Lett. · 2016 · 14 · 291510.1364/OL.41.002915 ↗
23. Liscidini · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 12111810.1063/1.3571285 ↗
24. Kocer · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 815710.1038/srep08157 ↗
25. Junesch · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 1040510.1021/nn304662e ↗
26. Fan · J. Opt. Soc. Am. A · 2003 · 20 · 56910.1364/JOSAA.20.000569 ↗
27. Ruan · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 114 · 732410.1021/jp9089722 ↗
28. Piper · ACS Photonics · 2014 · 1 · 34710.1021/ph400090p ↗
29. Miao · Phys. Rev. X · 2015 · 5 · 041027
30. Sherry · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 203410.1021/nl0515753 ↗
31. Shen · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 238110.1038/ncomms3381 ↗
32. Shalabney · Opt. Lett. · 2012 · 37 · 117510.1364/OL.37.001175 ↗
33. Offermans · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 515110.1021/nn201227b ↗