journal article·2013-12

Influence of Eu3+ doping concentration on the luminescence properties of Y2O2S: Eu3+, Mg2+, Ti4+ nanoarrays via sol–gel template method

Cai E. Cui, Huan Liu, Ping Huang, Lei Wang

Optical Materials· Volume 36· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Firstly, Y (2− x −0.04) O 3 : x Eu 3+ , Mg 2+ 0.02 , Ti 4+ 0.02 ( x = 5.0 mol%, 5.5 mol%, 6.0 mol%, 6.5 mol% and 7.0 mol%) nanotube arrays were synthesized by sol–gel template method to serve as the precursors. Then the precursors were calcined in CS 2 condition at 850 °C for 2 h to obtain the red long afterglow phosphor Y 2 O 2 S: Eu 3+ , Mg 2+ , Ti 4+ nanotube arrays with different Eu 3+ doping concentration. The samples of theY 2 O 2 S: Eu 3+ , Mg 2+ , Ti 4+ nanotube arrays were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), photoluminescence spectroscopy and long-lasting phosphorescence. SEM proves that the Y 2 O 2 S: Eu 3+ , Mg 2+ , Ti 4+ nanotube arrays are highly ordered and have uniform size. XRD testified that the main phase constitution of the phosphor is Y 2 O 2 S. From the spectrum, the main emission peaks at 616 nm and 626 nm are excited by the 339 nm UV excitation, which are ascribed to the Eu 3+ ions transition from 5 D 0 to 7 F 2 . After irradiation by 365 nm UV radiation for 10 min, the decay time of the Y 2 O 2 S: Eu 3+ , Mg 2+ , Ti 4+ nanotube arrays with 6.5 mol% Eu 3+ doping concentration could last for over 280 s (⩾1 mcd/m 2 ).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Wen · J. Power Sour. · 2013 · 234 · 10010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.146 ↗
2. Chen · Ceram. Int. · 2012 · 38 · 12510.1016/j.ceramint.2011.06.044 ↗
3. Cheng · Chem. Commun. · 2009 · 8 · 94410.1039/B818057A ↗
4. Bockrath · Science · 2001 · 291 · 28310.1126/science.291.5502.283 ↗
5. Wang · J. Lumin. · 2009 · 129 · 103210.1016/j.jlumin.2009.04.016 ↗
6. Huang · J. Rare Earth · 2011 · 29 · 83010.1016/S1002-0721(10)60551-0 ↗
7. Grobelna · Opt. Mater. · 2013 · 35 · 45610.1016/j.optmat.2012.09.040 ↗
8. Ogata · Opt. Mater. · 2011 · 33 · 182010.1016/j.optmat.2011.07.003 ↗
9. E Cui · J. Lumin. · 2013 · 138 · 13810.1016/j.jlumin.2013.02.013 ↗
10. Yan · Solid State Sci. · 2011 · 13 · 106010.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2011.01.019 ↗
11. Wang · Mater. Res. Bull. · 2012 · 47 · 391610.1016/j.materresbull.2012.06.028 ↗
12. Zhao · Physica B · 2010 · 405 · 320010.1016/j.physb.2010.04.049 ↗
13. Mao · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 227810.1021/jp0773738 ↗
14. Lin · J. Comb. Chem. · 2010 · 12 · 38310.1021/cc9001108 ↗
15. Jia · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 605010.1021/jp9002164 ↗
16. Mao · J. Alloys Compd. · 2008 · 465 · 36710.1016/j.jallcom.2007.10.119 ↗
17. Huang · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2008 · 8 · 73910.1021/cg700751j ↗
18. Wang · Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. · 2002 · 41 · 479010.1002/anie.200290049 ↗
19. Zhang · J. Alloys Compd. · 2013 · 553 · 18310.1016/j.jallcom.2012.11.118 ↗
20. Huang · Ceram. Int. · 2013 · 39 · 561510.1016/j.ceramint.2012.12.077 ↗