Aluminum–Fluorine Composite Particles: Microstructure Optimization for Improved After-Burning Effect in Thermobaric Explosives
Source abstract
Abstract
Aluminum nanopowder exhibits a limited degree of reactivity during the after-burning stage of thermobaric explosives due to factors such as sintering during combustion, which diminishes the destructive performance of these explosives. This paper employs the solvent/nonsolvent method to prepare aluminum–fluoride composites with three different microstructures (activities), replacing traditional aluminum powder in thermobaric explosives. Three formulations─HMX (octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine)-based thermobaric explosives (HMX-TE-1, HMX-TE-2, and HMX-TE-3)─were developed, with increasing contact areas between the aluminum powder and fluoropolymer. Confined explosion tests revealed that HMX-TE-3 maintained higher mean quasi-static pressure over 500 ms and exhibited a temperature exceeding 1650 K for 2.03 ms─significantly longer than other samples. The HMX-TE-2 (188.0 kPa·s –1 ) and the HMX-TE-3 (179.9 kPa·s –1 ) samples have significantly smaller pressure reduction rates at 50 ms than the HMX-TE-1 sample. Calculations based on explosion fireball temperatures indicated enhanced aluminum powder reactivity, increasing from 0.62 for HMX-TE-1 to 0.87 and 0.96 for HMX-TE-2 and HMX-TE-3, respectively. Additionally, RMD simulations were conducted to verify the impact of the microstructure on the combustion performance of aluminum powder.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Combustion and Detonation Processes · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Safety Science and Engineering
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20170629310.1002/adma.201706293 ↗
2. 10.1002/adem.20180133010.1002/adem.201801330 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17158610.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171586 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.08.02410.1016/j.combustflame.2018.08.024 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.17010.1016/j.cej.2019.02.170 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.dt.2018.06.00110.1016/j.dt.2018.06.001 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.8b1019710.1021/acsami.8b10197 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.5b0523810.1021/acsami.5b05238 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.12845510.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128455 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10973-016-5801-310.1007/s10973-016-5801-3 ↗
11. 10.1039/D0NJ04135A10.1039/D0NJ04135A ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12314610.1016/j.cej.2019.123146 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12707310.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127073 ↗
14. 10.1002/admi.20190102510.1002/admi.201901025 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.08.00910.1016/j.combustflame.2013.08.009 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.01.01910.1016/j.combustflame.2016.01.019 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.dt.2016.09.00210.1016/j.dt.2016.09.002 ↗
18. 10.1002/prep.20140028110.1002/prep.201400281 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.01910.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.019 ↗
20. 10.22211/cejem/6497010.22211/cejem/64970 ↗
21. Hu H. · Adv. Mech · 2022 · 52 · 53
22. 10.17222/mit.2019.23910.17222/mit.2019.239 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11051-010-9889-210.1007/s11051-010-9889-2 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.10310.1016/j.proci.2006.08.103 ↗