journal article·2018-05

Scintillation properties of Gd3Al2Ga3O12:Ce (GAGG:Ce): a comparison between monocrystalline and nanoceramic samples

Winicjusz Drozdowski, Marcin E. Witkowski, Piotr Solarz, Paweł Głuchowski, Michał Głowacki, Kamil Brylew

Optical Materials· Volume 79
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In this Communication the behavior of two types of Gd3Al2Ga3O12:Ce samples under gamma and X-ray excitation is compared. Single crystals of GAGG:1%Ce have been grown by the Czochralski technique, while nanoceramic pills of GAGG:1%Ce have been fabricated by the LTHP sintering from nanocrystalline powders prepared by the Pechini method. The results of pulse height, scintillation time profile, radioluminescence as a function of temperature, and low temperature thermoluminescence measurements, are reported, indicating that monocrystals are still a better choice for scintillator application, nevertheless some of the properties of nanoceramics are indeed promising and there should be a room for improvement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies · Terahertz technology and applications · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Kamada · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2011 · 11 · 448410.1021/cg200694a ↗
2. Nikl · Adv. Opt. Mater · 2015 · 3 · 46310.1002/adom.201400571 ↗
3. Seitz · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2016 · 63 · 50310.1109/TNS.2016.2535235 ↗
4. Sakthong · Radiat. Meas. · 2016 · 87 · 2410.1016/j.radmeas.2016.02.018 ↗
5. Kitaura · Appl. Phys. Express · 2016 · 910.7567/APEX.9.072602 ↗
6. Grigorjeva · Opt. Mater. · 2018 · 75 · 33110.1016/j.optmat.2017.10.054 ↗
7. Drozdowski · Opt. Mater. · 2014 · 36 · 166510.1016/j.optmat.2013.12.044 ↗
8. Kamada · Opt. Mater. · 2015 · 41 · 6310.1016/j.optmat.2014.10.008 ↗
9. Tamulaitis · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. · 2017 · A870 · 2510.1016/j.nima.2017.07.015 ↗
10. Lucchini · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. · 2016 · A816 · 17610.1016/j.nima.2016.02.004 ↗
11. Stanek · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. · 2007 · A579 · 2710.1016/j.nima.2007.04.006 ↗
12. Nikl · Phys. Status Solidi · 2005 · B242 · R119
13. Drozdowski · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2009 · 56 · 32010.1109/TNS.2008.2011269 ↗
14. Yanagida · Opt. Mater. · 2013 · 35 · 248010.1016/j.optmat.2013.07.002 ↗
15. Ye · Opt. Mater. · 2017 · 71 · 2310.1016/j.optmat.2016.08.001 ↗
16. Park · J. Instrum. · 2017 · 12
17. Kantorski · Opt. Mater. · 2016 · 59 · 9110.1016/j.optmat.2016.01.033 ↗
18. Guzik · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2006 · 53 · 23110.1109/TNS.2006.869819 ↗
19. Bertolaccini · Proc. Nucl. Electr. Symp., Versailles · 1968
20. Moszynski · Proc. SPIE 5922 · 2005
21. Swiderski · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2009 · 56 · 249910.1109/TNS.2009.2025040 ↗
22. Iwanowska · Nucl. Instr. Meth. A712 · 2013 · 3410.1016/j.nima.2013.01.064 ↗
23. Sibczynski · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. · 2015 · A772 · 11210.1016/j.nima.2014.10.041 ↗
24. Fujita · Jap. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 48
25. Brylew · J. Lumin. · 2014 · 154 · 45210.1016/j.jlumin.2014.05.035 ↗
26. Pejchal · Opt. Mater. · 2016 · 53 · 5410.1016/j.optmat.2016.01.024 ↗