journal article·2009-07

Extended transfer matrix modeling of an erbium-doped cavity with SiO2/TiO2 Bragg reflectors

Y.G. Boucher, A. Chiasera, M. Ferrari, G.C. Righini

Optical Materials· Volume 31· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Starting from the measured parameters of multilayer microcavities activated by Er3+ ion, we developed a comprehensive model based on extended (3 x 3) transfer matrix formalism including sources. The cavity, fabricated by rf-sputtering technique, was constituted by an Er3+-activated SiO2 active layer inserted between two six-pair SiO2/TiO2 distributed Bragg reflectors. Near infrared transmittance spectra evidence the presence of a stop-band from 1350 to 1850 nm and a cavity resonance centered at 1537 nm. Intensity enhancement and narrowing of the 4I13/2 à 4I15/2 emission band of Er3+ ion were observed, owing to the cavity effect. A cavity quality factor of 171 was achieved. All observations show excellent agreement with transfer matrix simulations, leading to improvements of the devices design operating in laser regime.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photonic Crystals and Applications · Photonic and Optical Devices · Mechanical and Optical Resonators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Desurvire · 1994
2. Tikhomirov · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 193710.1063/1.1497196 ↗
3. Snoeks · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 75 · 245910.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2459 ↗
4. Vredenberg · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1993 · 71 · 51710.1103/PhysRevLett.71.517 ↗
5. Bellessa · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 214210.1063/1.1405427 ↗
6. Schniepp · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 25740310.1103/PhysRevLett.89.257403 ↗
7. Kalkman · Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 229710.1063/1.1640459 ↗
8. Yang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 09111410.1063/1.1873043 ↗
9. Joannopoulos · Nature · 1977 · 386 · 14310.1038/386143a0 ↗
10. Yablonovitch · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1987 · 58 · 205910.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2059 ↗
11. Berger · Opt. Mat. · 1999 · 11 · 13110.1016/S0925-3467(98)00039-1 ↗
12. Zhou · Opt. Comm. · 2004 · 230 · 34710.1016/j.optcom.2003.11.061 ↗
13. Rigneault · Opt. Mat. · 1999 · 11 · 16710.1016/S0925-3467(98)00042-1 ↗
14. Chen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 75 · 380510.1063/1.125462 ↗
15. Chichibu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 16191410.1063/1.2197932 ↗
16. Persano · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 12111010.1063/1.2179611 ↗
17. Kelkar · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 52 · R549110.1103/PhysRevB.52.R5491 ↗
18. Boucher · Res. Signpost: Recent Res. Devel. Optics · 2003 · 3 · 177
19. Boucher · J. Europ. Opt. Soc. Rap. Public. · 2006 · 1 · 0602710.2971/jeos.2006.06027 ↗
20. Chiasera · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2003 · 322 · 28910.1016/S0022-3093(03)00217-5 ↗
21. Chiasera · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 17191010.1063/1.2364841 ↗
22. Miniscalco · J. Lightwave Technol. · 1991 · 9 · 23410.1109/50.65882 ↗
23. 1999