journal article·2014-12

Ultralow-concentration Sm codoping in CsI:Tl scintillator: A case of little things can make a big difference

Yuntao Wu, Guohao Ren, Fang Meng, Xiaofeng Chen, Dongzhou Ding, Huanyin Li, Shangke Pan

Optical Materials· Volume 38
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract CsI:Tl scintillators were hindered from computer tomography and high-speed imaging applications by a serious afterglow problem. In this study, the effects of ultralow-concentration Sm codoping on the scintillation characteristics of CsI:Tl were investigated. Pulsed X-ray excited afterglow after 50 ms in 0.005 mol% Sm-codoped CsI:Tl was lowered by over one order of magnitude in comparison with Sm-free one. The beneficial effects of ultralow-concentration Sm codoping also appeared to be maintaining the light yield and energy resolution. The light yield and energy resolution after 0.005 mol% Sm codoping were 71,700 ± 6000 photons/MeV and 6.9% at 662 keV, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies · Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Weber · J. Lumin. · 2002 · 100 · 3510.1016/S0022-2313(02)00423-4 ↗
2. Van Sciver · Phys. Rev. · 1951 · 84 · 106210.1103/PhysRev.84.1062.2 ↗
3. Nikl · Meas. Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 17 · R3710.1088/0957-0233/17/4/R01 ↗
4. Cha · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2011 · 633 · s29710.1016/j.nima.2010.06.194 ↗
5. Siewerdsen · Med. Phys. · 1999 · 26 · 162410.1118/1.598657 ↗
6. Thacker · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2009 · 604 · 8910.1016/j.nima.2009.01.036 ↗
7. Dorenbos · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. · 1994 · 6 · 4167
8. Yang · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2009 · 56 · 296010.1109/TNS.2009.2027018 ↗
9. Starzhinskiy · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2013 · 60 · 142710.1109/TNS.2013.2244910 ↗
10. Brecher · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2006 · 558 · 45010.1016/j.nima.2005.11.119 ↗
11. Bartram · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2006 · 558 · 45810.1016/j.nima.2005.11.051 ↗
12. Totsuka · Appl. Phys. Exp. · 2012 · 5 · 05260110.1143/APEX.5.052601 ↗
13. Wu · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2014 · 211 · 258610.1002/pssa.201431299 ↗
14. Nagarkar · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2008 · 55 · 127010.1109/TNS.2008.915689 ↗
15. Kappers · Radiat. Meas. · 2010 · 45 · 42610.1016/j.radmeas.2009.11.010 ↗
16. Wu · CrystEngComm · 2014 · 16 · 331210.1039/C3CE42645A ↗
17. Alekhin · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 16191510.1063/1.4803440 ↗
18. Spurrier · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2008 · 55 · 117810.1109/TNS.2007.913486 ↗
19. Chewpraditkul · Opt. Mater. · 2013 · 35 · 167910.1016/j.optmat.2013.04.024 ↗
20. Bartram · J. Lumin. · 1996 · 68 · 22510.1016/0022-2313(96)00026-9 ↗
21. www.apace-science.com.proteus/csi.htm.
22. Srivastava · 2007
23. Molodtsov · Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 44 · 133310.1103/PhysRevB.44.1333 ↗
24. Rodnyi · Phys. Status Solidi B · 1995 · 187 · 1510.1002/pssb.2221870102 ↗
25. Belev · Phys. Status Solidi C · 2011 · 8 · 282210.1002/pssc.201084103 ↗