Effective Interfacial Bubble Elimination in 2D Heterostructures via Atomic Force Microscope
Source abstract
Abstract
Two-dimensional (2D) heterostructures hold significant promise in electronics and photonics. However, bubbles that spontaneously form at the interface between two crystals often degrade the performance of electronic devices. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) offers a direct method for bubble removal in contact mode, but the efficiency of this method varies widely across different substrates, and the removal mechanism is unclear. In this study, we use a nanospherical AFM tip to remove bubbles at the interface between monolayer MoS 2 and three crystals, including hexagonal boron nitride (hBN), silicon dioxide (SiO 2 ), and etched SiO 2 substrates. The average bubble elimination ratios are 90.0, 80.7, and 14.4% for hBN, SiO 2, and etched SiO 2, respectively. This substrate-dependent difference is related to the interfacial adhesion energy rather than the surface roughness of the substrate. Given the similar aspect ratio of bubbles, the yield of bubble elimination is inversely proportional to the adhesion energy, which can be used to predict the efficiency of bubble elimination using an AFM tip and provides valuable guidance for the fabrication of 2D heterostructures with clean interfaces.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Graphene research and applications · 2D Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Information Science and Technology
Fudan University
Zhejiang Key Laboratory of 3D Micro/Nano Fabrication and Characterization, Department of Electronic and Information Engineering, School of Engineering
Westlake University
ZJUI Institute, International Campus
Zhejiang University
Westlake Institute for Optoelectronics, Fuyang
Research Center for Industries of the Future
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41586-019-1013-x10.1038/s41586-019-1013-x ↗
2. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.4210.1038/natrevmats.2016.42 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0124810.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01248 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.aac943910.1126/science.aac9439 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.9b1919110.1021/acsami.9b19191 ↗
6. 10.1021/nl500654210.1021/nl5006542 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20230301410.1002/adma.202303014 ↗
8. 10.1088/2053-1583/2/4/04100210.1088/2053-1583/2/4/041002 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.513102210.1063/1.5131022 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.8b0122410.1021/acsami.8b01224 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0593410.1021/acsomega.0c05934 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c0476510.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04765 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0092310.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00923 ↗
14. Ding, X.; Qiao, B.; Chen, H.; Uzoma, P. C.; Xu, Y.; Hu, H. In Damage-Free Cleaning of 2D van der Waals Heterostructures with Nano-Spherical AFM Probes, 2023 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Nanotechnology (NANO), Jeju, Republic of Korea, July; IEEE, 2023; pp 899–903.10.1109/NANO58406.2023.10231217 ↗
15. 10.1039/D4NR03583F10.1039/D4NR03583F ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-021-25302-210.1038/s41467-021-25302-2 ↗
17. 10.1038/nmat338610.1038/nmat3386 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0039810.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00398 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0164910.1021/acsnano.3c01649 ↗
20. 10.1021/nl203663910.1021/nl2036639 ↗
21. 10.1007/s12274-023-6060-910.1007/s12274-023-6060-9 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10338-024-00552-x10.1007/s10338-024-00552-x ↗
23. 10.1088/1361-6528/ac475a10.1088/1361-6528/ac475a ↗
24. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0188310.1021/acsanm.3c01883 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0699210.1021/acsnano.9b06992 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.04610110.1103/PhysRevLett.127.046101 ↗
27. 10.1073/pnas.180155111510.1073/pnas.1801551115 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jmps.2023.10528610.1016/j.jmps.2023.105286 ↗
29. 10.1038/ncomms1584410.1038/ncomms15844 ↗