journal article·2019-08

Modified automotive organic friction materials through infiltration of liquid carbon precursors

Kuo-Jung Lee, Ting-Yu Wu, Hsun-Yu Lin, Huy-Zu Cheng, Chih-Feng Wang

Carbon Letters· Volume 29· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

This research combines the liquid carbon precursor infiltration process for carbon/carbon composites with the fabrication procedure for organic, carbon-matrix friction materials in automotive. In the densification process, different liquid carbon precursors and numbers of densification cycle are adopted to investigate the influence on physical and mechanical properties, microstructure and tribological behavior. Experimental results indicate that the infiltration of liquid carbon precursors could improve the physical, mechanical properties and tribological performances of organic friction materials. The open porosity decreases with the number of densification cycle. Both bulk density and hardness increase with the number of densification cycle. The resin-based specimens show higher hardness and lower open porosity than those of the pitch-based specimens after each densification cycle. The tribological measurement of specimens with different carbon precursors shows that the pitch-based specimen shows lower and more stable friction coefficients and exhibits lower weight losses in comparison with other carbon precursors. Morphological observations show that a large area of smooth lubricative film was easily presented on the worn surfaces of the pitch-based specimens, whereas it was seldom observed on the worn surfaces of the preform specimen and resin-based specimens.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Wear Analysis · Brake Systems and Friction Analysis · Lubricants and Their Additives

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Jacko MG, Rhee SK (1983) Brake linings and clutch facings. In: Grayson M (ed) Encyclopedia of composite materials and components, J. Wiley, New York, pp 144–154
2. Gopal P, Dharani LR, Blum FD (1995) Load, speed and temperature sensitivities of a carbon-fiber-reinforced phenolic friction material. Wear 181:913–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(95)90215-510.1016/0043-1648(95)90215-5 ↗
3. Mutlu I, Eldogan O, Findik F (2005) Production of ceramic additive automotive brake lining and investigation of its braking characterisation. Ind Lubr Tribol 57:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/0036879051058340110.1108/00368790510583401 ↗
4. Han L, Huang L, Zhang J, Lu Y (2006) Optimization of ceramic friction materials. Compos Sci Technol 66:2895–2906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.02710.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.027 ↗
5. Anderson AE (1992) Friction and wear of automotive brakes. ASM International, Ohio, pp 569–577
6. Tsang PHS, Jacko MG, Rhee SK (1985) Comparison of Chase and inertial brake Dynamometer testing of automotive friction materials. Wear 103:217–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(85)90012-210.1016/0043-1648(85)90012-2 ↗
7. Jacko MG (1978) Physical and chemical changes of organic disc pads in service. Wear 46:163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(78)90118-710.1016/0043-1648(78)90118-7 ↗
8. Gopal P, Dharani LR, Blum FD (1994) Fade and wear characteristics of a glass-fiber-reinforced phenolic friction material. Wear 174:119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(94)90093-010.1016/0043-1648(94)90093-0 ↗
9. Fisher R (1990) Carbon–Carbon brakes for aircraft. In: Middleton DH (ed) Composite materials in aircraft structures. Wiley, New York, pp 336–340
10. Ruppe JP (1980) Today and the future in aircraft wheel and brake development. Can Aeronau Space 26:209–216
11. Su JM, Xiao ZC, Liu YQ, Meng FC, Peng ZG, Gu LM, Li GF, Xing RP (2010) Preparation and characterization of carbon/carbon aircraft brake materials with long service life and good frictional properties. New Carbon Mater 25:329–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5805(09)60037-810.1016/S1872-5805(09)60037-8 ↗
12. Lee KJ, Kuo HH, Chern Lin JH, Ju CP (1999) Effect of surface condition on tribological behavior of PAN-CVI based carbon–carbon composite. Mater Chem Phys 57:244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(98)00231-410.1016/S0254-0584(98)00231-4 ↗
13. Lee KJ, Lin JHC, Ju CP (1997) Electron microscopic study of worn PAN-pitch based carbon–carbon composite. Carbon 35:613–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00020-110.1016/S0008-6223(97)00020-1 ↗
14. Lei B, He L, Yi M, Ran L, Xu H, Ge Y, Peng K (2011) New insights into the microstructure of the friction surface layer of C/C composites. Carbon 49:4554–4562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.07310.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.073 ↗
15. Baoling L, Maozhong Y, Huijuan X, Liping R, Yicheng G, Ke P (2010) Microstructures of the worn surface layer of C/C composites. Acta Mater Compos Sin 27:64–69 (in Chinese)
16. Shi HB, Tang M, Gao B, Su JM (2011) Effect of graphitization parameters on the residual stress in 4D carbon fiber/carbon composites. New Carbon Mater 26:287–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5805(11)60082-610.1016/S1872-5805(11)60082-6 ↗
17. Song Q, Li KZ, Zhang LL, Qi LH, Li HJ, Fu QG, Deng HL (2013) Increasing mechanical strength retention rate of carbon/carbon composites after graphitization by grafting straight carbon nanotubes radially onto carbon fibers. Mater Sci Eng A 560:831–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.10.04610.1016/j.msea.2012.10.046 ↗
18. Zou L, Huang B, Huang Y, Huang Q, Wang C (2003) An investigation of heterogeneity of the degree of graphitization in carbon–carbon composites. Mater Chem Phys 82:654–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(03)00332-810.1016/S0254-0584(03)00332-8 ↗
19. Savage G (1993) Carbon–carbon composites, vol 119. Chapman & Hall, New York10.1007/978-94-011-1586-5 ↗
20. Kuo HH, Chern Lin JH, Ju CP (2005) Tribological behavior of fast-carbonized PAN/phenolic-based carbon/carbon composite and method for improving same. Wear 258:1555–1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2004.10.00910.1016/j.wear.2004.10.009 ↗
21. Longley RI, Midgley JW, Strang A, Teer DG (1963) Mechanism of the frictional behaviour of high, low and non-graphitic carbon. In: Proc. Lubrication and Wear Convention, Institute of Mechanical Engineers, London, pp 198–209
22. Awasthi S, Wood JL (1988) C/C composite materials for aircraft brakes. Adv Ceram Mater 3:449–45110.1111/j.1551-2916.1988.tb00254.x ↗
23. Murdie N, Ju CP, Don J, Fortunato FA (1991) Microstructure of worn pitch/resin/CVI C–C composites. Carbon 29:335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(91)90202-T10.1016/0008-6223(91)90202-T ↗
24. Ju CP, Chern Lin JH, Lee KJ, Kuo HH (2000) Multi-braking tribological behavior of PAN-pitch, PAN-CVI and pitch–resin-CVI carbon–carbon composites. Mater Chem Phys 64:196–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(99)00260-610.1016/S0254-0584(99)00260-6 ↗
25. Chen JD, Chern Lin JH, Ju CP (1996) Effect of humidity on the tribological behavior of carbon-carbon composites. Wear 193:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(95)06667-510.1016/0043-1648(95)06667-5 ↗