Influence of the synthesis method on preferential clustering of Yb3+ in CaF2:Yb3+/Er3+ upconverting nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Yb3+/Er3+ co-doped CaF2 upconverting nanoparticles have been synthesized by three preparation methods. Their 12 K absorption measurements exhibit signatures of preferentially formed Yb3+ clusters as the predominant centres along with a single ion cubic (Oh) centre. By changing the synthesis method from decomposition to co-precipitation and finally to hydrothermal, the ratio between negatively charged clusters and non-locally charge-compensated cubic centres decreases becoming similar to that in bulk crystals. For nanoparticles prepared by co-precipitation and decomposition the Er3+ 4S3/2,4F9/2 → 4I15/2 luminescence measured monitoring the heterogeneous Yb–Er cluster centres is insensitive to the excitation wavelength, giving a similar intensity when excited at around 10,204 cm−1 (980 nm) and 10,250 cm−1 (975 nm). However, for nanoparticles prepared by a hydrothermal growth method the intensity when excited at 10,250 cm−1 (975 nm), coinciding with the absorption maximum, is twice the yield when excited at 10,204 cm−1 (980 nm). By varying the optimum excitation wavelength and growth method, a factor of 102 times enhancement of the upconversion luminescence is achieved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials · Perovskite Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Chapter 273 - near-IR triggered photon upconversion: imaging, detection, and therapy10.1016/B978-0-444-63481-8.00273-6 ↗
2. Gulzar · Nanoscale · 2017 · 9 · 1224810.1039/C7NR01836C ↗
3. de Wild · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2011 · 4 · 483510.1039/c1ee01659h ↗
4. Atabaev · Front. Mater. Sci. · 2019 · 13 · 33510.1007/s11706-019-0482-z ↗
5. Deng · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 10 · 23710.1038/nnano.2014.317 ↗
6. Chen · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2015 · 44 · 168010.1039/C4CS00170B ↗
7. Cross · MRS Proc. · 2012 · 147110.1557/opl.2012.1270 ↗
8. W. Ren, G. Lin, C. Clarke, J. Zhou, D. Jin, Adv. Mater., 32, p. 1901430.
9. Wang · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2009 · 38 · 97610.1039/b809132n ↗
10. Petit · Appl. Phys. B · 2004 · 78 · 68110.1007/s00340-004-1514-6 ↗
11. Tessitore · Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 1201510.1039/C9NR02291K ↗
12. Chen · Inorgan. Chem. Front. · 2020 · 7 · 106710.1039/C9QI01358J ↗
13. Klier · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2015 · 3 · 1122810.1039/C5TC02218E ↗
14. Zhang · Chem. Sci. · 2018 · 9 · 526010.1039/C8SC01828F ↗
15. Jiang · Mater. Lett. · 2012 · 74 · 5410.1016/j.matlet.2012.01.045 ↗
16. Wang · Nature · 2010 · 463 · 106110.1038/nature08777 ↗
17. Chen · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2015 · 44 · 131810.1039/C4CS00151F ↗
18. Sedlmeier · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2015 · 44 · 152610.1039/C4CS00186A ↗
19. Chhetri · Part. Part. Syst. Char. · 2019 · 36 · 190015310.1002/ppsc.201900153 ↗
20. Li · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2015 · 44 · 134610.1039/C4CS00163J ↗
21. Balabhadra · J. Alloys Compd. · 2020 · 834 · 15516510.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155165 ↗
22. Balabhadra · Opt. Mater. · 2020 · 107 · 11005010.1016/j.optmat.2020.110050 ↗
23. Tahvildari · Int. J. Nano Dimens. (IJND) · 2012 · 2 · 269
24. Vetrone · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 96 · 66110.1063/1.1739523 ↗
25. Ansari · J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. · 2016 · 27 · 17810.1007/s10856-016-5791-5 ↗
26. Szczeszak · J. Alloys Compd. · 2020 · 817 · 15271810.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152718 ↗
27. Petit · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78
28. Lacroix · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 12512410.1103/PhysRevB.90.125124 ↗
29. Hamers · J. Chem. Phys. · 1982 · 77 · 68310.1063/1.443882 ↗
30. Miller · J. Chem. Phys. · 1979 · 71 · 32410.1063/1.438074 ↗