Scintillation properties of Pr3+-doped lutetium and yttrium aluminum garnets: Comparison with Ce3+-doped ones
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Scintillation properties of Pr 3+ -doped LuAG and YAG crystals were investigated and compared with those of Ce 3+ -doped ones. The highest L.Y.’s were observed with the longest shaping time 10 μs. They can reach up to ∼16,000 ph/MeV or ∼23,500 ph/MeV for LuAG:Pr and LuAG:Ce, respectively. Energy resolutions (FWHM) are a bit better with LuAG:Pr than those of LuAG:Ce, e.g. at 662 keV FWHM are around 6% and between 8–12%, respectively. There were observed no large changes in proportionality of Pr 3+ - or Ce 3+ -doped LuAG or YAG crystals but the best proportionality has YAP:Ce crystal. Pr 3+ - or Ce 3+ -doped LuAG crystals exhibit slow decay components in the time range 1.5–3.5 μs while those of YAG ones have shorter decay components between 0.3–1.7 μs.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Nuclear Physics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Pejchal · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 05511710.1088/0022-3727/42/5/055117 ↗
2. Zorenko · Rad. Meas. · 2010 · 45 · 44410.1016/j.radmeas.2009.10.039 ↗
3. Zorenko · IEEE TNS · 2010 · 57 · 1335
4. Yoshikawa · Opt. Mater · 2010 · 32 · 129410.1016/j.optmat.2010.05.002 ↗
5. Yanagida · IEEE TNS · 2010 · 57 · 1492
6. Cutler · IEEE TNS · 2009 · 56 · 915
7. Swiderski · IEEE TNS · 2009 · 56 · 934
8. Nikl · Phys. Status Solidi (a) · 2005 · 202 · R410.1002/pssa.200409079 ↗
9. J.A. Mares, M. Nikl, K. Blazek, K. Nejezchleb, C.D’Ambrosio, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Inorganic Scintillators and their Use in Scientific and Industrial Applications. SCINT’05, NAS, Ukrajina, Kharkov, 2006, p. 138.
10. Ogino · J. Cryst. Growth · 2006 · 287 · 33510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.11.023 ↗
11. Mares · Phys. Status Solidi (c) · 2007 · 4 · 99610.1002/pssc.200673858 ↗
12. Dujardin · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 01351010.1063/1.3452358 ↗
13. Ogino · J. Cryst. Growth · 2009 · 311 · 90810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.09.146 ↗
14. Zorenko · Rad. Meas. · 2007 · 42 · 52110.1016/j.radmeas.2007.01.045 ↗
15. Zych · J. Lumin. · 1997 · 75 · 19310.1016/S0022-2313(97)00103-8 ↗
16. Shi · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 013522-1
17. Yanagida · NIM Phys. Res. A · 2010
18. D’Ambrosio · NIM Phys. Res. A · 2003 · 501 · 46310.1016/S0168-9002(03)00431-5 ↗
19. D’Ambrosio · NIM Phys. Res. A · 1994 · 338 · 38910.1016/0168-9002(94)91321-8 ↗
20. Mares · Opt. Mater · 2007 · 30 · 2210.1016/j.optmat.2006.10.017 ↗
21. Mares · NIM Phys. Res. A · 2003 · 498 · 31210.1016/S0168-9002(02)01996-4 ↗
22. Moszynski · IEEE TNS · 1997 · 44 · 1052
23. Moszynski · IEEE TNS · 2010 · 57 · 2886
24. Gierlich · IEEE TNS · 2007 · 54 · 1367
25. Drozdowski · IEEE TNS · 2009 · 56 · 320
26. Chewpraditkul · IEEE TNS · 2009 · 56 · 3800
27. Swidierski · IEEE NSS Conf. Rekord · 2008 · N40
28. Kucera · IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2010 · 15 · 012012-(1)10.1088/1757-899X/15/1/012012 ↗
29. Prus · Phys. Status Solidi. A · 2009 · 206 · 149410.1002/pssa.200825050 ↗
30. Mares · IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2010 · 15 · 012020-(1)10.1088/1757-899X/15/1/012020 ↗