Determination of the antibacterial activity of various metal-doped carbon quantum dots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Xu X et al (2004) Electrophoretic analysis and purification of fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotube fragments. J Am Chem Soc 126(40):12736–12737. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja040082h10.1021/ja040082h ↗
2. Wang R et al (2017) Recent progress in carbon quantum dots: synthesis, properties and applications in photocatalysis. J Mater Chem A 5(8):3717–3734. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA08660H10.1039/C6TA08660H ↗
3. Kou XL et al (2020) A review: recent advances in preparations and applications of heteroatom-doped carbon quantum dots. Dalton Trans 49(21):6915–6938. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0dt01004a10.1039/d0dt01004a ↗
4. Abd Rani U et al (2020) A review of carbon quantum dots and their applications in wastewater treatment. Adv Coll Interface Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2020.10212410.1016/j.cis.2020.102124 ↗
5. Malmir S et al (2020) Antibacterial properties of a bacterial cellulose CQD-TiO2 nanocomposite. Carbohyd Polymers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11583510.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115835 ↗
6. Luo PG et al (2013) Carbon “quantum” dots for optical bioimaging. J Mater Chem B 1(16):2116–2127. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TB00018D10.1039/C3TB00018D ↗
7. Molaei MJ (2020) Principles, mechanisms, and application of carbon quantum dots in sensors: a review. Anal Methods 12(10):1266–1287. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9AY02696G10.1039/C9AY02696G ↗
8. Travlou NA et al (2018) S- and N-doped carbon quantum dots: Surface chemistry dependent antibacterial activity. Carbon 135:104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.01810.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.018 ↗
9. Ardekani SM et al (2019) Conjugated carbon quantum dots: Potent nano-antibiotic for intracellular pathogens. J Colloid Interface Sci 552:378–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.05.06710.1016/j.jcis.2019.05.067 ↗
10. Tejwan N et al (2021) Metal-doped and hybrid carbon dots: a comprehensive review on their synthesis and biomedical applications. J Control Release 330:132–15010.1016/j.jconrel.2020.12.023 ↗
11. Slavin YN et al (2017) Metal nanoparticles: understanding the mechanisms behind antibacterial activity. J Nanobiotechnology 15(1):65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-017-0308-z10.1186/s12951-017-0308-z ↗
12. Rajkumar V (2023). Heavy Metal Toxicity. StatPearls Publishing LLC. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560920/. Accessed 23 Mar 2023
13. Gadd GM, Griffiths AJ (1977) Microorganisms and heavy metal toxicity. Microb Ecol 4:303–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0201327410.1007/BF02013274 ↗
14. Kim S-H et al (2011) Antibacterial activity of silver-nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Microbiol Biotechnol Lett 39(1):77–85
15. Sharma VK et al (2016) A review of the influence of treatment strategies on antibiotic resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes. Chemosphere 150:702–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.12.08410.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.12.084 ↗
16. Rawashdeh R, Haik Y (2009) Antibacterial mechanisms of metallic nanoparticles: a review. Dyn Biochem Process Biotechnol Mol Biol 3(2):12–20
17. Jaishankar M et al (2014) Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip Toxicol 7(2):60. https://doi.org/10.2478/intox-2014-000910.2478/intox-2014-0009 ↗
18. Kotrange H et al (2021) Metal and metal oxide nanoparticle as a novel antibiotic carrier for the direct delivery of antibiotics. Int J Mol Sci 22(17):9596. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2217959610.3390/ijms22179596 ↗
19. Ezeuko AS et al (2021) Potentials of metallic nanoparticles for the removal of antibiotic resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes from wastewater: a critical review. J Water Proc Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.10204110.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102041 ↗
20. Bing W et al (2016) Programmed bacteria death induced by carbon dots with different surface charge. Small 12(34):4713–4718. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20160029410.1002/smll.201600294 ↗
21. Chai SQ et al (2021) P-doped carbon quantum dots with antibacterial activity. Micromachines 12:9. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1209111610.3390/mi12091116 ↗
22. Kandasamy G (2019) Recent advancements in doped/co-doped carbon quantum dots for multi-potential applications. C J Carb Res 5:2. https://doi.org/10.3390/c502002410.3390/c5020024 ↗
23. Li F et al (2017) Selenium-doped carbon quantum dots for free-radical scavenging. Angewan Chem Int Ed 56(33):9910–9914. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20170598910.1002/anie.201705989 ↗
24. Lin LP et al (2018) Metal ions doped carbon quantum dots: synthesis, physicochemical properties, and their applications. Trac-Trends Analyt Chem 103:87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.03.01510.1016/j.trac.2018.03.015 ↗
25. Zhang RZ, Chen W (2014) Nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots: Facile synthesis and application as a "turn-off’ fluorescent probe for detection of Hg2+ ions. Biosens Bioelectron 55:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2013.11.07410.1016/j.bios.2013.11.074 ↗
26. Das P et al (2018) Zinc and nitrogen ornamented bluish white luminescent carbon dots for engrossing bacteriostatic activity and Fenton based bio-sensor. Mater Sci Eng C 88:115–12910.1016/j.msec.2018.03.010 ↗
27. Yang J et al (2016) Carbon dot-based platform for simultaneous bacterial distinguishment and antibacterial applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(47):32170–32181. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b1039810.1021/acsami.6b10398 ↗
28. Nguyen DN et al (2022) Machine learning assisted design and optimization of transition metal-incorporated carbon quantum dot catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.14701, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.1470110.48550/arXiv.2210.14701 ↗
29. Banjara R, Jadhav S, Bhoite S (2012) Antibacterial activity of di-2-ethylaniline phosphate screened by paper disc diffusion method. J Appl Pharmaceut Sci 2(7):230–233. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2012.272010.7324/JAPS.2012.2720 ↗
30. Wiegand I, Hilpert K, Hancock RE (2008) Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc 3(2):163–175. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.52110.1038/nprot.2007.521 ↗
31. Parvekar P et al (2020) The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of silver nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus. Biomater Investig Dent 7(1):105–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2020.179667410.1080/26415275.2020.1796674 ↗
32. Aamer A, Abdul-Hafeez M, Sayed S (2014) Minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations (MIC and MBC) of honey and bee propolis against multi-drug resistant (MDR) Staphylococcus sp. isolated from bovine clinical mastitis. Alternat Integrat Med. https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-5162.10001710.4172/2327-5162.100017 ↗
33. Krishnan R, Arumugam V, Vasaviah SK (2015) The MIC and MBC of silver nanoparticles against Enterococcus faecalis-a facultative anaerobe. J Nanomed Nanotechnol 6(3):285. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7439.100028510.4172/2157-7439.1000285 ↗
34. Owuama CI (2017) Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) using a novel dilution tube method. Af J Microbiol Res 11(23):977–980. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2017.854510.5897/AJMR2017.8545 ↗
35. Rodríguez-Melcón C et al (2021) Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for twelve antimicrobials (biocides and antibiotics) in eight strains of Listeria monocytogenes. Biology 11(1):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology1101004610.3390/biology11010046 ↗
36. Campbell J (2010) High-throughput assessment of bacterial growth inhibition by optical density measurements. Curr Prot Chem Biol 2(4):195–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470559277.ch10011510.1002/9780470559277.ch100115 ↗
37. He Y et al (2016) The changing 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of cisplatin: a pilot study on the artifacts of the MTT assay and the precise measurement of density-dependent chemoresistance in ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 7(43):7080310.18632/oncotarget.12223 ↗
38. Sebaugh J (2011) Guidelines for accurate EC50/IC50 estimation. Pharm Stat 10(2):128–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.42610.1002/pst.426 ↗
39. Zhang G et al (2019) A general route via formamide condensation to prepare atomically dispersed metal–nitrogen–carbon electrocatalysts for energy technologies. Energy Environ Sci 12(4):1317–132510.1039/C9EE00162J ↗
40. Zhuo S et al (2019) Facile fabrication of fluorescent Fe-doped carbon quantum dots for dopamine sensing and bioimaging application. Analyst 144(2):656–66210.1039/C8AN01741G ↗
41. Kapoor G, Saigal S, Elongavan A (2017) Action and resistance mechanisms of antibiotics: a guide for clinicians. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 33(3):300–305. https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_349_1510.4103/joacp.JOACP_349_15 ↗
42. Kohanski MA et al (2007) A common mechanism of cellular death induced by bactericidal antibiotics. Cell 130(5):797–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.04910.1016/j.cell.2007.06.049 ↗
43. Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Collins JJ (2010) How antibiotics kill bacteria: from targets to networks. Nat Rev Microbiol 8(6):423–435. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro233310.1038/nrmicro2333 ↗
44. Raynor BD (1997) Penicillin and ampicillin. Prim Care Update OB/GYNS 4(4):147–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1068-607X(97)00012-710.1016/S1068-607X(97)00012-7 ↗
45. Gottlieb D and PD Shaw (2013) Antibiotics: volume I mechanism of action. Springer
46. Walsh C and T Wencewicz (2020) Antibiotics: challenges, mechanisms, opportunities. John Wiley and Sons
47. Emami-Karvani Z, Chehrazi P (2011) Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticle on gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Afr J Microbiol Res 5(12):1368–1373. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR10.15910.5897/AJMR10.159 ↗
48. Dizaj SM et al (2014) Antimicrobial activity of the metals and metal oxide nanoparticles. Mater Sci Eng, C 44:278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.08.03110.1016/j.msec.2014.08.031 ↗
49. Azam A et al (2012) Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comparative study. Internat J Nanomed. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S3534710.2147/IJN.S35347 ↗
50. Rohde M (2019) The Gram-positive bacterial cell wall. Microbiol Spect. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0044-201810.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0044-2018 ↗
51. Aasland S, Grande T, Julsrud S (1993) Oxidation-states of transition-metals in Zblan. J Non-Cryst Solids 161:177–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(93)90694-S10.1016/0022-3093(93)90694-S ↗
52. Schmid HK, Mader W (2006) Oxidation states of Mn and Fe in various compound oxide systems. Micron 37(5):426–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2005.12.00410.1016/j.micron.2005.12.004 ↗
53. Van Gaal H, Van der Linden J (1982) Trends in redox potentials of transition metal complexes. Coord Chem Rev 47(1–2):41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-8545(82)85009-110.1016/0010-8545(82)85009-1 ↗
54. Dsouza SD et al (2021) The importance of surface states in N-doped carbon quantum dots. Carbon 183:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.06.08810.1016/j.carbon.2021.06.088 ↗