journal article·2025-05-23

Magnetization Dynamics in Cobalt-Decorated Cobalt Ferrite Nanocomposites: Implications for High-Frequency Electromagnetic Shielding

Shah Qasim Jan, Noah Schulz, Rajeswari Roy Chowdhury, Ayomipo Israel Ojo, Dalaver Hussain Anjum, Hafsa Khurshid, Darío A. Arena, Hariharan Srikanth

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 8· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

Cobalt ferrite (CFO), despite its prospect in high-frequency applications, is limited by its narrow magnetic loss bandwidth, which significantly restricts its potential in broadband electromagnetic shielding. Here, we synthesize a Co–CoFe 2 O 4 -based nanocomposite system (Co–CFO NC) to expand the potential applications of the traditionally hard inverse spinel ferrite, CFO, via the inclusion of magnetically soft, high saturation magnetization Co. To confirm the morphology, chemical composition, and crystal structures, we employed a combination of analytical techniques including transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The results suggest that the synthesized nanostructures are highly crystalline with the elemental Co effectively integrated into the CFO particles, resulting in a cohesive composite system. Static and dynamic magnetic measurements were performed, which indicate robust magnetic ordering across a broad frequency range, underscoring the potential applicability of these nanostructures in high-frequency applications. Ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) studies reveal broadband resonance dispersion across 20–36 GHz, with a giant damping parameter indicative of strong energy dissipation. These properties, coupled with exchange-mediated interfacial coupling ( g ave ≈ 1.88), probe the frequency-dependent permeability critical for skin depth control ( ( ρ ω μ ) ), demonstrating the system’s potential for GHz-range electromagnetic shielding. Low-temperature magnetic exchange bias is observed. The respective contributions from the magnetically hard and soft phases were deconvoluted to determine the intrinsic and extrinsic magnetic properties. Additionally, a parameter, denoted as the exchange dispersion (δ), is introduced, which quantifies interfacial coupling dynamics during reversal, linking quasi-static and GHz-scale behavior. These results emphasize the potential of the inclusion of elemental Co in the Co–CFO composite system to tune the magnetic properties for high-frequency electromagnetic shielding, where the hybrid hard/soft phases enable broadband microwave absorption and EMI shielding in next-generation communication devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Magnetic Properties of Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics

University of South Florida

Khalifa University

Department of Applied Physics and Astronomy

University of Sharjah

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences · University of Sharjah · U.S. Department of Defense · Division of Materials Research

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsanm.7b0002510.1021/acsanm.7b00025 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c0053110.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00531 ↗
3. 10.3390/ijms14112126610.3390/ijms141121266 ↗
4. 10.3390/magnetochemistry602002310.3390/magnetochemistry6020023 ↗
5. 10.3390/magnetochemistry601000310.3390/magnetochemistry6010003 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma1204061710.3390/ma12040617 ↗
7. 10.3390/nano912179110.3390/nano9121791 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10948-021-05854-610.1007/s10948-021-05854-6 ↗
9. 10.30501/acp.2020.10592310.30501/acp.2020.105923 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.diamond.2023.11068010.1016/j.diamond.2023.110680 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.03710.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.037 ↗
12. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/4/04570710.1088/0957-4484/22/4/045707 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16212610.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162126 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsorginorgau.3c0000210.1021/acsorginorgau.3c00002 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0331410.1021/acsomega.3c03314 ↗
16. 10.3390/nano1310167910.3390/nano13101679 ↗
17. 10.1039/d1na00487e10.1039/d1na00487e ↗
18. 10.1016/j.oceram.2021.10017910.1016/j.oceram.2021.100179 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRev.105.90410.1103/PhysRev.105.904 ↗
20. 10.1038/nnano.2011.9510.1038/nnano.2011.95 ↗
21. 10.1021/nl301499u10.1021/nl301499u ↗
22. 10.1021/nn305261710.1021/nn3052617 ↗
23. 10.1021/ja302856z10.1021/ja302856z ↗
24. 10.1557/s43578-021-00345-910.1557/s43578-021-00345-9 ↗
25. 10.4236/wjnse.2012.2302010.4236/wjnse.2012.23020 ↗
26. 10.4236/wjcmp.2015.5302310.4236/wjcmp.2015.53023 ↗
27. 10.1107/S002188987801284410.1107/S0021889878012844 ↗
28. 10.1107/9780955360206000098210.1107/97809553602060000982 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0103410.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01034 ↗
30. 10.1088/1742-6596/26/1/01610.1088/1742-6596/26/1/016 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.172932410.1063/1.1729324 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.313929310.1063/1.3139293 ↗
33. 10.1063/5.018643710.1063/5.0186437 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10948-020-05490-610.1007/s10948-020-05490-6 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0200610.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02006 ↗
36. 10.1021/nn505781f10.1021/nn505781f ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.07510.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.075 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0142610.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01426 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.physb.2017.12.01010.1016/j.physb.2017.12.010 ↗
40. 10.3390/magnetochemistry908019110.3390/magnetochemistry9080191 ↗
41. 10.7566/JPSJ.90.08370210.7566/JPSJ.90.083702 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.05404410.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.054044 ↗
43. 10.1039/c5nr06791j10.1039/c5nr06791j ↗
44. 10.1007/s11051-012-1156-210.1007/s11051-012-1156-2 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsnano.3c1249510.1021/acsnano.3c12495 ↗
46. Kittel C. · 2018
47. 10.3390/nano611022110.3390/nano6110221 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.473362110.1063/1.4733621 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.486590410.1063/1.4865904 ↗
50. 10.1038/s41598-021-84843-010.1038/s41598-021-84843-0 ↗
51. 10.1039/D1NA00312G10.1039/D1NA00312G ↗
52. 10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.00710.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.007 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00376-510.1016/S0304-8853(99)00376-5 ↗
54. 10.1002/2014GC00526510.1002/2014GC005265 ↗
55. 10.1070/RC2005v074n06ABEH00089710.1070/RC2005v074n06ABEH000897 ↗
56. 10.1002/adma.20180244410.1002/adma.201802444 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0444810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b04448 ↗
58. 10.1088/1742-5468/2012/09/P0900610.1088/1742-5468/2012/09/P09006 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.05440210.1103/PhysRevB.102.054402 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRev.104.149710.1103/PhysRev.104.1497 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.3051810.1063/1.30518 ↗
62. 10.1016/0022-4073(77)90161-310.1016/0022-4073(77)90161-3 ↗
63. 10.1063/1.496375610.1063/1.4963756 ↗
64. Smith, R. C.; Massad, J. E. A unified methodology for modeling hysteresis in ferroic materials. In Proceedings of the ASME 2001 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference; American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001, pp 1389–1398.10.1115/DETC2001/VIB-21466 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.14442010.1103/PhysRevB.64.144420 ↗
66. O’handley R. C. · 1999
67. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.13240310.1103/PhysRevB.70.132403 ↗
68. 10.1088/1361-648X/ac99cc10.1088/1361-648X/ac99cc ↗