Mechanical properties of polycaprolactone bone scaffolds reinforced with carbon nanotube-modified tricalcium phosphate

1. Battafarano G, Rossi M, De Martino V, Marampon F, Borro L, Secinaro A, Del Fattore A (2021) Strategies for bone regeneration: from graft to tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci 22:1128. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2203112810.3390/ijms22031128 ↗

2. Wu Z, Pu P, Su Z, Zhang X, Nie L, Chang Y (2020) Schwann Cell-derived exosomes promote bone regeneration and repair by enhancing the biological activity of porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 531:559–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.07.09410.1016/j.bbrc.2020.07.094 ↗

3. Armiento AR, Hatt LP, Sanchez Rosenberg G, Thompson K, Stoddart MJ (2020) Functional biomaterials for bone regeneration: a lesson in complex biology. Adv Funct Mater 30:1909874. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20190987410.1002/adfm.201909874 ↗

4. Abbasi N, Hamlet S, Love RM, Nguyen N-T (2020) Porous scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Sci Adv Mater Devices 5:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.00710.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.007 ↗

5. Wang Z, Wang Y, Yan J, Zhang K, Lin F, Xiang L, Deng L, Guan Z, Cui W, Zhang H (2021) Pharmaceutical electrospinning and 3D printing scaffold design for bone regeneration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 174:504–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.00710.1016/j.addr.2021.05.007 ↗

6. Filippi M, Born G, Chaaban M, Scherberich A (2020) Natural polymeric scaffolds in bone regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.0047410.3389/fbioe.2020.00474 ↗

7. Dwivedi R, Kumar S, Pandey R, Mahajan A, Nandana D, Katti DS, Mehrotra D (2020) Polycaprolactone as biomaterial for bone scaffolds: review of literature. J Oral Biol Craniofacial Res 10:381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.10.00310.1016/j.jobcr.2019.10.003 ↗

8. Yang X, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Chen J, Wan Q (2021) The application of polycaprolactone in three-dimensional printing scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Polymers 13:2754. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1316275410.3390/polym13162754 ↗

9. Liu H, Du Y, Yang G, Hu X, Wang L, Liu B, Wang J, Zhang S (2020) Delivering proangiogenic factors from 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds for vascularized bone regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater 9:2000727. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20200072710.1002/adhm.202000727 ↗

10. Maleki-Ghaleh H, Hossein Siadati M, Fallah A, Zarrabi A, Afghah F, Koc B, Dalir Abdolahinia E, Omidi Y, Barar J, Akbari-Fakhrabadi A, Beygi-Khosrowshahi Y, Adibkia K (2021) Effect of zinc-doped hydroxyapatite/graphene nanocomposite on the physicochemical properties and osteogenesis differentiation of 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Chem Eng J 426:131321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.13132110.1016/j.cej.2021.131321 ↗

11. Nalesso PRL, Vedovatto M, Gregório JES, Huang B, Vyas C, Santamaria-Jr M, Bártolo P, Caetano GF (2023) Early In Vivo Osteogenic and Inflammatory Response of 3D Printed Polycaprolactone/Carbon Nanotube/Hydroxyapatite/Tricalcium Phosphate Composite Scaffolds. Polymers 15:2952. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1513295210.3390/polym15132952 ↗

12. Zhang A, Wang Y, Wang H (2023) Preparation of inorganic-polymer nano-emulsion inhibitor for corrosion resistance of steel reinforcement for concrete. Alex Eng J 66:537–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.11.02010.1016/j.aej.2022.11.020 ↗

13. Park SA, Lee H-J, Kim S-Y, Kim K-S, Jo D-W, Park S-Y (2021) Three-dimensionally printed polycaprolactone/beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold was more effective as an rhBMP-2 carrier for new bone formation than polycaprolactone alone. J Biomed Mater Res A 109:840–848. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3707510.1002/jbm.a.37075 ↗

14. Mohammadi H, Sepantafar M, Muhamad N, Bakar Sulong A (2021) How does scaffold porosity conduct bone tissue regeneration? Adv Eng Mater 23:210046310.1002/adem.202100463 ↗

15. Ghosh S, Haldar S, Gupta S, Bisht A, Chauhan S, Kumar V, Roy P, Lahiri D (2020) Anisotropically conductive biodegradable scaffold with coaxially aligned carbon nanotubes for directional regeneration of peripheral Nerves. ACS Appl Bio Mater 3:5796–5812. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c0053410.1021/acsabm.0c00534 ↗

16. Xia J, Yuan Y, Wu H, Huang Y, Weitz DA (2020) Decoupling the effects of nanopore size and surface roughness on the attachment, spreading and differentiation of bone marrow-derived stem cells. Biomaterials 248:120014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.12001410.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120014 ↗

17. Shafiei S, Omidi M, Nasehi F, Golzar H, Mohammadrezaei D, Rezai Rad M, Khojasteh A (2019) Egg shell-derived calcium phosphate/carbon dot nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: fabrication and characterization. Mater Sci Eng C 100:564–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.00310.1016/j.msec.2019.03.003 ↗

18. Jing X, Mi H-Y, Turng L-S (2017) Comparison between PCL/hydroxyapatite (HA) and PCL/halloysite nanotube (HNT) composite scaffolds prepared by co-extrusion and gas foaming. Mater Sci Eng C 72:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.04910.1016/j.msec.2016.11.049 ↗

19. Patlolla A, Collins G, Livingston Arinzeh T (2010) Solvent-dependent properties of electrospun fibrous composites for bone tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater 6:90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.02810.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.028 ↗

20. Park C-H, Kim EK, Tijing LD, Amarjargal A, Pant HR, Kim CS, Shon HK (2014) Preparation and characterization of LA/PCL composite fibers containing beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) particles. Ceram Int 40:5049–5054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.10.01610.1016/j.ceramint.2013.10.016 ↗

21. Alehosseini M, Golafshan N, Kharaziha M, Fathi M, Edris H (2018) Hemocompatible and Bioactive Heparin-Loaded PCL-α-TCP Fibrous Membranes for Bone Tissue Engineering. Macromol Biosci 18:1800020. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.20180002010.1002/mabi.201800020 ↗

22. Jin G, Kim G (2013) The effect of sinusoidal AC electric stimulation of 3D PCL/CNT and PCL/β-TCP based bio-composites on cellular activities for bone tissue regeneration. J Mater Chem B 1:1439–1452. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2TB00338D10.1039/C2TB00338D ↗

23. Flores-Cedillo ML, Alvarado-Estrada KN, Pozos-Guillén AJ, Murguía-Ibarra JS, Vidal MA, Cervantes-Uc JM, Rosales-Ibáñez R, Cauich-Rodríguez JV (2015) Multiwall carbon nanotubes/polycaprolactone scaffolds seeded with human dental pulp stem cells for bone tissue regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med 27:35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5640-y10.1007/s10856-015-5640-y ↗

24. Perilli E, Baleani M, Öhman C, Fognani R, Baruffaldi F, Viceconti M (2008) Dependence of mechanical compressive strength on local variations in microarchitecture in cancellous bone of proximal human femur. J Biomech 41:438–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.08.00310.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.08.003 ↗

25. Goutianos S, Peijs T (2021) On the low reinforcing efficiency of carbon nanotubes in high-performance polymer fibres. Nanocomposites 7:53–6910.1080/20550324.2021.1917815 ↗

26. Ahmadi P, Nazeri N, Derakhshan MA, Ghanbari H (2021) Preparation and characterization of polyurethane/chitosan/CNT nanofibrous scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 180:590–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.03.00110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.03.001 ↗

27. Qian Y, Lin H, Yan Z, Shi J, Fan C (2021) Functional nanomaterials in peripheral nerve regeneration: scaffold design, chemical principles and microenvironmental remodeling. Mater Today 51:165–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2021.09.01410.1016/j.mattod.2021.09.014 ↗

28. Wang Z, Tang Y, Yakufu M, Li L, Li G, Liu J, Zhang P (2020) Highly permeable gelatin/poly (lactic acid) Fibrous scaffolds with a three-dimensional spatial structure for efficient cell infiltration, mineralization and bone regeneration. ACS Appl Bio Mater 3:6932–694310.1021/acsabm.0c00815 ↗

29. Menicanin D, Mrozik KM, Wada N, Marino V, Shi S, Bartold PM, Gronthos S (2014) Periodontal-ligament-derived stem cells exhibit the capacity for long-term survival, self-renewal, and regeneration of multiple tissue types in vivo. Stem Cells Dev 23:1001–101110.1089/scd.2013.0490 ↗

30. Lopes D, Martins-Cruz C, Oliveira MB, Mano JF (2018) Bone physiology as inspiration for tissue regenerative therapies. Biomaterials 185:240–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.02810.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.028 ↗

31. Pulyala P, Singh A, Dias-Netipanyj MF, Cogo SC, Santos LS, Soares P, Gopal V, Suganthan V, Manivasagam G, Popat KC (2017) In-vitro cell adhesion and proliferation of adipose derived stem cell on hydroxyapatite composite surfaces. Mater Sci Eng C 75:1305–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.17510.1016/j.msec.2017.02.175 ↗