journal article·2025-04-04

Revisiting Microstructure, Facet Exposure, and Lattice Distortion in Bismuth Oxyhalide (BiOX, X = Cl, Br, I) Nanomaterials for Catalysis

Melissa Jane Marks, Cecilie Friberg Klysner, Sara Frank, Nanna Nielsen Lange, Rebekka Klemmt, Henrik Særkjær Jeppesen, Marcel Ceccato, Espen Drath Bøjesen, Maarten G. Goesten, Nina Lock

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 8· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

We present a comprehensive structural study of BiOCl, BiOBr, and BiOI nanomaterials, focusing on the impact of varying the synthesis pH and halide on the structural properties of BiOX catalysts. By employing a combination of advanced structural analysis techniques, including Rietveld refinement of powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) data, X-ray pair distribution function (PDF) analysis, and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), notable structural insights into crystallite dimensions, microstrain, and lattice distortion were elucidated. Most notably, all BiOX materials comprised anisotropic, platelet-shaped crystallites with dominant {001} facets when using a microwave-assisted synthesis protocol, irrespective of the synthesis pH or halide. While large cylindrical crystalline platelets formed in acidic conditions, significantly smaller crystalline regions were formed under neutral-mildly alkaline conditions, with dimensions in the layer stacking direction (i.e., along the crystallographic c axis) becoming ultrathin (approximately 4 nm for BiOBr synthesized at pH 9.0), corresponding to only 4 bound unit cells. As the crystalline regions become smaller, the microstrain increases and the crystal lattice experiences increased distortion, expanding in the c direction and contracting in the a = b directions. Given the widespread application of BiOX nanomaterials within photo- and electro-catalysis, the practical significance of the structural characteristics on properties relevant to catalytic performance is discussed throughout. Namely, the crystallite dimensions and facet exposure have important implications for the available surface area for catalytic application, while the tunable microstrain, unit cell distortion, and ultrathin morphology might influence the electronic band structure, optical properties, and charge carrier dynamics. This study provides valuable insight into tuning the properties of BiOX nanocatalysts for their intended application, as well as demonstrating the merit of performing detailed structural analysis on BiOX nanomaterials using X-ray probes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, Åbogade 40, Aarhus N 8200, Denmark

Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds Vej 14, Aarhus C 8000, Denmark

Centre for Integrated Materials Research, Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 140, Aarhus C 8000, Denmark

Deutsche Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY), Notkestraße 85, Hamburg 22607, Germany

Funding

Aarhus Universitet · Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond · Carlsbergfondet · DanScatt

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.00810.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.008 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.08.01010.1016/j.ccr.2017.08.010 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.inoche.2023.11101610.1016/j.inoche.2023.111016 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11157-022-09617-010.1007/s11157-022-09617-0 ↗
5. 10.1038/nchem.60910.1038/nchem.609 ↗
6. 10.1016/0015-6264(75)90010-310.1016/0015-6264(75)90010-3 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.06.01010.1016/j.jcis.2021.06.010 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.11.43310.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.11.433 ↗
9. 10.1002/sstr.20240027510.1002/sstr.202400275 ↗
10. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0445410.1021/acssuschemeng.8b04454 ↗
11. 10.1039/D1NA00223F10.1039/D1NA00223F ↗
12. 10.3390/catal1308117510.3390/catal13081175 ↗
13. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c0532610.1021/acssuschemeng.2c05326 ↗
14. 10.1021/ja210484t10.1021/ja210484t ↗
15. 10.1016/S1003-6326(20)65252-910.1016/S1003-6326(20)65252-9 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep0738410.1038/srep07384 ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20180949210.1002/anie.201809492 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-022-34798-110.1038/s41467-022-34798-1 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20180351410.1002/anie.201803514 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.21454110.1016/j.ccr.2022.214541 ↗
21. 10.1002/eem2.1217110.1002/eem2.12171 ↗
22. 10.1021/ja402956f10.1021/ja402956f ↗
23. 10.1002/cctc.20160078210.1002/cctc.201600782 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11906310.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119063 ↗
25. 10.1007/s12274-014-0564-210.1007/s12274-014-0564-2 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12067910.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120679 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0002210.1021/acsanm.0c00022 ↗
28. 10.1039/C5RA18768K10.1039/C5RA18768K ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.05010.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.050 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.01.03210.1016/j.cej.2016.01.032 ↗
31. 10.1021/jp503507910.1021/jp5035079 ↗
32. 10.1039/C9TC05752H10.1039/C9TC05752H ↗
33. 10.1039/c2ra20881d10.1039/c2ra20881d ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jtice.2013.12.01510.1016/j.jtice.2013.12.015 ↗
35. 10.1016/0022-4596(88)90167-310.1016/0022-4596(88)90167-3 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.10.01410.1016/j.materresbull.2010.10.014 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b0052310.1021/acs.accounts.6b00523 ↗
38. 10.1039/C6DT00997B10.1039/C6DT00997B ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.04.04410.1016/j.cattod.2017.04.044 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsami.2c0383710.1021/acsami.2c03837 ↗
41. 10.1039/C8CY00143J10.1039/C8CY00143J ↗
42. 10.1039/C6TA10964K10.1039/C6TA10964K ↗
43. 10.1002/anie.20191651010.1002/anie.201916510 ↗
44. 10.1107/S002188981103897010.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗
45. 10.1524/zkri.1993.205.12.3510.1524/zkri.1993.205.12.35 ↗
46. 10.1107/S010827018609330710.1107/S0108270186093307 ↗
47. 10.1515/znb-2005-120710.1515/znb-2005-1207 ↗
48. 10.1107/S160057751500222210.1107/S1600577515002222 ↗
49. 10.1107/S160057752000077610.1107/S1600577520000776 ↗
50. 10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I ↗
51. 10.1107/S002188988708709010.1107/S0021889887087090 ↗
52. 10.1107/S002188988201129710.1107/S0021889882011297 ↗
53. 10.1107/S002188988201203510.1107/S0021889882012035 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRev.56.97810.1103/PhysRev.56.978 ↗
55. 10.1088/0953-8984/3/19/00210.1088/0953-8984/3/19/002 ↗
56. 10.1088/0959-5309/56/3/30310.1088/0959-5309/56/3/303 ↗
57. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.443-444.12310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.443-444.123 ↗
58. Yang, X.; Juhas, P.; Farrow, C.; Billinge, S.PDFsuite: an end-to-end software solution for high throughput pair distribution function transformation, visualization and analysis, 2015. https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.3163v3.
59. 10.1039/D0NA00120A10.1039/D0NA00120A ↗
60. Billinge S. · 2023
61. 10.1088/0953-8984/19/33/33521910.1088/0953-8984/19/33/335219 ↗
62. 10.1088/1742-6596/712/1/01200810.1088/1742-6596/712/1/012008 ↗
63. 10.1107/S090904950501271910.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
64. 10.1088/1742-6596/430/1/01200710.1088/1742-6596/430/1/012007 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.ssc.2021.11457310.1016/j.ssc.2021.114573 ↗
66. 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c0047110.1021/acs.jctc.0c00471 ↗
67. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa8f7910.1088/1361-648X/aa8f79 ↗
68. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.09451510.1103/PhysRevB.89.094515 ↗
69. 10.1021/acsnano.2c1275910.1021/acsnano.2c12759 ↗
70. 10.1039/D0SC03048A10.1039/D0SC03048A ↗
71. Casas-Cabanas M. · 2006 · 23 · 24310.1524/9783486992526-042 ↗
72. 10.1002/smll.20240141310.1002/smll.202401413 ↗
73. 10.1002/cphc.20120025710.1002/cphc.201200257 ↗
74. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c0050610.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00506 ↗
75. 10.1038/s41699-023-00437-610.1038/s41699-023-00437-6 ↗
76. 10.2138/am-2003-042310.2138/am-2003-0423 ↗
77. Kohanoff J. · 2003 · 532
78. 10.1016/j.optmat.2017.01.04910.1016/j.optmat.2017.01.049 ↗
79. 10.1002/jcc.2119110.1002/jcc.21191 ↗
80. 10.1021/jacs.7b1149710.1021/jacs.7b11497 ↗
81. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0034910.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00349 ↗