journal article·2024-09-13

TiO2 Nanotube Arrays Decorated with Graphene/Graphite Oxide Nanocomposite for the Photocatalytic Degradation of Anticancer Drugs in the Aquatic Environment

Thao Phuong Huynh, Tho Chau Minh Vinh Do, Phuoc Huu Le

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 7· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, graphene–graphite oxide nanocomposite-decorated TiO 2 nanotube arrays (GGO-TNAs) were synthesized by using electrochemical exfoliation and anodizing methods. The influence of GGO content on the material and photocatalytic properties of GGO-TNAs was systematically investigated for the degradation of six anticancer drugs─irinotecan, doxorubicin, capecitabine, ifosfamide, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate─using LC-MS/MS. The efficacy of anticancer drug degradation was evaluated in both pure water and hospital wastewater, with GGO-TNAs showing superior performance compared to TNAs. GGO-TNAs featured well-defined porous TiO 2 nanotube arrays (anatase phase, (101) orientation, tube diameter ∼100 nm, thickness ∼16.2 μm) decorated with graphene sheets and graphite oxide particles. By varying the GGO solution concentration (10–40 mg L –1 ), carbon concentrations in GGO-TNAs ranged from 4.3 to 9.5 at. %. Surface and structural compositions were confirmed by XPS and Raman spectroscopy, while EPR results indicated the generation of highly active • OH and O 2 •– radicals under UV–vis irradiation. The GGO (20 mg L –1, 6.9 at. % C)-TNAs exhibited the highest photocatalytic activity with first-order rate constants ( k ) ranging from 4.8 × 10 –2 to 40.3 × 10 –2 min –1, significantly outperforming TNAs alone (1.2–1.8 times higher). GGO-TNAs retained 97% of their initial efficiency after five cycles of reuse, indicating material stability. The enhanced photocatalytic performance is attributed to improved utilization of visible light, increased generation of photocarriers, and reduced recombination of electron–hole pairs. Furthermore, the relationship between k values and the physicochemical properties of the anticancer drugs was investigated, and a degradation pathway for capecitabine was proposed based on MS spectra analysis. This study demonstrates that GGO-TNAs are highly effective and stable photocatalysts for degrading anticancer drugs in water and wastewater, offering a promising solution for environmental remediation. The enhanced photocatalytic efficiency and reusability of GGO-TNAs highlight their potential for practical water treatment applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Pharmacy, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 179 Nguyen Van Cu Street, Can Tho City 94000, Vietnam

Faculty of Pharmacy, Nam Can Tho University, 168 Nguyen Van Cu (Ext) Street, Can Tho City 94000, Vietnam

Center for Plasma and Thin Film Technologies, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City 24301, Taiwan

International Ph.D. Program in Plasma and Thin Film Technology, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City 24301, Taiwan

Department of Physics and Biophysics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 179 Nguyen Van Cu Street, Can Tho City 94000, Vietnam

Funding

Ming Chi University of Technology · T?p do?n Vingroup - C?ng ty CP · Qu? ??i m?i s?ng t?o Vingroup

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.envint.2021.10654310.1016/j.envint.2021.106543 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12718410.1016/j.cej.2020.127184 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11270-022-05763-x10.1007/s11270-022-05763-x ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12686610.1016/j.cej.2020.126866 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.10210.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.102 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.17410.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.174 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.03910.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.039 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11356-021-14360-010.1007/s11356-021-14360-0 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.38110.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.381 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.05710.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.057 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.11090610.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110906 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0460810.1021/acs.iecr.9b04608 ↗
13. 10.1080/10643389.2017.137099010.1080/10643389.2017.1370990 ↗
14. 10.3390/app1118867410.3390/app11188674 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.10470910.1016/j.jece.2020.104709 ↗
16. Le P. H. · 2018 · 131
17. 10.1021/acsami.0c0862410.1021/acsami.0c08624 ↗
18. 10.3390/ma1215243410.3390/ma12152434 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.10910.1016/j.cej.2015.09.109 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jece.2018.03.03610.1016/j.jece.2018.03.036 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12950610.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129506 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10904-020-01463-310.1007/s10904-020-01463-3 ↗
23. 10.3390/nano1219353610.3390/nano12193536 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10854-018-9749-x10.1007/s10854-018-9749-x ↗
25. 10.3390/catal1101014410.3390/catal11010144 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.catcom.2012.08.00410.1016/j.catcom.2012.08.004 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.11.14010.1016/j.jallcom.2011.11.140 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsmaterialsau.1c0002210.1021/acsmaterialsau.1c00022 ↗
29. 10.3390/en1517624810.3390/en15176248 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.07210.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.072 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12675110.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126751 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jece.2019.10335110.1016/j.jece.2019.103351 ↗
33. 10.1007/s11356-017-9005-610.1007/s11356-017-9005-6 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14039410.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140394 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.07.06910.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.07.069 ↗
36. 10.18178/ijesd.2020.11.10.129210.18178/ijesd.2020.11.10.1292 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.04010.1016/j.watres.2017.01.040 ↗
38. 10.1039/C7EN01171G10.1039/C7EN01171G ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12748910.1016/j.cej.2020.127489 ↗
40. 10.1007/s11783-019-1143-210.1007/s11783-019-1143-2 ↗
41. 10.1007/s11356-020-08500-110.1007/s11356-020-08500-1 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0484610.1021/acs.iecr.0c04846 ↗
43. 10.1098/rsos.18194810.1098/rsos.181948 ↗
44. 10.1039/c3ra46807k10.1039/c3ra46807k ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.10019510.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100195 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.02210.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.022 ↗
47. 10.1038/srep0859110.1038/srep08591 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.04210.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.042 ↗
49. 10.1186/s40201-015-0184-010.1186/s40201-015-0184-0 ↗
50. 10.1039/C7TB01711A10.1039/C7TB01711A ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13010310.1016/j.cej.2021.130103 ↗
52. 10.2478/ceer-2019-002110.2478/ceer-2019-0021 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0389510.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03895 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.24710.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.247 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.06.01210.1016/j.seppur.2016.06.012 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15521110.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155211 ↗