journal article·2025-03-21

Determining the Elastic Modulus of Microgel Particles by Nanoindentation

Nadine Raßmann, Steffen Trippmacher, Agnes Specht, Katinka Theis, Tamino Rößler, Sebastian Wohlrab, Richard Kellnberger, Sahar Salehi, Hendrik Bargel, Nicolas Helfricht, Krystyna Albrecht, Thomas Scheibel, Jürgen Groll, Stephan Gekle, Georg Papastavrou

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 8· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

The mechanical properties of materials and cells are key factors for many processes in biofabrication. Nanoindentation using atomic force microscopy represents an important technique to quantify the Young’s elastic modulus in a locally resolved manner or for single microgel particles and cells, respectively. Here, we address the question of the best-suited indenter geometry and continuum model for contact mechanics to describe the nanoindentation of microgels. Two different microgel model systems have been synthesized using microfluidics with a very narrow size distribution of the particles: poly(acrylamide) and ene-functionalized polyoxazoline/thiol-functionalized hyaluronic acid. The respective microgel particles have been characterized by up to six different types of indenter geometries, including spherical, parallel plate, and cone. Moreover, the influence of experimental parameters, such as indentation depth and velocity, on the resulting Young’s modulus has been studied. Compared to the Hertz model, the simplified double contact model (SDC model) provided a better description of the indentation process and a narrower distribution of Young’s moduli with respect to the different indenter geometries. By numerical simulation of the indentation process, we demonstrated that the remaining variation of the Young’s moduli is attributed to adhesion. The adhesive force between a particle and the substrate led to a prestress, which is similar to that of particle deformation by the substrate as accounted for by the SDC model. This effect varied in strength with the indenter geometries and can contribute significantly to the experimentally observed variation of Young’s moduli for different indenter geometries. Importantly, these results can also be extended to the indentation of single living cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physical Chemistry II − Interfaces and Nanoanalytics, University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstraße 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany

Department for Functional Medicine and Dentistry, University of Hospital of Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070 Würzburg, Germany

Biofluid Simulation and Modeling, Theoretische Physik VI, University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstraße 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany

Department of Biomaterials, University of Bayreuth, Prof.-Rüdiger-Bormann Str. 1, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany

Bavarian Polymer Institute, University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstraße 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany

Bayreuth Center for Colloids and Interfaces, Bayreuth Center for Molecular Biosciences, Bayreuth Center for Material Science and Engineering, University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstraße 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany

Faculty of Medicine, University of Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070 Würzburg, Germany

Bavarian Polymer Institute, University of Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070 Würzburg, Germany

Funding

Elitenetzwerk Bayern · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.10764810.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107648 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41592-020-0818-810.1038/s41592-020-0818-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.00510.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.005 ↗
4. 10.1038/nrm.2017.10810.1038/nrm.2017.108 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00249005021310.1007/s002490050213 ↗
6. 10.1039/D4TB00328D10.1039/D4TB00328D ↗
7. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.06.02910.1016/j.semcdb.2017.06.029 ↗
8. 10.1155/2004/48268010.1155/2004/482680 ↗
9. 10.1039/D3NR02034G10.1039/D3NR02034G ↗
10. 10.1039/C6AY00131A10.1039/C6AY00131A ↗
11. 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.04.01910.1016/j.bpj.2013.04.019 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.03.03110.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.03.031 ↗
13. 10.1038/srep4557510.1038/srep45575 ↗
14. 10.1021/ma101231z10.1021/ma101231z ↗
15. 10.1039/c3sm27400d10.1039/c3sm27400d ↗
16. 10.1002/pol.2022011010.1002/pol.20220110 ↗
17. 10.1039/C6BM00692B10.1039/C6BM00692B ↗
18. 10.1039/C8TB01421C10.1039/C8TB01421C ↗
19. 10.1039/C7CS00263G10.1039/C7CS00263G ↗
20. 10.1002/macp.20160041810.1002/macp.201600418 ↗
21. 10.1179/1743280413Y.000000002210.1179/1743280413Y.0000000022 ↗
22. 10.3390/polym1009097810.3390/polym10090978 ↗
23. 10.1002/adhm.20150022910.1002/adhm.201500229 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.09.00610.1016/j.bpj.2015.09.006 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10237-020-01397-210.1007/s10237-020-01397-2 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0031710.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00317 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.01.00410.1016/j.bpj.2019.01.004 ↗
28. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/34/34510210.1088/0957-4484/22/34/345102 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.micron.2023.10352310.1016/j.micron.2023.103523 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00249-020-01456-710.1007/s00249-020-01456-7 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.02191410.1103/PhysRevE.72.021914 ↗
32. 10.1515/crll.1882.92.15610.1515/crll.1882.92.156 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.223464810.1063/1.2234648 ↗
34. 10.1021/la980585z10.1021/la980585z ↗
35. 10.1021/la971300610.1021/la9713006 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75620-810.1016/S0006-3495(02)75620-8 ↗
37. 10.3390/polym304157510.3390/polym3041575 ↗
38. 10.1039/C4SM00788C10.1039/C4SM00788C ↗
39. 10.1039/D0SM00191K10.1039/D0SM00191K ↗
40. 10.1017/S143192762002490310.1017/S1431927620024903 ↗
41. 10.1116/6.000313610.1116/6.0003136 ↗
42. 10.1371/journal.pone.007738410.1371/journal.pone.0077384 ↗
43. 10.1002/jmr.301810.1002/jmr.3018 ↗
44. 10.1007/s40799-017-0199-910.1007/s40799-017-0199-9 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.02110.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.021 ↗
46. 10.1088/1758-5090/ad331810.1088/1758-5090/ad3318 ↗
47. 10.1002/mabi.20210027410.1002/mabi.202100274 ↗
48. 10.1007/s00396-010-2347-y10.1007/s00396-010-2347-y ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.02.01510.1016/j.ymeth.2013.02.015 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.114397010.1063/1.1143970 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.11.01810.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.11.018 ↗
52. 10.1177/0006355X200704400200110.1177/0006355X2007044002001 ↗
53. 10.1016/0966-7822(95)00013-510.1016/0966-7822(95)00013-5 ↗
54. 10.1002/nme.257910.1002/nme.2579 ↗
55. 10.1201/978143980248910.1201/9781439802489 ↗
56. 10.1016/b978-0-12-267351-1.x5000-710.1016/b978-0-12-267351-1.x5000-7 ↗
57. 10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-410.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.08.00110.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.08.001 ↗
59. 10.1038/s42254-018-0001-710.1038/s42254-018-0001-7 ↗
60. 10.1529/biophysj.103.03176510.1529/biophysj.103.031765 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.01710.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.017 ↗
62. 10.1002/jemt.2426110.1002/jemt.24261 ↗
63. 10.1063/1.480142810.1063/1.4801428 ↗
64. 10.1371/journal.pone.022028110.1371/journal.pone.0220281 ↗
65. 10.1116/1.58728610.1116/1.587286 ↗
66. 10.1098/rspa.1971.014110.1098/rspa.1971.0141 ↗
67. 10.1002/adfm.20170204010.1002/adfm.201702040 ↗
68. 10.1002/cpz1.51710.1002/cpz1.517 ↗
69. 10.1039/C5SM01143D10.1039/C5SM01143D ↗
70. 10.1016/j.jmps.2023.10549610.1016/j.jmps.2023.105496 ↗