journal article·2026-03-11Open access

Magnetic excitations of the Kitaev model candidate RuBr3

Kazuhiro Nawa, Yoshinori Imai, Maiko Kofu, Richard Mole, Hideyuki Fujihara, Takumi Hiraoka, Ryo Murasaki, Pharit Piyawongwatthana, Daisuke Okuyama, Hirotada Gotou, Kenya Ohgushi, Taku J. Sato

npj Quantum Materials· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract The Kitaev model, which consists of bond-dependent Ising interactions on the honeycomb plane, is known as a promising model for realising a spin liquid in the exact ground state. Since bond-dependent Ising interactions are induced by orbital exchange processes via ligand ions, it is important to reveal the effect of ligand ions on the formation of bond-dependent Ising interactions experimentally. In this study, we performed powder inelastic neutron scattering on RuBr 3 with a layered honeycomb structure, which is isostructural to the low-temperature structure of α -RuCl 3 . Strongly dispersive magnetic modes were observed near the centre of the antiferromagnetic zone below T N . With increasing temperature, the spectral weight remains near the centre of the antiferromagnetic zone just above T N , whereas it shifts to the Γ point at 3 T N . Strong dispersion indicates that antiferromagnetic interactions that stabilise the zigzag antiferromagnetic order, namely, nearest-neighbour symmetric off-diagonal or third-neighbour isotropic magnetic interactions, are comparable to or even stronger than ferromagnetic Kitaev interactions, and drive the ground state of RuBr 3 away from the ideal ferromagnetic Kitaev spin liquid state.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Condensed Matter Physics · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Organic and Molecular Conductors Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (78)

Show source-provided references
1. Kitaev, A. Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond. Ann. Phys. 321, 2–111 (2006).10.1016/j.aop.2005.10.005 ↗
2. Winter, S. M. et al. Models and materials for generalized Kitaev magnetism. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 493002 (2017).10.1088/1361-648X/aa8cf5 ↗
3. Hermanns, M., Kimchi, I. & Knolle, J. Physics of the Kitaev model: fractionalization, dynamic correlations, and material connections. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 9, 17–33 (2018).10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-033117-053934 ↗
4. Motome, Y. & Nasu, J. Hunting Majorana fermions in Kitaev magnets. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 89, 012002 (2020).10.7566/JPSJ.89.012002 ↗
5. Takagi, H., Takayama, T., Jackeli, G., Khaliullin, G. & Nagler, S. E. Concept and realization of Kitaev quantum spin liquids. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 264–280 (2019).10.1038/s42254-019-0038-2 ↗
6. Trebst, S. & Hickey, C. Kitaev materials. Phys. Rep. 950, 1–37 (2022).10.1016/j.physrep.2021.11.003 ↗
7. Baskaran, G., Mandal, S. & Shankar, R. Exact results for spin dynamics and fractionalization in the Kitaev model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 247201 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.247201 ↗
8. Jackeli, G. & Khaliullin, G. Mott insulators in the strong spin-orbit coupling limit: from Heisenberg to a quantum compass and Kitaev models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017205 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.017205 ↗
9. Stroganov, E. V. & Ovchinnikov, K. V. Crystal structure of ruthenium trichloride. Vestn. Leningr. Univ. Ser. 4 14, 151–152 (1968).
10. Kubota, Y., Tanaka, H., Ono, T., Narumi, Y. & Kindo, K. Successive magnetic phase transitions in α − RuCl3: Xy-like frustrated magnet on the honeycomb lattice. Phys. Rev. B 91, 094422 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.91.094422 ↗
11. Sears, J. A. et al. Magnetic order in α − RuCl3: a honeycomb-lattice quantum magnet with strong spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B 91, 144420 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.91.144420 ↗
12. Majumder, M. et al. Anisotropic Ru3+4d5 magnetism in the α − RuCl3 honeycomb system: susceptibility, specific heat, and zero-field nmr. Phys. Rev. B 91, 180401 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.91.180401 ↗
13. Johnson, R. D. et al. Monoclinic crystal structure of α − RuCl3 and the zigzag antiferromagnetic ground state. Phys. Rev. B 92, 235119 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.235119 ↗
14. Cao, H. B. et al. Low-temperature crystal and magnetic structure of α − RuCl3. Phys. Rev. B 93, 134423 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.134423 ↗
15. Park, S.-Y. et al. Emergence of the isotropic Kitaev honeycomb lattice α-RuCl3 and its magnetic properties. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 36, 215803 (2024).10.1088/1361-648X/ad294f ↗
16. Sears, J. A. et al. Ferromagnetic Kitaev interaction and the origin of large magnetic anisotropy in α-RuCl3. Nat. Phys. 16, 837–840 (2020).10.1038/s41567-020-0874-0 ↗
17. Banerjee, A. et al. Proximate Kitaev quantum spin liquid behaviour in a honeycomb magnet. Nat. Mater. 15, 733–740 (2016).10.1038/nmat4604 ↗
18. Ran, K. et al. Spin-wave excitations evidencing the Kitaev interaction in single crystalline α–RuCl3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 107203 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.107203 ↗
19. Banerjee, A. et al. Neutron scattering in the proximate quantum spin liquid α-RuCl3. Science 356, 1055–1059 (2017).10.1126/science.aah6015 ↗
20. Do, S.-H. et al. Majorana fermions in the Kitaev quantum spin system α-RuCl3. Nat. Phys. 13, 1079–1084 (2017).10.1038/nphys4264 ↗
21. Han, J.-H. et al. Weak-coupling to strong-coupling quantum criticality crossover in a Kitaev quantum spin liquid α-RuCl3. npj Quantum Mater. 8, 33 (2023).10.1038/s41535-023-00563-w ↗
22. Sandilands, L. J., Tian, Y., Plumb, K. W., Kim, Y.-J. & Burch, K. S. Scattering continuum and possible fractionalized excitations in α-RuCl3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 147201 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.147201 ↗
23. Glamazda, A., Lemmens, P., Do, S.-H., Kwon, Y. S. & Choi, K.-Y. Relation between Kitaev magnetism and structure in α − RuCl3. Phys. Rev. B 95, 174429 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.95.174429 ↗
24. Jansa, N. et al. Observation of two types of fractional excitation in the Kitaev honeycomb magnet. Nat. Phys. 14, 786 (2018).10.1038/s41567-018-0129-5 ↗
25. Suzuki, H. et al. Proximate ferromagnetic state in the Kitaev model material α-RuCl3. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24722-4 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-24722-4 ↗
26. Kasahara, Y. et al. Majorana quantization and half-integer thermal quantum hall effect in a Kitaev spin liquid. Nature 559, 227 (2018).10.1038/s41586-018-0274-0 ↗
27. Xing, Y. et al. Magnetothermal transport in ultraclean single crystals of Kitaev magnet α-RuCl3. npj Quantum Mater. 10, 33 (2025).10.1038/s41535-025-00749-4 ↗
28. Wang, W., Dong, Z.-Y., Yu, S.-L. & Li, J.-X. Theoretical investigation of magnetic dynamics in α −RuCl3. Phys. Rev. B 96, 115103 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.115103 ↗
29. Winter, S. M., Riedl, K., Kaib, D., Coldea, R. & Valentí, R. Probing α − RuCl3 beyond magnetic order: effects of temperature and magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 077203 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.077203 ↗
30. Suzuki, T. & Suga, S. -i Effective model with strong Kitaev interactions for α-RuCl3. Phys. Rev. B 97, 134424 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.97.134424 ↗
31. Chaloupka, J. & Khaliullin, G. Magnetic anisotropy in the Kitaev model systems Na2IrO3 and RuCl3. Phys. Rev. B 94, 064435 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.94.064435 ↗
32. Maksimov, P. A. & Chernyshev, A. L. Rethinking α − RuCl3. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033011 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033011 ↗
33. Lampen-Kelley, P. et al. Anisotropic susceptibilities in the honeycomb Kitaev system α − RuCl3. Phys. Rev. B 98, 100403 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.98.100403 ↗
34. Plumb, K. W. et al. α − RuCl3: A spin-orbit assisted Mott insulator on a honeycomb lattice. Phys. Rev. B 90, 041112 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.90.041112 ↗
35. Kim, H.-S., V, V. S., Catuneanu, A. & Kee, H.-Y. Kitaev magnetism in honeycomb RuCl3 with intermediate spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B 91, 241110 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.91.241110 ↗
36. Yadav, R. et al. Kitaev exchange and field-induced quantum spin-liquid states in honeycomb α-RuCl3. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37925 (2016).10.1038/srep37925 ↗
37. Kim, H.-S. & Kee, H.-Y. Crystal structure and magnetism in α − RuCl3: an ab initio study. Phys. Rev. B 93, 155143 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.155143 ↗
38. Winter, S. M., Li, Y., Jeschke, H. O. & Valentí, R. Challenges in design of kitaev materials: magnetic interactions from competing energy scales. Phys. Rev. B 93, 214431 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.214431 ↗
39. Rau, J. G., Lee, E. K.-H. & Kee, H.-Y. Generic spin model for the honeycomb iridates beyond the Kitaev limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 077204 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.077204 ↗
40. Chaloupka, J. & Khaliullin, G. Hidden symmetries of the extended Kitaev-Heisenberg model: implications for the honeycomb-lattice iridates A2IrO3. Phys. Rev. B 92, 024413 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.024413 ↗
41. Rusnačko, J., Gotfryd, D. & Chaloupka, J. Kitaev-like honeycomb magnets: Global phase behavior and emergent effective models. Phys. Rev. B 99, 064425 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.99.064425 ↗
42. Imai, Y. et al. Zigzag magnetic order in the Kitaev spin-liquid candidate material RuBr3 with a honeycomb lattice. Phys. Rev. B 105, L041112 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L041112 ↗
43. Ni, D., Gui, X., Powderly, K. M. & Cava, R. J. Honeycomb-structure RuI3, a new quantum material related to α − RuCl3. Adv. Mater. 34, 2106831 (2022).10.1002/adma.202106831 ↗
44. Nawa, K. et al. Strongly electron-correlated semimetal RuI3 with a layered honeycomb structure. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 90, 123703 (2021).10.7566/JPSJ.90.123703 ↗
45. Ersan, F. et al. Exploring the electronic and magnetic properties of new metal halides from bulk to two-dimensional monolayer: RuX3 (X = Br, I). J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 476, 111–119 (2019).10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.12.032 ↗
46. Kaib, D. A. S. et al. Electronic and magnetic properties of the RuX3 (X = Cl, Br, I) family: two siblings and a cousin? npj Quantum Mater. 7, 75 (2022).10.1038/s41535-022-00481-3 ↗
47. Kim, H.-S. Spin-orbit-entangled nature of magnetic moments and Kitaev magnetism in layered halides. Appl. Sci. Converg. Technol. 30, 191–194 (2021).10.5757/ASCT.2021.30.6.191 ↗
48. Shen, B. et al. Magnetic versus nonmagnetic polymorphs of RuBr3 under pressure. Phys. Rev. B 109, 224402 (2024).10.1103/PhysRevB.109.224402 ↗
49. Choi, Y. et al. Magnetic and spin-orbit exciton excitations in the honeycomb lattice compound RuBr3. Phys. Rev. B 106, 174430 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevB.106.174430 ↗
50. Gretarsson, H. et al. j=$$\frac{1}{2}$$ pseudospins and d-p hybridization in the Kitaev spin liquid candidates RuX3 (X=Cl, Br, I). Phys. Rev. B 109, L180413 (2024).10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L180413 ↗
51. Chun, S. H. et al. Direct evidence for dominant bond-directional interactions in a honeycomb lattice iridate Na2IrO3. Nat. Phys. 11, 462–466 (2015).10.1038/nphys3322 ↗
52. Kim, J. et al. Dynamic spin correlations in the honeycomb lattice Na2IrO3 measured by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering. Phys. Rev. X 10, 021034 (2020).
53. Knolle, J., Kovrizhin, D. L., Chalker, J. T. & Moessner, R. Dynamics of a two-dimensional quantum spin liquid: signatures of emergent Majorana fermions and fluxes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 207203 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.207203 ↗
54. Knolle, J., Kovrizhin, D. L., Chalker, J. T. & Moessner, R. Dynamics of fractionalization in quantum spin liquids. Phys. Rev. B 92, 115127 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.115127 ↗
55. Yoshitake, J., Nasu, J. & Motome, Y. Fractional spin fluctuations as a precursor of quantum spin liquids: Majorana dynamical mean-field study for the Kitaev model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 157203 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.157203 ↗
56. Yoshitake, J., Nasu, J., Kato, Y. & Motome, Y. Majorana dynamical mean-field study of spin dynamics at finite temperatures in the honeycomb Kitaev model. Phys. Rev. B 96, 024438 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.024438 ↗
57. Samarakoon, A. M. et al. Comprehensive study of the dynamics of a classical Kitaev spin liquid. Phys. Rev. B 96, 134408 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.134408 ↗
58. Winter, S. M. et al. Breakdown of magnons in a strongly spin-orbital coupled magnet. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01177-0 (2017).10.1038/s41467-017-01177-0 ↗
59. Gohlke, M., Verresen, R., Moessner, R. & Pollmann, F. Dynamics of the Kitaev-Heisenberg model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 157203 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.157203 ↗
60. Gohlke, M., Wachtel, G., Yamaji, Y., Pollmann, F. & Kim, Y. B. Quantum spin liquid signatures in Kitaev-like frustrated magnets. Phys. Rev. B 97, 075126 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.97.075126 ↗
61. Laurell, P. & Okamoto, S. Dynamical and thermal magnetic properties of the Kitaev spin liquid candidate α-RuCl3. npj Quantum Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-019-0203-y (2020).10.1038/s41535-019-0203-y ↗
62. Li, Y., Winter, S. M., Kaib, D. A. S., Riedl, K. & Valentí, R. Modified Curie-Weiss law for jeff magnets. Phys. Rev. B 103, L220408 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L220408 ↗
63. Pearce, J. S. et al. Anisotropy of the zigzag order in the Kitaev honeycomb magnet α − RuBr3. Phys. Rev. B 110, 214404 (2024).10.1103/PhysRevB.110.214404 ↗
64. Zhang, B. et al. High-quality single crystal of Kitaev spin liquid candidate material RuBr3 synthesized under high pressure. Chin. Phys. Lett. 42, 027503 (2025).10.1088/0256-307X/42/2/027503 ↗
65. Watanabe, K. et al. Coupled spin-$$\frac{1}{2}$$ antiferromagnetic chain Cs2LiRuCl6 with partially disordered crystal lattice. Phys. Rev. B 103, 064419 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevB.103.064419 ↗
66. Kim, C. et al. Spin waves in the two-dimensional honeycomb lattice xxz-type van der Waals antiferromagnet CoPS3. Phys. Rev. B 102, 184429 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevB.102.184429 ↗
67. Lançon, D., Ewings, R. A., Guidi, T., Formisano, F. & Wildes, A. R. Magnetic exchange parameters and anisotropy of the quasi-two-dimensional antiferromagnet NiPS3. Phys. Rev. B 98, 134414 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.98.134414 ↗
68. Wildes, A. R. et al. Magnetic dynamics of NiPS3. Phys. Rev. B 106, 174422 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevB.106.174422 ↗
69. Scheie, A. et al. Spin wave Hamiltonian and anomalous scattering in NiPS3. Phys. Rev. B 108, 104402 (2023).10.1103/PhysRevB.108.104402 ↗
70. Nakajima, K. et al. AMATERAS: a cold-neutron disk chopper spectrometer. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, SB028 (2011).10.1143/JPSJS.80SB.SB028 ↗
71. Yu, D., Mole, R., Noakes, T., Kennedy, S. & Robinson, R. Pelican – a time of flight cold neutron polarization analysis spectrometer at OPAL. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, SA027 (2013).10.7566/JPSJS.82SA.SA027 ↗
72. Nawa, K. et al. Present status and future prospects of the thermal-neutron triple-axis spectrometer 4G-GPTAS. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93, 091001 (2024).10.7566/JPSJ.93.091001 ↗
73. Nakamura, M. et al. First demonstration of novel method for inelastic neutron scattering measurement utilizing multiple incident energies. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 093002 (2009).10.1143/JPSJ.78.093002 ↗
74. Inamura, Y., Nakatani, T., Suzuki, J. & Otomo, T. Development status of software “Utsusemi” for chopper spectrometers at MLF, J-PARC. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, SA031 (2013).10.7566/JPSJS.82SA.SA031 ↗
75. Luttinger, J. M. & Tisza, L. Theory of dipole interaction in crystals. Phys. Rev. 70, 954–964 (1946).10.1103/PhysRev.70.954 ↗
76. Litvin, D. The Luttinger-Tisza method. Physica 77, 205–219 (1974).10.1016/0031-8914(74)90257-2 ↗
77. Smit, R. L. et al. Magnon damping in the zigzag phase of the Kitaev-Heisenberg-Γ model on a honeycomb lattice. Phys. Rev. B 101, 054424 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevB.101.054424 ↗
78. Kajimoto, R., Sato, K., Inamura, Y. & Fujita, M. Instrumental resolution of the chopper spectrometer 4SEASONS evaluated by Monte Carlo simulation. AIP Conf. Proc. 1969, 050004 (2018).10.1063/1.5039301 ↗