Particle Size and Humidity Effects on Nanocellulose Adhesion to Glass: Implications for Mitigating Particulate Contamination in Industrial Processes
Source abstract
Abstract
Particulates adhered to glass surfaces can result in manufacturing defects during display module fabrication. The adhesion force is highly sensitive to the water meniscus formed in humid environments and can be examined experimentally as a function of relative humidity using atomic force microscopy by measuring the pull-off force between a flat glass surface and either a spherical or a cone-shaped probe tip. In this work, the effective thickness and hydrogen bonding interaction of adsorbed water were probed using transmission FTIR at Brewster’s angle with p-polarized light, investigating two different multicomponent glass surfaces subject to different aqueous treatments. The effective thickness of water layers so measured was used to estimate the curvature of the water meniscus at the particulate–glass interface, thereby enabling the prediction of the adhesion forces exerted on the nanoparticles and microspheres in pull-off measurements. Correlations between the adsorbed water layer, the electrostatic charging, and the adhesion force of cellulosic materials to glass from the nanoscale to the microscale are discussed in this work, which provide insights into mitigating particulate contamination in industrial processes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania16802, United States
Science & Technology Division, Corning Incorporated, Corning, New York14831, United States
Funding
Corning Incorporated
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Walraven, J. A.Failure Mechanisms in MEMS, International Test Conference; IEEE, 2003; pp 828–833.10.1109/TEST.2003.1270915 ↗
2. 10.1116/1.57836110.1116/1.578361 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.00710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.007 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.06.03010.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.06.030 ↗
5. Israelachvili J. N. · 2015
6. 10.3389/fchem.2020.60091810.3389/fchem.2020.600918 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00894-015-2665-610.1007/s00894-015-2665-6 ↗
8. 10.1039/d1ta09286c10.1039/d1ta09286c ↗
9. 10.1007/s10570-021-04268-w10.1007/s10570-021-04268-w ↗
10. 10.1021/la025919610.1021/la0259196 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.219251010.1063/1.2192510 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb07857.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb07857.x ↗
13. 10.1007/s11249-013-0116-z10.1007/s11249-013-0116-z ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11639310.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116393 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b1110810.1021/acs.jpcb.6b11108 ↗
16. 10.1021/la061240g10.1021/la061240g ↗
17. 10.1111/jace.1754010.1111/jace.17540 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00339-014-8467-310.1007/s00339-014-8467-3 ↗
19. Smith, N., Novel approaches to the surface modification of glass by thermal poling, Materials Science and Engineering University Park, PA, Ph. D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, 2011.
20. 10.1063/1.114543910.1063/1.1145439 ↗
21. 10.1016/s0031-8914(37)80203-710.1016/s0031-8914(37)80203-7 ↗
22. 10.1080/0001873610010128110.1080/00018736100101281 ↗
23. 10.1016/s0167-5729(99)00003-510.1016/s0167-5729(99)00003-5 ↗
24. 10.1023/A:100925011125310.1023/A:1009250111253 ↗
25. 10.1021/la000770o10.1021/la000770o ↗
26. Kralchevsky P. · 2001
27. 10.3390/colloids303005510.3390/colloids3030055 ↗
28. 10.1080/0278682910895953110.1080/02786829108959531 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11340-021-00733-610.1007/s11340-021-00733-6 ↗
30. 10.1119/1.361986610.1119/1.3619866 ↗
31. 10.1201/b12247-710.1201/b12247-7 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.486289710.1063/1.4862897 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.36388410.1063/1.363884 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.20810.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.208 ↗
35. 10.1007/bf0141091310.1007/bf01410913 ↗
36. Ono, H.; Matsui, T.; Miyamoto, I., Cellulose dispersion. U.S. Patent, 6,541,627 B1, 2003.
37. 10.1021/bm300902210.1021/bm3009022 ↗
38. Ciolacu D. · Cellul. Chem. Technol. · 2011 · 45 · 13
39. 10.1111/jace.1601610.1111/jace.16016 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.08.00910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.08.009 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.01.03010.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.01.030 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.06.00810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.06.008 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0020510.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00205 ↗
44. 10.1039/c9cp04776j10.1039/c9cp04776j ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.11.00810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.11.008 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11741710.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117417 ↗
47. 10.1111/ijag.1579410.1111/ijag.15794 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0423310.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04233 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c0046910.1021/acs.biomac.0c00469 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.140498810.1063/1.1404988 ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c0069010.1021/acs.biomac.1c00690 ↗
52. MacKay J. L. · 2012 · 31310.1007/978-1-62703-056-4_15 ↗
53. 10.1002/chem.20170004410.1002/chem.201700044 ↗