Hybrid Nanoclay/Clove Essential Oil in Cellulose Acetate Bionanocomposites for Cooked Ham Active Packaging
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide This study presents a new formulation of cellulose acetate bionanocomposites impregnated with a hybrid of nanoclay and clove essential oil and its evaluation in the preservation of cooked ham. The properties of the bionanocomposites were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy, colorimetry, mechanical tests, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, as well as its application in cooked ham samples. The morphological analysis indicated a good dispersion of the nanoclay in the films, and the presence of the nanoclay impregnated with clove oil caused the water vapor permeability of the bionanocomposites to decrease. There was an increase in antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. A slight decrease was observed in the bacterial count, lipid oxidation, and pH of the cooked ham samples packaged with bionanocomposites. This study demonstrated that bionanocomposites of cellulose acetate and nano clove oil impregnated nanoclay hybrids can act as active packaging for slices of cooked ham.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Nutrition
Universidade Federal de Lavras
Graduate Program in Medicinal Plants
Aromatics and Condiments Universidade Federal de Lavras
Department of Food Science
Department of Engineering
Funding
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais · Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de NÃvel Superior
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.10076410.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100764 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.10047610.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100476 ↗
3. 10.1111/1750-3841.1588610.1111/1750-3841.15886 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.06.00910.1016/j.tifs.2021.06.009 ↗
5. 10.3390/foods1009208810.3390/foods10092088 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.06.00910.1016/j.foodcont.2017.06.009 ↗
7. 10.3390/polym1206124810.3390/polym12061248 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.10.01810.1016/j.carbpol.2018.10.018 ↗
9. 10.3390/app1120936410.3390/app11209364 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.11218610.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112186 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.19210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.192 ↗
12. 10.1111/ijfs.1601410.1111/ijfs.16014 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.06.01110.1016/j.fpsl.2018.06.011 ↗
14. 10.1007/s13197-018-3100-710.1007/s13197-018-3100-7 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.10.00310.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.10.003 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.fm.2023.10421810.1016/j.fm.2023.104218 ↗
17. 10.3390/app1315885310.3390/app13158853 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.11029310.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110293 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.11534710.1016/j.lwt.2023.115347 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.10959410.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109594 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2445710.1002/pc.24457 ↗
22. 10.1080/19440049.2013.87610510.1080/19440049.2013.876105 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.06810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.068 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.10586210.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.105862 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.11381610.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113816 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.10086210.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100862 ↗
27. 10.1111/jfpe.1359610.1111/jfpe.13596 ↗
28. 10.1590/1983-084x/14_13710.1590/1983-084x/14_137 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.09.02210.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.09.022 ↗
30. 10.1590/S0101-2061201200500002110.1590/S0101-20612012005000021 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2019.06.01010.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2019.06.010 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.crfs.2019.10.00210.1016/j.crfs.2019.10.002 ↗
33. Ramos E. M. · 2017
34. 10.1590/1981-6723.281610.1590/1981-6723.2816 ↗
35. 10.1021/jf00089a02210.1021/jf00089a022 ↗
36. 10.1590/S1413-7054201100060000110.1590/S1413-70542011000600001 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.bcab.2020.10174610.1016/j.bcab.2020.101746 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.17310.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.173 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.fbio.2020.10078510.1016/j.fbio.2020.100785 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.18310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.183 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.10054210.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100542 ↗
42. 10.1007/s11947-021-02724-w10.1007/s11947-021-02724-w ↗
43. 10.3390/polym1207145110.3390/polym12071451 ↗
44. 10.3390/polym1110165010.3390/polym11101650 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.05.04810.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.05.048 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.10916410.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109164 ↗
47. 10.3390/microorganisms1006110610.3390/microorganisms10061106 ↗
48. 10.1007/s13197-019-03642-810.1007/s13197-019-03642-8 ↗
49. 10.3390/polym1209187810.3390/polym12091878 ↗
50. 10.3390/molecules2413247110.3390/molecules24132471 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.10355910.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103559 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.fbio.2020.10063510.1016/j.fbio.2020.100635 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jics.2021.10020110.1016/j.jics.2021.100201 ↗
54. 10.1155/2020/970170110.1155/2020/9701701 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.03110.1016/j.cej.2018.05.031 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.19610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.196 ↗
57. 10.1007/s13197-019-03720-x10.1007/s13197-019-03720-x ↗
58. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.10615510.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106155 ↗
59. 10.3390/foods503005710.3390/foods5030057 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.10595110.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.105951 ↗
61. 10.3390/foods1001012110.3390/foods10010121 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.10889710.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108897 ↗