Theory, simulations and the design of functionalized nanoparticles for biomedical applications: A Soft Matter Perspective
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Functionalised nanoparticles for biomedical applications represents an incredibly exciting and rapidly growing field of research. Considering the complexity of the nano–bio interface, an important question is to what extent can theory and simulations be used to study these systems in a realistic, meaningful way. In this review, we will argue for a positive answer to this question. Approaching the issue from a “Soft Matter” perspective, we will consider those properties of functionalised nanoparticles that can be captured within a classical description. We will thus not concentrate on optical and electronic properties, but rather on the way nanoparticles’ interactions with the biological environment can be tuned by functionalising their surface and exploited in different contexts relevant to applications. In particular, we wish to provide a critical overview of theoretical and computational coarse-grained models, developed to describe these interactions and present to the readers some of the latest results in this fascinating area of research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Szabo, A. & Ostlund, N. S. Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory (McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York, 1989).
2. Parr, R. G. Density functional theory of atoms and molecules. In Horizons of Quantum Chemistry (eds Kenichi, F. & Bernard, P.) 5–15 (Springer, Kyoto, Japan, 1980)10.1007/978-94-009-9027-2_2 ↗
3. Andersen, O. K. & Jepsen, O. Explicit, first-principles tight-binding theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2571–2574 (1984).10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2571 ↗
4. Robson, B. & Garnier, J. Introduction to Proteins and Protein Engineering (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986).
5. Roco, M. C. Nanotechnology: convergence with modern biology and medicine. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 14, 337–346 (2003).10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00068-5 ↗
6. Anderson, V. J. & Lekkerkerker, H. N. Insights into phase transition kinetics from colloid science. Nature 416, 811–815 (2002).10.1038/416811a ↗
7. Martinez-Veracoechea, F. J., Mladek, B. M., Tkachenko, A. V. & Frenkel, D. Design rule for colloidal crystals of dna-functionalized particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 045902 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.045902 ↗
8. Likos, C. N. Effective interactions in soft condensed matter physics. Phys. Rep. 348, 267–439 (2001).10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00141-1 ↗
9. Frenkel, D. Soft condensed matter. Physica A 313, 1–31 (2002). Fundamental Problems in Statistical Physics.10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01032-4 ↗
10. Vácha, R., Martinez-Veracoechea, F. J. & Frenkel, D. Receptor-mediated endocytosis of nanoparticles of various shapes. Nano Lett. 11, 5391–5395 (2011).10.1021/nl2030213 ↗
11. Yi, X. & Gao, H. Kinetics of receptor-mediated endocytosis of elastic nanoparticles. Nanoscale 9, 454–463 (2017).10.1039/C6NR07179A ↗
12. Curk, T., Dobnikar, J. & Frenkel, D. Optimal multivalent targeting of membranes with many distinct receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 7210–7215 (2017).10.1073/pnas.1704226114 ↗
13. Lin, H. et al. Clathrate colloidal crystals. Science 355, 931–935 (2017).10.1126/science.aal3919 ↗
14. Mladek, B. M., Fornleitner, J., Martinez-Veracoechea, F. J., Dawid, A. & Frenkel, D. Quantitative prediction of the phase diagram of dna-functionalized nanosized colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 268301 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.268301 ↗
15. Knorowski, C., Burleigh, S. & Travesset, A. Dynamics and statics of dna-programmable nanoparticle self-assembly and crystallization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 215501 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.215501 ↗
16. Ruzicka, B. et al. Observation of empty liquids and equilibrium gels in a colloidal clay. Nat. Mater. 10, 56–60 (2011).10.1038/nmat2921 ↗
17. Farokhzad, O. C. & Langer, R. Impact of nanotechnology on drug delivery. ACS Nano 3, 16–20 (2009).10.1021/nn900002m ↗
18. Oh, N. & Park, J.-H. Endocytosis and exocytosis of nanoparticles in mammalian cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 9, 51–63 (2014).
19. Gao, H., Shi, W. & Freund, L. B. Mechanics of receptor-mediated endocytosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9469–9474 (2005).10.1073/pnas.0503879102 ↗
20. Zhang, S., Li, J., Lykotrafitis, G., Bao, G. & Suresh, S. Size-dependent endocytosis of nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 21, 419–424 (2009).10.1002/adma.200801393 ↗
21. Yuan, H., Li, J., Bao, G. & Zhang, S. Variable nanoparticle-cell adhesion strength regulates cellular uptake. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 138101 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.138101 ↗
22. Yi, X., Shi, X. & Gao, H. Cellular uptake of elastic nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 098101 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.098101 ↗
23. Yi, X. & Gao, H. Incorporation of soft particles into lipid vesicles: effects of particle size and elasticity. Langmuir 32, 13252–13260 (2016) PMID: 27951715.10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03184 ↗
24. Decuzzi, P. & Ferrari, M. The role of specific and non-specific interactions in receptor-mediated endocytosis of nanoparticles. Biomaterials 28, 2915–2922 (2007).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.013 ↗
25. Decuzzi, P. & Ferrari, M. Design maps for nanoparticles targeting the diseased microvasculature. Biomaterials 29, 377–384 (2008).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.025 ↗
26. Reynwar, B. J. et al. Aggregation and vesiculation of membrane proteins by curvature-mediated interactions. Nature 447, 461–464 (2007).10.1038/nature05840 ↗
27. Vacha, R., Martinez-Veracoechea, F. J. & Frenkel, D. Intracellular release of endocytosed nanoparticles upon a change of ligand–receptor interaction. ACS Nano 6, 10598–10605 (2012).10.1021/nn303508c ↗
28. Li, Y., Kröger, M. & Liu, W. K. Endocytosis of pegylated nanoparticles accompanied by structural and free energy changes of the grafted polyethylene glycol. Biomaterials 35, 8467–8478 (2014).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.032 ↗
29. Li, Y., Yue, T., Yang, K. & Zhang, X. Molecular modeling of the relationship between nanoparticle shape anisotropy and endocytosis kinetics. Biomaterials 33, 4965–4973 (2012).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.044 ↗
30. Ding, H.-m, Tian, W.-d & Ma, Y.-q Designing nanoparticle translocation through membranes by computer simulations. ACS Nano 6, 1230–1238 (2012).10.1021/nn2038862 ↗
31. Ding, H.-m & Ma, Y.-q Role of physicochemical properties of coating ligands in receptor-mediated endocytosis of nanoparticles. Biomaterials 33, 5798–5802 (2012).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.055 ↗
32. Yue, T. & Zhang, X. Cooperative effect in receptor-mediated endocytosis of multiple nanoparticles. ACS Nano 6, 3196–3205 (2012).10.1021/nn205125e ↗
33. Huang, C., Zhang, Y., Yuan, H., Gao, H. & Zhang, S. Role of nanoparticle geometry in endocytosis: laying down to stand up. Nano Lett. 13, 4546–4550 (2013).10.1021/nl402628n ↗
34. Dasgupta, S., Auth, T. & Gompper, G. Shape and orientation matter for the cellular uptake of nonspherical particles. Nano Lett. 14, 687–693 (2014).10.1021/nl403949h ↗
35. Dasgupta, S., Auth, T. & Gompper, G. Wrapping of ellipsoidal nano-particles by fluid membranes. Soft Matter 9, 5473–5482 (2013).10.1039/C3SM50351H ↗
36. Schubertova, V., Martinez-Veracoechea, F. J. & Vacha, R. Influence of ligand distribution on uptake efficiency. Soft Matter 11, 2726–2730 (2015).10.1039/C4SM02815E ↗
37. Li, Y., Zhang, X. & Cao, D. Nanoparticle hardness controls the internalization pathway for drug delivery. Nanoscale 7, 2758–2769 (2015).10.1039/C4NR05575F ↗
38. Shenoy, V. & Freund, L. Growth and shape stability of a biological membrane adhesion complex in the diffusion-mediated regime. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3213–3218 (2005).10.1073/pnas.0500368102 ↗
39. Canham, P. B. The minimum energy of bending as a possible explanation of the biconcave shape of the human red blood cell. J. Theor. Biol. 26, 61IN777–76IN881 (1970).10.1016/S0022-5193(70)80032-7 ↗
40. Helfrich, W. Elastic properties of lipid bilayers: theory and possible experiments. Z. Naturforsch. C 28, 693–703 (1973).10.1515/znc-1973-11-1209 ↗
41. Lipowsky, R. The conformation of membranes. Nature 349, 475–481 (1991).10.1038/349475a0 ↗
42. Lipowsky, R. The morphology of lipid membranes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5, 531–540 (1995).10.1016/0959-440X(95)80040-9 ↗
43. Nelson, D., Piran, T. & Weinberg, S. Statistical Mechanics of Membranes and Surfaces (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004).10.1142/5473 ↗
44. Safran, S. A. Statistical Thermodynamics of Surfaces, Interfaces, and Membranes, Vol. 90 (Perseus Books, Reading, MA, 1994).
45. Shang, L., Nienhaus, K. & Nienhaus, G. U. Engineered nanoparticles interacting with cells: size matters. J. Nanobiotechnol. 12, 5 (2014).10.1186/1477-3155-12-5 ↗
46. Varilly, P., Angioletti-Uberti, S., Mognetti, B. M. & Frenkel, D. A general theory of dna-mediated and other valence-limited colloidal interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 137, 094108–094122 (2012).10.1063/1.4748100 ↗
47. Gompper, G. et al. Triangulated-surface models of fluctuating membranes. Stat. Mech. Membr. Surf. 2, 359–425 (2004).10.1142/9789812565518_0012 ↗
48. Koibuchi, H., Shobukhov, A. & Sekino, H. Surface tension and laplace pressure in triangulated surface models for membranes without fixed boundary. J. Math. Chem. 54, 358–374 (2016).10.1007/s10910-015-0564-9 ↗
49. Zhang, Y. et al. Permission to enter cell by shape: nanodisk vs nanosphere. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4, 4099–4105 (2012).10.1021/am300840p ↗
50. Florez, L. et al. How shape influences uptake: interactions of anisotropic polymer nanoparticles and human mesenchymal stem cells. Small 8, 2222–2230 (2012).10.1002/smll.201102002 ↗
51. Frenkel, D. & Smit, B. Understanding Molecular Simulations 2nd edn (Academic Press, New York, 2002).10.1016/B978-012267351-1/50005-5 ↗
52. Cooke, I. R. & Deserno, M. Solvent-free model for self-assembling fluid bilayer membranes: stabilization of the fluid phase based on broad attractive tail potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 123, 224710 (2005).10.1063/1.2135785 ↗
53. Angioletti-Uberti, S., Varilly, P., Mognetti, B. M. & Frenkel, D. Mobile linkers on dna-coated colloids: valency without patches. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 128303 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.128303 ↗
54. Walkey, C. D., Olsen, J. B., Guo, H., Emili, A. & Chan, W. C. Nanoparticle size and surface chemistry determine serum protein adsorption and macrophage uptake. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 2139–2147 (2012).10.1021/ja2084338 ↗
55. Scheutjens, J. & Fleer, G. Statistical theory of the adsorption of interacting chain molecules. 1. partition function, segment density distribution, and adsorption isotherms. J. Phys. Chem. 83, 1619–1635 (1979).10.1021/j100475a012 ↗
56. Wijmans, C. et al. Polymer brushes at curved surfaces. Macromolecules 26, 7214–7224 (1993).10.1021/ma00078a016 ↗
57. Arora, A. et al. Broadly accessible self-consistent field theory for block polymer materials discovery. Macromolecules 49, 4675–4690 (2016).10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00107 ↗
58. Chithrani, B. D., Ghazani, A. A. & Chan, W. C. Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett. 6, 662–668 (2006).10.1021/nl052396o ↗
59. Chithrani, B. D. & Chan, W. C. Elucidating the mechanism of cellular uptake and removal of protein-coated gold nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes. Nano Lett. 7, 1542–1550 (2007).10.1021/nl070363y ↗
60. Shi Kam, N. W., Jessop, T. C., Wender, P. A. & Dai, H. Nanotube molecular transporters: internalization of carbon nanotube-protein conjugates into mammalian cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 6850–6851 (2004).10.1021/ja0486059 ↗
61. Immordino, M. L. et al. Stealth liposomes: review of the basic science, rationale, and clinical applications, existing and potential. Int. J. Nanomed. 1, 297–315 (2006).10.2217/17435889.1.3.297 ↗
62. LoPresti, C., Lomas, H., Massignani, M., Smart, T. & Battaglia, G. Polymersomes: nature inspired nanometer sized compartments. J. Mater. Chem. 19, 3576–3590 (2009).10.1039/b818869f ↗
63. Harrison, S. C. Viral membrane fusion. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 690–698 (2008).10.1038/nsmb.1456 ↗
64. Speir, J. A., Munshi, S., Wang, G., Baker, T. S. & Johnson, J. E. Structures of the native and swollen forms of cowpea chlorotic mottle virus determined by x-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy. Structure 3, 63–78 (1995).10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00135-6 ↗
65. Larsson, D. S., Liljas, L. & van der Spoel, D. Virus capsid dissolution studied by microsecond molecular dynamics simulations. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002502 (2012).10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002502 ↗
66. Wagner, E. Polymers for sirna delivery: inspired by viruses to be targeted, dynamic, and precise. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 1005–1013 (2011).10.1021/ar2002232 ↗
67. Blanco, E., Shen, H. & Ferrari, M. Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 941–951 (2015).10.1038/nbt.3330 ↗
68. Ferrari, M. Nanogeometry: beyond drug delivery. Nature Nanotechnol. 3, 131–132 (2008).10.1038/nnano.2008.46 ↗
69. Matsumura, Y. & Maeda, H. A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res. 46, 6387–6392 (1986).
70. Schmidt, N. W. et al. Liquid-crystalline ordering of antimicrobial peptide-dna complexes controls tlr9 activation. Nat. Mater. 14, 696–700 (2015).10.1038/nmat4298 ↗
71. Martinez-Veracoechea, F. J. & Frenkel, D. Designing super selectivity in multivalent nano-particle binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 10963–10968 (2011).10.1073/pnas.1105351108 ↗
72. Angioletti-Uberti, S. Exploiting receptor competition to enhance nanoparticle binding selectivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 068001 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.068001 ↗
73. Dubacheva, G. V., Curk, T., Auzély-Velty, R., Frenkel, D. & Richter, R. P. Designing multivalent probes for tunable superselective targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 5579–5584 (2015).10.1073/pnas.1500622112 ↗
74. Carlson, C. B., Mowery, P., Owen, R. M., Dykhuizen, E. C. & Kiessling, L. L. Selective tumor cell targeting using low-affinity, multivalent interactions. ACS Chem. Biol. 2, 119–127 (2007).10.1021/cb6003788 ↗
75. Pierleoni, C., Capone, B. & Hansen, J.-P. A soft effective segment representation of semidilute polymer solutions The Journal of Chemical Physics 127, 171102–171105 (2007).10.1063/1.2803421 ↗
76. Martinez-Veracoechea, F. J., Bozorgui, B. & Frenkel, D. Anomalous phase behavior of liquid–vapor phase transition in binary mixtures of dna-coated particles. Soft Matter 6, 6136–6145 (2010).10.1039/c0sm00567c ↗
77. Curk, T., Dobnikar, J. & Frenkel, D. Design principles for super selectivity using multivalent interactions. Preprint at arXiv:1608.01222 (2016).10.1002/9781119143505.ch3 ↗
78. Dubacheva, G. V. et al. Superselective targeting using multivalent polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 1722–1725 (2014).10.1021/ja411138s ↗
79. Angioletti-Uberti, S., Varilly, P., Mognetti, B. M., Tkachenko, A. & Frenkel, D. Communication: a simple analytical formula for the free energy of ligand-receptor-mediated interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 138, 021102–021106 (2013).10.1063/1.4775806 ↗
80. Kern, N. & Frenkel, D. Fluid–fluid coexistence in colloidal systems with short-ranged strongly directional attraction. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 9882–9889 (2003).10.1063/1.1569473 ↗
81. Yuan, H., Huang, C., Li, J., Lykotrafitis, G. & Zhang, S. One-particle-thick, solvent-free, coarse-grained model for biological and biomimetic fluid membranes. Phys. Rev. E 82, 011905 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevE.82.011905 ↗
82. Bell, G. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science 200, 618–627 (1978).10.1126/science.347575 ↗
83. Bell, G., Dembo, M. & Bongrand, P. Cell adhesion: competition between non specific repulsion and specific bonding. Biophys. J. 45, 1051–1064 (1984).10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84252-6 ↗
84. Tito, N. B., Angioletti-Uberti, S. & Frenkel, D. Communication: simple approach for calculating the binding free energy of a multivalent particle. J. Chem. Phys. 144, 161101 (2016).10.1063/1.4948257 ↗
85. Michele, L. D., Bachmann, S. J., Parolini, L. & Mognetti, B. M. Communication: free energy of ligand-receptor systems forming multimeric complexes. J. Chem. Phys. 144, 161104 (2016).10.1063/1.4947550 ↗
86. Angioletti-Uberti, S., Mognetti, B. M. & Frenkel, D. Theory and simulation of dna-coated colloids: a guide for rational design. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 6373–6393 (2016).10.1039/C5CP06981E ↗
87. Mammen, M., Choi, S.-K. & Whitesides, G. M. Polyvalent interactions in biological systems: implications for design and use of multivalent ligands and inhibitors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37, 2754–2794 (1998).10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19981102)37:20<2754::AID-ANIE2754>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
88. Fasting, C. et al. Multivalency as a chemical organization and action principle. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 10472–10498 (2012).10.1002/anie.201201114 ↗
89. Ercolani, G. Assessment of cooperativity in self-assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 16097–16103 (2003).10.1021/ja038396c ↗
90. Lundqvist, M. et al. Nanoparticle size and surface properties determine the protein corona with possible implications for biological impacts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 14265–14270 (2008).10.1073/pnas.0805135105 ↗
91. Monopoli, M. P., Åberg, C., Salvati, A. & Dawson, K. A. Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 779–786 (2012).10.1038/nnano.2012.207 ↗
92. Monopoli, M. P. et al. Physical-chemical aspects of protein corona: relevance to in vitro and in vivo biological impacts of nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 2525–2534 (2011).10.1021/ja107583h ↗
93. Salvati, A. et al. Transferrin-functionalized nanoparticles lose their targeting capabilities when a biomolecule corona adsorbs on the surface. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 137–143 (2013).10.1038/nnano.2012.237 ↗
94. Tenzer, S. et al. Rapid formation of plasma protein corona critically affects nanoparticle pathophysiology. Nature Nanotechnol. 8, 772–781 (2013).10.1038/nnano.2013.181 ↗
95. Ge, C. et al. Binding of blood proteins to carbon nanotubes reduces cytotoxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 16968–16973 (2011).10.1073/pnas.1105270108 ↗
96. Wei, Q. et al. Protein interactions with polymer coatings and biomaterials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 8004–8031 (2014).10.1002/anie.201400546 ↗
97. Szleifer, I. Protein adsorption on surfaces with grafted polymers: a theoretical approach. Biophys. J. 72, 595–612 (1997).10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78698-3 ↗
98. McPherson, T., Kidane, A., Szleifer, I. & Park, K. Prevention of protein adsorption by tethered poly(ethylene oxide) layers:experiments and single-chain mean-field analysis. Langmuir 14, 176–186 (1998).10.1021/la9706781 ↗
99. Szleifer, I. et al. Tethered polymer layers: phase transitions and reduction of protein adsorption. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 21, 423–448 (2000).10.1002/(SICI)1521-3927(20000501)21:8<423::AID-MARC423>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
100. Carignano, M. A. & Szleifer, I. Prevention of protein adsorption by flexible and rigid chain molecules. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 18, 169–182 (2000).10.1016/S0927-7765(99)00146-0 ↗