journal article·2017-08-03Open access

Discovering the building blocks of atomic systems using machine learning: application to grain boundaries

Conrad W. Rosenbrock, Eric R. Homer, Gábor Csányi, Gus L. W. Hart

npj Computational Materials· Volume 3· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Machine learning has proven to be a valuable tool to approximate functions in high-dimensional spaces. Unfortunately, analysis of these models to extract the relevant physics is never as easy as applying machine learning to a large data set in the first place. Here we present a description of atomic systems that generates machine learning representations with a direct path to physical interpretation. As an example, we demonstrate its usefulness as a universal descriptor of grain boundary systems. Grain boundaries in crystalline materials are a quintessential example of a complex, high-dimensional system with broad impact on many physical properties including strength, ductility, corrosion resistance, crack resistance, and conductivity. In addition to modeling such properties, the method also provides insight into the physical “building blocks” that influence them. This opens the way to discover the underlying physics behind behaviors by understanding which building blocks map to particular properties. Once the structures are understood, they can then be optimized for desirable behaviors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Hall, E. O. The deformation and ageing of mild steel: III discussion of results. Proc. Phys. Soc. B 64, 747–753 (1951).10.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
2. Petch, N. J. The cleavage strength of polycrystals. J. Iron Steel Inst. 174, 25–28 (1953).
3. Hansen, N. Hall–Petch relation and boundary strengthening. Scripta Mater. 51, 801–806 (2004).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.002 ↗
4. Chiba, A., Hanada, S., Watanabe, S., Abe, T. & T, Obana Relation between ductility and grain-boundary character distributions in NI3Al. Acta Metall. Mater. 42, 1733–1738 (1994).10.1016/0956-7151(94)90383-2 ↗
5. Fang, T. H., Li, W. L., Tao, N. R. & Lu, K. Revealing extraordinary intrinsic tensile plasticity in gradient nano-grained copper. Science 331, 1587–1590 (2011).10.1126/science.1200177 ↗
6. Shimada, M., Kokawa, H., Wang, Z. J., Sato, Y. S. & Karibe, I. Optimization of grain boundary character distribution for intergranular corrosion resistant 304 stainless steel by twin-induced grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater. 50, 2331–2341 (2002).10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00064-2 ↗
7. Lu, L. Ultrahigh strength and high electrical conductivity in copper. Science 304, 422–426 (2004).10.1126/science.1092905 ↗
8. Bagri, A., Kim, S.-P., Ruoff, R. S. & Shenoy, V. B. Thermal transport across twin grain boundaries in polycrystalline graphene from nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. Nano Lett. 11, 3917–3921 (2011).10.1021/nl202118d ↗
9. Meyers, M. A., Mishra, A. & Benson, D. J. Mechanical properties of nanocrystalline materials. Progr. Mat. Sci. 51, 427–556 (2006).10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
10. Wolf, D. & Yip, S. (eds.) Materials Interfaces: Atomic-Level Structure and Properties (Chapman & Hall, London, 1992).
11. Sutton, A. & Balluffi, R. Interfaces in Crystalline Materials (Oxford University Press, 1995).
12. Olmsted, D. L., Foiles, S. M. & Holm, E. A. Survey of computed grain boundary properties in face-centered cubic metals: I. Grain boundary energy. Acta Mater. 57, 3694–3703 (2009).10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.007 ↗
13. Cantwell, P. R. et al. Grain boundary complexions. Acta Mater. 62, 1–48 (2014).10.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.037 ↗
14. The interplay between grain boundary structure and defect sink/annealing behavior IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 89, 012004 (2015).10.1088/1757-899X/89/1/012004 ↗
15. Dillon, S. J., Tai, K. & Chen, S. The importance of grain boundary complexions in affecting physical properties of polycrystals. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 20, 324–335 (2016).10.1016/j.cossms.2016.06.003 ↗
16. Weins, M., Chalmers, B., Gleiter, H. & ASHBY, M. Structure of high angle grain boundaries. Scripta Metall. Mater. 3, 601–603 (1969).10.1016/0036-9748(69)90164-1 ↗
17. Ashby, M. F., Spaepen, F. & Williams, S. Structure of grain boundaries described as a packing of polyhedra. Acta Metall. Mater. 26, 1647–1663 (1978).10.1016/0001-6160(78)90075-5 ↗
18. Gleiter, H. On the structure of grain boundaries in metals. Mater. Sci. Eng. 52, 91–131 (1982).10.1016/0025-5416(82)90040-4 ↗
19. Frost, H. J., Ashby, M. F. & Spaepen, F. A catalogue of [100], [110], and [111] symmetric tilt boundaries in face-centered cubic hard sphere crystals. Harvard Div. Appl. Sci. 1–216 (1982).
20. Sutton, A. P. On the structural unit model of grain boundary structure. Phil. Mag. Lett. 59, 53–59 (1989).10.1080/09500838908214777 ↗
21. Wolf, D. Structure-energy correlation for grain boundaries in FCC metals—III. Symmetrical tilt boundaries. Acta Metall. Mater. 38, 781–790 (1990).10.1016/0956-7151(90)90030-K ↗
22. Tschopp, M. A., Tucker, G. J. & McDowell, D. L. Structure and free volume of symmetric tilt grain boundaries with the E structural unit. Acta. Mater. 55, 3959–3969 (2007).10.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.012 ↗
23. Tschopp, M. A. & McDowell, D. L. Structural unit and faceting description of Sigma 3 asymmetric tilt grain boundaries. J. Mater. Sci. 42, 7806–7811 (2007).10.1007/s10853-007-1626-6 ↗
24. Spearot, D. E. Evolution of the E structural unit during uniaxial and constrained tensile deformation. Acta Mater. 35, 81–88 (2008).
25. Bandaki, A. D. & Patala, S. A three-dimensional polyhedral unit model for grain boundary structure in fcc metals. Npj Comput. Mater. 3, 13 (2017).10.1038/s41524-017-0016-0 ↗
26. Han, J., Vitek, V. & Srolovitz, D. J. The grain-boundary structural unit model redux. Acta Mater. 133, 186–199 (2017).10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.002 ↗
27. Read, W. & Shockley, W. Dislocation models of crystal grain boundaries. Phys. Rev. 78, 275–289 (1950).10.1103/PhysRev.78.275 ↗
28. Frank, F. C. Martensite. Acta Metall. Mater. 1, 15–21 (1953).10.1016/0001-6160(53)90005-4 ↗
29. Bilby, B. A., Bullough, R. & Smith, E. Continuous distributions of dislocations: a new application of the methods of non-riemannian geometry. Proc. Roy. Soc. A-Math. Phy. 231, 263–273 (1955).10.1098/rspa.1955.0171 ↗
30. Wolf, D. A broken-bond model for grain boundaries in face-centered cubic metals. J. Appl. Phys. 68, 3221–3236 (1990).10.1063/1.346373 ↗
31. Wolf, D. Correlation between structure, energy, and ideal cleavage fracture for symmetrical grain boundaries in fcc metals. J. Mater. Res. 5, 1708–1730 (1990).10.1557/JMR.1990.1708 ↗
32. Yang, J. B., Nagai, Y. & Hasegawa, M. Use of the Frank–Bilby equation for calculating misfit dislocation arrays in interfaces. Scripta Mater. 62, 458–461 (2010).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.12.011 ↗
33. Olmsted, D. L., Holm, E. A. & Foiles, S. M. Survey of computed grain boundary properties in face-centered cubic metals-II: Grain boundary mobility. Acta Mater. 57, 3704–3713 (2009).10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.015 ↗
34. Homer, E. R., Foiles, S. M., Holm, E. A. & Olmsted, D. L. Phenomenology of shear-coupled grain boundary motion in symmetric tilt and general grain boundaries. Acta Mater. 61, 1048–1060 (2013).10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.005 ↗
35. Homer, E. R., Holm, E. A., Foiles, S. M. & Olmsted, D. L. Trends in grain boundary mobility: survey of motion mechanisms. JOM 66, 114–120 (2014).10.1007/s11837-013-0801-2 ↗
36. Bulatov, V. V., Reed, B. W. & Kumar, M. Grain boundary energy function for fcc metals. Acta. Mater. 65, 161–175 (2014).10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.057 ↗
37. Homer, E. R., Patala, S. & Priedeman, J. L. Grain boundary plane orientation fundamental zones and structure-property relationships. Sci. Rep 5, 15476 (2015).10.1038/srep15476 ↗
38. Kiyohara, S., Miyata, T. & Mizoguchi, T. Prediction of grain boundary structure and energy by machine learning arXiv:1512.03502 (2015).
39. Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136403 ↗
40. Bartók, A. P., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. On representing chemical environments. Phys. Rev. B 87, 184115 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.87.184115 ↗
41. Foiles, S. M. & Hoyt, J. J. Computation of grain boundary stiffness and mobility from boundary fluctuations. Acta Mater. 54, 3351–3357 (2006).10.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.037 ↗
42. Tadmor, E. B. & Miller, R. E. Modeling Materials: Continuum, Atomistic and Multiscale Techniques (Cambridge University Press, 2011).10.1017/CBO9781139003582 ↗
43. Cahn, J. W., Mishin, Y. & Suzuki, A. Coupling grain boundary motion to shear deformation. Acta Mater. 54, 4953–4975 (2006).10.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.004 ↗
44. Han, H., Wang, W. -Y. & Mao, B. -H. Borderline-smote: a new over-sampling method in imbalanced data sets learning. In Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Advances in Intelligent Computing - Volume Part I, ICIC'05, 878–887 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005).10.1007/11538059_91 ↗
45. Nguyen, H. M., Cooper, E. W. & Kamei, K. Borderline over-sampling for imbalanced data classification. Int. J. Knowl. Eng. Soft Data Paradigm 3, 4–21 (2011).10.1504/IJKESDP.2011.039875 ↗
46. Lemaître, G., Nogueira, F. & Aridas, C. K. Imbalanced-learn: a python toolbox to tackle the curse of imbalanced datasets in machine learning. CoRR abs/1609.06570 (2016).
47. Kelchner, C. L., Plimpton, S. J. & Hamilton, J. C. Dislocation nucleation and defect structure during surface indentation. Phys. Rev. B 58, 11085–11088 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗