Developing an interatomic potential for martensitic phase transformations in zirconium by machine learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Atomic simulations provide an effective means to understand the underlying physics of structural phase transformations. However, this remains a challenge for certain allotropic metals due to the failure of classical interatomic potentials to represent the multitude of bonding. Based on machine-learning (ML) techniques, we develop a hybrid method in which interatomic potentials describing martensitic transformations can be learned with a high degree of fidelity from ab initio molecular dynamics simulations (AIMD). Using zirconium as a model system, for which an adequate semiempirical potential describing the phase transformation process is lacking, we demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of our approach. Specifically, the ML-AIMD interatomic potential correctly captures the energetics and structural transformation properties of zirconium as compared to experimental and density-functional data for phonons, elastic constants, as well as stacking fault energies. Molecular dynamics simulations successfully reproduce the transformation mechanisms and reasonably map out the pressure–temperature phase diagram of zirconium.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Nuclear Materials and Properties · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Otsuka, K. & Wayman, C. M. Shape Memory Materials (Cambridge University Press, NY, 1999).
2. Kadau, K., Germann, T. C., Lomdahl, P. S. & Holian, B. L. Microscopic view of structural phase transitions induced by shock waves. Science 296, 1681–1684 (2002).10.1126/science.1070375 ↗
3. Zhang, J., Tasan, C. C., Lai, M. J., Dippel, A. C. & Raabe, D. Complexion-mediated martensitic phase transformation in titanium. Nat. Commun. 8, 14210 (2017).10.1038/ncomms14210 ↗
4. Harjo, S., Tsuchida, N., Abe, J. & Gong, W. Martensite phase stress and the strengthening mechanism in TRIP steel by neutron diffraction. Sci. Rep. 7, 15149 (2017).10.1038/s41598-017-15252-5 ↗
5. Bhattacharya, K., Conti, S., Zanzotto, G. & Zimmer, J. Crystal symmetry and the reversibility of martensitic transformations. Nature 428, 55 (2004).10.1038/nature02378 ↗
6. Jin, Y. M., Artemev, A. & Khachaturyan, A. G. Three-dimensional phase field model of low-symmetry martensitic transformation in polycrystal: simulation of ζ′2 martensite in AuCd alloys. Acta Mater. 49, 2309–2320 (2001).10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00108-2 ↗
7. Zong, H. X., Lookman, T., Ding, X. D., Luo, S. N. & Sun, J. Anisotropic shock response of titanium: reorientation and transformation mechanisms. Acta Mater. 65, 10–18 (2014).10.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.047 ↗
8. Zong, H. X. et al. Collective nature of plasticity in mediating phase transformation under shock compression. Phys. Rev. B 89, 220101 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.89.220101 ↗
9. Meyer, R. & Entel, P. Martensite-austenite transition and phonon dispersion curves of Fe-Ni studied by molecular-dynamics simulations. Phys. Rev. B 57, 5140–5147 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevB.57.5140 ↗
10. Rubini, S. & Ballone, P. Quasiharmonic and molecular-dynamics study of the martensitic transformation in Ni-Al alloys. Phys. Rev. B 48, 99–111 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.48.99 ↗
11. Yip, S. Handbook of Materials Modeling (Springer, Netherlands, 2007).
12. Ackland, G. J., Wooding, S. J. & Bacon, D. J. Defect, surface and displacement-threshold properties of alpha-zirconium simulated with a many-body potential. Philos. Mag. 71, 553–565 (1995).10.1080/01418619508244468 ↗
13. Lee, B.-J. & Baskes, M. I. Second nearest-neighbor modified embedded-atom-method potential. Phys. Rev. B 62, 8564–8567 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevB.62.8564 ↗
14. Perez-Prado, M. T., Gimazov, A. A., Ruano, O. A., Kassner, M. E. & Zhilyaev, A. P. Bulk nanocrystalline omega-Zr by high-pressure torsion. Scr. Mater. 58, 219–222 (2008).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.09.043 ↗
15. Ostanin, S. A. & Trubitsin, V. Y. Calculation of the P-T phase diagram of Zr in different approximations for the exchange-correlation energy. Phys. Rev. B 57, 13485–13490 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevB.57.13485 ↗
16. Hennig, R. G., Lenosky, T. J., Trinkle, D. R., Rudin, S. P. & Wilkins, J. W. Classical potential describes martensitic phase transformations between the alpha,beta, and omega titanium phases. Phys. Rev. B 78, 054121 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevB.78.054121 ↗
17. Souvatzis, P., Arapan, S., Eriksson, O. & Katsnelson, M. I. Temperature-driven alpha-to-beta phase transformation in Ti, Zr and Hf from first-principles theory combined with lattice dynamics. Epl 96, 66006 (2011).10.1209/0295-5075/96/66006 ↗
18. Poty, A. et al. Classification of the critical resolved shear stress in the hexagonal-close-packed materials by atomic simulation: Application to α-zirconium and α-titanium. J. Appl. Phys. 110, 014905 (2011).10.1063/1.3599870 ↗
19. Ahuja, R., Wills, J. M., Johansson, B. & Eriksson, O. Crystal-structures of Ti, Zr, and Hf under compression - theory. Phys. Rev. B 48, 16269–16279 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.48.16269 ↗
20. Yu, X. H. et al. High pressure phase-transformation induced texture evolution and strengthening in zirconium metal: experiment and modeling. Sci. Rep. 5, 12552 (2015).10.1038/srep12552 ↗
21. Sikka, S. K., Vohra, Y. K. & Chidambaram, R. Omega-phase in materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 27, 245–310 (1982).10.1016/0079-6425(82)90002-0 ↗
22. Errandonea, D., Meng, Y., Somayazulu, M. & Hausermann, D. Pressure-induced alpha-omega transition in titanium metal: a systematic study of the effects of uniaxial stress. Physica. B 355, 116–125 (2005).10.1016/j.physb.2004.10.030 ↗
23. Trinkle, D. R. et al. New mechanism for the alpha to omega martensitic transformation in pure titanium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 025701 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.025701 ↗
24. Gao, L., Ding, X. D., Lookman, T., Sun, J. & Salje, E. K. H. Metastable phase transformation and hcp-omega transformation pathways in Ti and Zr under high hydrostatic pressures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 4959864 (2016).
25. Willaime, F. & Massobrio, C. Development of an N-body interatomic potential for hcp and bcc zirconium. Phys. Rev. B 43, 11653–11665 (1991).10.1103/PhysRevB.43.11653 ↗
26. Baskes, M. I. & Johnson, R. A. Modified embedded atom potentials for HCP metals. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2, 147 (1994).10.1088/0965-0393/2/1/011 ↗
27. Kim, Y.-M., Lee, B.-J. & Baskes, M. I. Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for Ti and Zr. Phys. Rev. B 74, 014101 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevB.74.014101 ↗
28. Mendelev, M. I. & Ackland, G. J. Development of an interatomic potential for the simulation of phase transformations in zirconium. Philos. Mag. Lett. 87, 349–359 (2007).10.1080/09500830701191393 ↗
29. Hou, S. J., Lei, H. P. & Zeng, Z. Hydrogen influence on generalized stacking fault energies of Zr {0001} basal plane: a first-principles study. RCS Adv. 6, 54371–54376 (2016).
30. Botu, V., Batra, R., Chapman, J. & Ramprasad, R. Machine learning force fields: construction, validation, and outlook. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 511–522 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10908 ↗
31. Seko, A., Takahashi, A. & Tanaka, I. First-principles interatomic potentials for ten elemental metals via compressed sensing. Phys. Rev. B 92, 054113 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.054113 ↗
32. Huan, T. D. et al. A universal strategy for the creation of machine learning-based atomistic force fields. NPJ Comput. Mater. 3, 37 (2017).10.1038/s41524-017-0042-y ↗
33. Behler, J. Perspective: machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 145, 170901 (2016).10.1063/1.4966192 ↗
34. Deringer, V. L. & Csanyi, G. Machine learning based interatomic potential for amorphous carbon. Phys. Rev. B 95, 15 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.95.094203 ↗
35. Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 ↗
36. Behler, J. Atom-centered symmetry functions for constructing high-dimensional neural network potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 3553717 (2011).10.1063/1.3553717 ↗
37. Moriarty, J. A. Density-functional formulation of the generalized pseudopotential theory. III. Transition-metal interatomic potentials. Phys. Rev. B 38, 3199 (1988).10.1103/PhysRevB.38.3199 ↗
38. Moriarty, J. A. Angular forces and melting in bcc transition metals: a case study of molybdenum. Phys. Rev. B 49, 12431 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.49.12431 ↗
39. Aguayo, A., Murrieta, G. & de Coss, R. Elastic stability and electronic structure of fcc Ti, Zr, and Hf: a first-principles study. Phys. Rev. B 65, 092106 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevB.65.092106 ↗
40. Hu, C. E., Zeng, Z. Y., Zhang, L., Chen, X. R. & Cai, L. C. Density functional study of the phase diagram and thermodynamic properties of Zr. Comp. Mater. Sci. 50, 835–840 (2011).10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.10.017 ↗
41. Ko, W.-S., Grabowski, B. & Neugebauer, J. Development and application of a Ni-Ti interatomic potential with high predictive accuracy of the martensitic phase transition. Phys. Rev. B 92, 134107 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.134107 ↗
42. Evans, D. J. & Holian, B. L. The Nose-Hoover thermostat. J. Chem. Phys. 83, 4069–4074 (1985).10.1063/1.449071 ↗
43. Martonak, R., Laio, A. & Parrinello, M. Predicting crystal structures: the Parrinello-Rahman method revisited. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 075503 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.075503 ↗
44. Gao, L. et al. Diffuse scattering as an indicator for martensitic variant selection. Acta Mater. 66, 69–78 (2014).10.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.068 ↗
45. Klotz, S. & Braden, M. Phonon dispersion of bcc iron to 10 GPa. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3209–3212 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3209 ↗
46. Zhao, W., Zha, G. C., Shi, X. F. & Gao, S. Y. Strengthening effect of incremental shear deformation on Zr alloy sheets. J. Alloy. Compd. 650, 458–462 (2015).10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.008 ↗
47. Zhang, J. et al. Experimental constraints on the phase diagram of elemental zirconium. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 66, 1213–1219 (2005).10.1016/j.jpcs.2005.03.004 ↗
48. Liu, W., Li, B. S., Wang, L., Zhang, J. Z. & Zhao, Y. S. Elasticity of ω-phase zirconium. Phys. Rev. B 76, 144107 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevB.76.144107 ↗
49. Wenk, H.-R., Kaercher, P., Kanitpanyacharoen, W., Zepeda-Alarcon, E. & Wang, Y. Orientation relations during the α - ω phase transition of zirconium: in situ texture observations at high pressure and temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 195701 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.195701 ↗
50. Olinger, B. & Jamieson, J. C. Zirconium: phases and compressibility to 120 kilobars. High Temp. High Press. 5, 123–131 (1973).
51. Caspersen, K. J. & Carter, E. A. Finding transition states for crystalline solid–solid phase transformations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6738–6743 (2005).10.1073/pnas.0408127102 ↗
52. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
53. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
54. Kung, S. Y. Kernel Methods and Machine Learning. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014.10.1017/CBO9781139176224 ↗
55. Thompson, A. P., Plimpton, S. J. & Mattson, W. General formulation of pressure and stress tensor for arbitrary many-body interaction potentials under periodic boundary conditions. J. Chem. Phys. 131, 154107 (2009).10.1063/1.3245303 ↗