journal article·2022-11-11Open access

Data-driven discovery of 2D materials by deep generative models

Peder Lyngby, Kristian Sommer Thygesen

npj Computational Materials· Volume 8· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Efficient algorithms to generate candidate crystal structures with good stability properties can play a key role in data-driven materials discovery. Here, we show that a crystal diffusion variational autoencoder (CDVAE) is capable of generating two-dimensional (2D) materials of high chemical and structural diversity and formation energies mirroring the training structures. Specifically, we train the CDVAE on 2615 2D materials with energy above the convex hull ΔHhull < 0.3 eV/atom, and generate 5003 materials that we relax using density functional theory (DFT). We also generate 14192 new crystals by systematic element substitution of the training structures. We find that the generative model and lattice decoration approach are complementary and yield materials with similar stability properties but very different crystal structures and chemical compositions. In total we find 11630 predicted new 2D materials, where 8599 of these have ΔHhull < 0.3 eV/atom as the seed structures, while 2004 are within 50 meV of the convex hull and could potentially be synthesised. The relaxed atomic structures of all the materials are available in the open Computational 2D Materials Database (C2DB). Our work establishes the CDVAE as an efficient and reliable crystal generation machine, and significantly expands the space of 2D materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
2. Curtarolo, S. et al. Aflow: An automatic framework for high-throughput materials discovery. Computational Mater. Sci. 58, 218–226 (2012).10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.005 ↗
3. Jain, A. et al. Fireworks: a dynamic workflow system designed for high-throughput applications. Concurrency Comput. 27, 5037–5059 (2015).10.1002/cpe.3505 ↗
4. Pizzi, G., Cepellotti, A., Sabatini, R., Marzari, N. & Kozinsky, B. Aiida: automated interactive infrastructure and database for computational science. Computational Mater. Sci. 111, 218–230 (2016).10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.013 ↗
5. Gjerding, M. et al. Atomic simulation recipes: A python framework and library for automated workflows. Computational Mater. Sci. 199, 110731 (2021).10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110731 ↗
6. Mortensen, J., Gjerding, M. & Thygesen, K. Myqueue: Task and workflow scheduling system. J. Open Source Softw. 5, 1844 (2020).10.21105/joss.01844 ↗
7. Greeley, J., Jaramillo, T. F., Bonde, J., Chorkendorff, I. & Nørskov, J. K. Computational high-throughput screening of electrocatalytic materials for hydrogen evolution. Nat. Mater. 5, 909–913 (2006).10.1038/nmat1752 ↗
8. Madsen, G. K. Automated search for new thermoelectric materials: the case of liznsb. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 12140–12146 (2006).10.1021/ja062526a ↗
9. Curtarolo, S. et al. The high-throughput highway to computational materials design. Nat. Mater. 12, 191–201 (2013).10.1038/nmat3568 ↗
10. Kirklin, S., Meredig, B. & Wolverton, C. High-throughput computational screening of new li-ion battery anode materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 252–262 (2013).10.1002/aenm.201200593 ↗
11. Ørnsø, K. B., Garcia-Lastra, J. M. & Thygesen, K. S. Computational screening of functionalized zinc porphyrins for dye sensitized solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 19478–19486 (2013).10.1039/c3cp54050b ↗
12. Zhang, Z. et al. Computational screening of layered materials for multivalent ion batteries. ACS Omega 4, 7822–7828 (2019).10.1021/acsomega.9b00482 ↗
13. Chen, W. et al. Understanding thermoelectric properties from high-throughput calculations: trends, insights, and comparisons with experiment. J. Mater. Chem. C. 4, 4414–4426 (2016).10.1039/C5TC04339E ↗
14. Hachmann, J. et al. The harvard clean energy project: large-scale computational screening and design of organic photovoltaics on the world community grid. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 2241–2251 (2011).10.1021/jz200866s ↗
15. Bhattacharya, S. & Madsen, G. K. High-throughput exploration of alloying as design strategy for thermoelectrics. Phys. Rev. B 92, 085205 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.085205 ↗
16. Castelli, I. E. et al. Computational screening of perovskite metal oxides for optimal solar light capture. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 5814–5819 (2012).10.1039/C1EE02717D ↗
17. Hautier, G., Miglio, A., Ceder, G., Rignanese, G.-M. & Gonze, X. Identification and design principles of low hole effective mass p-type transparent conducting oxides. Nat. Commun. 4, 1–7 (2013).10.1038/ncomms3292 ↗
18. Yu, L. & Zunger, A. Identification of potential photovoltaic absorbers based on first-principles spectroscopic screening of materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 068701 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.068701 ↗
19. Kuhar, K., Pandey, M., Thygesen, K. S. & Jacobsen, K. W. High-throughput computational assessment of previously synthesized semiconductors for photovoltaic and photoelectrochemical devices. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 436–446 (2018).10.1021/acsenergylett.7b01312 ↗
20. Aykol, M. et al. High-throughput computational design of cathode coatings for li-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–12 (2016).10.1038/ncomms13779 ↗
21. Mounet, N. et al. Two-dimensional materials from high-throughput computational exfoliation of experimentally known compounds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 246–252 (2018).10.1038/s41565-017-0035-5 ↗
22. Chen, L.-Q. et al. Design and discovery of materials guided by theory and computation. npj Computational Mater. 1, 1–2 (2015).10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.7 ↗
23. Thygesen, K. S. & Jacobsen, K. W. Making the most of materials computations. Science 354, 180–181 (2016).10.1126/science.aah4776 ↗
24. Himanen, L., Geurts, A., Foster, A. S. & Rinke, P. Data-driven materials science: status, challenges, and perspectives. Adv. Sci. 6, 1900808 (2019).10.1002/advs.201900808 ↗
25. Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Aykol, M., Meredig, B. & Wolverton, C. Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: the open quantum materials database (oqmd). JOM 65, 1501–1509 (2013).10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
26. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The materials project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
27. Borysov, S. S., Geilhufe, R. M. & Balatsky, A. V. Organic materials database: An open-access online database for data mining. PLoS ONE 12, e0171501 (2017).10.1371/journal.pone.0171501 ↗
28. Draxl, C. & Scheffler, M. The nomad laboratory: from data sharing to artificial intelligence. J. Phys.: Mater. 2, 036001 (2019).
29. Haastrup, S. et al. The computational 2d materials database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals. 2D Mater. 5, 042002 (2018).10.1088/2053-1583/aacfc1 ↗
30. Cheon, G. et al. Data mining for new two-and one-dimensional weakly bonded solids and lattice-commensurate heterostructures. Nano Lett. 17, 1915–1923 (2017).10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05229 ↗
31. Gjerding, M. N. et al. Recent progress of the computational 2d materials database (c2db). 2D Mater. 8, 044002 (2021).10.1088/2053-1583/ac1059 ↗
32. Noh, J., Gu, G. H., Kim, S. & Jung, Y. Machine-enabled inverse design of inorganic solid materials: promises and challenges. Chem. Sci. 11, 4871–4881 (2020).10.1039/D0SC00594K ↗
33. Noh, J. et al. Inverse design of solid-state materials via a continuous representation. Matter 1, 1370–1384 (2019).10.1016/j.matt.2019.08.017 ↗
34. Kim, S., Noh, J., Gu, G. H., Aspuru-Guzik, A. & Jung, Y. Generative adversarial networks for crystal structure prediction. ACS Cent. Sci. 6, 1412–1420 (2020).10.1021/acscentsci.0c00426 ↗
35. Long, T. et al. Constrained crystals deep convolutional generative adversarial network for the inverse design of crystal structures. NPJ Comput. Mater. 7, 66 (2021).10.1038/s41524-021-00526-4 ↗
36. Zhao, Y. et al. High-throughput discovery of novel cubic crystal materials using deep generative neural networks. Adv. Sci. 8, 2100566 (2021).10.1002/advs.202100566 ↗
37. Song, Y., Siriwardane, E. M. D., Zhao, Y. & Hu, J. Computational discovery of new 2d materials using deep learning generative models. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 53303–53313 (2021).10.1021/acsami.1c01044 ↗
38. Ren, Z. et al. An invertible crystallographic representation for general inverse design of inorganic crystals with targeted properties. Matter 5, 314–335 (2022).10.1016/j.matt.2021.11.032 ↗
39. Xie, T., Fu, X., Ganea, O.-E., Barzilay, R. & Jaakkola, T. Crystal diffusion variational autoencoder for periodic material generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.06197 (2021).
40. Kingma, D. P. & Welling, M.Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114 (2013).
41. Song, Y. & Ermon, S. Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution. In Wallach, H. et al. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2019). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/file/3001ef257407d5a371a96dcd947c7d93-Paper.pdf.
42. Glawe, H., Sanna, A., Gross, E. K. U. & Marques, M. A. L. The optimal one dimensional periodic table: a modified pettifor chemical scale from data mining. N. J. Phys. 18, 093011 (2016).10.1088/1367-2630/18/9/093011 ↗
43. Belsky, A., Hellenbrandt, M., Karen, V. L. & Luksch, P. New developments in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD): accessibility in support of materials research and design. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B 58, 364–369 (2002).10.1107/S0108768102006948 ↗
44. Aykol, M., Dwaraknath, S. S., Sun, W. & Persson, K. A. Thermodynamic limit for synthesis of metastable inorganic materials. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq0148 (2018).10.1126/sciadv.aaq0148 ↗
45. Kappera, R. et al. Phase-engineered low-resistance contacts for ultrathin mos2 transistors. Nat. Mater. 13, 1128–1134 (2014).10.1038/nmat4080 ↗
46. Bell, R. E. & Herfert, R. E. Preparation and characterization of a new crystalline form of molybdenum disulfide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79, 3351–3354 (1957).10.1021/ja01570a012 ↗
47. https://cmr.fysik.dtu.dk/c2db/c2db.html.
48. Mortensen, J. J., Hansen, L. B. & Jacobsen, K. W. Real-space grid implementation of the projector augmented wave method. Phys. Rev. B 71, 035109 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevB.71.035109 ↗
49. Ong, S. P. et al. Python materials genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Computational Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013).10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
50. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗