Chemical hardness-driven interpretable machine learning approach for rapid search of photocatalysts
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Strategies combining high-throughput (HT) and machine learning (ML) to accelerate the discovery of promising new materials have garnered immense attention in recent years. The knowledge of new guiding principles is usually scarce in such studies, essentially due to the ‘black-box’ nature of the ML models. Therefore, we devised an intuitive method of interpreting such opaque ML models through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values and coupling them with the HT approach for finding efficient 2D water-splitting photocatalysts. We developed a new database of 3099 2D materials consisting of metals connected to six ligands in an octahedral geometry, termed as 2DO (octahedral 2D materials) database. The ML models were constructed using a combination of composition and chemical hardness-based features to gain insights into the thermodynamic and overall stabilities. Most importantly, it distinguished the target properties of the isocompositional 2DO materials differing in bond connectivities by combining the advantages of both elemental and structural features. The interpretable ML regression, classification, and data analysis lead to a new hypothesis that the highly stable 2DO materials follow the HSAB principle. The most stable 2DO materials were further screened based on suitable band gaps within the visible region and band alignments with respect to standard redox potentials using the GW method, resulting in 21 potential candidates. Moreover, HfSe2 and ZrSe2 were found to have high solar-to-hydrogen efficiencies reaching their theoretical limits. The proposed methodology will enable materials scientists and engineers to formulate predictive models, which will be accurate, physically interpretable, transferable, and computationally tractable.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · 2D Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (91)
Show source-provided references
1. Jafari, T. et al. Photocatalytic water splitting – the untamed dream: a review of recent advances. Molecules 21, 900 (2016).10.3390/molecules21070900 ↗
2. Luo, B., Liu, G. & Wang, L. Recent advances in 2D materials for photocatalysis. Nanoscale 8, 6904–6920 (2016).10.1039/C6NR00546B ↗
3. Zhang, H. Introduction: 2D materials chemistry. Chem. Rev. 118, 6089–6090 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00278 ↗
4. Lu, Q., Yu, Y., Ma, Q., Chen, B. & Zhang, H. 2D transition-metal-dichalcogenide-nanosheet-based composites for photocatalytic and electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reactions. Adv. Mater. 28, 1917–1933 (2016).10.1002/adma.201503270 ↗
5. Maity, N., Srivastava, P., Mishra, H., Shinde, R. & Singh, A. K. Anisotropic interlayer exciton in gese/sns van der Waals heterostructure. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 1765–1771 (2021).10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03469 ↗
6. Zhang, J., Zhang, M., Sun, R.-Q. & Wang, X. A facile band alignment of polymeric carbon nitride semiconductors to construct isotype heterojunctions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 10145–10149 (2012).10.1002/anie.201205333 ↗
7. Kumar, R., Das, D. & Singh, A. K. C2N/WS2 van der waals type-II heterostructure as a promising water splitting photocatalyst. J. Catal. 359, 143–150 (2018).10.1016/j.jcat.2018.01.005 ↗
8. Gunjakar, J. L., Kim, I. Y., Lee, J. M., Lee, N.-S. & Hwang, S.-J. Self-assembly of layered double hydroxide 2D nanoplates with graphene nanosheets: An effective way to improve the photocatalytic activity of 2D nanostructured materials for visible light-induced O2 generation. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 1008–1017 (2013).10.1039/c3ee23989f ↗
9. Zhao, Y. et al. Two-dimensional photocatalyst design: a critical review of recent experimental and computational advances. Mater. Today 34, 78–91 (2020).10.1016/j.mattod.2019.10.022 ↗
10. Kuhar, K. et al. Sulfide perovskites for solar energy conversion applications: computational screening and synthesis of the selected compound LaYS3. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 2579–2593 (2017).10.1039/C7EE02702H ↗
11. Castelli, I. E. et al. New cubic perovskites for one-and two-photon water splitting using the computational materials repository. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 9034–9043 (2012).10.1039/c2ee22341d ↗
12. Shinde, A. et al. Discovery of manganese-based solar fuel photoanodes via integration of electronic structure calculations, Pourbaix stability modeling, and high-throughput experiments. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 2307–2312 (2017).10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00607 ↗
13. Castelli, I. E. et al. New light-harvesting materials using accurate and efficient bandgap calculations. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1400915 (2015).10.1002/aenm.201400915 ↗
14. Kahle, L., Marcolongo, A. & Marzari, N. High-throughput computational screening for solid-state Li-ion conductors. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 928–948 (2020).10.1039/C9EE02457C ↗
15. Juneja, R., Yumnam, G., Satsangi, S. & Singh, A. K. Coupling the high-throughput property map to machine learning for predicting lattice thermal conductivity. Chem. Mater. 31, 5145–5151 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01046 ↗
16. Rajan, A. C. et al. Machine-learning-assisted accurate band gap predictions of functionalized MXene. Chem. Mater. 30, 4031–4038 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00686 ↗
17. Wu, L. et al. Recent advances in self-supported layered double hydroxides for oxygen evolution reaction. Research 2020, 1–17 (2020).10.34133/2020/3976278 ↗
18. Lu, X. et al. 2D layered double hydroxide nanosheets and their derivatives toward efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Nano-Micro Lett. 12, 1–32 (2020).10.1007/s40820-020-00421-5 ↗
19. Greenwood, N. N. & Earnshaw, A. Chemistry of the Elements (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997).
20. Ward, L., Agrawal, A., Choudhary, A. & Wolverton, C. A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials. npj Comput. Mater. 2, 1–7 (2016).10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.28 ↗
21. Ward, L. et al. Matminer: an open source toolkit for materials data mining. Comput. Mater. Sci. 152, 60–69 (2018).10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.018 ↗
22. Ward, L. et al. Including crystal structure attributes in machine learning models of formation energies via Voronoi tessellations. Phys. Rev. B 96, 024104 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.024104 ↗
23. Hansen, M. H. et al. An atomistic machine learning package for surface science and catalysis. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.00904 (2019).
24. Parr, R. G. & Pearson, R. G. Absolute hardness: companion parameter to absolute electronegativity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105, 7512–7516 (1983).10.1021/ja00364a005 ↗
25. Pearson, R. G. Hard and soft acids and bases, HSAB, part 1: Fundamental principles. J. Chem. Educ. 45, 581–586 (1968).10.1021/ed045p581 ↗
26. Pearson, R. G. Hard and soft acids and bases, HSAB, part II: Underlying theories. J. Chem. Educ. 45, 643–648 (1968).10.1021/ed045p643 ↗
27. Pearson, R. G. Absolute electronegativity and hardness: application to inorganic chemistry. Inorg. Chem. 27, 734–740 (1988).10.1021/ic00277a030 ↗
28. Pearson, R. G. Hard and soft acids and bases – the evolution of a chemical concept. Coord. Chem. Rev. 100, 403–425 (1990).10.1016/0010-8545(90)85016-L ↗
29. Shankar, R., Senthilkumar, K. & Kolandaivel, P. Calculation of ionization potential and chemical hardness: a comparative study of different methods. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 109, 764–771 (2009).10.1002/qua.21883 ↗
30. De Proft, F. & Geerlings, P. Calculation of ionization energies, electron affinities, electronegativities, and hardnesses using density functional methods. J. Chem. Phys. 106, 3270–3279 (1997).10.1063/1.473796 ↗
31. Mukherjee, M., Satsangi, S. & Singh, A. K. A statistical approach for the rapid prediction of electron relaxation time using elemental representatives. Chem. Mater. 32, 6507–6514 (2020).10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01778 ↗
32. Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794 (2016).10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
33. PyCaret: An open source, low-code machine learning library in python. https://pycaret.org.
34. Optuna: A hyperparameter optimization framework. https://optuna.readthedocs.io/en/stable/index.html.
35. SHAP (shapley additive explanations): A game theoretic approach to explain the output of any machine learning model. https://shap.readthedocs.io/en/latest.
36. Pandey, M. & Jacobsen, K. W. Heats of formation of solids with error estimation: the mBEEF functional with and without fitted reference energies. Phys. Rev. B 91, 235201 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.91.235201 ↗
37. Stevanović, V., Lany, S., Zhang, X. & Zunger, A. Correcting density functional theory for accurate predictions of compound enthalpies of formation: fitted elemental-phase reference energies. Phys. Rev. B 85, 115104 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevB.85.115104 ↗
38. Haastrup, S. et al. The computational 2D materials database: High-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals. 2D Mater. 5, 042002 (2018).10.1088/2053-1583/aacfc1 ↗
39. Sun, J. et al. Accurate first-principles structures and energies of diversely bonded systems from an efficient density functional. Nat. Chem. 8, 831 (2016).10.1038/nchem.2535 ↗
40. Becke, A. D. & Roussel, M. R. Exchange holes in inhomogeneous systems: a coordinate-space model. Phys. Rev. A 39, 3761 (1989).10.1103/PhysRevA.39.3761 ↗
41. Wang, Z., Guo, X., Montoya, J. & Nørskov, J. K. Predicting aqueous stability of solid with computed Pourbaix diagram using SCAN functional. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 1–7 (2020).10.1038/s41524-020-00430-3 ↗
42. Yang, J. H., Kitchaev, D. A. & Ceder, G. Rationalizing accurate structure prediction in the meta-GGA SCAN functional. Phys. Rev. B 100, 035132 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.100.035132 ↗
43. Friedrich, R. et al. Coordination corrected ab initio formation enthalpies. npj Comput. Mater. 5, 1–12 (2019).10.1038/s41524-019-0192-1 ↗
44. Datta, D. Geometric mean principle for hardness eualization: a corollary of Sanderson’s geometric mean principle of electronegativity equalization. J. Phys. Chem. 90, 4216–4217 (1986).10.1021/j100408a076 ↗
45. Kaya, S. & Kaya, C. A new equation for calculation of chemical hardness of groups and molecules. Mol. Phys. 113, 1311–1319 (2015).10.1080/00268976.2014.991771 ↗
46. Ke, G. et al. Lightgbm: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Adv. Neural Inform. Proc. Syst. 30, 3146–3154 (2017).
47. Murdock, R. J., Kauwe, S. K., Wang, A. Y.-T. & Sparks, T. D. Is domain knowledge necessary for machine learning materials properties? Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 9, 221–227 (2020).10.1007/s40192-020-00179-z ↗
48. Bartel, C. J. et al. A critical examination of compound stability predictions from machine-learned formation energies. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 1–11 (2020).10.1038/s41524-020-00362-y ↗
49. Schleder, G. R., Acosta, C. M. & Fazzio, A. Exploring two-dimensional materials thermodynamic stability via machine learning. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 20149–20157 (2019).10.1021/acsami.9b14530 ↗
50. Siriwardane, E. M., Joshi, R. P., Kumar, N. & Çakır, D. Revealing the formation energy–exfoliation energy–structure correlation of MAB phases using machine learning and DFT. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 29424–29431 (2020).
51. Esterhuizen, J. A., Goldsmith, B. R. & Linic, S. Theory-guided machine learning finds geometric structure-property relationships for chemisorption on subsurface alloys. Chem 6, 3100–3117 (2020).10.1016/j.chempr.2020.09.001 ↗
52. Wagner, N. & Rondinelli, J. M. Theory-guided machine learning in materials science. Front. Mater. 3, 28 (2016).10.3389/fmats.2016.00028 ↗
53. Lundberg, S. M. et al. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 56–67 (2020).10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 ↗
54. Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Aykol, M., Meredig, B. & Wolverton, C. Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: the open quantum materials database (OQMD). JOM 65, 1501–1509 (2013).10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
55. Ong, S. P. et al. Python materials genomics (Pymatgen): a robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013).10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
56. Malyi, O. I., Sopiha, K. V. & Persson, C. Energy, phonon, and dynamic stability criteria of two-dimensional materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 24876–24884 (2019).10.1021/acsami.9b01261 ↗
57. Shang, S., Wang, Y. & Liu, Z.-K. First-principles elastic constants of α- and θ-Al2O3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 101909 (2007).10.1063/1.2711762 ↗
58. Choudhary, K., Cheon, G., Reed, E. & Tavazza, F. Elastic properties of bulk and low-dimensional materials using van der Waals density functional. Phys. Rev. B 98, 014107 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.98.014107 ↗
59. Geurts, P., Ernst, D. & Wehenkel, L. Extremely randomized trees. Mach. Learn. 63, 3–42 (2006).10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
60. Singh, A. K., Mathew, K., Zhuang, H. L. & Hennig, R. G. Computational screening of 2D materials for photocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 1087–1098 (2015).10.1021/jz502646d ↗
61. Bredas, J.-L. Mind the gap! Mater. Horiz. 1, 17–19 (2014).10.1039/C3MH00098B ↗
62. Makuła, P., Pacia, M. & Macyk, W. How to correctly determine the band gap energy of modified semiconductor photocatalysts based on UV-Vis spectra. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 6814–6817 (2018).10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02892 ↗
63. Zhang, Y. & Xu, X. Machine learning band gaps of doped-TiO2 photocatalysts from structural and morphological parameters. ACS omega 5, 15344–15352 (2020).10.1021/acsomega.0c01438 ↗
64. Beranek, R. (Photo) electrochemical methods for the determination of the band edge positions of TiO2-based nanomaterials. Adv. Phys. Chem. 2011, 1–20 (2011).10.1155/2011/786759 ↗
65. van Schilfgaarde, M., Kotani, T. & Faleev, S. Quasiparticle self-consistent GW theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 226402 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.226402 ↗
66. Trasatti, S. The absolute electrode potential: an explanatory note (Recommendations 1986). Pure Appl. Chem 58, 955–966 (1986).10.1351/pac198658070955 ↗
67. Starr, C. Biology: Concepts and Applications (Thomson Brooks/Cole, 2005).
68. Weast, R. C., Astle, M. J. & Beyer, W. H. Handbook of Physics and Chemistry (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1986).
69. Fan, Y., Song, X., Qi, S., Ma, X. & Zhao, M. Li-III-VI bilayers for efficient photocatalytic overall water splitting: The role of intrinsic electric field. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 26123–26130 (2019).10.1039/C9TA10466F ↗
70. Li, X., Li, Z. & Yang, J. Proposed photosynthesis method for producing hydrogen from dissociated water molecules using incident near-infrared light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 018301 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.018301 ↗
71. Chen, Z. et al. Accelerating materials development for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production: standards for methods, definitions, and reporting protocols. J. Mater. Res. 25, 3–16 (2010).10.1557/JMR.2010.0020 ↗
72. Murphy, A. et al. Efficiency of solar water splitting using semiconductor electrodes. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 31, 1999–2017 (2006).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.01.014 ↗
73. Fu, C.-F. et al. Intrinsic electric fields in two-dimensional materials boost the solar-to-hydrogen efficiency for photocatalytic water splitting. Nano Lett. 18, 6312–6317 (2018).10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02561 ↗
74. Wang, Y. et al. Monolayer PtSe2, a new semiconducting transition-metal-dichalcogenide, epitaxially grown by direct selenization of Pt. Nano Lett. 15, 4013–4018 (2015).10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00964 ↗
75. Sun, X. et al. An efficient and extremely stable photocatalytic PtSe2/FTO thin film for water splitting. Energy Technol. 8, 1900903 (2020).10.1002/ente.201900903 ↗
76. Wen, Y., Zhu, Y. & Zhang, S. Low temperature synthesis of ZrS2 nanoflakes and their catalytic activity. RSC Adv. 5, 66082–66085 (2015).10.1039/C5RA12412C ↗
77. Zhang, R. et al. Direct Z-scheme water splitting photocatalyst based on two-dimensional van der waals heterostructures. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 5419–5424 (2018).10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02369 ↗
78. Lin, Y. et al. Semiconductor nanostructure-based photoelectrochemical water splitting: a brief review. Chem. Phys. Lett. 507, 209–215 (2011).10.1016/j.cplett.2011.03.074 ↗
79. Rasmussen, F. A. & Thygesen, K. S. Computational 2D materials database: Electronic structure of transition-metal dichalcogenides and oxides. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 13169–13183 (2015).10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02950 ↗
80. Chen, Y. et al. Two-dimensional nanomaterials for photocatalytic CO2 reduction to solar fuels. Sustainable Energy Fuels 1, 1875–1898 (2017).10.1039/C7SE00344G ↗
81. Kumar, R. & Singh, A. K. Electronic structure based intuitive design principle of single-atom catalysts for efficient electrolytic nitrogen reduction. ChemCatChem 12, 5456–5464 (2020).10.1002/cctc.202000902 ↗
82. Yu, J., Pan, S., Zhang, Y., Liu, Q. & Li, B. Facile synthesis of monodispersed α-Ni(OH)2 microspheres assembled by ultrathin nanosheets and its performance for oxygen evolution reduction. Front. Mater. 6, 124 (2019).10.3389/fmats.2019.00124 ↗
83. Balasubramanian, P., He, S.-B., Deng, H.-H., Peng, H.-P. & Chen, W. Defects engineered 2D ultrathin cobalt hydroxide nanosheets as highly efficient electrocatalyst for non-enzymatic electrochemical sensing of glucose and L-cysteine. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 320, 128374 (2020).10.1016/j.snb.2020.128374 ↗
84. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
85. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
86. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
87. Shishkin, M. & Kresse, G. Implementation and performance of the frequency-dependent GW method within the paw framework. Phys. Rev. B 74, 035101 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevB.74.035101 ↗
88. scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. https://scikit-learn.org/stable.
89. Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O. & Kegelmeyer, W. P. SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002).10.1613/jair.953 ↗
90. Lemaître, G., Nogueira, F. & Aridas, C. K. Imbalanced-learn: a python toolbox to tackle the curse of imbalanced datasets in machine learning. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18, 1–5 (2017).
91. aNANt: A functional materials database. http://anant.mrc.iisc.ac.in.