journal article·2022-04-28Open access

Discovering plasticity models without stress data

Moritz Flaschel, Siddhant Kumar, Laura De Lorenzis

npj Computational Materials· Volume 8· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract We propose an approach for data-driven automated discovery of material laws, which we call EUCLID (Efficient Unsupervised Constitutive Law Identification and Discovery), and we apply it here to the discovery of plasticity models, including arbitrarily shaped yield surfaces and isotropic and/or kinematic hardening laws. The approach isunsupervised, i.e., it requires no stress data but only full-field displacement and global force data; it deliversinterpretablemodels, i.e., models that are embodied by parsimonious mathematical expressions discovered through sparse regression of a potentially large catalog of candidate functions; it isone-shot, i.e., discovery only needs one experiment. The material model library is constructed by expanding the yield function with a Fourier series, whereas isotropic and kinematic hardening is introduced by assuming a yield function dependency on internal history variables that evolve with the plastic deformation. For selecting the most relevant Fourier modes and identifying the hardening behavior, EUCLID employs physics knowledge, i.e., the optimization problem that governs the discovery enforces the equilibrium constraints in the bulk and at the loaded boundary of the domain. Sparsity promoting regularization is deployed to generate a set of solutions out of which a solution with low cost and high parsimony is automatically selected. Through virtual experiments, we demonstrate the ability of EUCLID to accurately discover several plastic yield surfaces and hardening mechanisms of different complexity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Elasticity and Material Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Ghaboussi, J., Garrett, J. H. & Wu, X. Knowledge based modeling of material behavior with neural networks. J. Eng. Mech. 117, 132–153 (1991).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:1(132) ↗
2. Sussman, T. & Bathe, K.-J. A model of incompressible isotropic hyperelastic material behavior using spline interpolations of tension-compression test data. Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 25, 53–63 (2009).10.1002/cnm.1105 ↗
3. Kirchdoerfer, T. & Ortiz, M. Data-driven computational mechanics. Computer Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 304, 81–101 (2016).10.1016/j.cma.2016.02.001 ↗
4. Ibañez, R. et al. Data-driven non-linear elasticity: constitutive manifold construction and problem discretization. Comput. Mech. 60, 813–826 (2017).10.1007/s00466-017-1440-1 ↗
5. Crespo, J., Latorre, M. & Montáns, F. J. WYPIWYG hyperelasticity for isotropic, compressible materials. Comput. Mech. 59, 73–92 (2017).10.1007/s00466-016-1335-6 ↗
6. González, D., Chinesta, F. & Cueto, E. Learning corrections for hyperelastic models from data. Front. Mater. 6, 14 (2019).10.3389/fmats.2019.00014 ↗
7. Mozaffar, M. et al. Deep learning predicts path-dependent plasticity. Proc. Natl, Acad. Sci. 116, 26414–26420 (2019).10.1073/pnas.1911815116 ↗
8. Zhang, A. & Mohr, D. Using neural networks to represent von Mises plasticity with isotropic hardening. Int. J. Plasticity 132, 102732 (2020).10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102732 ↗
9. Kovachki, N. et al. Multiscale modeling of materials: computing, data science, uncertainty and goal-oriented optimization. Mech. Mater. 165, 104156 (2022).10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.104156 ↗
10. Leygue, A., Coret, M., Réthoré, J., Stainier, L. & Verron, E. Data-based derivation of material response. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 331, 184–196 (2018).10.1016/j.cma.2017.11.013 ↗
11. Dalémat, M. Measuring stress field without constitutive equation. Mech. Mater. 136, 103087 (2019).10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103087 ↗
12. Cameron, B. C. & Tasan, C. Full-field stress computation from measured deformation fields: a hyperbolic formulation. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 147, 104186 (2021).10.1016/j.jmps.2020.104186 ↗
13. Tartakovsky, A. M., Marrero, C. O., Perdikaris, P., Tartakovsky, G. D. & Barajas Solano, D. Physics informed deep neural networks for learning parameters and constitutive relationships in subsurface flow problems. Water Resour. Res. 56 e2019WR026731 (2020).10.1029/2019WR026731 ↗
14. Huang, D. Z., Xu, K., Farhat, C. & Darve, E. Learning constitutive relations from indirect observations using deep neural networks. J. Comput. Phys. 416, 109491 (2020).10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109491 ↗
15. Haghighat, E., Raissi, M., Moure, A., Gomez, H. & Juanes, R. A physics-informed deep learning framework for inversion and surrogate modeling in solid mechanics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 379, 113741 (2021).10.1016/j.cma.2021.113741 ↗
16. Chinesta, F. et al. Data-driven computational plasticity. Procedia Eng. 207, 209–214 (2017).10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.763 ↗
17. Ibañez, R. et al. A manifold learning approach to data-driven computational elasticity and inelasticity. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 25, 47–57 (2018).10.1007/s11831-016-9197-9 ↗
18. Eggersmann, R., Kirchdoerfer, T., Reese, S., Stainier, L. & Ortiz, M. Model-free data-driven inelasticity. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 350, 81–99 (2019).10.1016/j.cma.2019.02.016 ↗
19. Tang, S. et al. MAP123-EP: A mechanistic-based data-driven approach for numerical elastoplastic analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 364, 112955 (2020).10.1016/j.cma.2020.112955 ↗
20. Carrara, P., De Lorenzis, L., Stainier, L. & Ortiz, M. Data-driven fracture mechanics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 372, 113390 (2020).10.1016/j.cma.2020.113390 ↗
21. Carrara, P., Ortiz, M. & De Lorenzis, L. Data-driven rate-dependent fracture mechanics. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 155, 104559 (2021).10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104559 ↗
22. Li, X., Roth, C. C. & Mohr, D. Machine-learning based temperature- and rate-dependent plasticity model: application to analysis of fracture experiments on DP steel. Int. J. Plasticity 118, 320–344 (2019).10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.02.012 ↗
23. Vlassis, N. N. & Sun, W. Sobolev training of thermodynamic-informed neural networks for interpretable elasto-plasticity models with level set hardening. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 377, 113695 (2021).10.1016/j.cma.2021.113695 ↗
24. Huang, D., Fuhg, J. N., Weißenfels, C. & Wriggers, P. A machine learning based plasticity model using proper orthogonal decomposition. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 365, 113008 (2020).10.1016/j.cma.2020.113008 ↗
25. Shen, W., Cao, Y., Shao, J. & Liu, Z. Prediction of plastic yield surface for porous materials by a machine learning approach. Mater. Today Commun. 25, 101477 (2020).10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101477 ↗
26. Kumar, S., Tan, S., Zheng, L. & Kochmann, D. M. Inverse-designed spinodoid metamaterials. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 73 (2020).10.1038/s41524-020-0341-6 ↗
27. Zheng, L., Kumar, S. & Kochmann, D. M. Data-driven topology optimization of spinodoid metamaterials with seamlessly tunable anisotropy. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 383, 113894 (2021).10.1016/j.cma.2021.113894 ↗
28. Hartmaier, A. Data-oriented constitutive modeling of plasticity in metals. Materials 13, 1600 (2020).10.3390/ma13071600 ↗
29. Bomarito, G. et al. Development of interpretable, data-driven plasticity models with symbolic regression. Comput. Struct. 252, 106557 (2021).10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106557 ↗
30. Ibáñez, R. et al. Hybrid constitutive modeling: data-driven learning of corrections to plasticity models. Int. J. Mater. Form. 12, 717–725 (2019).10.1007/s12289-018-1448-x ↗
31. Flaschel, M., Kumar, S. & De Lorenzis, L. Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive laws. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 381, 113852 (2021).10.1016/j.cma.2021.113852 ↗
32. Flaschel, M., Kumar, S. & De Lorenzis, L. Supplementary software for “Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive laws". ETH Libr. https://doi.org/10.5905/ethz-1007-508 (2021).10.5905/ethz-1007-508 ↗
33. Flaschel, M., Kumar, S. & De Lorenzis, L. FEM Data - Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive laws. ETH Res Collect https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000505693 (2021).10.3929/ethz-b-000505693 ↗
34. Brunton, S. L., Proctor, J. L. & Kutz, J. N. Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113, 3932–3937 (2016).10.1073/pnas.1517384113 ↗
35. Simo, J. C. & Hughes, T. J. R. Computational inelasticity. No. v. 7 in Interdisciplinary applied mathematics (Springer, New York, 1998).
36. Neto, E. d. S., Peric, D. & Owen, D. Computational methods for plasticity (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).
37. Pannier, Y., Avril, S., Rotinat, R. & Pierron, F. Identification of elasto-plastic constitutive parameters from statically undetermined tests using the virtual fields method. Exp. Mech. 46, 735–755 (2006).10.1007/s11340-006-9822-x ↗
38. Ortiz, M. & Popov, E. P. Distortional hardening rules for metal plasticity. J. Eng. Mech. 109, 1042–1057 (1983).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1983)109:4(1042) ↗
39. Raemy, C., Manopulo, N. & Hora, P. On the modelling of plastic anisotropy, asymmetry and directional hardening of commercially pure titanium: a planar Fourier series based approach. Int. J. Plasticity 91, 182–204 (2017).10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.02.010 ↗
40. Voce, E. The relationship between stress and strain for homogeneous deformation. J. Inst. Met. 74, 537–562 (1948).
41. Voce, E. A practical strain-hardening function. Metallurgia 51, 219–226 (1955).
42. Armstrong, P. J. & Frederick, C. A mathematical representation of the multiaxial Bauschinger effect, vol. 731 (Central Electricity Generating Board and Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, 1966).
43. Tibshirani, R. Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Methodol.) 58, 267–288 (1996).10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x ↗
44. Coleman, T. F. & Li, Y. On the convergence of interior-reflective Newton methods for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. Math. Program. 67, 189–224 (1994).10.1007/BF01582221 ↗
45. Kolupaev, V. A. Equivalent Stress Concept for Limit State Analysis, vol. 86 of Advanced Structured Materials (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018). http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-73049-3.10.1007/978-3-319-73049-3_2 ↗
46. Rosendahl, P. L., Kolupaev, V. A. & Altenbach, H. Extreme Yield Figures for Universal Strength Criteria. In Altenbach, H. & Öchsner, A. (eds.) State of the Art and Future Trends in Material Modeling, vol. 100, 259–324 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019). http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-30355-6_12. Series Title: Advanced Structured Materials.10.1007/978-3-030-30355-6_12 ↗
47. Tresca, H. E. Mémoire sur l’écoulement des corps solides (Imprimerie impériale, 1869).
48. Schmidt, R. Über den Zusammenhang von Spannungen und Formänderungen im Verfestigungsgebiet. Ing.-Arch. 3, 215–235 (1932).10.1007/BF02079970 ↗
49. Ishlinsky, A. Y. Hypothesis of strength of shape change (in Russ.: Gipoteza prochnosti formoizmenenija). Uchebnye Zap. Moskovskogo Universiteta, Mekhanika 46, 104–114 (1940).
50. Ivlev, D. The theory of fracture of solids. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 23, 884–895 (1959).10.1016/0021-8928(59)90185-6 ↗
51. Mariotte, E. & de La Hire, P. Traité du mouvement des eaux et des autres corps fluides (Chez Claude-Jombert, 1718).
52. Glüge, R. & Bucci, S. Does convexity of yield surfaces in plasticity have a physical significance? Math. Mech. Solids 23, 1364–1373 (2018).10.1177/1081286517721599 ↗
53. Pierron, F., Avril, S. & The Tran, V. Extension of the virtual fields method to elasto-plastic material identification with cyclic loads and kinematic hardening. Int. J. Solids Struct. 47, 2993–3010 (2010).10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.06.022 ↗
54. Marek, A., Davis, F. M., Rossi, M. & Pierron, F. Extension of the sensitivity-based virtual fields to large deformation anisotropic plasticity. Int. J. Mater. Form. 12, 457–476 (2019).10.1007/s12289-018-1428-1 ↗
55. Savitzky, A. & Golay, M. J. E. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal. Chem. 36, 1627–1639 (1964).10.1021/ac60214a047 ↗
56. Flaschel, M., Kumar, S. & De Lorenzis, L. FEM Data - Discovering plasticity models without stress data. ETH Res Collect https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000534002 (2022).10.3929/ethz-b-000534002 ↗
57. Flaschel, M., Kumar, S. & De Lorenzis, L. Supplementary software for “Discovering plasticity models without stress data". ETH Lib https://doi.org/10.5905/ethz-1007-509 (2022).10.5905/ethz-1007-509 ↗