An electrostatic spectral neighbor analysis potential for lithium nitride
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Machine-learned interatomic potentials based on local environment descriptors represent a transformative leap over traditional potentials based on rigid functional forms in terms of prediction accuracy. However, a challenge in their application to ionic systems is the treatment of long-ranged electrostatics. Here, we present a highly accurate electrostatic Spectral Neighbor Analysis Potential (eSNAP) for ionic α-Li3N, a prototypical lithium superionic conductor of interest as a solid electrolyte or coating for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. We show that the optimized eSNAP model substantially outperforms traditional Coulomb–Buckingham potential in the prediction of energies and forces, as well as various properties, such as lattice constants, elastic constants, and phonon dispersion curves. We also demonstrate the application of eSNAP in long-time, large-scale Li diffusion studies in Li3N, providing atomistic insights into measures of concerted ionic motion (e.g., the Haven ratio) and grain boundary diffusion. This work aims at providing an approach to developing quantum-accurate force fields for multi-component ionic systems under the SNAP formalism, enabling large-scale atomistic simulations for such systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964).10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
2. Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133–A1138 (1965).10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
3. Buckingham, R. A. The classical equation of state of gaseous helium, neon and argon. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 168, 264–283 (1938).10.1098/rspa.1938.0173 ↗
4. Daw, M. S. & Baskes, M. I. Embedded-atom method: derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metals. Phys. Rev. B 29, 6443–6453 (1984).10.1103/PhysRevB.29.6443 ↗
5. Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 ↗
6. Artrith, N., Morawietz, T. & Behler, J. High-dimensional neural-network potentials for multicomponent systems: applications to zinc oxide. Phys. Rev. B 83, 153101 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.83.153101 ↗
7. Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. Gaussian approximation potentials: The accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136403 ↗
8. Bartók, A. P., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. On representing chemical environments. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 87, 1–16 (2013).
9. Thompson, A., Swiler, L., Trott, C., Foiles, S. & Tucker, G. Spectral neighbor analysis method for automated generation of quantum-accurate interatomic potentials. J. Comput. Phys. 285, 316–330 (2015).10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.018 ↗
10. Shapeev, A. V. Moment tensor potentials: a class of systematically improvable interatomic potentials. Multiscale Model. Simul. 14, 1153–1173 (2016).10.1137/15M1054183 ↗
11. Behler, J. Atom-centered symmetry functions for constructing high-dimensional neural network potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 074106 (2011).10.1063/1.3553717 ↗
12. Wood, M. A. & Thompson, A. P. Extending the accuracy of the SNAP interatomic potential form. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241721 (2018).10.1063/1.5017641 ↗
13. Chen, C. et al. Accurate force field for molybdenum by machine learning large materials. Data. Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 043603 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.043603 ↗
14. Li, X. G. et al. Quantum-accurate spectral neighbor analysis potential models for Ni-Mo binary alloys and fcc metals. Phys. Rev. B 98, 1–10 (2018a).
15. Lewis, G. V. & Catlow, C. R. A. Potential models for ionic oxides. J. Phys. C. Solid State Phys. 18, 1149 (1985).10.1088/0022-3719/18/6/010 ↗
16. Lee, E., Lee, K. R., Baskes, M. I. & Lee, B. J. A modified embedded-atom method interatomic potential for ionic systems: 2NNMEAM+Qeq. Phys. Rev. B 93, 144110 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.144110 ↗
17. Boukamp, B. A. & Huggins, R. A. Fast ionic conductivity in lithium nitride. Mater. Res. Bull. 13, 23–32 (1978).10.1016/0025-5408(78)90023-5 ↗
18. Zhu, Y., He, X. & Mo, Y. Strategies based on nitride materials chemistry to stabilize Li metal anode. Adv. Sci. 4, 1600517 (2017).10.1002/advs.201600517 ↗
19. Li, Y. et al. Robust Pinhole-free Li3N solid electrolyte grown from molten lithium. ACS Cent. Sci. 4, 97–104 (2018b).10.1021/acscentsci.7b00480 ↗
20. Ewald, P. P. Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale. Ann. Phys. 369, 253–287 (1921).10.1002/andp.19213690304 ↗
21. Rappe, A. K. & Goddard, W. A. III Charge equilibration for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 95, 3358–3363 (1991).10.1021/j100161a070 ↗
22. Walker, J. & Catlow, C. Defect structure and ionic conductivity in lithium nitride. Philos. Mag. A 43, 265–272 (1981).10.1080/01418618108239406 ↗
23. Rabenau, A. & Schulz, H. Re-evaluation of the lithium nitride structure. J. Less-Common Met. 50, 155–159 (1976).10.1016/0022-5088(76)90263-0 ↗
24. Kress, W., Grimm, H., Press, W. & Lefebvre, J. Lattice vibrations in lithium nitride, Li3N. Phys. Rev. B 22, 4620–4625 (1980).10.1103/PhysRevB.22.4620 ↗
25. Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901 (2000).10.1063/1.1329672 ↗
26. Togo, A. & Tanaka, I. First principles phonon calculations in materials science. Scr. Mater. 108, 1–5 (2015).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.021 ↗
27. Wu, G., Wu, S. & Wu, P. Doping-enhanced lithium diffusion in lithium-ion batteries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 118302 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.118302 ↗
28. Alpen, U. V., Rabenau, A. & Talat, G. H. Ionic conductivity in Li3N single crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 30, 621–623 (1977).10.1063/1.89283 ↗
29. Messer, R., Birli, H. & Differt, K. NMR study of diffusion in Li3N. J. Phys. C. Solid State Phys. 14, 2731–2746 (1981).10.1088/0022-3719/14/20/012 ↗
30. Wahl, J. & Holland, U. Local ionic motion in the superionic conductor Li3N. Solid State Commun. 27, 237–241 (1978).10.1016/0038-1098(78)90026-1 ↗
31. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
32. Szlachta, W. J., Bartók, A. P. & Csányi, G. Accuracy and transferability of Gaussian approximation potential models for tungsten. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 90, 104108 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.90.104108 ↗
33. Ziegler, J., Biersack, J. & Littmark, U. The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter 1 (Pergamon Press, New York, 1985).10.1007/978-1-4615-8103-1_3 ↗
34. de Jong, M. et al. Charting the complete elastic properties of inorganic crystalline compounds. Sci. Data 2, 150009 (2015).10.1038/sdata.2015.9 ↗
35. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
36. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
37. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
38. Ong, S. P. et al. Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013).10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗