Predicting defect behavior in B2 intermetallics by merging ab initio modeling and machine learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We present a combination of machine learning and high throughput calculations to predict the points defects behavior in binary intermetallic (A–B) compounds, using as an example systems with the cubic B2 crystal structure (with equiatomic AB stoichiometry). To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first application of machine learning-models for point defect properties. High throughput first principles density functional calculations have been employed to compute intrinsic point defect energies in 100 B2 intermetallic compounds. The systems are classified into two groups: (i) those for which the intrinsic defects are antisites for both A and B rich compositions, and (ii) those for which vacancies are the dominant defect for either or both composition ranges. The data was analyzed by machine learning-techniques using decision tree, and full and reduced multiple additive regression tree (MART) models. Among these three schemes, a reduced MART (r-MART) model using six descriptors (formation energy, minimum and difference of electron densities at the Wigner–Seitz cell boundary, atomic radius difference, maximal atomic number and maximal electronegativity) presents the highest fit (98 %) and predictive (75 %) accuracy. This model is used to predict the defect behavior of other B2 compounds, and it is found that 45 % of the compounds considered feature vacancies as dominant defects for either A or B rich compositions (or both). The ability to predict dominant defect types is important for the modeling of thermodynamic and kinetic properties of intermetallic compounds, and the present results illustrate how this information can be derived using modern tools combining high throughput calculations and data analytics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Carling, K. et al. Vacancies in metals: from first-principles calculations to experimental data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3862–3865 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3862 ↗
2. Nguyen-Manh, D., Horsfield, A. P. & Dudarev, S. L. Self-interstitial atom defects in bcc transition metals: Group-specific trends. Phys. Rev. B 73, 020101 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevB.73.020101 ↗
3. Ding, H., Razumovskiy, V. I. & Asta, M. Self diffusion anomaly in ferromagnetic metals: a density-functional-theory investigation of magnetically ordered and disordered Fe and Co. Acta Mater. 70, 130–136 (2014).10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.025 ↗
4. Freysoldt, C. et al. First-principles calculations for point defects in solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 253–305 (2014).10.1103/RevModPhys.86.253 ↗
5. Angsten, T., Mayeshiba, T., Wu, H. & Morgan, D. Elemental vacancy diffusion database from high throughput first-principles calculations for fcc and hcp structures. New J. Phys. 16, 015018 (2014).10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/015018 ↗
6. Medasani, B., Haranczyk, M., Canning, A. & Asta, M. Vacancy formation energies in metals: a comparison of MetaGGA with LDA and GGA exchangecorrelation functionals. Comput. Mater. Sci. 101, 96–107 (2015).10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.01.018 ↗
7. Morgan, D., Ceder, G. & Curtarolo, S. High throughput and data mining with ab initio methods. Meas. Sci. Technol. 16, 296–391 (2004).10.1088/0957-0233/16/1/039 ↗
8. Jain, A. et al. A high throughput infrastructure for density functional theory calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 50, 2295–2310 (2011).10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.02.023 ↗
9. Jain, A., Shin, Y. & Persson, K. A. Computational predictions of energy materials using density functional theory. Nat. Rev. Mater 1, 15004 (2016).10.1038/natrevmats.2015.4 ↗
10. Mueller, T., Kusne, A. & Ramprasad, R. In Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Vol 29 (eds Parrill, A. L. & Lipkowitz, K. B.) Ch. 4 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015).
11. Hautier, G., Fischer, C. C., Jain, A., Mueller, T. & Ceder, G. Finding natures missing ternary oxide compounds using machine learning and density functional theory. Chem. Mater. 22, 3762–3767 (2010).10.1021/cm100795d ↗
12. Rupp, M., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K. R. & Von Lilienfeld, O. A. Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 058301 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.058301 ↗
13. Meredig, B. & Wolverton, C. A hybrid computational-experimental approach for automated crystal structure solution. Nat. Mater. 12, 123–127 (2013).10.1038/nmat3490 ↗
14. Isayev, O. et al. Materials cartography: representing and mining materials space using structural and electronic fingerprints. Chem. Mater. 27, 735–743 (2015).10.1021/cm503507h ↗
15. Simon, C. M., Mercado, R., Schnell, S. K., Smit, B. & Haranczyk, M. What are the best materials to separate a xenon/krypton mixture?. Chem. Mater. 27, 4459–4475 (2015).10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01475 ↗
16. Pilania, G., Gubernatis, J. E. & Lookman, T. Classification of octet AB-type binary compounds using dynamical charges: a materials informatics perspective. Sci. Rep. 5, 17504 (2015).10.1038/srep17504 ↗
17. Ward, L. et al. A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials. npj Comput. Mater. 2, 16028 (2016).10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.28 ↗
18. Choudhury, S. et al. Ab-initio based modeling of diffusion in dilute bcc FeNi and FeCr alloys and implications for radiation induced segregation. J. Nucl. Mater. 411, 1–14 (2011).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.231 ↗
19. Choe, H. & Dunand, D. C. Synthesis, structure, and mechanical properties of Ni--Al and Ni-Cr-Al superalloy foams. Acta Mater. 52, 1283–1295 (2004).10.1016/j.actamat.2003.11.012 ↗
20. Teng, Z. et al. Characterization of nanoscale nial-type precipitates in a ferritic steel by electron microscopy and atom probe tomography. Scr. Mater 63, 61–64 (2010).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.013 ↗
21. Song, G. et al. Ferritic alloys with extreme creep resistance via coherent hierarchical precipitates. Sci. Rep. 5, 16327 (2015).10.1038/srep16327 ↗
22. Subramanian, P., Mendiratta, M. & Dimiduk, D. The development of Nb-based advanced intermetallic alloys for structural applications. JOM 48, 33–38 (1996).10.1007/BF03221360 ↗
23. Clemens, H. & Smarsly, W. Light-weight intermetallic titanium aluminides-status of research and development. Adv. Mat. Res. 278, 551–556 (2011).10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.278.551 ↗
24. Neumann, J. On the occurrence of substitutional and triple defects in intermetallic phases with the B2 structure. Acta Metall. 28, 1165–1170 (1980).10.1016/0001-6160(80)90099-1 ↗
25. Steinberg, D. Rules of thumb when working with small data samples. https://www.salford-systems.com/blog/dan-steinberg/rules-of-thumb-when-working-with-small-data-samples. Accessed: 29 June 2016.
26. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: the materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater 1, 011002 (2013).10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
27. Woodward, C., Asta, M., Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Density of constitutional and thermal point defects in L12 Al3Sc. Phys. Rev. B 63, 094103 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevB.63.094103 ↗
28. Ding, H. et al. PyDII: a python framework for computing equilibrium intrinsic point defect concentrations and extrinsic solute site preferences in intermetallic compounds. Comput. Phys. Commun. 193, 118–123 (2015).10.1016/j.cpc.2015.03.015 ↗
29. Jain, A. et al. Fireworks: a dynamic workflow system designed for high throughput applications. Concurr. Comput. 27, 5037–5059 (2015).10.1002/cpe.3505 ↗
30. Mooser, E. & Pearson, W. B. On the crystal chemistry of normal valence compounds. Acta Crystallogr. 12, 1015–1022 (1959).10.1107/S0365110X59002857 ↗
31. Miedema, A. R., Boom, R. & Boer, F. R. D. On the heat of formation of solid alloys. J. Less-Common Met 41, 283–298 (1975).10.1016/0022-5088(75)90034-X ↗
32. Kong, C. S. et al. Information-theoretic approach for the discovery of design rules for crystal chemistry. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52, 1812–1820 (2012).10.1021/ci200628z ↗
33. Villars, P. In Intermetallic Compounds, Vol. 1, Crystal Structures of (eds Westbrook, J. C. & Fleischer, R. L.) Ch. 1 (Wiley, 2000).
34. Pilania, G., Gubernatis, J. E. & Lookman, T. Structure classification and melting temperature prediction in octet ab solids via machine learning. Phys. Rev. B 91, 214302 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.91.214302 ↗
35. Seko, A., Maekawa, T., Tsuda, K. & Tanaka, I. Machine learning with systematic density-functional theory calculations: application to melting temperatures of single- and binary-component solids. Phys. Rev. B 89, 054303 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.89.054303 ↗
36. Spearman, C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am. J. Psychol. 15, 72–101 (1904).10.2307/1412159 ↗
37. Mann, H. B. & Whitney, D. R. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Statist 18, 50–60 (1947).10.1214/aoms/1177730491 ↗
38. Zunger, A. Systematization of the stable crystal structure of all AB-type binary compounds: a pseudopotential orbital-radii approach. Phys. Rev. B 22, 5839–5872 (1980).10.1103/PhysRevB.22.5839 ↗
39. Clementi, E. & Raimondi, D. L. Atomic screening constants from scf functions. J. Chem. Phys. 38, 2686–2689 (1963).10.1063/1.1733573 ↗
40. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2008. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org/.
41. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd edn (Springer, 2013).
42. Meredig, B. et al. Combinatorial screening for new materials in unconstrained composition space with machine learning. Phys. Rev. B 89, 094104 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.89.094104 ↗
43. Jiang, C., Chen, L.-Q. & Liu, Z.-K. First-principles study of constitutional point defects in B2 NiAl using special quasirandom structures. Acta Mater. 53, 2643–2652 (2005).10.1016/j.actamat.2005.02.026 ↗
44. Jiang, C. Site preference of transition-metal elements in B2 NiAl: A comprehensive study. Acta Mater. 55, 4799–4806 (2007).10.1016/j.actamat.2007.04.049 ↗
45. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
46. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal21amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
47. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
48. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
49. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
50. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
51. Methfessel, M. & Paxton, A. T. High-precision sampling for brillouin-zone integration in metals. Phys. Rev. B 40, 3616–3621 (1989).10.1103/PhysRevB.40.3616 ↗