Predicting accurate cathode properties of layered oxide materials using the SCAN meta-GGA density functional
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Layered lithium intercalating transition metal oxides are promising cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. Here, we scrutinize the recently developed strongly constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) density functional method to study structural, magnetic, and electrochemical properties of prototype cathode materials LiNiO2, LiCoO2, and LiMnO2 at different Li-intercalation limits. We show that SCAN outperforms earlier popular functional combinations, providing results in considerably better agreement with experiment without the use of Hubbard parameters, and dispersion corrections are found to have a small effect. In particular, SCAN fares better than Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional for the prediction of band-gaps and absolute voltages, better than PBE+U for the electronic density of states and voltage profiles, and better than both PBE and PBE+U for electron densities and in operando lattice parameters. This overall better performance of SCAN may be ascribed to improved treatment of localized states and a better description of short-range dispersion interactions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (87)
Show source-provided references
1. Tarascon, J. M. & Armand, M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 414, 359–367 (2001).10.1038/35104644 ↗
2. Winter, M. & Brodd, R. J. What are batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors? Chem. Rev. 104, 4245–4269 (2004).10.1021/cr020730k ↗
3. Whittingham, M. S. Lithium batteries and cathode materials. Chem. Rev. 104, 4271–4302 (2004).10.1021/cr020731c ↗
4. Bruce, P. G. Energy storage beyond the horizon: rechargeable lithium batteries. Solid State Ion. 179, 752–760 (2008).10.1016/j.ssi.2008.01.095 ↗
5. Goodenough, J. B. & Kim, Y. Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem. Mater. 22, 587–603 (2010).10.1021/cm901452z ↗
6. Etacheri, V., Marom, R., Elazari, R., Salitra, G. & Aurbach, D. Challenges in the development of advanced Li-ion batteries: a review. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 3243–3262 (2011).10.1039/c1ee01598b ↗
7. Thackeray, M. M., Wolverton, C. & Isaacs, E. D. Electrical energy storage for transportation-approaching the limits of, and going beyond, lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7854–7863 (2012).10.1039/c2ee21892e ↗
8. Meng, Y. S. & Arroyo-de Dompablo, M. E. Recent advances in first principles computational research of cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1171–1180 (2013).10.1021/ar2002396 ↗
9. Islam, M. S. & Fisher, C. A. Lithium and sodium battery cathode materials: computational insights into voltage, diffusion and nanostructural properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 185–204 (2014).10.1039/C3CS60199D ↗
10. Nitta, N., Wu, F., Lee, J. T. & Yushin, G. Li-ion battery materials: present and future. Mater. Today 18, 252–264 (2015).10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 ↗
11. Ceder, G. Opportunities and challenges for first-principles materials design and applications to Li battery materials. MRS Bull. 35, 693–701 (2010).10.1557/mrs2010.681 ↗
12. Goodenough, J. B. & Park, K.-S. The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 1167–1176 (2013).10.1021/ja3091438 ↗
13. Singh, V. et al. Magnetism in olivine-type LiCo(1−x)Fe(x)PO4 cathode materials: bridging theory and experiment. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 31202–31215 (2015).10.1039/C5CP04871K ↗
14. Dixit, M. et al. Thermodynamic and kinetic studies of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 as a positive electrode material for Li-ion batteries using first principles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 6799–6812 (2016).10.1039/C5CP07128C ↗
15. Liu, W. et al. Nickel-rich layered lithium transition-metal oxide for high-energy lithium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem. 54, 4440–4457 (2015).10.1002/anie.201409262 ↗
16. Schipper, F. et al. Review—recent advances and remaining challenges for lithium ion battery cathodes I. Nickel-rich, LiNixCoyMnzO2. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A6220–A6228 (2017).10.1149/2.0351701jes ↗
17. Delmas, C. et al. An overview of the Li(Ni,M)O2 systems: syntheses, structures and properties. Electrochim. Acta 45, 243–253 (1999).10.1016/S0013-4686(99)00208-X ↗
18. Ohzuku, T. & Brodd, R. J. An overview of positive-electrode materials for advanced lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 174, 449–456 (2007).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.154 ↗
19. He, P., Yu, H., Li, D. & Zhou, H. Layered lithium transition metal oxide cathodes towards high energy lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 3680–3695 (2012).10.1039/c2jm14305d ↗
20. Myung, S.-T. et al. Nickel-rich layered cathode materials for automotive lithium-ion batteries: achievements and perspectives. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 196–223 (2017).10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00594 ↗
21. Mizushima, K., Jones, P. C., Wiseman, P. J. & Goodenough, J. B. LixCoO2 (0 < x ≤ 1): a new cathode material for batteries of high energy density. Mater. Res. Bull. 15, 783–789 (1980).10.1016/0025-5408(80)90012-4 ↗
22. Ohzuku, T. & Makimura, Y. Layered lithium insertion material of LiCo1/3Ni1/3Mn1/3O2 for lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Lett. 30, 642–643 (2001).10.1246/cl.2001.642 ↗
23. Belharouak, I., Sun, Y. K., Liu, J. & Amine, K. Li(Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)O2 as a suitable cathode for high power applications. J. Power Sources 123, 247–252 (2003).10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00529-9 ↗
24. Noh, H.-J., Youn, S., Yoon, C. S. & Sun, Y.-K. Comparison of the structural and electrochemical properties of layered Li[NixCoyMnz]O2 (x = 1/3, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 and 0.85) cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 233, 121–130 (2013).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.063 ↗
25. Dixit, M., Markovsky, B., Schipper, F., Aurbach, D. & Major, D. T. Origin of structural degradation during cycling and low thermal stability of Ni-rich layered transition metal-based electrode materials. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 22628–22636 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b06122 ↗
26. Hwang, S. et al. Investigating local degradation and thermal stability of charged nickel-based cathode materials through real-time electron microscopy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 15140–15147 (2014).10.1021/am503278f ↗
27. Yang, J. & Xia, Y. Suppressing the phase transition of the layered Ni-rich oxide cathode during high-voltage cycling by introducing low-content Li2MnO3. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 1297–1308 (2016).10.1021/acsami.5b09938 ↗
28. Schipper, F. et al. Stabilizing nickel-rich layered cathode materials by a high-charge cation doping strategy: zirconium-doped LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 16073–16084 (2016).10.1039/C6TA06740A ↗
29. Arroyo y de Dompablo, M. E., Van der Ven, A. & Ceder, G. First-principles calculations of lithium ordering and phase stability on LixNiO2. Phys. Rev. B 66, 064112 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevB.66.064112 ↗
30. Seo, D.-H. et al. The structural and chemical origin of the oxygen redox activity in layered and cation-disordered Li-excess cathode materials. Nat. Chem. 8, 692–697 (2016).10.1038/nchem.2524 ↗
31. Ceder, G., Hautier, G., Jain, A. & Ong, S. P. Recharging lithium battery research with first-principles methods. MRS Bull. 36, 185–191 (2011).10.1557/mrs.2011.31 ↗
32. Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 140(4A), A1133–A1138 (1965).10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
33. Aydinol, M. K., Kohan, A. F., Ceder, G., Cho, K. & Joannopoulos, J. Ab initio study of lithium intercalation in metal oxides and metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 56, 1354–1365 (1997).10.1103/PhysRevB.56.1354 ↗
34. Aydinol, M. K., Kohan, A. F. & Ceder, G. Ab initio calculation of the intercalation voltage of lithium-transition-metal oxide electrodes for rechargeable batteries. J. Power Sources 68, 664–668 (1997).10.1016/S0378-7753(96)02638-9 ↗
35. Aydinol, M. K. & Ceder, G. First-principles prediction of insertion potentials in Li–Mn oxides for secondary Li batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 3832–3835 (1997).10.1149/1.1838099 ↗
36. Langreth, D. C. & Mehl, M. J. Beyond the local-density approximation in calculations of ground-state electronic properties. Phys. Rev. B 28, 1809–1834 (1983).10.1103/PhysRevB.28.1809 ↗
37. Deiss, E., Wokaun, A., Barras, J. L., Daul, C. & Dufek, P. Average voltage, energy density, and specific energy of lithium-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 3877–3881 (1997).10.1149/1.1838105 ↗
38. Meng, Y. S. & Arroyo-de Dompablo, M. E. First principles computational materials design for energy storage materials in lithium ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2, 589–609 (2009).10.1039/b901825e ↗
39. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
40. Anisimov, V. I., Zaanen, J. & Andersen, O. K. Band theory and Mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner I. Phys. Rev. B 44, 943–954 (1991).10.1103/PhysRevB.44.943 ↗
41. Vladimir, I. A., Aryasetiawan, F. & Lichtenstein, A. I. First-principles calculations of the electronic structure and spectra of strongly correlated systems: the LDA+U method. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 9, 767–808 (1997).10.1088/0953-8984/9/4/002 ↗
42. Zhou, F., Cococcioni, M., Marianetti, C. A., Morgan, D. & Ceder, G. First-principles prediction of redox potentials in transition-metal compounds with LDA+U. Phys. Rev. B 70, 235121 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevB.70.235121 ↗
43. Dixit, M., Markovsky, B., Aurbach, D. & Major, D. T. Unraveling the effects of Al doping on the electrochemical properties of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 using first principles. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A6359–A6365 (2017).10.1149/2.0561701jes ↗
44. Singh, V., Kosa, M., Majhi, K. & Major, D. T. Putting DFT to the test: a first principles study of electronic, magnetic and optical properties of Co3O4. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 64–72 (2015).10.1021/ct500770m ↗
45. Mattsson, A. E. In pursuit of the “Divine” functional. Science 298, 759–760 (2002).10.1126/science.1077710 ↗
46. Sun, J. W., Ruzsinszky, A. & Perdew, J. P. Strongly constrained and appropriately normed semilocal density functional. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036402 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.036402 ↗
47. Sun, J. et al. Accurate first-principles structures and energies of diversely bonded systems from an efficient density functional. Nat. Chem. 8, 831–836 (2016).10.1038/nchem.2535 ↗
48. Perdew, J. P., Sun, J., Martin, R. M. & Delley, B. Semilocal density functionals and constraint satisfaction. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 116, 847–851 (2016).10.1002/qua.25100 ↗
49. Zhang, Y. et al. Efficient first-principles prediction of solid stability: towards chemical accuracy. npj Comput. Mater. 4, 9 (2018).10.1038/s41524-018-0065-z ↗
50. Isaacs, E. B. & Wolverton, C. Performance of the strongly constrained and appropriately normed density functional for solid-state materials. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 063801 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.063801 ↗
51. Peng, H. & Perdew, J. P. Rehabilitation of the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof generalized gradient approximation for layered materials. Phys. Rev. B 95, 081105 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.95.081105 ↗
52. Hinuma, Y., Hayashi, H., Kumagai, Y., Tanaka, I. & Oba, F. Comparison of approximations in density functional theory calculations: energetics and structure of binary oxides. Phys. Rev. B 96, 094102 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.094102 ↗
53. Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Perdew, J. P. & Wu, X. Comparative first-principles studies of prototypical ferroelectric materials by LDA, GGA, and SCAN meta-GGA. Phys. Rev. B 96, 035143 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.035143 ↗
54. Kennedy, B. J. et al. Low-temperature structure and the ferroelectric phase transitions in the CdTiO3 perovskite. Phys. Rev. B 96, 214105 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.214105 ↗
55. Bokdam, M., Lahnsteiner, J., Ramberger, B., Schafer, T. & Kresse, G. Assessing density functionals using many body theory for hybrid perovskites. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 145501 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.145501 ↗
56. Chen, T., Sai Gautam, G., Huang, W. & Ceder, G. First-principles study of the voltage profile and mobility of Mg intercalation in a chromium oxide spinel. Chem. Mater. 30, 153–162 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04038 ↗
57. Huang, L. F. & Rondinelli, J. M. Electrochemical phase diagrams for Ti oxides from density functional calculations. Phys. Rev. B 92, 245126 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.245126 ↗
58. Kitchaev, D. A. et al. Energetics of MnO2 polymorphs in density functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 93, 045132 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.045132 ↗
59. Huang, L. F. & Rondinelli, J. M. Electrochemical phase diagrams of Ni from ab initio simulations: role of exchange interactions on accuracy. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 475501 (2017).10.1088/1361-648X/aa9140 ↗
60. Amatucci, G. G., Tarascon, J. M. & Klein, L. C. CoO2, the end member of the LixCoO2 solid solution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 143, 1114–1123 (1996).10.1149/1.1836594 ↗
61. Koyama, Y., Tanaka, I., Adachi, H., Makimura, Y. & Ohzuku, T. Crystal and electronic structures of superstructural Li1−x[Co1/3Ni1/3Mn1/3]O2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1). J. Power Sources 119-121, 644–648 (2003).10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00194-0 ↗
62. Aykol, M., Kim, S. & Wolverton, C. van der Waals interactions in layered lithium cobalt oxides. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 19053–19058 (2015).10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06240 ↗
63. de Biasi, L. et al. Between Scylla and Charybdis: balancing among structural stability and energy density of layered NCM cathode materials for advanced lithium-ion batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 26163–26171 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b06363 ↗
64. Perdew, J. P. Density functional theory and the band gap problem. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 28(S19), 497–523 (1985).10.1002/qua.560280846 ↗
65. Yang, Z.-h, Peng, H., Sun, J. & Perdew, J. P. More realistic band gaps from meta-generalized gradient approximations: only in a generalized Kohn–Sham scheme. Phys. Rev. B 93, 205205 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.205205 ↗
66. Laubach, S. et al. Changes in the crystal and electronic structure of LiCoO2 and LiNiO2 upon Li intercalation and de-intercalation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 3278–3289 (2009).10.1039/b901200a ↗
67. Kong, F. et al. Ab initio study of doping effects on LiMnO2 and Li2MnO3 cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 8489–8500 (2015).10.1039/C5TA01445J ↗
68. Galakhov, V. R. et al. Electronic structure of LiNiO2, LiFeO2 and LiCrO2: X-ray photoelectron and X-ray emission study. Solid State Commun. 95, 347–351 (1995).10.1016/0038-1098(95)00279-0 ↗
69. van Elp, J. et al. Electronic structure of CoO, Li-doped CoO, and LiCoO2. Phys. Rev. B 44, 6090–6103 (1991).10.1103/PhysRevB.44.6090 ↗
70. Ensling, D., Thissen, A., Laubach, S., Schmidt, P. C. & Jaegermann, W. Electronic structure of LiCoO2 thin films: a combined photoemission spectroscopy and density functional theory study. Phys. Rev. B 82, 195431 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.82.195431 ↗
71. Galakhov, V. R. et al. Electronic structure of LiMnO: X-ray emission and photoelectron spectra and band structure calculations. Eur. Phys. J. B 14, 281–286 (2000).10.1007/s100510050130 ↗
72. Adamo, C. & Barone, V. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6158–6170 (1999).10.1063/1.478522 ↗
73. Medvedev, M. G., Bushmarinov, I. S., Sun, J., Perdew, J. P. & Lyssenko, K. A. Density functional theory is straying from the path toward the exact functional. Science 355, 49–52 (2017).10.1126/science.aah5975 ↗
74. Brorsen, K. R., Yang, Y., Pak, M. V. & Hammes-Schiffer, S. Is the accuracy of density functional theory for atomization energies and densities in bonding regions correlated? J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 2076–2081 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00774 ↗
75. Van der Ven, A., Aydinol, M. K., Ceder, G., Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. First-principles investigation of phase stability in LixCoO2. Phys. Rev. B 58, 2975–2987 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevB.58.2975 ↗
76. Mizutani, A., Sugiura, K., Ohta, H. & Koumoto, K. Epitaxial film growth of LixCoO2 (0.6 ≤ x ≤ 0.9) via topotactic ion exchange of Na0.8CoO2. Cryst. Growth Des. 8, 755–758 (2008).10.1021/cg060637f ↗
77. Moshtev, R. V., Zlatilova, P., Manev, V. & Sato, A. The LiNiO2 solid solution as a cathode material for rechargeable lithium batteries. J. Power Sources 54, 329–333 (1995).10.1016/0378-7753(94)02094-J ↗
78. Ohzuku, T., Ueda, A. & Nagayama, M. Electrochemistry and structural chemistry of LiNiO2 (R3̅m) for 4 Volt secondary lithium cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, 1862–1870 (1993).10.1149/1.2220730 ↗
79. Julien, C., Mauger, A., Zaghib, K. & Groult, H. Comparative Issues of cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. Inorganics 2, 132–154 (2014).10.3390/inorganics2010132 ↗
80. Bruce, P. G., Armstrong, A. R. & Gitzendanner, R. L. New intercalation compounds for lithium batteries: layered LiMnO2. J. Mater. Chem. 9, 193–198 (1999).10.1039/a803938k ↗
81. Shi, Y. et al. Understanding the electrochemical properties of naphthalene diimide: implication for stable and high-rate lithium-ion battery electrodes. Chem. Mater. 30, 3508–3517 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01304 ↗
82. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
83. Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
84. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
85. Dudarev, S. L., Botton, G. A., Savrasov, S. Y., Humphreys, C. J. & Sutton, A. P. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA+U study. Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505 ↗
86. Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).10.1063/1.3382344 ↗
87. Croguennec, L., Deniard, P., Brec, R. & Lecerf, A. Nature of the stacking faults in orthorhombic LiMnO2. J. Mater. Chem. 7, 511–516 (1997).10.1039/a604947h ↗