journal article·2019-02-01Open access

Deep learning analysis of defect and phase evolution during electron beam-induced transformations in WS2

Artem Maksov, Ondrej Dyck, Kai Wang, Kai Xiao, David B. Geohegan, Bobby G. Sumpter, Rama K. Vasudevan, Stephen Jesse, Sergei V. Kalinin, Maxim Ziatdinov

npj Computational Materials· Volume 5· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Recent advances in scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) allow the real-time visualization of solid-state transformations in materials, including those induced by an electron beam and temperature, with atomic resolution. However, despite the ever-expanding capabilities for high-resolution data acquisition, the inferred information about kinetics and thermodynamics of the process, and single defect dynamics and interactions is minimal. This is due to the inherent limitations of manual ex situ analysis of the collected volumes of data. To circumvent this problem, we developed a deep-learning framework for dynamic STEM imaging that is trained to find the lattice defects and apply it for mapping solid state reactions and transformations in layered WS2. The trained deep-learning model allows extracting thousands of lattice defects from raw STEM data in a matter of seconds, which are then classified into different categories using unsupervised clustering methods. We further expanded our framework to extract parameters of diffusion for sulfur vacancies and analyzed transition probabilities associated with switching between different configurations of defect complexes consisting of Mo dopant and sulfur vacancy, providing insight into point-defect dynamics and reactions. This approach is universal and its application to beam-induced reactions allows mapping chemical transformation pathways in solids at the atomic level.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. Attygalle, A. B., Svatos, A., Wilcox, C. & Voerman, S. Gas-phase infrared spectroscopy for determination of double bond configuration of monounsaturated compounds. Anal. Chem. 66, 1696–1703 (1994).10.1021/ac00082a016 ↗
2. Iskra, A. et al. Infrared spectroscopy of gas-phase M+(CO2)n (M=Co, Rh, Ir) ion–molecule complexes. J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 133–140 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpca.6b10902 ↗
3. Holman, R. W., Rozeboom, M. D., Gross, M. L. & Warner, C. D. Mass spectrometry for investigations of gas-phase radical cation chemistry: the two step cycloaddition of the benzene radical cation and 1,3-butadiene. Tetrahedron 42, 6235–6244 (1986).10.1016/S0040-4020(01)88085-6 ↗
4. Jameson, C. J. Gas-phase NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 91, 1375–1395 (1991).10.1021/cr00007a005 ↗
5. Frank, I., Parrinello, M. & Klamt, A. Insight into chemical reactions from first-principles simulations: the mechanism of the gas-phase reaction of OH radicals with ketones. J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 3614–3617 (1998).10.1021/jp980531y ↗
6. Snyder, J. A., Hanway, D., Mendez, J., Jamka, A. J. & Tao, F.-M. A density functional theory study of the gas-phase hydrolysis of dinitrogen pentoxide. J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 9355–9358 (1999).10.1021/jp992526f ↗
7. Frank, J. Time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy: recent progress. J. Struct. Biol. 200, 303–306 (2017).10.1016/j.jsb.2017.06.005 ↗
8. Pande, K. et al. Femtosecond structural dynamics drives the trans/cis isomerization in photoactive yellow protein. Science 352, 725 (2016).10.1126/science.aad5081 ↗
9. Barmak, K. et al. Ex situ characterization of phase transformations and associated microstructures in polycrystalline thin films. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 17, 1950–1957 (1999).10.1116/1.581709 ↗
10. Lucadamo, G., Barmak, K., Carpenter, D. T. & Rickman, J. M. Microstructure evolution during solid state reactions of Nb/Al multilayers. Acta Mater. 49, 2813–2826 (2001).10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00176-8 ↗
11. Suresh, S. Colloid modspriel for atoms. Nat. Mater. 5, 253 (2006).10.1038/nmat1621 ↗
12. Taheri, M. L. et al. Current status and future directions for in situ transmission electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 170, 86–95 (2016).10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.08.007 ↗
13. Jiang, N. et al. Atom-by-atom fabrication by electron beam via induced phase transformations. Mrs. Bull. 42, 653–659 (2017).10.1557/mrs.2017.183 ↗
14. Kalinin, S. V. & Pennycook, S. J. Single-atom fabrication with electron and ion beams: from surfaces and two-dimensional materials toward three-dimensional atom-by-atom assembly. Mrs. Bull. 42, 637–643 (2017).10.1557/mrs.2017.186 ↗
15. Mishra, R., Ishikawa, R., Lupini, A. R. & Pennycook, S. J. Single-atom dynamics in scanning transmission electron microscopy. Mrs. Bull. 42, 644–652 (2017).10.1557/mrs.2017.187 ↗
16. Zhao, X. et al. Engineering and modifying two-dimensional materials by electron beams. Mrs. Bull. 42, 667–676 (2017).10.1557/mrs.2017.184 ↗
17. Susi, T. et al. Towards atomically precise manipulation of 2D nanostructures in the electron microscope. 2D Mater. 4, 042004 (2017).10.1088/2053-1583/aa878f ↗
18. Zheng, H. & Zhu, Y. Perspectives on in situ electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 180, 188–196 (2017).10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.03.022 ↗
19. Jesse, S. et al. Directing matter: toward atomic-scale 3D nanofabrication. ACS Nano 10, 5600–5618 (2016).10.1021/acsnano.6b02489 ↗
20. Gonzalez-Martinez, I. et al. Electron-beam induced synthesis of nanostructures: a review. Nanoscale 8, 11340–11362 (2016).10.1039/C6NR01941B ↗
21. He, Z. et al. Atomic structure and dynamics of metal dopant pairs in graphene. Nano Lett. 14, 3766–3772 (2014).10.1021/nl500682j ↗
22. Robertson, A. W. et al. Stability and dynamics of the tetravacancy in graphene. Nano Lett. 14, 1634–1642 (2014).10.1021/nl500119p ↗
23. Robertson, A. W. et al. Dynamics of single Fe atoms in graphene vacancies. Nano Lett. 13, 1468–1475 (2013).10.1021/nl304495v ↗
24. Yang, Z. et al. Direct observation of atomic dynamics and silicon doping at a topological defect in graphene. Angew. Chem. 126, 9054–9058 (2014).10.1002/ange.201403382 ↗
25. Lee, J., Zhou, W., Pennycook, S. J., Idrobo, J.-C. & Pantelides, S. T. Direct visualization of reversible dynamics in a Si6 cluster embedded in a graphene pore. Nat. Commun. 4, 1650 (2013).10.1038/ncomms2671 ↗
26. Kotakoski, J. et al. Stone–Wales-type transformations in carbon nanostructures driven by electron irradiation. Phys. Rev. B 83, 245420 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.83.245420 ↗
27. Kotakoski, J., Mangler, C. & Meyer, J. C. Imaging atomic-level random walk of a point defect in graphene. Nat. Commun. 5, 3991 (2014).10.1038/ncomms4991 ↗
28. Kotakoski, J., Krasheninnikov, A. V., Kaiser, U. & Meyer, J. C. From point defects in graphene to two-dimensional amorphous carbon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 105505 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.105505 ↗
29. Ishikawa, R. et al. Direct observation of dopant atom diffusion in a bulk semiconductor crystal enhanced by a large size mismatch. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 155501 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.155501 ↗
30. Susi, T. et al. Atomistic description of electron beam damage in nitrogen-doped graphene and single-walled carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano 6, 8837–8846 (2012).10.1021/nn303944f ↗
31. Lehtinen, O., Kurasch, S., Krasheninnikov, A. V. & Kaiser, U. Atomic scale study of the life cycle of a dislocation in graphene from birth to annihilation. Nat. Commun. 4, 2098 (2013).10.1038/ncomms3098 ↗
32. Robertson, A. W. et al. Partial dislocations in graphene and their atomic level migration dynamics. Nano Lett. 15, 5950–5955 (2015).10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02080 ↗
33. Warner, J. H. et al. Dislocation-driven deformations in graphene. Science 337, 209–212 (2012).10.1126/science.1217529 ↗
34. Zhao, J. et al. Free-standing single-atom-thick iron membranes suspended in graphene pores. Science 343, 1228–1232 (2014).10.1126/science.1245273 ↗
35. Quang, H. T. et al. In situ observations of free-standing graphene-like mono- and bilayer ZnO membranes. ACS Nano 9, 11408–11413 (2015).10.1021/acsnano.5b05481 ↗
36. Wang, H. et al. Unraveling the atomic structure of ultrafine iron clusters. Sci. Rep. 2, 995 (2012).10.1038/srep00995 ↗
37. Ta, H. Q. et al. Single Cr atom catalytic growth of graphene. Nano Res. 11, 2405–2411 (2017).10.1007/s12274-017-1861-3 ↗
38. Zhao, J. et al. Direct in situ observations of single Fe atom catalytic processes and anomalous diffusion at graphene edges. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, 15641–15646 (2014).10.1073/pnas.1412962111 ↗
39. Wang, W. L. et al. Direct observation of a long-lived single-atom catalyst chiseling atomic structures in graphene. Nano Lett. 14, 450–455 (2014).10.1021/nl403327u ↗
40. Ramasse, Q. M. et al. Direct experimental evidence of metal-mediated etching of suspended graphene. ACS Nano 6, 4063–4071 (2012).10.1021/nn300452y ↗
41. Zan, R., Bangert, U., Ramasse, Q. & Novoselov, K. S. Metal−graphene interaction studied via atomic resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett. 11, 1087–1092 (2011).10.1021/nl103980h ↗
42. Dorp, W. Fv. et al. Nanometer-scale lithography on microscopically clean graphene. Nanotechnology 22, 505303 (2011).10.1088/0957-4484/22/50/505303 ↗
43. Zan, R., Ramasse, Q. M., Bangert, U. & Novoselov, K. S. Graphene reknits its holes. Nano Lett. 12, 3936–3940 (2012).10.1021/nl300985q ↗
44. Lin, J. et al. Flexible metallic nanowires with self-adaptive contacts to semiconducting transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 436 (2014).10.1038/nnano.2014.81 ↗
45. Jesse, S. et al. Atomic-level sculpting of crystalline oxides: toward bulk nanofabrication with single atomic plane precision. Small 11, 5895–5900 (2015).10.1002/smll.201502048 ↗
46. Jesse, S. et al. Direct atomic fabrication and dopant positioning in Si using electron beams with active real-time image-based feedback. Nanotechnology 29, 255303 (2018).10.1088/1361-6528/aabb79 ↗
47. Chuvilin, A., Kaiser, U., Bichoutskaia, E., Besley, N. A. & Khlobystov, A. N. Direct transformation of graphene to fullerene. Nat. Chem. 2, 450 (2010).10.1038/nchem.644 ↗
48. Girit, Ç. Ö. Graphene at the edge: stability and dynamics. Science 323, 1705 (2009).10.1126/science.1166999 ↗
49. Kotakoski, J., Santos-Cottin, D. & Krasheninnikov, A. V. Stability of graphene edges under electron beam: equilibrium energetics versus dynamic effects. ACS Nano 6, 671–676 (2012).10.1021/nn204148h ↗
50. Susi, T. et al. Silicon-carbon bond inversions driven by 60-keV electrons in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 115501 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.115501 ↗
51. Susi, T., Meyer, J. C. & Kotakoski, J. Manipulating low-dimensional materials down to the level of single atoms with electron irradiation. Ultramicroscopy 180, 163–172 (2017).10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.03.005 ↗
52. Dyck, O., Kim, S., Kalinin, S. V. & Jesse, S. Placing single atoms in graphene with a scanning transmission electron microscope. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 113104 (2017).10.1063/1.4998599 ↗
53. Dyck, O. et al. Building structures atom by atom via electron beam manipulation. Small 14, 1801771 (2018).10.1002/smll.201801771 ↗
54. Eigler, D. M. & Schweizer, E. K. Positioning single atoms with a scanning tunnelling microscope. Nature 344, 524–526 (1990).10.1038/344524a0 ↗
55. Kalinin, S. V., Borisevich, A. & Jesse, S. Fire up the atom forge. Nature 539, 485–487 (2016).10.1038/539485a ↗
56. Vasudevan, R. K. et al. Mapping mesoscopic phase evolution during E-beam induced transformations via deep learning of atomically resolved images. npj Comput. Mater. 4, 30 (2018).10.1038/s41524-018-0086-7 ↗
57. Ziatdinov, M. et al. Deep learning of atomically resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy images: chemical identification and tracking local transformations. ACS Nano 11, 12742–12752 (2017).10.1021/acsnano.7b07504 ↗
58. Belianinov, A. et al. Identification of phases, symmetries and defects through local crystallography. Nat. Commun. 6, 7801 (2015).10.1038/ncomms8801 ↗
59. Zhou, B., Khosla, A., Lapedriza, A., Oliva, A. & Torralba, A. Learning deep features for discriminative localization. "Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization," 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, pp. 2921–2929 (2016).10.1109/CVPR.2016.319 ↗
60. Long, J., Shelhamer, E. & Darrell, T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). (IEEE: Boston, MA, USA, 2015).
61. Wenzhi, L. et al. Local crystallography analysis for atomically resolved scanning tunneling microscopy images. Nanotechnology 24, 415707 (2013).10.1088/0957-4484/24/41/415707 ↗
62. McLachlan, G., Peel, D. Finite Mixture Models (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2000).10.1002/0471721182 ↗
63. Azizi, A. et al. Defect coupling and sub-angstrom structural distortions in W1–xMoxS2 monolayers. Nano Lett. 17, 2802–2808 (2017).10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05045 ↗
64. Ievlev, A. V. et al. Quantitative description of crystal nucleation and growth from in situ liquid scanning transmission electron microscopy. ACS Nano 9, 11784–11791 (2015).10.1021/acsnano.5b03720 ↗
65. Rushton, M. J. D. & Chroneos, A. Impact of uniaxial strain and doping on oxygen diffusion in CeO2. Sci. Rep. 4, 6068 (2014).10.1038/srep06068 ↗
66. Li, W. & Li, J. Ferroelasticity and domain physics in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. Nat. Commun. 7, 10843 (2016).10.1038/ncomms10843 ↗
67. Arlia, D. & Coppola, M. Experiments in parallel clustering with dbscan. In: European Conference on Parallel Processing. pp. 326–331. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001).10.1007/3-540-44681-8_46 ↗
68. Ziatdinov, M. et al. Deep analytics of atomically-resolved images: manifest and latent features. arXiv:1801.05133.
69. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. arXiv:1412.6980.