The electrode tortuosity factor: why the conventional tortuosity factor is not well suited for quantifying transport in porous Li-ion battery electrodes and what to use instead
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The tortuosity factor of porous battery electrodes is an important parameter used to correlate electrode microstructure with performance through numerical modeling. Therefore, having an appropriate method for the accurate determination of tortuosity factors is critical. This paper presents a numerical approach, based on simulations performed on numerically-generated microstructural images, which enables a comparison between two common experimental methods. Several key issues with the conventional “flow through” type tortuosity factor are highlighted, when used to characterise electrodes. As a result, a new concept called the “electrode tortuosity factor” is introduced, which captures the transport processes relevant to porous electrodes better than the “flow through” type tortuosity factor. The simulation results from this work demonstrate the importance of non-percolating (“dead-end”) pores in the performance of real electrodes. This is an important result for optimizing electrode design that should be considered by electrochemical modelers. This simulation tool is provided as an open-source MATLAB application and is freely available online as part of the TauFactor platform.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Goodenough, J. B. Rechargeable batteries: challenges old and new. J. Solid State Electrochem. 16, 2019–2029 (2012).10.1007/s10008-012-1751-2 ↗
2. Liu, Y., Zhu, Y. & Cui, Y. Challenges and opportunities towards fast-charging battery materials. Nat. Energy 4, 540–550 (2019).10.1038/s41560-019-0405-3 ↗
3. Veneri, O., Ferraro, L., Capasso, C. & Iannuzzi, D. Charging infrastructures for EV: overview of technologies and issues. In International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway and Ship Propulsion, ESARS, IEEE (2012).10.1109/ESARS.2012.6387434 ↗
4. Botsford, C. & Szczepanek, A. Fast charging vs. slow charging: pros and cons for the new age of electric vehicles. EVS24 International Battery, Hybridand Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium (2009)
5. Newman, J. & Tiedemann, W. Porous-electrode theory with battery applications. AIChE J. 21, 25–41 (1975).10.1002/aic.690210103 ↗
6. Newman, J. & Thomas-Alyea, K. E. Electrochemical Systems. (Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, 2012).
7. Taiwo, O. O. et al. Comparison of three-dimensional analysis and stereological techniques for quantifying lithium-ion battery electrode microstructures. J. Microsc. 263, 280–292 (2016).10.1111/jmi.12389 ↗
8. Wood, V. X-ray tomography for battery research and development. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 293–295 (2018).10.1038/s41578-018-0053-4 ↗
9. Su, Z. et al. X-ray nano-computed tomography in zernike phase contrast for studying 3D morphology of Li-O2 battery electrode. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 4093–4102 (2020).10.1021/acsaem.9b02236 ↗
10. Tiedemann, W. & Newman, J. Double-layer capacity determination of porous electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 122, 70 (1965).10.1149/1.2134161 ↗
11. MacMullin, R. B. & Muccini, G. A. Characteristics of porous beds and structures. AIChE J. 2, 393–403 (1956).10.1002/aic.690020320 ↗
12. Zahn, R., Lagadec, M. F. & Wood, V. Transport in lithium ion batteries: reconciling impedance and structural analysis. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 2452–2453 (2017).10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00740 ↗
13. Newman, J. & Chapman, T. W. Restricted diffusion in binary solutions. AIChE J. 19, 343–348 (1973).10.1002/aic.690190220 ↗
14. Thompson, S. D. & Newman, J. Differential diffusion coefficients of sodium polysulfide melts. J. Electrochem. Soc 136, 3362 (1989).10.1149/1.2096451 ↗
15. Harned, H. S. & French, D. M. A Conductance Method for the Determination of the Diffusion Coefficients of Electrolytes. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 46, 267–284 (1945).10.1111/j.1749-6632.1945.tb36171.x ↗
16. Thorat, I. V. et al. Quantifying tortuosity in porous Li-ion battery materials. J. Power Sources 188, 592–600 (2009).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.032 ↗
17. Landesfeind, J., Hattendorff, J., Ehrl, A., Wall, W. A. & Gasteiger, H. A. Tortuosity determination of battery electrodes and separators by impedance spectroscopy. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, A1373–A1387 (2016).10.1149/2.1141607jes ↗
18. Malifarge, S., Delobel, B. & Delacourt, C. Determination of tortuosity using impedance spectra analysis of symmetric cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, E3329–E3334 (2017).10.1149/2.0331711jes ↗
19. Ogihara, N. et al. Theoretical and experimental analysis of porous electrodes for lithium-ion batteries by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy using a symmetric cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 159, 1034–1039 (2012).10.1149/2.057207jes ↗
20. Pouraghajan, F. et al. Quantifying tortuosity of porous Li-ion battery electrodes: comparing polarization-interrupt and blocking-electrolyte methods. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, 2644–2653 (2018).10.1149/2.0611811jes ↗
21. Eastwood, D. S. et al. The application of phase contrast X-ray techniques for imaging Li-ion battery electrodes. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 324, 118–123 (2014).10.1016/j.nimb.2013.08.066 ↗
22. Shearing, P. R. et al. Exploring electrochemical devices using X-ray microscopy: 3D micro-structure of batteries and fuel cells. Microscopy Anal. 27, 19–22 (2013).
23. Julie, V. et al. 3D phase mapping of solid oxide fuel cell YSZ/Ni cermet at the nanoscale by holographic X-ray nanotomography. J. Power Sources 243, 841–849 (2013).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.069 ↗
24. Pietsch, P. & Wood, V. X-Ray tomography for lithium ion battery research: a practical guide. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 47, 451–479 (2017).10.1146/annurev-matsci-070616-123957 ↗
25. Elango, R., Demortière, A., De Andrade, V., Morcrette, M. & Seznec, V. Thick binder-free electrodes for Li-ion battery fabricated using templating approach and spark plasma sintering reveals high areal capacity. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1703031 (2018).10.1002/aenm.201703031 ↗
26. Zielke, L. et al. Three-phase multiscale modeling of a LiCoO2 cathode: combining the advantages of FIB-SEM imaging and X-ray tomography. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401612 (2015).10.1002/aenm.201401612 ↗
27. Hutzenlaub, T. et al. FIB/SEM-based calculation of tortuosity in a porous LiCoO2 cathode for a Li-ion battery. Electrochem. Commun. 27, 77–80 (2013).10.1016/j.elecom.2012.11.006 ↗
28. Usseglio-Viretta, F. L. E. et al. Resolving the discrepancy in tortuosity factor estimation for Li-ion battery electrodes through micro-macro modeling and experiment. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A3403–A3426 (2018).10.1149/2.0731814jes ↗
29. Landesfeind, J., Ebner, M., Eldiven, A., Wood, V. & Gasteiger, H. A. Tortuosity of battery electrodes: validation of impedance-derived values and critical comparison with 3D tomography. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A469–A476 (2018).10.1149/2.0231803jes ↗
30. Miller, D. J., Proff, C., Wen, J. G., Abraham, D. P. & Bareño, J. Observation of microstructural evolution in li battery cathode oxide particles by in situ electron microscopy. Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 1098–1103 (2013).10.1002/aenm.201300015 ↗
31. Cooper, S. J., Bertei, A., Shearing, P. R., Kilner, J. A. & Brandon, N. P. TauFactor: an open-source application for calculating tortuosity factors from tomographic data. SoftwareX 5, 203–210 (2016).10.1016/j.softx.2016.09.002 ↗
32. Patel, K. K., Paulsen, J. M. & Desilvestro, J. Numerical simulation of porous networks in relation to battery electrodes and separators. J. Power Sources 122, 144–152 (2003).10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00399-9 ↗
33. Morasch, R., Landesfeind, J., Suthar, B. & Gasteiger, H. A. Detection of binder gradients using impedance spectroscopy and their influence on the tortuosity of Li-ion battery graphite electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A3459 (2018).10.1149/2.1021814jes ↗
34. Lu, X. et al. 3D microstructure design of lithium-ion battery electrodes assisted by X-ray nano-computed tomography and modelling. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–13 (2020).10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7 ↗
35. de Levie, R. On porous electrodes in electrolyte solutions: I. Capacitance effects. Electrochim. Acta 8, 751–780 (1963).10.1016/0013-4686(63)80042-0 ↗
36. Lasia, A. Impedance of porous electrodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 397, 27–33 (1995).10.1016/0022-0728(95)04177-5 ↗
37. Meyers, J. P., Doyle, M., Darling, R. M. & Newman, J. The impedance response of a porous electrode composed of intercalation particles. J. Electrochem. Soc. 147, 2930–2940 (1988).10.1149/1.1393627 ↗
38. Keiser, H., Beccu, K. D. & Gutjahr, M. A. Abschätzung der porenstruktur poröser elektroden aus impedanzmessungen. Electrochim. Acta 21, 539–543 (1976).10.1016/0013-4686(76)85147-X ↗
39. Tröltzsch, U. & Kanoun, O. Generalization of transmission line models for deriving the impedance of diffusion and porous media. Electrochim. Acta 75, 347–356 (2012).10.1016/j.electacta.2012.05.014 ↗
40. ITAGAKI, M. et al. Electrochemical impedance and complex capacitance to interpret electrochemical capacitor. Electrochemistry 8, 649–655 (2007).10.5796/electrochemistry.75.649 ↗
41. de Levie, R. On porous electrodes in electrolyte solutions—IV. Electrochim. Acta 9, 1231–1245 (1964).10.1016/0013-4686(64)85015-5 ↗
42. Cooper, S. J., Bertei, A., Finegan, D. P. & Brandon, N. P. Simulated impedance of diffusion in porous media. Electrochim. Acta 251, 681–689 (2017).10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.152 ↗
43. Lagadec, M. F. Microstructure of Celgard® PP1615 lithium-ion battery separator. ETH Zurich. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000265085 (2018).10.3929/ethz-b-000265085 ↗