journal article·2022-01-27Open access

Mechanism of keyhole pore formation in metal additive manufacturing

Lu Wang, Yanming Zhang, Hou Yi Chia, Wentao Yan

npj Computational Materials· Volume 8· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract During metal additive manufacturing, the porosity of the as-built part deteriorates the mechanical property and even hinders the further application of metal additive manufacturing. Particularly, the mechanisms of keyhole pores associated with the keyhole fluctuation are not fully understood. To reveal the mechanisms of the keyhole pores formation, we adopt a multiphysics thermal-fluid flow model incorporating heat transfer, liquid flow, metal evaporation, Marangoni effect, and Darcy’s law to simulate the keyhole pore formation process, and the results are validated with the in situ X-ray images. The simulation results present the instant bubble formation due to the keyhole instability and motion of the instant bubble pinning on the solidification front. Furthermore, comparing the keyhole pore formation under different laser scanning speeds shows that the keyhole pore is sensitive to the manufacturing parameters. Additionally, the simulation under a low ambient pressure shows the feasibility of improving the keyhole stability to reduce and even avoid the formation of keyhole pores.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Yang, L., Harrysson, O., West, H. & Cormier, D. Compressive properties of Ti–6Al–4V auxetic mesh structures made by electron beam melting. Acta Mater. 60, 3370 – 3379 (2012).10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.015 ↗
2. Yan, W. et al. Multi-scale modeling of electron beam melting of functionally graded materials. Acta Mater. 115, 403–412 (2016).10.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.022 ↗
3. Wei, H. et al. Mechanistic models for additive manufacturing of metallic components. Prog. Mater. Sci. 116, 100703 (2021).10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100703 ↗
4. DebRoy, T. et al. Additive manufacturing of metallic components–process, structure and properties. Prog. Mater. Sci. 92, 112–224 (2018).10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
5. Snow, Z., Nassar, A. & Reutzel, E. W. Review of the formation and impact of flaws in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 36, 101457 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860420308290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101457 (2020).10.1016/j.addma.2020.101457 ↗
6. Beretta, S. & Romano, S. A comparison of fatigue strength sensitivity to defects for materials manufactured by am or traditional processes. Int. J. Fatigue 94, 178–191 (2017).10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.020 ↗
7. Masuo, H. et al. Influence of defects, surface roughness and hip on the fatigue strength of ti-6al-4v manufactured by additive manufacturing. Int. J. Fatigue 117, 163–179 (2018).10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.020 ↗
8. Yang, K. V. et al. Porosity formation mechanisms and fatigue response in al-si-mg alloys made by selective laser melting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 712, 166–174 (2018).10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.078 ↗
9. Aboulkhair, N. T., Everitt, N. M., Ashcroft, I. & Tuck, C. Reducing porosity in alsi10mg parts processed by selective laser melting. Addit. Manuf. 1, 77–86 (2014).
10. Weingarten, C. et al. Formation and reduction of hydrogen porosity during selective laser melting of alsi10mg. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 221, 112–120 (2015).10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.02.013 ↗
11. King, W. E. et al. Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214, 2915–2925 (2014).10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.005 ↗
12. Leung, C. L. A. et al. The effect of powder oxidation on defect formation in laser additive manufacturing. Acta Mater. 166, 294–305 (2019).10.1016/j.actamat.2018.12.027 ↗
13. Yang, T. et al. Laser powder bed fusion of alsi10mg: Influence of energy intensities on spatter and porosity evolution, microstructure and mechanical properties. J. Alloy. Compd. 849, 156300 (2020).10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156300 ↗
14. Cunningham, R., Narra, S. P., Montgomery, C., Beuth, J. & Rollett, A. Synchrotron-based x-ray microtomography characterization of the effect of processing variables on porosity formation in laser power-bed additive manufacturing of ti-6al-4v. JOM 69, 479–484 (2017).10.1007/s11837-016-2234-1 ↗
15. Fabbro, R. Melt pool and keyhole behaviour analysis for deep penetration laser welding. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 43, 445501 (2010).10.1088/0022-3727/43/44/445501 ↗
16. Forien, J.-B. et al. Detecting keyhole pore defects and monitoring process signatures during laser powder bed fusion: a correlation between in situ pyrometry and ex situ x-ray radiography. Addit. Manuf. 35, 101336 (2020).
17. Hojjatzadeh, S. M. H. et al. Direct observation of pore formation mechanisms during lpbf additive manufacturing process and high energy density laser welding. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 153, 103555 (2020).10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.103555 ↗
18. Martin, A. A. et al. Dynamics of pore formation during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Nat. Commun. 10, 1987 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-10009-2 ↗
19. Zhao, C. et al. Critical instability at moving keyhole tip generates porosity in laser melting. Science 370, 1080–1086 (2020).10.1126/science.abd1587 ↗
20. Cunningham, R. et al. Keyhole threshold and morphology in laser melting revealed by ultrahigh-speed x-ray imaging. Science 363, 849–852 (2019).10.1126/science.aav4687 ↗
21. Khairallah, S. A., Anderson, A. T., Rubenchik, A. & King, W. E. Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: Physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones. Acta Mater. 108, 36–45 (2016).10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014 ↗
22. Khairallah, S. A. et al. Controlling interdependent meso-nanosecond dynamics and defect generation in metal 3d printing. Science 368, 660–665 (2020).10.1126/science.aay7830 ↗
23. Zhao, C. et al. Bulk-explosion-induced metal spattering during laser processing. Phys. Rev. X 9, 021052 (2019).
24. Wang, L., Zhang, Y. & Yan, W. Evaporation model for keyhole dynamics during additive manufacturing of metal. Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 064039 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.064039 ↗
25. Lin, R., Wang, H.-p, Lu, F., Solomon, J. & Carlson, B. E. Numerical study of keyhole dynamics and keyhole-induced porosity formation in remote laser welding of al alloys. Int. J. Heat. Mass Transf. 108, 244–256 (2017).10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.12.019 ↗
26. Bayat, M. et al. Keyhole-induced porosities in Laser-based Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) of Ti6Al4V: high-fidelity modelling and experimental validation. Addit. Manuf. 30, 100835 (2019).
27. Tang, C., Tan, J. L. & Wong, C. H. A numerical investigation on the physical mechanisms of single track defects in selective laser melting. Int. J. Heat. Mass Transf. 126, 957–968 (2018).10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.06.073 ↗
28. Tan, P., Kiran, R. & Zhou, K. Effects of sub-atmospheric pressure on keyhole dynamics and porosity in products fabricated by selective laser melting. J. Manuf. Process. 64, 816–827 (2021).10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.01.058 ↗
29. Tammas-Williams, S., Withers, P. J., Todd, I. & Prangnell, P. Porosity regrowth during heat treatment of hot isostatically pressed additively manufactured titanium components. Scr. Mater. 122, 72–76 (2016).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.05.002 ↗
30. Miotello, A. & Kelly, R. Laser-induced phase explosion: new physical problems when a condensed phase approaches the thermodynamic critical temperature. Appl. Phys. A 69, S67–S73 (1999).10.1007/s003390051357 ↗
31. Guo, Q. et al. In-situ full-field mapping of melt flow dynamics in laser metal additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 31, 100939 (2020).
32. Li, S., Chen, G., Katayama, S. & Zhang, Y. Relationship between spatter formation and dynamic molten pool during high-power deep-penetration laser welding. Appl. Surf. Sci. 303, 481–488 (2014).10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.030 ↗
33. Hojjatzadeh, S. M. H. et al. Pore elimination mechanisms during 3D printing of metals. Nat. Commun. 10, 3088 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-10973-9 ↗
34. Zhang, B., Liao, H. & Coddet, C. Microstructure evolution and density behavior of cp ti parts elaborated by self-developed vacuum selective laser melting system. Appl. Surf. Sci. 279, 310–316 (2013).10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.04.090 ↗
35. Zhou, B., Zhou, J., Li, H. & Lin, F. A study of the microstructures and mechanical properties of ti6al4v fabricated by slm under vacuum. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 724, 1–10 (2018).10.1016/j.msea.2018.03.021 ↗
36. Jiang, M., Chen, X., Chen, Y. & Tao, W. Mitigation of porosity defects in fiber laser welding under low vacuum. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 276, 116385 (2020).10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116385 ↗
37. Katayama, S., Kobayashi, Y., Mizutani, M. & Matsunawa, A. Effect of vacuum on penetration and defects in laser welding. J. Laser Appl. 13, 187–192 (2001).10.2351/1.1404413 ↗
38. Zhou, J. et al. Research on aluminum component change and phase transformation of TiAl-based alloy in electron beam selective melting process under multiple scan. Intermetallics 113, 106575 (2019).10.1016/j.intermet.2019.106575 ↗
39. Tang, H. P. et al. Additive manufacturing of a high niobium-containing titanium aluminide alloy by selective electron beam melting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 636, 103–107 (2015).10.1016/j.msea.2015.03.079 ↗
40. Zhu, Q. & Yan, J. A mixed interface-capturing/interface-tracking formulation for thermal multi-phase flows with emphasis on metal additive manufacturing processes. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 383, 113910 (2021).10.1016/j.cma.2021.113910 ↗
41. Yan, W. et al. Multi-physics modeling of single/multiple-track defect mechanisms in electron beam selective melting. Acta Mater. 134, 324–333 (2017).10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.061 ↗
42. Poirier, D. R. Permeability for flow of interdendritic liquid in columnar-dendritic alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 18, 245–255 (1987).10.1007/BF02658450 ↗
43. Amador, C. & de Juan, L. M. Strategies for structured particulate systems design. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 39, 509–579 (2016).10.1016/B978-0-444-63683-6.00019-8 ↗
44. Wang, Y. M. et al. Additively manufactured hierarchical stainless steels with high strength and ductility. Nat. Mater. 17, 63–71 (2018).10.1038/nmat5021 ↗
45. Ahn, J. & Na, S.-J. Three-dimensional thermal simulation of nanosecond laser ablation for semitransparent material. Appl. Surf. Sci. 283, 115–127 (2013).10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.048 ↗
46. Johnson, P. B. & Christy, R. W. Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972).10.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370 ↗
47. Hirt, C. W. & Nichols, B. D. Volume of fluid (vof) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 39, 201–225 (1981).10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5 ↗