journal article·2020-01-06Open access

Machine learning enabled autonomous microstructural characterization in 3D samples

Henry Chan, Mathew Cherukara, Troy D. Loeffler, Badri Narayanan, Subramanian K. R. S. Sankaranarayanan

npj Computational Materials· Volume 6· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract We introduce an unsupervised machine learning (ML) based technique for the identification and characterization of microstructures in three-dimensional (3D) samples obtained from molecular dynamics simulations, particle tracking data, or experiments. Our technique combines topology classification, image processing, and clustering algorithms, and can handle a wide range of microstructure types including grains in polycrystalline materials, voids in porous systems, and structures from self/directed assembly in soft-matter complex solutions. Our technique does not require a priori microstructure description of the target system and is insensitive to disorder such as extended defects in polycrystals arising from line and plane defects. We demonstrate quantitively that our technique provides unbiased microstructural information such as precise quantification of grains and their size distributions in 3D polycrystalline samples, characterizes features such as voids and porosity in 3D polymeric samples and micellar size distribution in 3D complex fluids. To demonstrate the efficacy of our ML approach, we benchmark it against a diverse set of synthetic data samples representing nanocrystalline metals, polymers and complex fluids as well as experimentally published characterization data. Our technique is computationally efficient and provides a way to quickly identify, track, and quantify complex microstructural features that impact the observed material behavior.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Ludwig, W. et al. Three-dimensional grain mapping by x-ray diffraction contrast tomography and the use of Friedel pairs in diffraction data analysis. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 033905 (2009).10.1063/1.3100200 ↗
2. Lienert, U. et al. High-energy diffraction microscopy at the advanced photon source. JOM 63, 70–77 (2011).10.1007/s11837-011-0116-0 ↗
3. Holm, E. A. & Foiles, S. M. How grain growth stops: a mechanism for grain-growth stagnation in pure materials. Science 328, 1138–1141 (2010).10.1126/science.1187833 ↗
4. McFadden, S. X., Mishra, R. S., Valiev, R. Z., Zhilyaev, A. P. & Mukherjee, A. K. Low-temperature superplasticity in nanostructured nickel and metal alloys. Nature 398, 684–686 (1999).10.1038/19486 ↗
5. Uchic, M. D., Dimiduk, D. M., Florando, J. N. & Nix, W. D. Sample dimensions influence strength and crystal plasticity. Science 305, 986 (2004).10.1126/science.1098993 ↗
6. Van Swygenhoven, H. Grain boundaries and dislocations. Science 296, 66 (2002).10.1126/science.1071040 ↗
7. Offerman, S. E. et al. Grain nucleation and growth during phase transformations. Science 298, 1003 (2002).10.1126/science.1076681 ↗
8. Arzt, E. Size effects in materials due to microstructural and dimensional constraints: a comparative review. Acta Mater. 46, 5611–5626 (1998).10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00231-6 ↗
9. Chu, Z. et al. Impact of grain boundaries on efficiency and stability of organic-inorganic trihalide perovskites. Nat. Commun. 8, 2230 (2017).10.1038/s41467-017-02331-4 ↗
10. Hall, E. O. The deformation and ageing of mild steel: III discussion of results. Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. B 64, 747–753 (1951).10.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
11. Petch, N. J. The cleavage strength of polycrystals. J. Iron Steel Inst. 174, 25–28 (1953).
12. Berbenni, S., Favier, V. & Berveiller, M. Impact of the grain size distribution on the yield stress of heterogeneous materials. Int. J. Plast. 23, 114–142 (2007).10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.03.004 ↗
13. Bennett E. G., Roebuck B. The metallographic measurement of hardmetal grain size. (National Physical Laboratory, 2000).
14. Engqvist, H. & Uhrenius, B. Determination of the average grain size of cemented carbides. Int. J. Refractory Met. Hard Mater. 21, 31–35 (2003).10.1016/S0263-4368(03)00005-2 ↗
15. Groeber, M. A., Haley, B. K., Uchic, M. D., Dimiduk, D. M. & Ghosh, S. 3D reconstruction and characterization of polycrystalline microstructures using a FIB–SEM system. Mater. Charact. 57, 259–273 (2006).10.1016/j.matchar.2006.01.019 ↗
16. Peregrina-Barreto, H. et al. Automatic grain size determination in microstructures using image processing. Measurement 46, 249–258 (2013).10.1016/j.measurement.2012.06.012 ↗
17. Roebuck, B. Measuring WC grain size distribution. Met. Powder Rep. 54, 20–24 (1999).10.1016/S0026-0657(99)80421-4 ↗
18. ISO 449-2. Hardmetals-metallographic determination of microstructure. Part 2: Measurement of WC grain size (International Standards Organization, Geneva, 2008).
19. Mingard, K. P. et al. Comparison of EBSD and conventional methods of grain size measurement of hardmetals. Int. J. Refractory Met. Hard Mater. 27, 213–223 (2009).10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2008.06.009 ↗
20. Ma, B. et al. Deep learning-based image segmentation for al-la alloy microscopic images. Symmetry 10, 107 (2018).10.3390/sym10040107 ↗
21. Maire, E. & Withers, P. J. Quantitative X-ray tomography. Int. Mater. Rev. 59, 1–43 (2014).10.1179/1743280413Y.0000000023 ↗
22. Narayanan, B. et al. Machine learnt bond order potential to model metal–organic (Co–C) heterostructures. Nanoscale 9, 18229–18239 (2017).10.1039/C7NR06038F ↗
23. Chan, H. et al. Machine learning coarse grained models for water. Nat. Commun. 10, 379 (2019).10.1038/s41467-018-08222-6 ↗
24. Kofu, M. et al. Heterogeneous slow dynamics of imidazolium-based ionic liquids studied by neutron spin echo. J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 2773–2781 (2013).10.1021/jp312608r ↗
25. Burankova, T., Hempelmann, R., Wildes, A. & Embs, J. P. Collective ion diffusion and localized single particle dynamics in pyridinium-based ionic liquids. J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 14452–14460 (2014).10.1021/jp5092416 ↗
26. Zheng, Z.-P. et al. Ionic liquids: not only structurally but also dynamically heterogeneous. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 687–690 (2015).10.1002/anie.201409136 ↗
27. Lee, K.-K. et al. Ultrafast fluxional exchange dynamics in electrolyte solvation sheath of lithium ion battery. Nat. Commun. 8, 14658 (2017).10.1038/ncomms14658 ↗
28. Hayes, R., Warr, G. G. & Atkin, R. Structure and nanostructure in ionic liquids. Chem. Rev. 115, 6357–6426 (2015).10.1021/cr500411q ↗
29. Prévost, S., Gradzielski, M. & Zemb, T. Self-assembly, phase behaviour and structural behaviour as observed by scattering for classical and non-classical microemulsions. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 247, 374–396 (2017).10.1016/j.cis.2017.07.022 ↗
30. Ellis, R. J. et al. Complexation-induced supramolecular assembly drives metal-ion extraction. Chem. – A Eur. J. 20, 12796–12807 (2014).10.1002/chem.201403859 ↗
31. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
32. Sun, H. COMPASS: an ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applicationsoverview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 7338–7364 (1998).10.1021/jp980939v ↗
33. Sun, H., Mumby, S. J., Maple, J. R. & Hagler, A. T. An ab Initio CFF93 all-atom force field for polycarbonates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 2978–2987 (1994).10.1021/ja00086a030 ↗
34. Phillips, J. C. et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Computational Chem. 26, 1781–1802 (2005).10.1002/jcc.20289 ↗
35. Marrink, S. J., Risselada, H. J., Yefimov, S., Tieleman, D. P. & de Vries, A. H. The MARTINI force field: coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 7812–7824 (2007).10.1021/jp071097f ↗
36. Campbell, A., Murray, P., Yakushina, E., Marshall, S. & Ion, W. New methods for automatic quantification of microstructural features using digital image processing. Mater. Des. 141, 395–406 (2018).10.1016/j.matdes.2017.12.049 ↗