journal article·2017-12-13Open access

Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects

Rampi Ramprasad, Rohit Batra, Ghanshyam Pilania, Arun Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, Chiho Kim

npj Computational Materials· Volume 3· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Propelled partly by the Materials Genome Initiative, and partly by the algorithmic developments and the resounding successes of data-driven efforts in other domains, informatics strategies are beginning to take shape within materials science. These approaches lead to surrogate machine learning models that enable rapid predictions based purely on past data rather than by direct experimentation or by computations/simulations in which fundamental equations are explicitly solved. Data-centric informatics methods are becoming useful to determine material properties that are hard to measure or compute using traditional methods—due to the cost, time or effort involved—but for which reliable data either already exists or can be generated for at least a subset of the critical cases. Predictions are typically interpolative, involving fingerprinting a material numerically first, and then following a mapping (established via a learning algorithm) between the fingerprint and the property of interest. Fingerprints, also referred to as “descriptors”, may be of many types and scales, as dictated by the application domain and needs. Predictions may also be extrapolative—extending into new materials spaces—provided prediction uncertainties are properly taken into account. This article attempts to provide an overview of some of the recent successful data-driven “materials informatics” strategies undertaken in the last decade, with particular emphasis on the fingerprint or descriptor choices. The review also identifies some challenges the community is facing and those that should be overcome in the near future.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Computational Drug Discovery Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Gopnik, A. Making AI more human. Sci. Am. 316, 60–65 (2017).10.1038/scientificamerican0617-60 ↗
2. Jordan, M. I. & Mitchell, T. M. Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349, 255–260 (2015).10.1126/science.aaa8415 ↗
3. Srinivasan, S. & Ranganathan, S. India’s Legendary Wootz Steel: An Advanced Material of the Ancient World (National Institute of advanced studies, 2004).
4. Ward, G. W. R. The Grove Encyclopedia of Materials and Techniques in Art (Oxford University Press, 2008).
5. Hume-Rothery, W. Atomic theory for students of metallurgy. J. Less Common Met. 3, 264 (1961).10.1016/0022-5088(61)90071-6 ↗
6. Hall, E. O. The deformation and ageing of mild steel: III discussion of results. Proc. Phys. Soc. B 64, 747–753 (1951).10.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
7. Petch, N. J. The influence of grain boundary carbide and grain size on the cleavage strength and impact transition temperature of steel. Acta Metall. 34, 1387–1393 (1986).10.1016/0001-6160(86)90026-X ↗
8. Van Krevelen, D. W. & Te Nijenhuis, K. Properties of Polymers: Their Correlation with Chemical Structure; their Numerical Estimation and Prediction from Additive Group Contributions (Elsevier, 2009).
9. Mueller, T., Kusne, A. G. & Ramprasad, R. In Reviews in Computational Chemistry, 186–273 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2016).10.1002/9781119148739.ch4 ↗
10. Ward, L. & Wolverton, C. Atomistic calculations and materials informatics: a review. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 21, 167–176 (2017).10.1016/j.cossms.2016.07.002 ↗
11. Green, M. L. et al. Fulfilling the promise of the materials genome initiative with high-throughput experimental methodologies. Appl. Phys. Rev. 4, 011105 (2017).10.1063/1.4977487 ↗
12. Hattrick-Simpers, J. R., Gregoire, J. M. & Kusne, A. G. Perspective: composition–structure–property mapping in high-throughput experiments: turning data into knowledge. APL Mater. 4, 053211 (2016).10.1063/1.4950995 ↗
13. Bishop, C. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, 2006).
14. Theodoridis, S. Machine Learning: A Bayesian and Optimization Perspective (Academic Press, 2015).10.1016/B978-0-12-801522-3.00012-4 ↗
15. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).
16. Sanchez, J., Ducastelle, F. & Gratias, D. Generalized cluster description of multicomponent systems. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 128, 334–350 (1984).10.1016/0378-4371(84)90096-7 ↗
17. Fontaine, D. Cluster approach to order-disorder transformations in alloys. Solid State Phys. 47, 33–176 (1994).10.1016/S0081-1947(08)60639-6 ↗
18. Zunger, A. First-principles statistical mechanics of semiconductor alloys and intermetallic compounds, NATO Advanced Study Institute, Series B: Physics Vol. 319 (Turchi, P. & Gonis, A. eds), 361419 (Plenum, New York, 1994).10.1007/978-1-4615-2476-2_23 ↗
19. Laks, D. B., Ferreira, L. G., Froyen, S. & Zunger, A. Efficient cluster expansion for substitutional systems. Phys. Rev. B 46, 12587–12605 (1992).10.1103/PhysRevB.46.12587 ↗
20. van de Walle, A. & Ceder, G. Automating first-principles phase diagram calculations. J. Phase Equilib. 23, 348 (2002).10.1361/105497102770331596 ↗
21. Mueller, T. & Ceder, G. Bayesian approach to cluster expansions. Phys. Rev. B 80, 024103 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.80.024103 ↗
22. Cockayne, E. & van de Walle, A. Building effective models from sparse but precise data: application to an alloy cluster expansion model. Phys. Rev. B 81, 012104 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.81.012104 ↗
23. Seko, A., Koyama, Y. & Tanaka, I. Cluster expansion method for multicomponent systems based on optimal selection of structures for density-functional theory calculations. Phys. Rev. B 80, 165122 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.80.165122 ↗
24. Mueller, T. & Ceder, G. Exact expressions for structure selection in cluster expansions. Phys. Rev. B 82, 184107 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.82.184107 ↗
25. Lance, N. J., Hart, G. L. W., Zhou, F. & Ozolins, V. Compressive sensing as a paradigm for building physics models. Phys. Rev. B 87, 24–32 (2015).
26. Sanders, J. N., Andrade, X. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Compressive sensing for the fast computation of matrices: application to molecular vibrations. ACS Cent. Sci. 1, 035125 (2013).
27. Schmidt, M. & Lipson, H. Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data. Science 324, 81–85 (2009).10.1126/science.1165893 ↗
28. Ghiringhelli, L. M., Vybiral, J., Levchenko, S. V., Draxl, C. & Scheffler, M. Big data of materials science: critical role of the descriptor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 105503 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105503 ↗
29. Ghiringhelli, L. M. et al. Learning physical descriptors for materials science by compressed sensing. New. J. Phys. 19, 023017 (2017).10.1088/1367-2630/aa57bf ↗
30. Lookman, T., Alexander, F. J. & Rajan, K. Information Science for Materials Discovery and Design (Springer, 2015).10.1007/978-3-319-23871-5 ↗
31. Kim, C., Pilania, G. & Ramprasad, R. From organized high-throughput data to phenomenological theory using machine learning: the example of dielectric breakdown. Chem. Mater. 28, 1304–1311 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04109 ↗
32. Kim, C., Pilania, G. & Ramprasad, R. Machine learning assisted predictions of intrinsic dielectric breakdown strength of ABX3 perovskites. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 14575–14580 (2016).10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05068 ↗
33. Goldsmith, B. R. et al. Uncovering structure-property relationships of materials by subgroup discovery. New. J. Phys. 19, 013031 (2017).10.1088/1367-2630/aa57c2 ↗
34. Bialon, A. F., Hammerschmidt, T. & Drautz, R. Three-parameter crystal-structure prediction for sp-d-valent compounds. Chem. Mater. 28, 2550–2556 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04299 ↗
35. Pearson’s crystal data. Crystal structure database for inorganic compounds. Choice Rev. Online 45, 45–3800–45–3800 (2008).
36. Oliynyk, A. O. et al. High-throughput machine-learning-driven synthesis of Full-Heusler compounds. Chem. Mater. 28, 7324–7331 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02724 ↗
37. ASM international the materials information society–ASM international. http://www.asminternational.org/. Accessed 23.06.2017.
38. Dey, P. et al. Informatics-aided bandgap engineering for solar materials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 83, 185–195 (2014).10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.10.016 ↗
39. Ward, L., Agrawal, A., Choudhary, A. & Wolverton, C. A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials. NPJ Comput. Mater. 2, 201628 (2016).10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.28 ↗
40. Lee, J., Seko, A., Shitara, K., Nakayama, K. & Tanaka, I. Prediction model of band gap for inorganic compounds by combination of density functional theory calculations and machine learning techniques. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 93, 115104 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.115104 ↗
41. Pilania, G. et al. Machine learning bandgaps of double perovskites. Sci. Rep. 6, 19375 (2016).10.1038/srep19375 ↗
42. Pilania, G., Gubernatis, J. E. & Lookman, T. Multi-fidelity machine learning models for accurate bandgap predictions of solids. Comput. Mater. Sci. 129, 156–163 (2017).10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.12.004 ↗
43. Faber, F. A., Lindmaa, A., von Lilienfeld, O. A. & Armiento, R. Machine learning energies of 2 million elpasolite (ABC2D6) crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 135502 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.135502 ↗
44. Meredig, B. et al. Combinatorial screening for new materials in unconstrained composition space with machine learning. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 89, 094104 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.89.094104 ↗
45. Deml, A. M., O’Hayre, R., Wolverton, C. & Stevanović, V. Predicting density functional theory total energies and enthalpies of formation of metal-nonmetal compounds by linear regression. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 93, 085142 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.085142 ↗
46. Legrain, F., Carrete, J., van Roekeghem, A., Curtarolo, S. & Mingo, N. How the chemical composition alone can predict vibrational free energies and entropies of solids. Chem. Mater. 29, 6220–6227 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00789 ↗
47. Medasani, B. et al. Predicting defect behavior in B2 intermetallics by merging ab initio modeling and machine learning. NPJ Comput. Mater. 2, 1 (2016).10.1038/s41524-016-0001-z ↗
48. Seko, A., Maekawa, T., Tsuda, K. & Tanaka, I. Machine learning with systematic density-functional theory calculations: Application to melting temperatures of single- and binary-component solids. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 89, 054303 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.89.054303 ↗
49. Pilania, G., Gubernatis, J. E. & Lookman, T. Structure classification and melting temperature prediction in octet AB solids via machine learning. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 91, 214302 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.91.214302 ↗
50. Chatterjee, S., Murugananth, M. & Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. δ TRIP steel. Mater. Sci. Technol. 23, 819–827 (2007).10.1179/174328407X179746 ↗
51. De Jong, M. et al. A statistical learning framework for materials science: application to elastic moduli of k-nary inorganic polycrystalline compounds. Sci. Rep. 6, 34256 (2016).10.1038/srep34256 ↗
52. Aryal, S., Sakidja, R., Barsoum, M. W. & Ching, W.-Y. A genomic approach to the stability, elastic, and electronic properties of the MAX phases. Phys. Status Solidi 251, 1480–1497 (2014).10.1002/pssb.201451226 ↗
53. Seko, A. et al. Prediction of low-thermal-conductivity compounds with first-principles anharmonic lattice-dynamics calculations and bayesian optimization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 205901 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.205901 ↗
54. Li, Z., Ma, X. & Xin, H. Feature engineering of machine-learning chemisorption models for catalyst design. Catal. Today 280, 232–238 (2017).10.1016/j.cattod.2016.04.013 ↗
55. Hong, W. T., Welsch, R. E. & Shao-Horn, Y. Descriptors of oxygen-evolution activity for oxides: a statistical evaluation. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 78–86 (2016).10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10071 ↗
56. Pilania, G. et al. Using machine learning to identify factors that govern amorphization of irradiated pyrochlores. Chem. Mater. 29, 2574–2583 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04666 ↗
57. Xue, D. et al. Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design. Nat. Commun. 7, 11241 (2016).10.1038/ncomms11241 ↗
58. Xue, D. et al. Accelerated search for BaTiO3-based piezoelectrics with vertical morphotropic phase boundary using bayesian learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A 113, 13301–13306 (2016).10.1073/pnas.1607412113 ↗
59. Ashton, M., Hennig, R. G., Broderick, S. R., Rajan, K. & Sinnott, S. B. Computational discovery of stable M2AX phases. Phys. Rev. B. Condens. Matter 94, 20 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.94.054116 ↗
60. Pilania, G., Balachandran, P. V., Kim, C. & Lookman, T. Finding new perovskite halides via machine learning. Front. Mater. 3, 19 (2016).10.3389/fmats.2016.00019 ↗
61. Fernandez, M., Boyd, P. G., Daff, T. D., Aghaji, M. Z. & Woo, T. K. Rapid and accurate machine learning recognition of high performing metal organic frameworks for CO2 capture. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 3056–3060 (2014).10.1021/jz501331m ↗
62. Emery, A. A., Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Hegde, V. I. & Wolverton, C. High-throughput computational screening of perovskites for thermochemical water splitting applications. Chem. Mater. 28, 5621–5634 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01182 ↗
63. Kalidindi, S. R. et al. Role of materials data science and informatics in accelerated materials innovation. MRS Bull. 41, 596–602 (2016).10.1557/mrs.2016.164 ↗
64. Brough, D. B., Kannan, A., Haaland, B., Bucknall, D. G. & Kalidindi, S. R. Extraction of process-structure evolution linkages from x-ray scattering measurements using dimensionality reduction and time series analysis. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 6, 147–159 (2017).10.1007/s40192-017-0093-4 ↗
65. Kalidindi, S. R., Gomberg, J. A., Trautt, Z. T. & Becker, C. A. Application of data science tools to quantify and distinguish between structures and models in molecular dynamics datasets. Nanotechnology 26, 344006 (2015).10.1088/0957-4484/26/34/344006 ↗
66. Gupta, A., Cecen, A., Goyal, S., Singh, A. K. & Kalidindi, S. R. Structure–property linkages using a data science approach: Application to a non-metallic inclusion/steel composite system. Acta Mater. 91, 239–254 (2015).10.1016/j.actamat.2015.02.045 ↗
67. Brough, D. B., Wheeler, D., Warren, J. A. & Kalidindi, S. R. Microstructure-based knowledge systems for capturing process-structure evolution linkages. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 21, 129–140 (2017).10.1016/j.cossms.2016.05.002 ↗
68. Panchal, J. H., Kalidindi, S. R. & McDowell, D. L. Key computational modeling issues in integrated computational materials engineering. Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 45, 4–25 (2013).10.1016/j.cad.2012.06.006 ↗
69. Brough, D. B., Wheeler, D. & Kalidindi, S. R. Materials knowledge systems in python—a data science framework for accelerated development of hierarchical materials. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 6, 36–53 (2017).10.1007/s40192-017-0089-0 ↗
70. Kalidindi, S. R. Computationally efficient, fully coupled multiscale modeling of materials phenomena using calibrated localization linkages. International Scholarly Research Notices 2012, 1–13 (2012).10.5402/2012/305692 ↗
71. Adamson, G. W. & Bush, J. A. Method for relating the structure and properties of chemical compounds. Nature 248, 406–407 (1974).10.1038/248406a0 ↗
72. Adamson, G. W., Bush, J. A., McLure, A. H. W. & Lynch, M. F. An evaluation of a substructure search screen system based on bond-centered fragments. J. Chem. Doc. 14, 44–48 (1974).10.1021/c160052a011 ↗
73. Judson, P. Knowledge-Based Expert Systems in Chemistry: Not Counting on Computers (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2009).
74. Huan, T. D. et al. A polymer dataset for accelerated property prediction and design. Sci. Data 3, 160012 (2016).10.1038/sdata.2016.12 ↗
75. Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. et al. Rational co-design of polymer dielectrics for energy storage. Adv. Mater. 28, 6277–6291 (2016).10.1002/adma.201600377 ↗
76. Treich, G. M. et al. A rational co-design approach to the creation of new dielectric polymers with high energy density. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 24, 732–743 (2017).10.1109/TDEI.2017.006329 ↗
77. Huan, T. D. et al. Advanced polymeric dielectrics for high energy density applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 83, 236–269 (2016).10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.05.001 ↗
78. Sharma, V. et al. Rational design of all organic polymer dielectrics. Nat. Commun. 5, 4845 (2014).10.1038/ncomms5845 ↗
79. Lorenzini, R. G., Kline, W. M., Wang, C. C., Ramprasad, R. & Sotzing, G. A. The rational design of polyurea & polyurethane dielectric materials. Polymer 54, 3529 (2013).10.1016/j.polymer.2013.05.003 ↗
80. Liu, C. S., G, P., C, W. & R, R. How critical are the van der waals interactions in polymer crystals? J. Phys. Chem. A 116, 9347 (2012).10.1021/jp3005844 ↗
81. Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A., Pilania, G., Huan, T. D., Lookman, T. & Ramprasad, R. Machine learning strategy for accelerated design of polymer dielectrics. Sci. Rep. 6, 20952 (2016).10.1038/srep20952 ↗
82. Pilania, G., Wang, C., Jiang, X., Rajasekaran, S. & Ramprasad, R. Accelerating materials property predictions using machine learning. Sci. Rep. 3, 2810 (2013).10.1038/srep02810 ↗
83. Huan, T. D., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. & Ramprasad, R. Accelerated materials property predictions and design using motif-based fingerprints. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 92, 014106 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.014106 ↗
84. Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A., Huan, T. D. & Ramprasad, R. Mining materials design rules from data: the example of polymer dielectrics. (Under Review). Chem. Mat. 29, 9001–9010 (2017)10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02027 ↗
85. PolymerGenome. http://polymergenome.org.
86. Hautier, G., Fischer, C. C., Jain, A., Mueller, T. & Ceder, G. Finding nature’s missing ternary oxide compounds using machine learning and density functional theory. Chem. Mater. 22, 3762–3767 (2010).10.1021/cm100795d ↗
87. Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 ↗
88. Behler, J., Martonák, R., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Metadynamics simulations of the high-pressure phases of silicon employing a high-dimensional neural network potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 185501 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.185501 ↗
89. Behler, J. Representing potential energy surfaces by high-dimensional neural network potentials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 26, 183001 (2014).10.1088/0953-8984/26/18/183001 ↗
90. Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136403 ↗
91. Rupp, M., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 058301 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.058301 ↗
92. Chmiela, S. et al. Machine learning of accurate energy-conserving molecular force fields. Sci. Adv. 3, e1603015 (2017).10.1126/sciadv.1603015 ↗
93. Bartók, A. P., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. On representing chemical environments. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 87, 184115 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.87.184115 ↗
94. Szlachta, W. J., Bartók, A. P. & Csányi, G. Accuracy and transferability of gaussian approximation potential models for tungsten. Phys. Rev. B. Condens. Matter 90, 104108 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.90.104108 ↗
95. Bartók, A. P. & Csányi, G. Gaussian approximation potentials: a brief tutorial introduction. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 115, 1051–1057 (2015).10.1002/qua.24927 ↗
96. Deringer, V. L. & Csányi, G. Machine learning based interatomic potential for amorphous carbon. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 95, 094203 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.95.094203 ↗
97. Jindal, S., Chiriki, S. & Bulusu, S. S. Spherical harmonics based descriptor for neural network potentials: structure and dynamics of Au147 nanocluster. J. Chem. Phys. 146, 204301 (2017).10.1063/1.4983392 ↗
98. Thompson, A., Swiler, L., Trott, C., Foiles, S. & Tucker, G. Spectral neighbor analysis method for automated generation of quantum-accurate interatomic potentials. J. Comput. Phys. 285, 316–330 (2015).10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.018 ↗
99. Rupp, M. Machine learning for quantum mechanics in a nutshell. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 115, 1058–1073 (2015).10.1002/qua.24954 ↗
100. Li, Z., Kermode, J. R. & De Vita, A. Molecular dynamics with on-the-fly machine learning of quantum-mechanical forces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 096405 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.096405 ↗