AI-driven image processing framework for high-accuracy detection and characterization of vacancies in 2D materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Two-dimensional (2D) materials such as graphene, phosphorene, and MoS₂ offer transformative opportunities but are often impaired by synthesis-induced vacancies. Existing characterization tools—atomic-resolution microscopy and molecular dynamics—are slow, costly, and unsuitable for large-scale screening. We introduce an AI-driven image-processing framework that combines automated grayscale image analysis with machine learning to rapidly and accurately detect and quantify vacancies. By converting structural information into tailored pixel-based descriptors, our method regresses defect coordinates, radii, and densities without atomic-scale input. Validated on thousands of simulated images with controlled defects, the framework attains over 96% prediction accuracy and surpasses thermal vibration analysis (~90%) while removing the need for specialized experimental setups. The approach is generalizable across material systems, enabling high-throughput screening and standardized defect analysis for nanoelectronics, sensing, and quantum technology applications. This work accelerates the AI-guided design and optimization of defect-engineered 2D materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Neural Network Applications · 2D Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Geim, A. K. & Novoselov, K. S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 6, 183–191 (2007).10.1038/nmat1849 ↗
2. Berger, C. et al. Ultrathin epitaxial graphite: 2D electron gas properties and a route toward graphene-based nanoelectronics. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 19912–19916 (2004).10.1021/jp040650f ↗
3. Liu, M. et al. A graphene-based broadband optical modulator. Nature 474, 64–67 (2011).10.1038/nature10067 ↗
4. Withers, F., Dubois, M. & Savchenko, A. K. Electron properties of fluorinated single-layer graphene transistors. Phys. Rev. B 82, 073403 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.82.073403 ↗
5. Appalakondaiah, S., Vaitheeswaran, G., Lebègue, S., Christensen, N. E. & Svane, A. Effect of van der Waals interactions on the structural and elastic properties of black phosphorus. Phys. Rev. B 86, 035105 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevB.86.035105 ↗
6. Qiao, J., Kong, X., Hu, Z.-X., Yang, F. & Ji, W. High-mobility transport anisotropy and linear dichroism in few-layer black phosphorus. Nat. Commun. 5, 4475 (2014).10.1038/ncomms5475 ↗
7. Li, L. et al. Black phosphorus field-effect transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 372–377 (2014).10.1038/nnano.2014.35 ↗
8. Guo, H., Lu, N., Dai, J., Wu, X. & Zeng, X. C. Phosphorene nanoribbons, phosphorus nanotubes, and van der waals multilayers. J. Phys. Chem. C. 118, 14051–14059 (2014).10.1021/jp505257g ↗
9. Liu, H. et al. Phosphorene: an unexplored 2D semiconductor with a high hole mobility. ACS Nano 8, 4033–4041 (2014).10.1021/nn501226z ↗
10. Radisavljevic, B., Radenovic, A., Brivio, J., Giacometti, V. & Kis, A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotech 6, 147–150 (2011).10.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
11. Cahangirov, S., Topsakal, M., Aktürk, E., Şahin, H. & Ciraci, S. Two- and one-dimensional honeycomb structures of silicon and germanium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 236804 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.236804 ↗
12. Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T. & Kanda, H. Direct-bandgap properties and evidence for ultraviolet lasing of hexagonal boron nitride single crystal. Nat. Mater. 3, 404–409 (2004).10.1038/nmat1134 ↗
13. Wei, Y. & Yang, R. Nanomechanics of graphene. Natl. Sci. Rev. 6, 324–348 (2019).10.1093/nsr/nwy067 ↗
14. Liu, Y., Xiao, H. & Goddard, W. A. I. Two-dimensional halide perovskites: tuning electronic activities of defects. Nano Lett. 16, 3335–3340 (2016).10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00964 ↗
15. Zheng, B. & Gu, G. X. Tuning the graphene mechanical anisotropy via defect engineering. Carbon 155, 697–705 (2019).10.1016/j.carbon.2019.09.008 ↗
16. Araujo, P. T., Terrones, M. & Dresselhaus, M. S. Defects and Impurities in Graphene-like Materials (Elsevier, 2012).10.1016/S1369-7021(12)70045-7 ↗
17. Mak, K. F. & Shan, J. Photonics and optoelectronics of 2D semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Photon 10, 216–226 (2016).10.1038/nphoton.2015.282 ↗
18. Tran, T. T., Bray, K., Ford, M. J., Toth, M. & Aharonovich, I. Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers. Nat. Nanotech. 11, 37–41 (2016).10.1038/nnano.2015.242 ↗
19. Zhang, T., Li, X. & Gao, H. Fracture of graphene: a review. Int. J. Fract. 196, 1–31 (2015).10.1007/s10704-015-0039-9 ↗
20. Hamed Mashhadzadeh, A., Ghorbanzadeh Ahangari, M., Dadrasi, A. & Fathalian, M. Theoretical studies on the mechanical and electronic properties of 2D and 3D structures of Beryllium-Oxide graphene and graphene nanobud. Appl. Surf. Sci. 476, 36–48 (2019).10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.083 ↗
21. Zheng, B. & Gu, G. X. Recovery from mechanical degradation of graphene by defect enlargement. Nanotechnology 31, 085707 (2019).10.1088/1361-6528/ab5401 ↗
22. Zheng, B. & Gu, G. X. Stress field characteristics and collective mechanical properties of defective graphene. J. Phys. Chem. C. 124, 7421–7431 (2020).10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11027 ↗
23. Zarghami Dehaghani, M. et al. Fracture toughness and crack propagation behavior of nanoscale beryllium oxide graphene-like structures: a molecular dynamics simulation analysis. Eng. Fract. Mech. 235, 107194 (2020).10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107194 ↗
24. Zahedi, R. K., Shirazi, A. H. N., Alimouri, P., Alajlan, N. & Rabczuk, T. Mechanical properties of graphene-like BC3; a molecular dynamics study. Comput. Mater. Sci. 168, 1–10 (2019).10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.05.053 ↗
25. Jariwala, D., Sangwan, V. K., Lauhon, L. J., Marks, T. J. & Hersam, M. C. Emerging device applications for semiconducting two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 8, 1102–1120 (2014).10.1021/nn500064s ↗
26. Sadeghzadeh, S. Effects of vacancies and divacancies on the failure of C3N nanosheets. Diam. Relat. Mater. 89, 257–265 (2018).10.1016/j.diamond.2018.09.018 ↗
27. Akinwande, D. et al. Graphene and two-dimensional materials for silicon technology. Nature 573, 507–518 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1573-9 ↗
28. Atatüre, M., Englund, D., Vamivakas, N., Lee, S.-Y. & Wrachtrup, J. Material platforms for spin-based photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 38–51 (2018).10.1038/s41578-018-0008-9 ↗
29. Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F. & Cappellaro, P. Quantum sensing. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017).10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002 ↗
30. Alkauskas, A., Bassett, L. C., Exarhos, A. L. & Fu, K.-M. C. Defects by design: quantum nanophotonics in emerging materials. Nanophotonics 8, 1863–1865 (2019).10.1515/nanoph-2019-0437 ↗
31. Chen, H. et al. Atomically precise engineering of spin–orbit polarons in a kagome magnetic Weyl semimetal. Nat. Commun. 15, 2301 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-46729-3 ↗
32. Aharonovich, I., Englund, D. & Toth, M. Solid-state single-photon emitters. Nat. Photon 10, 631–641 (2016).10.1038/nphoton.2016.186 ↗
33. Weston, L., Wickramaratne, D., Mackoit, M., Alkauskas, A. & Van de Walle, C. G. Native point defects and impurities in hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. B 97, 214104 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.97.214104 ↗
34. Narang, P., Ciccarino, C. J., Flick, J. & Englund, D. Quantum materials with atomic precision: artificial atoms in solids: ab initio design, control, and integration of single photon emitters in artificial quantum materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1904557 (2019).10.1002/adfm.201904557 ↗
35. Huang, P. Y. et al. Grains and grain boundaries in single-layer graphene atomic patchwork quilts. Nature 469, 389–392 (2011).10.1038/nature09718 ↗
36. Gómez-Navarro, C. et al. Atomic structure of reduced graphene oxide. Nano Lett. 10, 1144–1148 (2010).10.1021/nl9031617 ↗
37. Dong, J. et al. Transmission electron microscopy of epitaxial semiconductor materials and devices. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 58, 043001 (2024).10.1088/1361-6463/ad8a6b ↗
38. Li, K., Bu, Y. & Wang, H. Advances on in situ TEM mechanical testing techniques: a retrospective and perspective view. Front. Mater. 10, 1207024 (2023).10.3389/fmats.2023.1207024 ↗
39. Zheng, B. & Gu, G. X. Machine learning-based detection of graphene defects with atomic precision. Nano-Micro Lett. 12, 181 (2020).10.1007/s40820-020-00519-w ↗
40. Namin, S. F. A. & Pilafkan, R. Vibration analysis of defective graphene sheets using nonlocal elasticity theory. Phys. E: Low. Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 93, 257–264 (2017).10.1016/j.physe.2017.06.014 ↗
41. Tahouneh, V., Naei, M. H. & Mashhadi, M. M. Using IGA and trimming approaches for vibrational analysis of L-shape graphene sheets via nonlocal elasticity theory. Steel Compos. Struct. 33, 717–727 (2019).
42. Chu, L., Shi, J. & Souza de Cursi, E. Vibration analysis of vacancy defected graphene sheets by Monte Carlo based finite element method. Nanomaterials 8, 489 (2018).10.3390/nano8070489 ↗
43. Butler, K. T., Davies, D. W., Cartwright, H., Isayev, O. & Walsh, A. Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 559, 547–555 (2018).10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 ↗
44. Alibagheri, E., Ranjbar, A., Khazaei, M., Kühne, T. D. & Vaez Allaei, S. M. Remarkable optoelectronic characteristics of synthesizable square-octagon haeckelite structures: machine learning materials discovery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2402390 (2024).10.1002/adfm.202402390 ↗
45. Ramprasad, R., Batra, R., Pilania, G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. & Kim, C. Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects. NPJ Comput Mater. 3, 1–13 (2017).10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 ↗
46. Brown, K. A., Brittman, S., Maccaferri, N., Jariwala, D. & Celano, U. Machine learning in nanoscience: big data at small scales. Nano Lett. 20, 2–10 (2020).10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04090 ↗
47. Chen, C.-T. & Gu, G. X. Machine learning for composite materials. MRS Commun. 9, 556–566 (2019).10.1557/mrc.2019.32 ↗
48. Alibagheri, E. et al. Synthesizable two-dimensional haeckelites with auxetic behavior and multifunctional properties: a computational study integrating machine learning interatomic potentials. ACS Mater. Lett. 7, 3527–3536 (2025).10.1021/acsmaterialslett.5c00809 ↗
49. Chen, C.-T. & Gu, G. X. Generative deep neural networks for inverse materials design using backpropagation and active learning. Adv. Sci. 7, 1902607 (2020).10.1002/advs.201902607 ↗
50. Alibagheri, E., Mortazavi, B. & Rabczuk, T. Predicting the electronic and structural properties of two-dimensional materials using machine learning. CMC 67, 1287–1300 (2021).10.32604/cmc.2021.013564 ↗
51. Alibagheri, E. et al. LAX phases: A family of novel stable layered materials, informatics-based discovery. InfoMat 7, e12664 (2025).10.1002/inf2.12664 ↗
52. Yang, C., Kim, Y., Ryu, S. & Gu, G. X. Prediction of composite microstructure stress-strain curves using convolutional neural networks. Mater. Des. 189, 108509 (2020).10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108509 ↗
53. Zhang, Z. & Gu, G. X. Finite-element-based deep-learning model for deformation behavior of digital materials. Adv. Theory Simul. 3, 2000031 (2020).10.1002/adts.202000031 ↗
54. Alibagheri, E. et al. Data-driven discovery of novel synthesizable MAX phase materials. Appl. Mater. Today 46, 102893 (2025).10.1016/j.apmt.2025.102893 ↗
55. Chen, F.-X. R. et al. Deep learning based atomic defect detection framework for two-dimensional materials. Sci. Data 10, 91 (2023).10.1038/s41597-023-02004-6 ↗
56. Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. et al. Universal machine learning framework for defect predictions in zinc blende semiconductors. Patterns 3, 100450 (2022).10.1016/j.patter.2022.100450 ↗
57. Zhang, E., Dao, M., Karniadakis, G. E. & Suresh, S. Analyses of internal structures and defects in materials using physics-informed neural networks. Sci. Adv. 8, eabk0644 (2022).10.1126/sciadv.abk0644 ↗
58. Gui, C. et al. Deep learning analysis on transmission electron microscope imaging of atomic defects in two-dimensional materials. iScience 26, 107982 (2023).10.1016/j.isci.2023.107982 ↗
59. Andrew, R. C., Mapasha, R. E., Ukpong, A. M. & Chetty, N. Mechanical properties of graphene and boronitrene. Phys. Rev. B 85, 125428 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevB.85.125428 ↗
60. Jain, A. & McGaughey, A. J. H. Strongly anisotropic in-plane thermal transport in single-layer black phosphorene. Sci. Rep. 5, 8501 (2015).10.1038/srep08501 ↗
61. Zhong, H. et al. Interfacial properties of monolayer and bilayer MoS2 contacts with metals: beyond the energy band calculations. Sci. Rep. 6, 21786 (2016).10.1038/srep21786 ↗
62. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. V. M. D. Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996).10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
63. Momma, K. & Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl Cryst. 44, 1272–1276 (2011).10.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗
64. Moldovan, D., Anđelković, M. & Peeters, F. pybinding v0.9.5: a Python package for tight-binding calculations. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4010216 (2020).10.5281/zenodo.4010216 ↗
65. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
66. Caballé-Cervigón, N., Castillo-Sequera, J. L., Gómez-Pulido, J. A., Gómez-Pulido, J. M. & Polo-Luque, M. L. Machine learning applied to diagnosis of human diseases: a systematic review. Appl. Sci. 10, 5135 (2020).10.3390/app10155135 ↗