Strategies to search for two-dimensional materials with long spin qubit coherence time
Source abstract
Abstract
Two-dimensional (2D) materials that can host qubits with long spin coherence time ( T 2 ) have the distinct advantage of integrating easily with existing microelectronic and photonic platforms, making them attractive for designing novel quantum devices with enhanced performance. However, the relative lack of 2D materials as spin qubit hosts, as well as appropriate substrates that can help maintain long T 2 , necessitates a strategy to search for candidates with robust spin coherence. Here, we develop a high-throughput computational workflow to predict the nuclear spin bath-driven qubit decoherence and T 2 in 2D materials and heterostructures. We initially screen 1172 2D materials and find 189 monolayers with T 2 > 1 ms, higher than that of naturally-abundant diamond. We then construct 1554 lattice-commensurate heterostructures between high- T 2 2D materials and select 3D substrates, and we find that T 2 is generally lower in a heterostructure than in the bare 2D host material; however, low-noise substrates (such as CeO 2 and CaO) can help maintain high T 2 . To further accelerate the material screening effort, we derive analytical models that enable rapid predictions of T 2 for 2D materials and heterostructures. The models offer a simple, yet quantitative, way to determine the relative contributions to decoherence from the nuclear spin baths of the 2D host and substrate in a heterostructural system. By developing a high-throughput workflow and analytical models, we expand the genome of 2D materials and their spin coherence times for the development of spin qubit platforms.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · 2D Materials and Applications · Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Janitz, E. et al. Diamond surface engineering for molecular sensing with nitrogen-vacancy centers. J. Mater. Chem. C 10, 13533 (2022).10.1039/D2TC01258H ↗
2. Ye, M., Seo, H. & Galli, G. Spin coherence in two-dimensional materials. npj Comput. Mater. 5, 44 (2019).10.1038/s41524-019-0182-3 ↗
3. Onizhuk, M. & Galli, G. Substrate-controlled dynamics of spin qubits in low dimensional Van der Waals materials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 154003 (2021).10.1063/5.0048399 ↗
4. Schuler, B. et al. Electrically driven photon emission from individual atomic defects in monolayer WS2. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb5988 (2020).10.1126/sciadv.abb5988 ↗
5. Cochrane, K. A. et al. Spin-dependent vibronic response of a carbon radical ion in two-dimensional WS2. Nat. Commun. 12, 7287 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-27585-x ↗
6. Thomas, J. C. et al. A substitutional quantum defect in WS2 discovered by high-throughput computational screening and fabricated by site-selective STM manipulation. Nat. Commun. 15, 3556 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-47876-3 ↗
7. Fang, H.-H., Wang, X.-J., Marie, X. & Sun, H.-B. Quantum sensing with optically accessible spin defects in Van der Waals layered materials. Light Sci. Appl. 13, 303 (2024).10.1038/s41377-024-01630-y ↗
8. Zhang, G., Cheng, Y., Chou, J.-P. & Gali, A. Material platforms for defect qubits and single-photon emitters. Appl. Phys. Rev. 7, 031308 (2020).10.1063/5.0006075 ↗
9. Montblanch, A. R.-P., Barbone, M., Aharonovich, I., Atatüre, M. & Ferrari, A. C. Layered materials as a platform for quantum technologies. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 555 (2023).10.1038/s41565-023-01354-x ↗
10. Liu, W. et al. Experimental observation of spin defects in Van der Waals material GeS2. Preprint at 25, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c03575 (2024).
11. Vaidya, S. et al. Coherent spins in Van der Waals semiconductor GeS2 at ambient conditions. Preprint at arXiv 25, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c03567 (2025).
12. Sajid, A. & Thygesen, K. S. Spin coherence times of point defects in two-dimensional materials from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 106, 104108 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevB.106.104108 ↗
13. Kanai, S. et al. Generalized scaling of spin qubit coherence in over 12,000 host materials. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2121808119 (2022).10.1073/pnas.2121808119 ↗
14. Onizhuk, M. & Galli, G. Colloquium: decoherence of solid-state spin qubits: a computational perspective. Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 021001 (2025).10.1103/RevModPhys.97.021001 ↗
15. Mounet, N. et al. Two-dimensional materials from high-throughput computational exfoliation of experimentally known compounds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 246 (2018).10.1038/s41565-017-0035-5 ↗
16. Campi, D., Mounet, N., Gibertini, M., Pizzi, G. & Marzari, N. Expansion of the materials cloud 2D database. ACS Nano 17, 11268 (2023).10.1021/acsnano.2c11510 ↗
17. Zhou, J. et al. 2DMatPedia, an open computational database of two-dimensional materials from top-down and bottom-up approaches. Sci. Data 6, 86 (2019).10.1038/s41597-019-0097-3 ↗
18. Haastrup, S. et al. The Computational 2D Materials Database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals. 2D Mater. 5, 042002 (2018).10.1088/2053-1583/aacfc1 ↗
19. Gjerding, M. N. et al. Recent progress of the Computational 2D Materials Database (C2DB). 2D Mater. 8, 044002 (2021).10.1088/2053-1583/ac1059 ↗
20. Wang, H.-C., Schmidt, J., Marques, M. A. L., Wirtz, L. & Romero, A. H. Symmetry-based computational search for novel binary and ternary 2D materials. 2D Mater. 10, 035007 (2023).10.1088/2053-1583/accc43 ↗
21. Campi, D., Mounet, N., Gibertini, M., Pizzi, G. & Marzari, N. The materials cloud 2D database (MC2D). https://archive.materialscloud.org/record/2022.84 (2022).
22. Belsky, A., Hellenbrandt, M., Karen, V. L. & Luksch, P. New developments in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD): accessibility in support of materials research and design. Acta Crystallogr. B 58, 364 (2002).10.1107/S0108768102006948 ↗
23. Zagorac, D., Müller, H., Ruehl, S., Zagorac, J. & Rehme, S. Recent developments in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database: theoretical crystal structure data and related features. J. Appl. Crytallogr. 52, 918 (2019).10.1107/S160057671900997X ↗
24. Gražulis, S. et al. Crystallography Open Database - an open-access collection of crystal structures. J. Appl. Crytallogr. 42, 726 (2009).10.1107/S0021889809016690 ↗
25. Gražulis, S. et al. Crystallography Open Database (COD): an open-access collection of crystal structures and platform for world-wide collaboration. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D420 (2012).10.1093/nar/gkr900 ↗
26. Villars, P., Onodera, N. & Iwata, S. The Linus Pauling file (LPF) and its application to materials design. J. Alloy Compd. 279, 1 (1998).10.1016/S0925-8388(98)00605-7 ↗
27. Weber, J. R. et al. Quantum computing with defects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8513 (2010).10.1073/pnas.1003052107 ↗
28. Zhan, J., Govoni, M. & Galli, G. Nonempirical range-separated hybrid functional with spatially dependent screened exchange. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 5851 (2023).10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00580 ↗
29. Zhan, J., Govoni, M. & Galli, G. Dielectric-dependent range-separated hybrid functional calculations for metal oxides. Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 053808 (2025).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.9.053808 ↗
30. Onizhuk, M. & Galli, G. PyCCE: a Python package for cluster correlation expansion simulations of spin qubit dynamics. Adv. Theory Simul. 4, 2100254 (2021).10.1002/adts.202100254 ↗
31. Huber, S. P. et al. AiiDA 1.0, a scalable computational infrastructure for automated reproducible workflows and data provenance. Sci. Data 7, 300 (2020).10.1038/s41597-020-00638-4 ↗
32. Uhrin, M., Huber, S. P., Yu, J., Marzari, N. & Pizzi, G. Workflows in AiiDA: engineering a high-throughput, event-based engine for robust and modular computational workflows. Comput. Mater. Sci. 187, 110086 (2021).10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110086 ↗
33. Alvarez, S. A cartography of the Van der Waals territories. Dalton Trans. 42, 8617 (2013).10.1039/c3dt50599e ↗
34. Zur, A. & McGill, T. C. Lattice match: an application to heteroepitaxy. J. Appl. Phys. 55, 378 (1984).10.1063/1.333084 ↗
35. Mathew, K. et al. MPInterfaces: a Materials Project based Python tool for high-throughput computational screening of interfacial systems. Comput. Mater. Sci. 122, 183 (2016).10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.05.020 ↗
36. Bakti Utama, M. I. et al. Recent developments and future directions in the growth of nanostructures by van der Waals epitaxy. Nanoscale 5, 3570 (2013).10.1039/c3nr34011b ↗
37. Shi, H., Pan, H., Zhang, Y.-W. & Yakobson, B. I. Quasiparticle band structures and optical properties of strained monolayer MoS2 and WS2. Phys. Rev. B 87, 155304 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.87.155304 ↗
38. Chen, W., Griffin, S. M., Rignanese, G.-M. & Hautier, G. Nonunique fraction of Fock exchange for defects in two-dimensional materials. Phys. Rev. B 106, L161107 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevB.106.L161107 ↗
39. Chernikov, A. et al. Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic Rydberg series in monolayer WS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 076802 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.076802 ↗
40. Zhu, B., Chen, X. & Cui, X. Exciton binding energy of monolayer WS2. Sci. Rep. 5, 9218 (2015).10.1038/srep09218 ↗
41. Avsar, A. et al. Probing magnetism in atomically thin semiconducting PtSe2. Nat. Commun. 11, 4806 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-18521-6 ↗
42. Aslam, M. A. et al. All Van der Waals semiconducting PtSe2 field effect transistors with low contact resistance graphite electrodes. Nano Lett. 24, 6529 (2024).10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c00956 ↗
43. Cho, Y. S. et al. Electronic and electrocatalytic applications based on solution-processed two-dimensional platinum diselenide with thickness-dependent electronic properties. EcoMat 5, e12358 (2023).10.1002/eom2.12358 ↗
44. Dahmen, T., Rittner, P., Böger-Seidl, S. & Gruehn, R. Beiträge zum thermischen Verhalten von Sulfaten XIV. zum thermischen Verhalten von PdSO4 ⋅ 2H2O und PdSO4 ⋅ 0.75H2O sowie zur Struktur von m-PdSO4. J. Alloy Compd. 216, 11 (1994).10.1016/0925-8388(94)91034-0 ↗
45. Alkathiri, T. et al. 2D palladium sulphate for visible-light-driven optoelectronic reversible gas sensing at room temperature. Small Sci. 2, 2100097 (2022).10.1002/smsc.202100097 ↗
46. Sipahigil, A. et al. Indistinguishable photons from separated silicon-vacancy centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 113602 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.113602 ↗
47. Stoll, S. & Schweiger, A. EasySpin, a comprehensive software package for spectral simulation and analysis in EPR. J. Magn. Reson. 178, 42 (2006).10.1016/j.jmr.2005.08.013 ↗
48. Seo, H. et al. Quantum decoherence dynamics of divacancy spins in silicon carbide. Nat. Commun. 7, 12935 (2016).10.1038/ncomms12935 ↗
49. Davis, E. J. et al. Probing many-body dynamics in a two-dimensional dipolar spin ensemble. Nat. Phys. 19, 836 (2023).10.1038/s41567-023-01944-5 ↗
50. Kezerashvili, R. Y. & Kezerashvili, V. Y. Charge-dipole and dipole-dipole interactions in two-dimensional materials. Phys. Rev. B 105, 205416 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevB.105.205416 ↗
51. Song, Y., Siriwardane, E. M. D., Zhao, Y. & Hu, J. Computational discovery of new 2D materials using deep learning generative models. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 13, 53303 (2021).10.1021/acsami.1c01044 ↗
52. Lyngby, P. & Thygesen, K. S. Data-driven discovery of 2D materials by deep generative models. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 232 (2022).10.1038/s41524-022-00923-3 ↗
53. Dong, R., Song, Y., Siriwardane, E. M. D. & Hu, J. Discovery of 2D materials using transformer network-based generative design. Adv. Intel. Syst. 5, 2300141 (2023).10.1002/aisy.202300141 ↗
54. Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964).10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
55. Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
56. Teale, A. M. et al. DFT exchange: sharing perspectives on the workhorse of quantum chemistry and materials science. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 28700 (2022).
57. Tran, F. & Blaha, P. Accurate band gaps of semiconductors and insulators with a semilocal exchange-correlation potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 226401 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.226401 ↗
58. Ghosh, S., Verma, P., Cramer, C. J., Gagliardi, L. & Truhlar, D. G. Combining wave function methods with density functional theory for excited states. Chem. Rev. 118, 7249 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00193 ↗
59. Gygi, F. Architecture of Qbox: a scalable first-principles molecular dynamics code. IBM J. Res. Dev. 52, 137 (2008).10.1147/rd.521.0137 ↗
60. Hamann, D. R. Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 88, 085117 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.88.085117 ↗