journal article·2021-05-14Open access

Topological vectors as a fingerprinting system for 2D-material flake distributions

Joyce C. C. Santos, Mariana C. Prado, Helane L. O. Morais, Samuel M. Sousa, Elisangela Silva-Pinto, Luiz G. Cançado, Bernardo R. A. Neves

Abstract

Abstract The production of 2D material flakes in large quantities is a rapidly evolving field and a cornerstone for their industrial applicability. Although flake production has advanced in a fast pace, its statistical characterization is somewhat slower, with few examples in the literature which may lack either modelling uniformity and/or physical equivalence to actual flake dimensions. The present work brings a methodology for 2D material flake characterization with a threefold target: (i) propose a set of morphological shape parameters that correctly map to actual and relevant flake dimensions; (ii) find a single distribution function that efficiently describes all these parameter distributions; and (iii) suggest a representation system—topological vectors—that uniquely characterizes the statistical flake morphology within a given distribution. The applicability of such methodology is illustrated via the analysis of tens of thousands flakes of graphene/graphite and talc, which were submitted to different production protocols. The richness of information unveiled by this universal methodology may help the development of necessary standardization procedures for the imminent 2D-materials industry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Graphene research and applications · Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Ferrari, A. C. et al. Science and technology roadmap for graphene, related two dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems. Nanoscale 7, 4598–4810 (2015).10.1039/C4NR01600A ↗
2. Yi, M. & Shen, Z. A review on mechanical exfoliation for the scalable production of graphene. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 11700–11715 (2015).10.1039/C5TA00252D ↗
3. Nicolosi, V., Chhowalla, M., Kanatzidis, M. G., Strano, M. S. & Coleman, J. N. Liquid exfoliation of layered materials. Science 340, 1226419 (2013).10.1126/science.1226419 ↗
4. Backes, C. et al. Production and processing of graphene and related materials. 2D Mater. 7, 022001 (2020).10.1088/2053-1583/ab1e0a ↗
5. Ciesielski, A. & Samori, P. Graphene via sonication assisted liquid-phase exfoliation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 381–398 (2014).10.1039/C3CS60217F ↗
6. Kouroupis-Agalou, K. et al. Fragmentation and exfoliation of 2-dimensional materials: a statistical approach. Nanoscale 6, 5926–5933 (2014).10.1039/C3NR06919B ↗
7. Backes, C. et al. Equipartition of energy defines the size−thickness relationship in liquid-exfoliated nanosheets. ACS Nano 13, 7050–7061 (2019).10.1021/acsnano.9b02234 ↗
8. Chacham, H. et al. Controlling the morphology of nanoflakes obtained by liquid-phase exfoliation: implications for the mass production of 2D materials. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 3, 12095–12105 (2020).10.1021/acsanm.0c02598 ↗
9. Merkus, H. G. Particle Size Measurements: Fundamentals, Practice, Quality (Springer, 2009)
10. Erasmus, J. J., Connolly, J. E., McAdams, H. P. & Roggli, V. L. Solitary pulmonary nodules: Part I. Morphologic evaluation for differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. Radiographics 20, 43–58 (2000).10.1148/radiographics.20.1.g00ja0343 ↗
11. Mogilner, J. G. et al. Computer-assisted image analysis can aid the prognostication of advanced-stage neuroblastomas. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 126, 285–290 (2000).10.1007/s004320050344 ↗
12. Yap, F. Y. et al. Quantitative morphometric analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma: development of a programmed algorithm and preliminary application. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 19, 97–105 (2013).
13. Fernandes, T. D. F. et al. A semi-automated general statistical treatment of graphene systems. 2D Mater. 7, 025045–025047 (2020).10.1088/2053-1583/ab7975 ↗
14. Wackerly, D., Mendenhall, W. & Scheaffer, R. Mathematical Statistics with Applications. 7th edn. (Thomson Brooks/Cole, 2007).
15. McWilliam, I. G. & Bolton, H. C. Instrumental peak distortion. I. Relaxation time effects. Anal. Chem. 41, 1755–1762 (1969).10.1021/ac60282a001 ↗
16. Grushka, E. Characterization of exponentially modified Gaussian peaks in chromatography. Anal. Chem. 44, 1733–1738 (1972).10.1021/ac60319a011 ↗
17. Golubev, A. Exponentially modified Gaussian (EMG) relevance to distributions related to cell proliferation and differentiation. J. Theor. Biol. 262, 257–266 (2010).10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.10.005 ↗
18. Gunzert-Marx, K. et al. Secondary beam fragments produced by 200 MeVu−1 12C ions in water and their dose contributions in carbon ion radiotherapy. N. J. Phys. 10, 1–21 (2008).10.1088/1367-2630/10/7/075003 ↗
19. Cricenti, A. L. & Branch, P. A. The Ex-Gaussian distribution as a model of first-person shooter game traffic. Multimed. Syst. 19, 221–229 (2013).10.1007/s00530-012-0272-2 ↗
20. Olivier, J. & Norberg, M. M. Positively skewed data: revisiting the box-cox power transformation. Int. J. Psych. Res. 3, 68–75 (2010).10.21500/20112084.846 ↗
21. Li, Z. et al. Mechanisms of liquid-phase exfoliation for the production of graphene. ACS Nano 14, 10976–10985 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.0c03916 ↗
22. Tillett, J. P. K. Axial and transverse Stokes flow past slender axisymmetric bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 401–417 (1970).10.1017/S0022112070001908 ↗
23. Leung, W. W.-F. Centrifugal separations in Biotechnology (Elsevier, 2020).10.1016/B978-0-08-102634-2.00004-0 ↗
24. Foley, J. P. & Dorsey, J. G. A review of the exponentially modified Gaussian (EMG) function: evaluation and subsequent calculation of universal data. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 22, 40–46 (1984).10.1093/chromsci/22.1.40 ↗
25. Alencar, A. B., Barboza, A. P. M., Archanjo, B. S., Chacham, H. & Neves, B. R. A. Experimental and theoretical investigations of monolayer and few-layer talc. 2D Mater. 2, 015004 (2015).10.1088/2053-1583/2/1/015004 ↗
26. Neikov, O. D., Naboychenko, S. S. & Yefimov, N. A. Handbook of Non-Ferrous Metal Powders—Technologies and Applications (Elsevier, 2019).10.1016/B978-0-08-100543-9.00009-9 ↗
27. Harvey, A. et al. Exploring the versatility of liquid phase exfoliation: producing 2D nanosheets from talcum powder, cat litter and beach sand. 2D Mater. 4, 025054 (2017).10.1088/2053-1583/aa641a ↗
28. Backes, C. et al. Production of highly monolayer enriched dispersions of liquid-exfoliated nanosheets by liquid cascade centrifugation. ACS Nano 10, 1589–1601 (2016).10.1021/acsnano.5b07228 ↗