journal article·2018-08-03Open access

In situ control of graphene ripples and strain in the electron microscope

U. Ludacka, M. R. A. Monazam, C. Rentenberger, M. Friedrich, U. Stefanelli, J. C. Meyer, J. Kotakoski

Abstract

Abstract We demonstrate control over the three-dimensional (3D) structure of suspended 2D materials in a transmission electron microscope. The shape of our graphene samples is measured from the diffraction patterns recorded at different sample tilts while applying tensile strain on the sample carrier. The changes in the shape of the pattern and in individual diffraction spots allow us to analyze both corrugations and strain in the lattice. Due to the significant effect of ripples and strain on the properties of 2D materials, our results may lead to new ways for their engineering for applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Quantum and electron transport phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Ishigami, M., Chen, J. H., Cullen, W. G., Fuhrer, M. S. & Williams, E. D. Atomic structure of graphene on SiO2. Nano Lett. 7, 1643–1648 (2007).10.1021/nl070613a ↗
2. Meyer, J. C. et al. The structure of suspended graphene sheets. Nature 446, 60–63 (2007).10.1038/nature05545 ↗
3. Fasolino, A., Los, J. H. & Katsnelson, M. I. Intrinsic ripples in graphene. Nat. Mater. 6, 858–861 (2007).10.1038/nmat2011 ↗
4. Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. Statistical Physics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1980).
5. Mermin, N. D. Crystalline order in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. 176, 250–254 (1968).10.1103/PhysRev.176.250 ↗
6. Mermin, N. D. & Wagner, H. Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic heisenberg models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133–1136 (1966).10.1103/PhysRevLett.17.1133 ↗
7. Herrero, C. P. & Ramirez, R. Quantum effects in graphene monolayers: path-integral simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 145, 224701 (2016).10.1063/1.4971453 ↗
8. Vasić, B., Zurutuza, A. & Gajić, R. Spatial variation of wear and electrical properties across wrinkles in chemical vapour deposition graphene. Carbon N. Y. 102, 304–310 (2016).10.1016/j.carbon.2016.02.066 ↗
9. Schiefele, J., Martin-Moreno, L. & Guinea, F. Faraday effect in rippled graphene: magneto-optics and random gauge fields. Phys. Rev. B 94, 035401 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.94.035401 ↗
10. Liang, T. et al. Permeation through graphene ripples. 2D Mater. 4, 025010 (2017).10.1088/2053-1583/aa59ca ↗
11. Zan, R. et al. Scanning tunnelling microscopy of suspended graphene. Nanoscale 4, 3065–3068 (2012).10.1039/c2nr30162h ↗
12. Xu, P. et al. Atomic control of strain in freestanding graphene. Phys. Rev. B 85, 121406 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevB.85.121406 ↗
13. Eder, F. R. et al. Probing from both sides: reshaping the graphene landscape via face-to-face dual-probe microscopy. Nano Lett. 13, 1934–1940 (2013).10.1021/nl3042799 ↗
14. Breitwieser, R. et al. Flipping nanoscale ripples of free-standing graphene using a scanning tunneling microscope tip. Carbon N. Y. 77, 236–243 (2014).10.1016/j.carbon.2014.05.026 ↗
15. Tapasztó, L. et al. Breakdown of continuum mechanics for nanometre-wavelength rippling of graphene. Nat. Phys. 8, 739–742 (2012).10.1038/nphys2389 ↗
16. Brivio, J., Alexander, D. T. L. & Kis, A. Ripples and layers in ultrathin MoS2 membranes. Nano Lett. 11, 5148–5153 (2011).10.1021/nl2022288 ↗
17. Kirilenko, D. A., Dideykin, A. T. & Tendeloo, G. V. Measuring the corrugation amplitude of suspended and supported graphene. Phys. Rev. B 84, 235417 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.84.235417 ↗
18. Thomsen, J. D. et al. Suppression of intrinsic roughness in encapsulated graphene. Phys. Rev. B 96, 014101 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.014101 ↗
19. Friedrich, M. & Stefanelli, U. Graphene ground states. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.05049 (2018).10.1007/s00033-018-0965-2 ↗
20. Friedrich, M. & Stefanelli, U. Ripples in graphene: a variational approach. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.05053 (2018).
21. Ebner, C., Sarkar, R., Rajagopalan, J. & Rentenberger, C. Local, atomic-level elastic strain measurements of metallic glass thin films by electron diffraction. Ultramicroscopy 165, 51–58 (2016).10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.04.004 ↗
22. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
23. Plimpton, S. J. & Thompson, A. P. Computational aspects of many-body potentials. MRS Bull. 37, 513–521 (2012).10.1557/mrs.2012.96 ↗
24. Coleman, S. P., C, L. & Spearot, D. E. Virtual diffraction analysis of ni [010] symmetric tilt grain boundaries. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 21, 055020 (2013).10.1088/0965-0393/21/5/055020 ↗
25. Los, J. H. & Fasolino, A. Intrinsic long-range bond-order potential for carbon: performance in Monte carlo simulations of graphitization. Phys. Rev. B 68, 024107 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevB.68.024107 ↗
26. Susi, T. et al. Isotope analysis in the transmission electron microscope. Nat. Commun. 7, 13040 (2016).10.1038/ncomms13040 ↗