Single-atom cobalt on N-doped reduced graphene oxide pushes the oxygen reduction reaction toward 4-electron pathway
Source abstract
Abstract
We present a cobalt-based single-atom catalyst (SAC) anchored on nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide (Co-N-rGO), synthesized via a rapid, one-pot microwave-assisted method. Comprehensive characterization by FESEM, TEM, Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirms the successful formation of atomically dispersed Co(II) centers, coordinated to oxygen-containing functional groups within the graphene matrix, with no evidence of metallic clusters or oxide nanoparticles. The atomically dispersed Co sites act as highly active centers for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in alkaline media, achieving an onset potential of ~0.9 V vs. RHE, an average electron transfer number of ~3.9, and a low peroxide yield of ~6%, delivering near four-electron transfer efficiency, and outstanding durability that surpasses commercial Pt/C catalysts. First-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations corroborate the XPS findings and reveal the electronic structure of the Co–O coordination environment, offering atomistic insight into the catalytic mechanism. The synergy between precise site isolation, optimized local coordination, and electronic modulation enables the superior electrocatalytic performance of this Co SAC. This study establishes a versatile and scalable framework for engineering high-performance ORR catalysts featuring non-noble metal single-atom active sites.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (90)
Show source-provided references
1. Liu, Y. et al. A CO₂/H₂ fuel cell: reducing CO₂ while generating electricity. J. Mater. Chem. A https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta02855j (2020).10.1039/d0ta02855j ↗
2. Huo, W. et al. Digitally‑assisted structure design of a large‑size proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Energy Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ee04713c (2024).10.1039/d4ee04713c ↗
3. Nørskov, J. K. et al. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel‑cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B https://doi.org/10.1021/jp047349j (2004).10.1021/jp047349j ↗
4. Wang, J. et al. Quantitative kinetic analysis on oxygen reduction reaction: a perspective. Nano Mater. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoms.2021.03.006 (2021).10.1016/j.nanoms.2021.03.006 ↗
5. Chen, M. et al. Atomically dispersed metal catalysts for oxygen reduction. ACS Energy Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00804 (2019).10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00804 ↗
6. Katsounaros, I. et al. Oxygen electrochemistry as a cornerstone for sustainable energy conversion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201306588 (2014).10.1002/anie.201306588 ↗
7. Yang, L. et al. Carbon‑based metal‑free ORR electrocatalysts for fuel cells: past, present, and future. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201804799 (2019).10.1002/adma.201804799 ↗
8. Luo, C. et al. The influence of multiple factors on the PtCo₃ catalyst characteristics during the ORR process in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Renew. Energy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.122263 (2025).10.1016/j.renene.2024.122263 ↗
9. Li, Y. et al. Revisiting Mo‑doped SrFeO₃−δ perovskite: The origination of cathodic activity and longevity for intermediate‑temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202411025 (2024).10.1002/adfm.202411025 ↗
10. Song, Z. et al. Regulating coordination environment of atomic dimer catalysts for high performance oxygen reduction reaction in fuel cells. Appl. Catal. B https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124970 (2025).10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124970 ↗
11. Zhao, K. et al. Coupled cation–electron transfer at the Pt(111)/perfluoro‑sulfonic acid ionomer interface and its impact on the oxygen reduction reaction kinetics. Nat. Catal. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-024-01279-1 (2025).10.1038/s41929-024-01279-1 ↗
12. Rampf, A. et al. A comparative study of the oxygen reduction reaction on Pt and Ag in alkaline media. ChemElectroChem https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202400563 (2025).10.1002/celc.202400563 ↗
13. Zhang, L. Y. et al. Weakening Pd–O bonds by an amorphous Pd layer to promote electrocatalysis. Small https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202409404 (2025).10.1002/smll.202409404 ↗
14. Zhou, M. et al. Nanoscale design of Pd‑based electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction enhancement in alkaline media. Small Struct. https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.202100188 (2022).10.1002/sstr.202100188 ↗
15. Lyu, Z. et al. Biphase Pd nanosheets with atomic‑hybrid RhOx/Pd amorphous skins disentangle the activity‑stability trade‑off in oxygen reduction reaction. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202314252 (2024).10.1002/adma.202314252 ↗
16. Liu, H. et al. Origin of the superior oxygen reduction activity of zirconium nitride in alkaline media. Chem. Sci. 14, 9000–9009 (2023).10.1039/D3SC01827J ↗
17. Hu, C. & Dai, L. Kohlenstoffbasierte metallfreie Katalysatoren für die Elektrokatalyse jenseits der ORR. Angew. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201509982 (2016).10.1002/ange.201509982 ↗
18. Liu, X. & Dai, L. Carbon‑based metal‑free catalysts. Nat. Rev. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.64 (2016).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.64 ↗
19. Thompson, S. T. & Papageorgopoulos, D. Platinum group metal‑free catalysts boost cost competitiveness of fuel cell vehicles. Nat. Catal. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0291-x (2019).10.1038/s41929-019-0291-x ↗
20. Zhou, X. et al. A review of graphene‑based nanostructural materials for both catalyst supports and metal‑free catalysts in PEM fuel cell oxygen reduction reactions. Adv. Energy Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201301523 (2014).10.1002/aenm.201301523 ↗
21. Choi, S. et al. Reduced graphene oxide‑based materials for electrochemical energy conversion reactions. Carbon Energy https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.13 (2019).10.1002/cey2.13 ↗
22. He, Y. et al. Metal‑nitrogen‑carbon catalysts for oxygen reduction in PEM fuel cells: self‑template synthesis approach to enhancing catalytic activity and stability. Electrochem. Energy Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-019-00031-9 (2019).10.1007/s41918-019-00031-9 ↗
23. Wu, G. Current challenge and perspective of PGM‑free cathode catalysts for PEM fuel cells. Front. Energy https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-017-0477-3 (2017).10.1007/s11708-017-0477-3 ↗
24. Thompson, S. T. et al. ElectroCat: DOE’s approach to PGM‑free catalyst and electrode R&D. Solid State Ion. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2018.01.030 (2018).10.1016/j.ssi.2018.01.030 ↗
25. Garino, N. et al. Proving the existence of Mn porphyrin‑like complexes hosted in reduced graphene oxide with outstanding performance as oxygen reduction reaction catalysts. 2D Mater. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ab2449 (2019).10.1088/2053-1583/ab2449 ↗
26. Bruna, M. et al. Doping dependence of the Raman spectrum of defected graphene. ACS Nano https://doi.org/10.1021/nn502676g (2014).10.1021/nn502676g ↗
27. Pumera, M. Materials electrochemists’ never‑ending quest for efficient electrocatalysts: the devil is in the impurities. ACS Catal. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c02020 (2020).10.1021/acscatal.0c02020 ↗
28. Wang, L. et al. Metal‑free” catalytic oxygen reduction reaction on heteroatom‑doped graphene is caused by trace metal impurities. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201309171 (2013).10.1002/anie.201309171 ↗
29. Parvez, K. et al. Nitrogen‑doped graphene and its iron‑based composite as efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Nano https://doi.org/10.1021/nn302674k (2012).10.1021/nn302674k ↗
30. Zhang, W. et al. Role of vacancy defects and nitrogen dopants for the reduction of oxygen on graphene. ACS Catal. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.4c01713 (2024).10.1021/acscatal.4c01713 ↗
31. Wang, Y. et al. Optimizing heteroatom doping for efficient hydrogen peroxide production via oxygen reduction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c00036 (2024).10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c00036 ↗
32. Bai, P. & Xu, L. Toward a unified pH‑performance picture of active sites in nitrogen‑doped carbon materials. Appl. Catal. B https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124908 (2025).10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124908 ↗
33. Mazánek, V. et al. Ultrapure graphene is a poor electrocatalyst: definitive proof of the key role of metallic impurities in graphene‑based electrocatalysis. ACS Nano https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b07534 (2019).10.1021/acsnano.8b07534 ↗
34. Tang, C. et al. Asymmetric low‑coordination tailoring of single‑atom cobalt catalysts enabling efficient oxygen reduction reaction. Nano Energy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2025.110776 (2025).10.1016/j.nanoen.2025.110776 ↗
35. Nasim, F. & Nadeem, M. A. Understanding the mechanism and synergistic interaction of cobalt‑based electrocatalysts containing nitrogen‑doped carbon for 4 e− ORR. J. Mater. Chem. A https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ta00576c (2023).10.1039/d3ta00576c ↗
36. Meng, N. et al. Boosting the ORR/OER activity of cobalt‑based nano‑catalysts by Co 3d orbital regulation. Small https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202400855 (2024).10.1002/smll.202400855 ↗
37. Gupta, S. et al. A review of cobalt‑based catalysts for sustainable energy and environmental applications. Appl. Catal. A https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2023.119254 (2023).10.1016/j.apcata.2023.119254 ↗
38. Sun, T. et al. Cobalt‑nitrogen‑doped ordered macro‑/mesoporous carbon for highly efficient oxygen reduction reaction. Appl. Catal. B https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.04.006 (2016).10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.04.006 ↗
39. Li, X. et al. MOF derived Co₃O₄ nanoparticles embedded in N‑doped mesoporous carbon layer/MWCNT hybrids: extraordinary bi‑functional electrocatalysts for OER and ORR. J. Mater. Chem. A https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta03900b (2015).10.1039/c5ta03900b ↗
40. Liu, J. et al. Metallic cobalt nanoparticles embedded in sulfur and nitrogen co‑doped rambutan‑like nanocarbons for the oxygen reduction reaction under both acidic and alkaline conditions. J. Mater. Chem. A https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta01234f (2019).10.1039/c9ta01234f ↗
41. Ma, X. et al. The surface engineering of cobalt carbide spheres through N, B co‑doping achieved by room‑temperature: in situ anchoring effects for active and durable multifunctional electrocatalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta03762d (2019).10.1039/c9ta03762d ↗
42. Ejaz, A. & Jeon, S. Synthesis and application of electrochemically reduced N‑rGO‑Co(OH)₂ nanocomposite for concurrent detection of biomolecules. Electrochim. Acta https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.036 (2017).10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.036 ↗
43. Yaengthip, P. et al. The ORR activity of nitrogen doped‑reduced graphene oxide below decomposition temperature cooperated with cobalt prepared by strong electrostatic adsorption technique. J. Electroanal. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116366 (2022).10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116366 ↗
44. Zhang, T. et al. Co₃O₄ nanoparticles anchored on nitrogen‑doped reduced graphene oxide as a multifunctional catalyst for H₂O₂ reduction, oxygen reduction and evolution reaction. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43638 (2017).10.1038/srep43638 ↗
45. Garino, N. et al. Facilely synthesized nitrogen‑doped reduced graphene oxide functionalized with copper ions as electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction. npj 2D Mater. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-020-00185-x (2021).10.1038/s41699-020-00185-x ↗
46. Risplendi, F. et al. Unravelling electrocatalytic properties of metal porphyrin‑like complexes hosted in graphene matrices. 2D Mater. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ab6a5f (2020).10.1088/2053-1583/ab6a5f ↗
47. Garino, N. et al. Microwave‑assisted synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/SnO₂ nanocomposite for oxygen reduction reaction in microbial fuel cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b11198 (2016).10.1021/acsami.5b11198 ↗
48. Castellino, M. et al. The effect of sulfur and nitrogen doping on the oxygen reduction performance of graphene/iron oxide electrocatalysts prepared by using microwave‑assisted synthesis. Nanomaterials https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14070560 (2024).10.3390/nano14070560 ↗
49. Zafar, Z. et al. Evolution of Raman spectra in nitrogen doped graphene. Carbon https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.065 (2013).10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.065 ↗
50. Dresselhaus, M.S., Dresselhaus, G. Light scattering in graphite intercalation compounds. In: Light Scattering in Solids III. Topics in Applied Physics, vol 51 (eds Cardona, M. & Güntherodt, G.) Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3540115137_2 (1982).10.1007/3540115137_2 ↗
51. Yang, J. et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Cobalt Hydroxide, Cobalt Oxyhydroxide, and Cobalt Oxide Nanodiscs. Chem. Soc. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp908548f (2009).10.1021/jp908548f ↗
52. Wu, J.-B. et al. Raman spectroscopy of graphene-based materials and its applications in related devices. Chem. Soc. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00915H (2018).10.1039/C6CS00915H ↗
53. Tuinstra, F. & Koenig, J. L. Raman spectrum of graphite. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1674108 (1970).10.1063/1.1674108 ↗
54. Ferrari, A. C. & Basko, D. M. Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.46 (2013).10.1038/nnano.2013.46 ↗
55. Lee, H. et al. A review of doping modulation in graphene. Synth. Met. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2018.07.001 (2018).10.1016/j.synthmet.2018.07.001 ↗
56. Yap, P. L. et al. Tuning the multifunctional surface chemistry of reduced graphene oxide via combined elemental doping and chemical modifications. ACS Omega https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b02642 (2019).10.1021/acsomega.9b02642 ↗
57. Akhtar, A. J. et al. Unusual dielectric response in cobalt doped reduced graphene oxide. Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4845536 (2013).10.1063/1.4845536 ↗
58. Casiraghi, C. et al. Raman fingerprint of charged impurities in graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2818692 (2007).10.1063/1.2818692 ↗
59. Biesinger, M. C. et al. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl. Surf. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051 (2011).10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051 ↗
60. Briggs, D. & Gibson, V. A. Direct observation of multiplet splitting in 2p photoelectron peaks of cobalt complexes. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(74)85350-9 (1974).10.1016/0009-2614(74)85350-9 ↗
61. Ivanova, T. et al. X‑ray photoelectron spectra and electron structure of polynuclear cobalt complexes. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elspec.2006.12.005 (2007).10.1016/j.elspec.2006.12.005 ↗
62. Wu, H. et al. A graphene‑based electrocatalyst co‑doped with nitrogen and cobalt for oxygen reduction reaction. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.074 (2016).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.074 ↗
63. Gianola, G. et al. Effect of silica leaching treatment during template‑assisted synthesis on the performance of FeNC catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochim. Acta https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2025.146085 (2025).10.1016/j.electacta.2025.146085 ↗
64. Delmondo, L. et al. Nanostructured MnₓOᵧ for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts. Appl. Surf. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.224 (2016).10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.224 ↗
65. Kim, W. S. et al. Facile synthesis of perovskite LaMnO₃+δ nanoparticles for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Catal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2016.10.029 (2016).10.1016/j.jcat.2016.10.029 ↗
66. Dumitrescu, I. & Crooks, R. M. Effect of mass transfer on the oxygen reduction reaction catalyzed by platinum dendrimer encapsulated nanoparticles. PNAS https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201370109 (2012).10.1073/pnas.1201370109 ↗
67. Garino, N. et al. One‑pot microwave‑assisted synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/iron oxide nanocomposite catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. ChemSelect https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201601037 (2016).10.1002/slct.201601037 ↗
68. Rossmeisl, J. et al. Electrolysis of water on (oxidized) metal surfaces. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.05.038 (2005).10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.05.038 ↗
69. Rossmeisl, J. et al. Electrolysis of water on oxide surfaces. J. Electroanal. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2006.11.008 (2007).10.1016/j.jelechem.2006.11.008 ↗
70. Sacco, A. et al. Anodically‑grown TiO₂ nanotubes: effect of the crystallization on the catalytic activity toward the oxygen reduction reaction. Appl. Surf. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.224 (2017).10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.224 ↗
71. Zeng, J. et al. Advanced Cu–Sn foam for selectively converting CO₂ to CO in aqueous solution. Appl. Catal. B https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.056 (2018).10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.056 ↗
72. Garino, N. et al. Multifunctional flexible membranes based on reduced graphene oxide/tin dioxide nanocomposite and cellulose fibers. Electrochim. Acta https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.02.095 (2019).10.1016/j.electacta.2019.02.095 ↗
73. Hernández, S. et al. New transparent laser‑drilled fluorine‑doped tin oxide covered quartz electrodes for photo‑electrochemical water splitting. Electrochim. Acta https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.01.037 (2014).10.1016/j.electacta.2014.01.037 ↗
74. Zhu, Z. et al. Construction of a cobalt‑embedded nitrogen‑doped carbon material with the desired porosity derived from the confined growth of MOFs within graphene aerogels as a superior catalyst towards HER and ORR. J. Mater. Chem. A https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta05196k (2016).10.1039/c6ta05196k ↗
75. Zhang, X. et al. Probing the electro‑catalytic ORR activity of cobalt‑incorporated nitrogen‑doped CNTs. J. Catal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2016.10.019 (2016).10.1016/j.jcat.2016.10.019 ↗
76. Zhao, H. et al. Synthesis of cobalt and nitrogen co‑doped carbon nanotubes and its ORR activity as the catalyst used in hydrogen fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.271 (2019).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.271 ↗
77. Brown, M. B. & Forsythe, A. B. Robust Tests for the Equality of Variances. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. https://doi.org/10.2307/2285659 (1974).10.2307/2285659 ↗
78. Faul, F. et al. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 (2009).10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 ↗
79. Faul, F. et al. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 (2007).10.3758/BF03193146 ↗
80. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
81. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
82. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
83. Perdew, J. P. et al. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
84. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
85. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
86. Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20495 (2006).10.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
87. Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 (1976).10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
88. Nørskov, J. K. et al. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp047349j (2004).10.1021/jp047349j ↗
89. Jerkiewicz, G. Standard and reversible hydrogen electrodes: Theory, design, operation, and applications. ACS Catal. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c02046 (2020).10.1021/acscatal.0c02046 ↗
90. Garino, N. et al. Microwave-assisted synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/SnO2 nanocomposite for oxygen reduction reaction in microbial fuel cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b11198 (2016).10.1021/acsami.5b11198 ↗