journal article·2019-11-05Open access

Inkjet-printed CMOS-integrated graphene–metal oxide sensors for breath analysis

Tien-Chun Wu, Andrea De Luca, Qinyu Zhong, Xiaoxi Zhu, Osarenkhoe Ogbeide, Doo-Seung Um, Guohua Hu, Tom Albrow-Owen, Florin Udrea, Tawfique Hasan

Abstract

Abstract Early diagnosis in exhaled breath is a key technology for next-generation personal healthcare monitoring. Current chemiresistive sensors, primarily based on metal oxide (MOx) thin films, have limited applicability in such portable systems due to their high power consumption, long recovery time, poor device-to-device consistency, and baseline drifts. To address these challenges for ammonia ($${{\rm{NH}}}3$$) detection in exhaled breath, a critical biomarker for a variety of kidney and liver problems, we present a formulation of a graphene–MOx functional ink-based sensing platform. We integrate our sensing layer directly onto miniaturized CMOS microhotplates (μHP) via inkjet printing, potentially enabling scalability and device-to-device performance repeatability. Using stage-by-stage temporal analysis, and a temperature-pulsed modulation (TM) strategy, we achieve ultrahigh responsivity (1500% at 10 ppm pure $${{\rm{NH}}}3$$), fast response and recovery time (28 and 43 s), ultralow power consumption (~6 mW), negligible baseline drift (<0.67%), excellent cross-device and cross-cycle consistency (<0.5% and <0.41% variation in responsivity) and long-term stability (<1% variation) in our graphene–zinc oxide (ZnO) formulation, outperforming conventional MOx chemiresistive sensors. We further mitigate the effect of humidity through our measurement protocols, while interference from acetone is compensated through the parallel deployment of an additional inkjet printed graphene–tungsten oxide ($${{\rm{WO}}}3$$) device as part of the sensor array. Our dual graphene–MOx formulations and their integration with ultralow power CMOS through inkjet printing represent a significant step towards reliable and portable multi-analyte breath diagnostics.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Nakhleh, M. K. et al. Diagnosis and classification of 17 diseases from 1404 subjects via pattern analysis of exhaled molecules. ACS Nano 11, 112–125 (2017).10.1021/acsnano.6b04930 ↗
2. Mathew, T., Pownraj, P., Abdulla, S. & Pullithadathil, B. Technologies for clinical diagnosis using expired human breath analysis. Diagnostics 5, 27–60 (2015).10.3390/diagnostics5010027 ↗
3. Spacek, L. A. et al. Repeated measures of blood and breath ammonia in response to control, moderate and high protein dose in healthy men. Sci. Rep. 8, 2554 (2018).10.1038/s41598-018-20503-0 ↗
4. Meng, Z., Stolz, R. M., Mendecki, L. & Mirica, K. A. Electrically-transduced chemical sensors based on two-dimensional nanomaterials. Chem. Rev. 119, 478–598 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00311 ↗
5. Chatterjee, B. & Bandyopadhyay, A. Development of zinc oxide sensors for detecting ammonia gas in the ambient air: a critical short review. Environ. Qual. Manag. 26, 89–105 (2016).10.1002/tqem.21483 ↗
6. Lin, Q., Li, Y. & Yang, M. Tin oxide/graphene composite fabricated via a hydrothermal method for gas sensors working at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B 173, 139–147 (2015).10.1016/j.snb.2012.06.055 ↗
7. Wang, C. et al. Metal oxide gas sensors: sensitivity and influencing factors. Sensors 10, 2088–2106 (2010).10.3390/s100302088 ↗
8. Mao, S., Lu, G. & Chen, J. Nanocarbon-based gas sensors: progress and challenges. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 5573–5579 (2014).10.1039/c3ta13823b ↗
9. Huang, Q., Zeng, D., Li, H. & Xie, C. Room temperature formaldehyde sensors with enhanced performance, fast response and recovery based on zinc oxide quantum dots/graphene nanocomposites. Nanoscale 4, 5651 (2012).10.1039/c2nr31131c ↗
10. Zhang, J., Liu, X., Neri, G. & Pinna, N. Nanostructured materials for room-temperature gas sensors. Adv. Mater. 28, 795–831 (2016).10.1002/adma.201503825 ↗
11. Singh, G. et al. ZnO decorated luminescent graphene as a potential gas sensor at room temperature. Carbon 50, 385–394 (2012).10.1016/j.carbon.2011.08.050 ↗
12. Tammanoon, N. et al. Ultrasensitive NO$${}2$$ Sensor Based on Ohmic Metal–semiconductor interfaces of electrolytically exfoliated graphene/flame-spray-made SnO$${}2$$ nanoparticles composite operating at low temperatures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 24338–24352 (2015).10.1021/acsami.5b09067 ↗
13. Abideen, Z. U. et al. Excellent gas detection of ZnO nanofibers by loading with reduced graphene oxide nanosheets. Sens. Actuators B 221, 1499–1507 (2015).10.1016/j.snb.2015.07.120 ↗
14. Tai, H. et al. ZnO nanoparticles/reduced graphene oxide bilayer thin films for improved NH$${}3$$-sensing performances at room temperature. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11, 130 (2016).10.1186/s11671-016-1343-7 ↗
15. Renganathan, B., Sastikumar, D., Gobi, G., RajeswariYogamalar, N. & ChandraBose, A. Nanocrystalline ZnO coated fiber optic sensor for ammonia gas detection. Opt. Laser Technol. 43, 1398–1404 (2011).10.1016/j.optlastec.2011.04.008 ↗
16. Shao, F. et al. NH$${}3$$ sensing with self-assembled ZnO-nanowire $${}3$$HP sensors in isothermal and temperature-pulsed mode. Sens. Actuators, B 226, 110–117 (2016).10.1016/j.snb.2015.11.109 ↗
17. Liu, S., Yu, B., Zhang, H., Fei, T. & Zhang, T. Enhancing NO$${}2$$ gas sensing performances at room temperature based on reduced graphene oxide-ZnO nanoparticles hybrids. Sens. Actuators B 202, 272–278 (2014).10.1016/j.snb.2014.05.086 ↗
18. Lu, G. et al. Toward practical gas sensing with highly reduced graphene oxide: a new signal processing method to circumvent run-to-run and device-to-device variations. ACS Nano 5, 1154–1164 (2011).10.1021/nn102803q ↗
19. Lin, Q., Li, Y. & Yang, M. Tin oxide/graphene composite fabricated via a hydrothermal method for gas sensors working at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B 173, 139–147 (2012).10.1016/j.snb.2012.06.055 ↗
20. Suematsu, K. et al. Pulse-driven semiconductor gas sensors toward ppt level toluene detection. Anal. Chem. 90, 11219–11223 (2018).10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03076 ↗
21. DeLuca, A. et al. Temperature-modulated graphene oxide resistive humidity sensor for indoor air quality monitoring. Nanoscale 8, 4565–4572 (2016).10.1039/C5NR08598E ↗
22. Rogers, P. H., Benkstein, K. D. & Semancik, S. Machine learning applied to chemical analysis: sensing multiple biomarkers in simulated breath using a temperature-pulsed electronic-nose. Anal. Chem. 84, 9774–9781 (2012).10.1021/ac301687j ↗
23. Hossein-Babaei, F. & Amini, A. A breakthrough in gas diagnosis with a temperature-modulated generic metal oxide gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B 166-167, 419–425 (2012).10.1016/j.snb.2012.02.082 ↗
24. Lotya, M. et al. Liquid phase production of graphene by exfoliation of graphite in surfactant/water solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 3611–3620 (2009).10.1021/ja807449u ↗
25. Backes, C. et al. Guidelines for exfoliation, characterization and processing of layered materials produced by liquid exfoliation. Chem. Mater. 29, 243–255 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03335 ↗
26. Ng, L. W. T. et al. Printing of Graphene and Related 2D Materials 53–101 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019).10.1007/978-3-319-91572-2_3 ↗
27. Liang, Y. T. & Hersam, M. C. Highly concentrated graphene solutions via polymer enhanced solvent exfoliation and iterative solvent exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 17661–17663 (2010).10.1021/ja107661g ↗
28. Bourlinos, A. B. et al. Aqueous-phase exfoliation of graphite in the presence of polyvinylpyrrolidone for the production of water-soluble graphenes. Solid State Commun. 149, 2172–2176 (2009).10.1016/j.ssc.2009.09.018 ↗
29. Hasan, T. et al. Stabilization and âĂIJDebundlingâĂİ of single-wall carbon nanotube dispersions in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) by polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 12594–12602 (2007).10.1021/jp0723012 ↗
30. Dodoo-Arhin, D. et al. Inkjet-printed graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Carbon 105, 33–41 (2016).10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.012 ↗
31. Faure, B. et al. Dispersion and surface functionalization of oxide nanoparticles for transparent photocatalytic and UV-protecting coatings and sunscreens. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 14, 023001 (2013).10.1088/1468-6996/14/2/023001 ↗
32. Guo, L. et al. Highly monodisperse polymer-capped ZnO nanoparticles: preparation and optical properties. Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2901 (2000).10.1063/1.126511 ↗
33. Arapov, K. et al. Conductive screen printing inks by gelation of graphene dispersions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 586–593 (2016).10.1002/adfm.201504030 ↗
34. Bolten, D. & Turk, M. Experimental study on the surface tension, density, and viscosity of aqueous poly(vinylpyrrolidone) solutions. J. Chem. Eng. Data 56, 582–588 (2011).10.1021/je101277c ↗
35. Torrisi, F. et al. Inkjet-printed graphene electronics. ACS Nano 6, 2992–3006 (2012).10.1021/nn2044609 ↗
36. Deegan, R. D. et al. Capillary flow as the cause of ring stains from dried liquid drops. Nature 389, 827–829 (1997).10.1038/39827 ↗
37. Deegan, R. D. et al. Contact line deposits in an evaporating drop. Phys. Rev. E 62, 756–765 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevE.62.756 ↗
38. Hu, G. et al. Black phosphorus ink formulation for inkjet printing of optoelectronics and photonics. Nat. Commun. 8, 278 (2017).10.1038/s41467-017-00358-1 ↗
39. Hu, G. et al. Functional inks and printing of two-dimensional materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 3265–3300 (2018).10.1039/C8CS00084K ↗
40. Luo, S., Harris, T. & Wong, C. Study on surface tension and adhesion for flip chip packaging. In Proc. International Symposium on Advanced Packaging Materials Processes, Properties and Interfaces, 299–304 (2001).
41. Derby, B. Inkjet printing of functional and structural materials: fluid property requirements, feature stability, and resolution. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 40, 395–414 (2010).10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104502 ↗
42. Ali, S., Udrea, F., Milne, W. & Gardner, J. Tungsten-based SOI microhotplates for smart gas sensors. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 17, 1408–1417 (2008).10.1109/JMEMS.2008.2007228 ↗
43. Secor, E. B., Prabhumirashi, P. L., Puntambekar, K., Geier, M. L. & Hersam, M. C. Inkjet printing of high conductivity, flexible graphene patterns. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 1347–1351 (2013).10.1021/jz400644c ↗
44. Al-Hada, N. M. et al. A facile thermal-treatment route to synthesize ZnO nanosheets and effect of calcination temperature. PLoS One 9, e103134 (2014).10.1371/journal.pone.0103134 ↗
45. Jussila, H. et al. New approach for thickness determination of solution-deposited graphene thin films. ACS Omega 2, 2630–2638 (2017).10.1021/acsomega.7b00336 ↗
46. Zinc oxide. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/677450. Accessed Oct 2019.
47. Wu, J.-B., Lin, M.-L., Cong, X., Liu, H.-N. & Tan, P.-H. Raman spectroscopy of graphene-based materials and its applications in related devices. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 1822–1873 (2018).10.1039/C6CS00915H ↗
48. Ferrari, A. C. & Basko, D. M. Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 235–246 (2013).10.1038/nnano.2013.46 ↗
49. Chen, S. J. et al. Structural and optical properties of uniform ZnO nanosheets. Adv. Mater. 17, 586–590 (2005).10.1002/adma.200401263 ↗
50. Cançado, L. G. et al. Quantifying defects in graphene via raman spectroscopy at different excitation energies. Nano Lett. 11, 3190–3196 (2011).10.1021/nl201432g ↗
51. Santra, S. et al. CMOS integration of inkjet-printed graphene for humidity sensing. Sci. Rep. 5, 17374 (2015).10.1038/srep17374 ↗
52. Lupan, O. et al. Sensing performances of pure and hybridized carbon nanotubes-ZnO nanowire networks: a detailed study. Sci. Rep. 7, 14715 (2017).10.1038/s41598-017-14544-0 ↗
53. Guan, Z., Ni, S. & Hu, S. Band gap opening of graphene by forming a graphene/PtSe$${}2$$ van der Waals heterojunction. RSC Adv. 7, 45393–45399 (2017).10.1039/C7RA06865D ↗
54. Das, S. & Jayaraman, V. SnO$${}2$$: a comprehensive review on structures and gas sensors. Prog. Mater. Sci. 66, 112–255 (2014).10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.06.003 ↗
55. Bai, J. & Zhou, B. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials for sensor applications. Chem. Rev. 114, 10131–10176 (2014).10.1021/cr400625j ↗
56. Nasehzadeh, A., Mohseni, M., Azizi, K. & Azizi, K. The effect of temperature on the Lennard–Jones (6-12) pair potential function. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 589-590, 329–335 (2002).10.1016/S0166-1280(02)00188-4 ↗
57. Damyanova, M., Balabanova, E. & Hohm, U. Temperature-dependent interaction potential between NF$${}3$$ molecules and thermophysical properties of gaseous NF$${}3$$. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 514, 012055 (2014).10.1088/1742-6596/514/1/012055 ↗
58. Nancy Anna Anasthasiya, A., Rai, P. & Jeyaprakash, B. Understanding ammonia adsorption and charge transfer process on ZnO using experimental and DFT approach. Mater. Chem. Phys. 214, 540–547 (2018).10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.04.101 ↗
59. Li, H.-Y., Lee, C.-S., Kim, D. H. & Lee, J.-H. Flexible room-temperature NH$${}3$$ sensor for ultrasensitive, selective, and humidity-independent gas detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 27858–27867 (2018).10.1021/acsami.8b09169 ↗
60. Schmidt, F. M. et al. Ammonia in breath and emitted from skin. J. Breath Res. 7, 017109 (2013).10.1088/1752-7155/7/1/017109 ↗
61. Hibbard, T. & Killard, A. J. Breath ammonia analysis: clinical application and measurement. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 41, 21–35 (2011).10.1080/10408347.2011.521729 ↗
62. Lindinger, W. & Jordan, A. Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS): on-line monitoring of volatile organic compounds at pptv levels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 27, 347 (1998).10.1039/a827347z ↗
63. Righettoni, M., Tricoli, A. & Pratsinis, S. E. Si:WO$${}3$$ sensors for highly selective detection of acetone for easy diagnosis of diabetes by breath analysis. Anal. Chem. 82, 3581–3587 (2010).10.1021/ac902695n ↗
64. Deng, C., Zhang, J., Yu, X., Zhang, W. & Zhang, X. Determination of acetone in human breath by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and solid-phase microextraction with on-fiber derivatization. J. Chromatogr. B 810, 269–275 (2004).10.1016/S1570-0232(04)00657-9 ↗
65. Udrea, F., Ali, S. & Gardner, J. CMOS micro-hotplate array design for nanomaterial-based gas sensors. In Proc. 2008 International Semiconductor Conference, 143–146 (2008).10.1109/SMICND.2008.4703352 ↗