Salinity gradient induced blue energy generation using two-dimensional membranes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Salinity gradient energy (SGE), known as blue energy is harvested from mixing seawater with river water in a controlled way using ion exchange membranes (IEMs). Using 2D materials as IEMs improves the output power density from a few Wm−2 to a few thousands of Wm−2 over conventional membranes. In this review, we survey the efforts taken to employ the different 2D materials as nanoporous or lamellar membranes for SGE and provide a comprehensive analysis of the fundamental principles behind the SGE. Overall, this review is anticipated to explain how the 2D materials can make SGE a viable source of energy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Kumar, Y. et al. Wind energy: trends and enabling technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 53, 209–224 (2016).10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.200 ↗
2. Chu, S. & Majumdar, A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 488, 294–303 (2012).10.1038/nature11475 ↗
3. Chu, S., Cui, Y. & Liu, N. The path towards sustainable energy. Nat. Mater. 16, 16–22 (2017).10.1038/nmat4834 ↗
4. Moran, E. F., Lopez, M. C., Moore, N., Müller, N. & Hyndman, D. W. Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, 11891–11898 (2018).10.1073/pnas.1809426115 ↗
5. Lewis, N. S. Toward cost-effective solar energy use. Science 315, 798–801 (2007).10.1126/science.1137014 ↗
6. Herbert, G. J., Iniyan, S., Sreevalsan, E. & Rajapandian, S. A review of wind energy technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11, 1117–1145 (2007).10.1016/j.rser.2005.08.004 ↗
7. Tan, J. D., Chang, C. C. W., Bhuiyan, M. A. S., Minhad, K. N. & Ali, K. Advancements of wind energy conversion systems for low-wind urban environments: a review. Energy Rep. 8, 3406–3414 (2022).10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.153 ↗
8. Kannan, N. & Vakeesan, D. Solar energy for future world: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 62, 1092–1105 (2016).10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.022 ↗
9. Sharmin, T., Khan, N. R., Akram, M. S. & Ehsan, M. M. A state-of-the-art review on geothermal energy extraction, utilization, and improvement strategies: conventional, hybridized, and enhanced geothermal systems. Int. J. Thermofluids 18, 100323 (2023).10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100323 ↗
10. Yip, N. Y., Brogioli, D., Hamelers, H. V. M. & Nijmeijer, K. Salinity gradients for sustainable energy: primer, progress, and prospects. Environ. Sci. Tech. 50, 12072–12094 (2016).10.1021/acs.est.6b03448 ↗
11. Pattle, R. E. Production of electric power by mixing fresh and salt water in the hydroelectric pile. Nature 174, 660–660 (1954).10.1038/174660a0 ↗
12. Alvarez-Silva, O., Osorio, A. & Winter, C. Practical global salinity gradient energy potential. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 60, 1387–1395 (2016).10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.021 ↗
13. Ramon, G. Z., Feinberg, B. J. & Hoek, E. M. V. Membrane-based production of salinity-gradient power. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 4423 (2011).10.1039/c1ee01913a ↗
14. Logan, B. E. & Elimelech, M. Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water. Nature 488, 313–319 (2012).10.1038/nature11477 ↗
15. Nguyen, D.-V. et al. Chapter 20 - forward osmosis: Principle and applications in sustainable water and energy development. In Bui, X.-T., Guo, W., Chiemchaisri, C. & Pandey, A. (eds.) Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 463–491 (Elsevier, 2023).10.1016/B978-0-443-19180-0.00017-1 ↗
16. Thorsen, T. & Holt, T. The potential for power production from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 335, 103–110 (2009).10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.003 ↗
17. Długołècki, P., Gambier, A., Nijmeijer, K. & Wessling, M. Practical potential of reverse electrodialysis as process for sustainable energy generation. Environ. Sci. Tech. 43, 6888–6894 (2009).10.1021/es9009635 ↗
18. Yip, N. Y. & Elimelech, M. Thermodynamic and energy efficiency analysis of power generation from natural salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis. Environ. Sci. Tech. 46, 5230–5239 (2012).10.1021/es300060m ↗
19. Han, G., Zhang, S., Li, X. & Chung, T.-S. High performance thin film composite pressure retarded osmosis (pro) membranes for renewable salinity-gradient energy generation. J. Membr. Sci. 440, 108–121 (2013).10.1016/j.memsci.2013.04.001 ↗
20. Post, J. W., Hamelers, H. V. M. & Buisman, C. J. N. Energy recovery from controlled mixing salt and fresh water with a reverse electrodialysis system. Environ. Sci. Tech. 42, 5785–5790 (2008).10.1021/es8004317 ↗
21. Yip, N. Y., Vermaas, D. A., Nijmeijer, K. & Elimelech, M. Thermodynamic, energy efficiency, and power density analysis of reverse electrodialysis power generation with natural salinity gradients. Environ. Sci. Tech. 48, 4925–4936 (2014).10.1021/es5005413 ↗
22. Rahman, S. N., Saleem, H. & Zaidi, S. J. Progress in membranes for pressure retarded osmosis application. Desalination 549, 116347 (2023).10.1016/j.desal.2022.116347 ↗
23. Helfer, F. & Lemckert, C. The power of salinity gradients: an Australian example. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 50, 1–16 (2015).10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.188 ↗
24. Zaidi, S. J. & Saleem, H. Reverse Osmosis Systems: Design, Optimization and Troubleshooting Guide (Elsevier, 2021).10.1016/B978-0-12-823965-0.00011-0 ↗
25. Mantia, F. L., Pasta, M., Deshazer, H. D., Logan, B. E. & Cui, Y. Batteries for efficient energy extraction from a water salinity difference. Nano Lett. 11, 1810–1813 (2011).10.1021/nl200500s ↗
26. Kang, B., Kim, H. J. & Kim, D.-K. Membrane electrode assembly for energy harvesting from salinity gradient by reverse electrodialysis. J. Membr. Sci. 550, 286–295 (2018).10.1016/j.memsci.2018.01.006 ↗
27. Mehdizadeh, S., Kakihana, Y., Abo, T., Yuan, Q. & Higa, M. Power generation performance of a pilot-scale reverse electrodialysis using monovalent selective ion-exchange membranes. Membranes 11, 27 (2021).10.3390/membranes11010027 ↗
28. Zoungrana, A. & Çakmakci, M. Optimization of the reverse electrodialysis power output through the ratio of the feed solutions salinity. IET Renew. Power Gen. 15, 769–777 (2021).10.1049/rpg2.12066 ↗
29. Vermaas, D. A. et al. Clean energy generation using capacitive electrodes in reverse electrodialysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 643–651 (2013).10.1039/C2EE23562E ↗
30. Kim, D.-K., Duan, C., Chen, Y.-F. & Majumdar, A. Power generation from concentration gradient by reverse electrodialysis in ion-selective nanochannels. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 9, 1215–1224 (2010).10.1007/s10404-010-0641-0 ↗
31. Ramasamy, G., Rajkumar, P. K. & Narayanan, M. Generation of energy from salinity gradients using capacitive reverse electro dialysis: a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 63672–63681 (2021).10.1007/s11356-020-12188-8 ↗
32. Liu, X. et al. Power generation by reverse electrodialysis in a single-layer nanoporous membrane made from core-rim polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 307–312 (2020).10.1038/s41565-020-0641-5 ↗
33. Chen, W., Xiang, Y., Kong, X.-Y. & Wen, L. Polymer-based membranes for promoting osmotic energy conversion. Giant 10, 100094 (2022).10.1016/j.giant.2022.100094 ↗
34. Wu, Q. et al. Salinity-gradient power generation with ionized wood membranes. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1902590 (2020).10.1002/aenm.201902590 ↗
35. Chen, G. et al. Scalable wood hydrogel membrane with nanoscale channels. ACS Nano 15, 11244–11252 (2021).10.1021/acsnano.0c10117 ↗
36. Li, C. et al. Large-scale, robust mushroom-shaped nanochannel array membrane for ultrahigh osmotic energy conversion. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg2183 (2021).10.1126/sciadv.abg2183 ↗
37. Zhou, Y. & Jiang, L. Bioinspired nanoporous membrane for salinity gradient energy harvesting. Joule 4, 2244–2248 (2020).10.1016/j.joule.2020.09.009 ↗
38. Xue, L. et al. Solid-state nanopore sensors. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 931–951 (2020).10.1038/s41578-020-0229-6 ↗
39. He, Y., Tsutsui, M., Zhou, Y. & Miao, X.-S. Solid-state nanopore systems: from materials to applications. NPG Asia Mater. 13, 48 (2021).10.1038/s41427-021-00313-z ↗
40. Patil, O., Manikandan, D. & Nandigana, V. V. R. A molecular dynamics simulation framework for predicting noise in solid-state nanopores. Mol. Simul. 46, 1011–1016 (2020).10.1080/08927022.2020.1798004 ↗
41. Wen, C. & Zhang, S.-L. Fundamentals and potentials of solid-state nanopores: a review. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 54, 023001 (2021).10.1088/1361-6463/ababce ↗
42. Xiao, K., Jiang, L. & Antonietti, M. Ion transport in nanofluidic devices for energy harvesting. Joule 3, 2364–2380 (2019).10.1016/j.joule.2019.09.005 ↗
43. Gupta, A., Sakthivel, T. & Seal, S. Recent development in 2d materials beyond graphene. Prog. Mater. Sci. 73, 44–126 (2015).10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.002 ↗
44. Unsuree, N. et al. A review: ion transport of two-dimensional materials in novel technologies from macro to nanoscopic perspectives. Energies 14, 5819 (2021).10.3390/en14185819 ↗
45. Alabi, A. et al. Review of nanomaterials-assisted ion exchange membranes for electromembrane desalination. npj Clean. Water 1, 10 (2018).10.1038/s41545-018-0009-7 ↗
46. Xie, L. et al. Two-dimensional nanofluidics for blue energy harvesting. Energy Mater. 2, 200008 (2022).10.20517/energymater.2022.04 ↗
47. Rastgar, M. et al. Harvesting blue energy based on salinity and temperature gradient: challenges, solutions, and opportunities. Chem. Rev. 123, 10156–10205 (2023).10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00168 ↗
48. Zhang, Z., Wen, L. & Jiang, L. Nanofluidics for osmotic energy conversion. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 622–639 (2021).10.1038/s41578-021-00300-4 ↗
49. Siria, A., Bocquet, M.-L. & Bocquet, L. New avenues for the large-scale harvesting of blue energy. Nat. Rev. Chem. 1, 0091 (2017).10.1038/s41570-017-0091 ↗
50. Macha, M., Marion, S., Nandigana, V. V. R. & Radenovic, A. 2d materials as an emerging platform for nanopore-based power generation. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 588–605 (2019).10.1038/s41578-019-0126-z ↗
51. Xin, W., Jiang, L. & Wen, L. Two-dimensional nanofluidic membranes toward harvesting salinity gradient power. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 4154–4165 (2021).10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00431 ↗
52. Safaei, J. & Wang, G. Progress and prospects of two-dimensional materials for membrane-based osmotic power generation. Nano Res. Energy 1, e9120008 (2022).10.26599/NRE.2022.9120008 ↗
53. Laucirica, G., Toimil-Molares, M. E., Trautmann, C., Marmisolle, W. & Azzaroni, O. Nanofluidic osmotic power generators—advanced nanoporous membranes and nanochannels for blue energy harvesting. Chem. Sci. 12, 12874–12910 (2021).10.1039/D1SC03581A ↗
54. Aliprandi, A., Pakulski, D., Ciesielski, A. & Samori, P. Punctured two-dimensional sheets for harvesting blue energy. ACS Nano 11, 10654–10658 (2017).10.1021/acsnano.7b06657 ↗
55. Tong, X., Liu, S., Crittenden, J. & Chen, Y. Nanofluidic membranes to address the challenges of salinity gradient power harvesting. ACS Nano 15, 5838–5860 (2021).10.1021/acsnano.0c09513 ↗
56. Chu, C., Fauziah, A. R. & Yeh, L. Optimizing membranes for osmotic power generation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202303582 (2023).10.1002/anie.202303582 ↗
57. Mai, V.-P., Huang, W.-H. & Yang, R.-J. Enhancing ion transport through nanopores in membranes for salinity gradient power generation. ACS ES T Eng. 1, 1725–1752 (2021).10.1021/acsestengg.1c00309 ↗
58. Li, M., Cao, Y., Xiong, Y. & Qing, G. Hierarchically engineered nanochannel systems with pore-in/on-pore structures. NPG Asia Mater. 15, 16 (2023).10.1038/s41427-022-00451-y ↗
59. Jia, Z., Wang, B., Song, S. & Fan, Y. Blue energy: current technologies for sustainable power generation from water salinity gradient. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 31, 91–100 (2014).10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.049 ↗
60. Wang, Z., Wang, L. & Elimelech, M. Viability of harvesting salinity gradient (blue) energy by nanopore-based osmotic power generation. Engineering 9, 51–60 (2022).10.1016/j.eng.2021.02.016 ↗
61. Zachopoulos, K., Kokkos, N., Elmasides, C. & Sylaios, G. Coupling hydrodynamic and energy production models for salinity gradient energy assessment in a salt-wedge estuary (Strymon River, Northern Greece). Energies 15, 2970 (2022).10.3390/en15092970 ↗
62. Micale, G., Cipollina, A. & Tamburini, A. 1 - salinity gradient energy. In Cipollina, A. &. Micale, G. (eds.) Sustainable Energy from Salinity Gradients, 1–17 (Woodhead Publishing, 2016).10.1016/B978-0-08-100312-1.00001-8 ↗
63. Wang, L., Wang, Z., Patel, S. K., Lin, S. & Elimelech, M. Nanopore-based power generation from salinity gradient: why it is not viable. ACS Nano 15, 4093–4107 (2021).10.1021/acsnano.0c08628 ↗
64. Manikandan, D. & Nandigana, V. V. R. Overlimiting current near a nanochannel a new insight using molecular dynamics simulations. Sci. Rep. 11, 15216 (2021).10.1038/s41598-021-94477-x ↗
65. Manikandan, D. Non Linear Electrokinetic Flow and Ion Transport Near in the Nanofluidic Devices Insights Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Madras (2022).
66. Schoch, R. B., Han, J. & Renaud, P. Transport phenomena in nanofluidics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 839–883 (2008).10.1103/RevModPhys.80.839 ↗
67. Moosa, A. A. & Abed, M. S. Graphene preparation and graphite exfoliation. Turk. J. Chem. 45, 493–519 (2021).10.3906/kim-2101-19 ↗
68. Cai, Z., Liu, B., Zou, X. & Cheng, H.-M. Chemical vapor deposition growth and applications of two-dimensional materials and their heterostructures. Chem. Rev. 118, 6091–6133 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00536 ↗
69. Shi, Y., Li, H. & Li, L.-J. Recent advances in controlled synthesis of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides via vapour deposition techniques. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2744–2756 (2015).10.1039/C4CS00256C ↗
70. Sahoo, D. et al. Cost effective liquid phase exfoliation of mos2 nanosheets and photocatalytic activity for wastewater treatment enforced by visible light. Sci. Rep. 10, 10759 (2020).10.1038/s41598-020-67683-2 ↗
71. Kaushik, S. et al. High-yield exfoliation of mos2 nanosheets by a novel spray technique and the importance of soaking and surfactants. Nano Struct. Nano Objects 32, 100922 (2022).10.1016/j.nanoso.2022.100922 ↗
72. Li, Y., Kuang, G., Jiao, Z., Yao, L. & Duan, R. Recent progress on the mechanical exfoliation of 2d transition metal dichalcogenides. Mater. Res. Express 9, 122001 (2022).10.1088/2053-1591/aca6c6 ↗
73. Lin, T. et al. Scotch-tape-like exfoliation of graphite assisted with elemental sulfur and graphene-sulfur composites for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 1283 (2013).10.1039/c3ee24324a ↗
74. Janwery, D. et al. Lamellar graphene oxide-based composite membranes for efficient separation of heavy metal ions and desalination of water. ACS Omega 8, 7648–7656 (2023).10.1021/acsomega.2c07243 ↗
75. Lu, G. et al. Synthesis of large single-crystal hexagonal boron nitride grains on cu-ni alloy. Nat. Commun. 6, 6160 (2015).10.1038/ncomms7160 ↗
76. Wang, S. et al. Shape evolution of monolayer mos2 crystals grown by chemical vapor deposition. Chem. Mater. 26, 6371–6379 (2014).10.1021/cm5025662 ↗
77. Nayak, P. K. et al. Probing evolution of twist-angle-dependent interlayer excitons in mose2/wse2 van der Waals heterostructures. ACS Nano 11, 4041–4050 (2017).10.1021/acsnano.7b00640 ↗
78. Nayak, P. K., Lin, F.-C., Yeh, C.-H., Huang, J.-S. & Chiu, P.-W. Robust room temperature valley polarization in monolayer and bilayer ws2. Nanoscale 8, 6035–6042 (2016).10.1039/C5NR08395H ↗
79. Wu, Y. A. et al. Large single crystals of graphene on melted copper using chemical vapor deposition. ACS Nano 6, 5010–5017 (2012).10.1021/nn3016629 ↗
80. Rajarapu, R. et al. Pulsed carrier gas assisted high-quality synthetic 3r-phase sword-like mos2: a versatile optoelectronic material. ACS Nano 16, 21366–21376 (2022).10.1021/acsnano.2c09673 ↗
81. Basu, N. et al. Strain relaxation in monolayer mos2 over flexible substrate. RSC Adv. 13, 16241–16247 (2023).10.1039/D3RA01381B ↗
82. Momeni, K. et al. Multiscale computational understanding and growth of 2d materials: a review. Npj Comput. Mater. 6, 22 (2020).10.1038/s41524-020-0280-2 ↗
83. Zhu, J. et al. Low-thermal-budget synthesis of monolayer molybdenum disulfide for silicon back-end-of-line integration on a 200 mm platform. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 456–463 (2023).10.1038/s41565-023-01375-6 ↗
84. Xia, Y. et al. 12-inch growth of uniform mos2 monolayer for integrated circuit manufacture. Nat. Mater. 22, 1324–1331 (2023).10.1038/s41563-023-01671-5 ↗
85. Sharma, M., Singh, A., Aggarwal, P. & Singh, R. Large-area transfer of 2d tmdcs assisted by a water-soluble layer for potential device applications. ACS Omega 7, 11731–11741 (2022).10.1021/acsomega.1c06855 ↗
86. Schranghamer, T. F., Sharma, M., Singh, R. & Das, S. Review and comparison of layer transfer methods for two-dimensional materials for emerging applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 11032–11054 (2021).10.1039/D1CS00706H ↗
87. Nayak, P. K. Pulsed-grown graphene for flexible transparent conductors. Nanoscale Adv. 1, 1215–1223 (2019).10.1039/C8NA00181B ↗
88. Martins, L. G. P. et al. Direct transfer of graphene onto flexible substrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110, 17762–17767 (2013).10.1073/pnas.1306508110 ↗
89. Chen, C.-S. & Hsieh, C.-K. An easy, low-cost method to transfer large-scale graphene onto polyethylene terephthalate as a transparent conductive flexible substrate. Thin Solid Films 570, 595–598 (2014).10.1016/j.tsf.2014.03.092 ↗
90. Shivayogimath, A. et al. Do-it-yourself transfer of large-area graphene using an office laminator and water. Chem. Mater. 31, 2328–2336 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b04196 ↗
91. Qiu, H., Zhou, W. & Guo, W. Nanopores in graphene and other 2d materials: a decade’s journey toward sequencing. ACS Nano 15, 18848–18864 (2021).10.1021/acsnano.1c07960 ↗
92. Su, S., Wang, X. & Xue, J. Nanopores in two-dimensional materials: accurate fabrication. Mater. Horiz. 8, 1390–1408 (2021).10.1039/D0MH01412E ↗
93. Lin, K. et al. Fabrication of solid-state nanopores. Nanotechnology 33, 272003 (2022).10.1088/1361-6528/ac622b ↗
94. Chen, Q. & Liu, Z. Fabrication and applications of solid-state nanopores. Sensors 19, 1886 (2019).10.3390/s19081886 ↗
95. Thiruraman, J. P. et al. Angstrom-size defect creation and ionic transport through pores in single-layer mos2. Nano Lett. 18, 1651–1659 (2018).10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04526 ↗
96. Danda, G. et al. Monolayer ws2 nanopores for DNA translocation with light-adjustable sizes. ACS Nano 11, 1937–1945 (2017).10.1021/acsnano.6b08028 ↗
97. Shan, Y. P. et al. Surface modification of graphene nanopores for protein translocation. Nanotechnology 24, 495102 (2013).10.1088/0957-4484/24/49/495102 ↗
98. Deng, Y. et al. Precise fabrication of a 5 nm graphene nanopore with a helium ion microscope for biomolecule detection. Nanotechnology 28, 045302 (2017).10.1088/1361-6528/28/4/045302 ↗
99. Chen, Q., Wang, Y., Deng, T. & Liu, Z. Fabrication of nanopores and nanoslits with feature sizes down to 5 nm by wet etching method. Nanotechnology 29, 085301 (2018).10.1088/1361-6528/aaa523 ↗
100. Kaur, R., Eljamal, G., Tran, T. T., Primetzhofer, D. & Ström, P. Ion track formation and nanopore etching in polyimide: Possibilities in the mev ion energy regime. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 309, 2300232 (2024).10.1002/mame.202300232 ↗