Studies of two-dimensional h-BN and MoS2 for potential diffusion barrier application in copper interconnect technology
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Copper interconnects in modern integrated circuits require a barrier layer to prevent Cu diffusion into surrounding dielectrics. However, conventional barrier materials like TaN are highly resistive compared to Cu and will occupy a large fraction of the cross-section of ultra-scaled Cu interconnects due to their thickness scaling limits at 2–3 nm, which will significantly increase the Cu line resistance. It is well understood that ultrathin, effective diffusion barriers are required to continue the interconnect scaling. In this study, a new class of two-dimensional (2D) materials, hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) and molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), is explored as alternative Cu diffusion barriers. Based on time-dependent dielectric breakdown measurements and scanning transmission electron microscopy imaging coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and electron energy loss spectroscopy characterizations, these 2D materials are shown to be promising barrier solutions for Cu interconnect technology. The predicted lifetime of devices with directly deposited 2D barriers can achieve three orders of magnitude improvement compared to control devices without barriers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Shacham-Diamand, Y. et al. Copper transport in thermal SiO2. J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, 2427–2432 (1993).10.1149/1.2220837 ↗
2. Tagami, M. et al. Highly-reliable low resistance Cu interconnects with PVD-Ru/Ti barrier metal toward automotive LSIs. Proc. Int. Interconnect. Technol. Conf. 205–207 (2008).10.1109/IITC.2008.4546968 ↗
3. Watanabe, T. et al. Self-formed barrier technology using CuMn alloy seed for copper dual-damascene interconnect with porous-SiOC/porous-PAr hybrid dielectric. Proc. Int. Interconnect. Technol. Conf. 7–9 (2007).10.1109/IITC.2007.382332 ↗
4. Kapur, P. et al. Technology and reliability constrained future copper interconnects—part I: resistance modeling. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 49, 590–596 (2002).10.1109/16.992867 ↗
5. Li, L. et al. Vertical and lateral copper transport through graphene layers. ACS Nano 9, 8361–8367 (2015).10.1021/acsnano.5b03038 ↗
6. Li, L. et al. Cu diffusion barrier: graphene benchmarked to TaN for ultimate interconnect scaling. Proc. Symp. VLSIT. T122–T123 (2015).10.1109/VLSIT.2015.7223713 ↗
7. Mehta, R. et al. Transfer-free multi-layer graphene as a diffusion barrier. Nanoscale 9, 1827–1834 (2017).10.1039/C6NR07637H ↗
8. Mehta, R. et al. Enhanced electrical and thermal conduction in graphene-encapsulated copper nanowires. Nano Lett. 15, 2024–2030 (2015).10.1021/nl504889t ↗
9. Cassabois, G. et al. Hexagonal boron nitride is an indirect bandgap semiconductor. Nat. Photonics 10, 262–266 (2016).10.1038/nphoton.2015.277 ↗
10. Hill, H. M. et al. Band alignment in MoS2/WS2 transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures probed by scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy. Nano. Lett. 16, 4831–4837 (2016).10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01007 ↗
11. Koh, E. W. K. et al. Hydrogen adsorption on and diffusion through MoS2 monolayer: first-principles study. Int. J. Hydro Energy 37, 14323–14328 (2012).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.11.109 ↗
12. Sen, H. S. et al. Monolayers of MoS2 as an oxidation protective nanocoating material. J. Appl. Phys. 116, 083508 (2014).10.1063/1.4893790 ↗
13. Adema, G. M. et al. Passivation schemes for copper/polymer thin-film interconnections used in multichip modules. IEEE Trans. Compon. Hybrids Manuf. Technol. 16, 53–59 (1993).10.1109/33.214860 ↗
14. Li, J. et al. Thermal stability issues in copper based metallization. Proc. VLSI Multilevel Interconnect. Conf. 153–159 (1991).
15. Smithe, K. K. H. et al. Intrinsic electrical transport and performance projections of synthetic monolayer MoS2 devices. 2D Mater. 4, 011009 (2016).10.1088/2053-1583/4/1/011009 ↗
16. Ahn, C. et al. Low-temperature synthesis of large-scale molybdenum disulfide thin films directly on a plastic substrate using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Adv. Mater. 27, 5223–5229 (2015).10.1002/adma.201501678 ↗
17. Amani, M. et al. Growth-substrate induced performance degradation in chemically synthesized monolayer MoS2 field effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 203506 (2014).10.1063/1.4873680 ↗
18. Smithe, K. K., Suryavanshi, S. V., Muñoz Rojo, M., Tedjarati, A. D., & Pop, E. Low variability in synthetic monolayer MoS2 devices. ACS Nano 11, 8456–8463 (2017).10.1021/acsnano.7b04100 ↗
19. Haase, G. S. et al. Reliability analysis method for low-k interconnect dielectrics breakdown in integrated circuits. J. Appl. Phys. 98, 034503 (2005).10.1063/1.1999028 ↗
20. Zhao, L. et al. Direct observation of the 1/E dependence of time dependent dielectric breakdown in the presence of copper. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 032107 (2011).10.1063/1.3543850 ↗
21. Zhao, L. et al. A new perspective of barrier material evaluation and process optimization. IEEE Int. Interconnect. Technol. Conf. 206–208 (2009).10.1109/IITC.2009.5090389 ↗
22. Suzumura, N. et al. A new TDDB degradation model based on Cu ion drift in Cu interconnect dielectrics. Proc. Int. Rel. Phys. Symp. 484–489 (2006).10.1109/RELPHY.2006.251266 ↗
23. Chen, F. et al. A comprehensive study of low-k SiCOH TDDB phenomena and its reliability lifetime model development. Proc. Int. Rel. Phys. Symp. 46–53 (2006).10.1109/RELPHY.2006.251190 ↗
24. Croes, K. et al. Low field TDDB of BEOL interconnects using >40 months of data. Proc. Int. Rel. Phys. Symp. 2F.4.1–2F.4.8 (2013).10.1109/IRPS.2013.6531969 ↗
25. Wong, T. K. S. Time dependent dielectric breakdown in copper low-k interconnects: mechanisms and reliability models. Materials 5, 1602–1625 (2012).10.3390/ma5091602 ↗
26. McPherson, J. W. Time dependent dielectric breakdown physics–models revisited. Microelectron. Reliab. 52, 1753–1760 (2012).10.1016/j.microrel.2012.06.007 ↗
27. Balk, P. et al. High temperature annealing behavior of electron traps in thermal SiO2. Solid State Electron. 27, 709–719 (1984).10.1016/0038-1101(84)90019-4 ↗
28. Hofmann, K. et al. High temperature reaction and defect chemistry at the Si/SiO2 interface. Appl. Surf. Sci. 30, 25–31 (1987).10.1016/0169-4332(87)90069-9 ↗
29. Tromp, R. et al. High-temperature SiO2 decomposition at the SiO2/Si interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2332–2335 (1985).10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2332 ↗
30. Liang, X. et al. Toward clean and crackless transfer of graphene. ACS Nano 5, 9144–9153 (2011).10.1021/nn203377t ↗
31. Yang, L. et al. High-performance MoS2 field-effect transistors enabled by chloride doping: Record low contact resistance (0.5 kΩ·μm) and record high drain current (460 μA/μm). Proc. Symp. VLSIT. T5–T6 (2014).
32. Li, B. et al. Reliability challenges for copper interconnects. Microelectron. Reliab. 44, 365–380 (2004).10.1016/j.microrel.2003.11.004 ↗
33. Kappera, R. et al. Phase-engineered low-resistance contacts for ultrathin MoS2 transistors. Nat. Mater. 13, 1128–1134 (2014).10.1038/nmat4080 ↗
34. Li, L. et al. BEOL compatible graphene/Cu with improved electromigration lifetime for future interconnects. IEDM Technical Dig. 9.5.1–9.5.4 (2017).10.1109/IEDM.2016.7838383 ↗
35. Nguyen, B.-S. et al. 1-nm-thick graphene tri-layer as the ultimate copper diffusion barrier. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 082105 (2014).10.1063/1.4866857 ↗
36. Hong, J. et al. Graphene as an atomically thin barrier to Cu diffusion into Si. Nanoscale 6, 7503–7511 (2014).10.1039/C3NR06771H ↗
37. Bong, J. H. et al. Ultrathin graphene and graphene oxide layers as a diffusion barrier for advanced Cu metallization. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 063112 (2015).10.1063/1.4908559 ↗