Comprehensive modelling of ferrofluids via dual dissipation mechanisms for multiplexed thermal activation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Ferrofluids, composed of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), act as magnetothermal energy transducers under alternating magnetic fields. Heat conversion occurs through two primary mechanisms: Néel relaxation and Brownian relaxation. However, establishing activation standards for each particle type remains challenging, with significant discrepancies between theoretical and experimental values. We propose that these discrepancies arise not only from the nonlinear responses of magnetic particles but also from the simultaneous occurrence of both heat generation mechanisms. To address this issue, we propose a refined equation that considers the dual dissipation of each relaxation process. This comprehensive model predicts the transduced power more accurately and helps trace the stochastic Brownian rotation inside magnetic colloidal suspensions. Furthermore, our approach theoretically proves the multiplexed activation with three (or more) channels, which cannot be verified using the conventional theory. This study offers insights into the selection of stable operations for magnetothermal energy conversion, whether in single or multiple channels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry · Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen, R., Romero, G., Christiansen, M. G., Mohr, A. & Anikeeva, P. Wireless magnetothermal deep brain stimulation. Science 347, 1477–1480, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261821 (2015).10.1126/science.1261821 ↗
2. Sung, K. et al. Computational analysis of multichannel magnetothermal neural stimulation using magnetic resonator array. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 13, 209–219, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-023-00267-x (2023).10.1007/s13534-023-00267-x ↗
3. Hescham, S.-A. et al. Magnetothermal nanoparticle technology alleviates Parkinsonian-like symptoms in mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 5569, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25837-4 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-25837-4 ↗
4. Zhang, Z., You, Y., Ge, M., Lin, H. & Shi, J. Functional nanoparticle-enabled non-genetic neuromodulation. J. Nanobiotechnology 21, 319, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-02084-x (2023).10.1186/s12951-023-02084-x ↗
5. Shin, W. et al. Magnetogenetics with Piezo1 mechanosensitive ion channel for CRISPR gene editing. Nano Lett 22, 7415–7422, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02314 (2022).10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02314 ↗
6. Lee, J. U. et al. Non-contact long-range magnetic stimulation of mechanosensitive ion channels in freely moving animals. Nat. Mater. 20, 1029–1036, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-00896-y (2021).10.1038/s41563-020-00896-y ↗
7. Young, J. H., Wang, M.-T. & Brezovich, I. A. Frequency/depth-penetration considerations in hyperthermia by magnetically induced currents. Electron. Lett. 16, 358–359, https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19800255 (1980).10.1049/el:19800255 ↗
8. Song, G. et al. Carbon-coated FeCo nanoparticles as sensitive magnetic-particle-imaging tracers with photothermal and magnetothermal properties. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 325–334, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0506-0 (2020).10.1038/s41551-019-0506-0 ↗
9. Paysen, H. et al. Cellular uptake of magnetic nanoparticles imaged and quantified by magnetic particle imaging. Sci. Rep. 10, 1922, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58853-3 (2020).10.1038/s41598-020-58853-3 ↗
10. Buzug, T. M.world scientific (firm). Magnetic Nanoparticles: Particle Science, Imaging Technology, and Clinical Applications. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Magnetic Particle Imaging. (2010) (Inst. of Medical Engineering, Univ. of Lubeck, Germany, 2010).
11. Hemery, G. et al. Monocore: Vs. multicore magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Uptake by glioblastoma cells and efficiency for magnetic hyperthermia. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 2, 629–639, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7ME00061H (2017).10.1039/C7ME00061H ↗
12. Sharifianjazi, F. et al. Polymer incorporated magnetic nanoparticles: Applications for magnetoresponsive targeted drug delivery. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 272, 115358, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2021.115358 (2021).10.1016/j.mseb.2021.115358 ↗
13. Li, Z. et al. Construction of pH-responsive nanoplatform from stable magnetic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery and intracellular imaging. Sens. Actuators B 375, 132869, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2022.132869 (2023).10.1016/j.snb.2022.132869 ↗
14. Li, J. et al. Functional material-mediated wireless physical stimulation for neuro-modulation and regeneration. J. Mater. Chem. B 11, 9056–9083, https://doi.org/10.1039/d3tb01354e (2023).10.1039/d3tb01354e ↗
15. Sebesta, C. et al. Subsecond multichannel magnetic control of select neural circuits in freely moving flies. Nat. Mater. 21, 951–958, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-022-01281-7 (2022).10.1038/s41563-022-01281-7 ↗
16. Tabatabaei, S. N., Girouard, H., Carret, A. S. & Martel, S. Remote control of the permeability of the blood-brain barrier by magnetic heating of nanoparticles: A proof of concept for brain drug delivery. J. Control. Rel. 206, 49–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.02.027 (2015).10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.02.027 ↗
17. Chen, J., Yuan, M., Madison, C. A., Eitan, S. & Wang, Y. Blood-brain barrier crossing using magnetic stimulated nanoparticles. J. Control. Rel. 345, 557–571, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.007 (2022).10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.007 ↗
18. Wang, Y. et al. Fe3O4@polydopamine nanoparticle-loaded human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells improve the cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease mice by promoting hippocampal neurogenesis. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 40, 102507, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2021.102507 (2022).10.1016/j.nano.2021.102507 ↗
19. Le, T. A., Bui, M. P. & Yoon, J. Theoretical analysis for wireless magnetothermal deep brain stimulation using commercial nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 2873, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20122873 (2019).10.3390/ijms20122873 ↗
20. Zhang, M. et al. TRP (transient receptor potential) ion channel family: Structures, biological functions and therapeutic interventions for diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 8, 261, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01464-x (2023).10.1038/s41392-023-01464-x ↗
21. Güler, A. D. et al. Heat-evoked activation of the ion channel, TRPV4. J. Neurosci. 22, 6408–6414, https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-15-06408.2002 (2002).10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-15-06408.2002 ↗
22. Rosenfeld, D. et al. Magnetothermal modulation of calcium-dependent nerve growth. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2204558, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202204558 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202204558 ↗
23. Askri, D. et al. Sub-acute intravenous exposure to Fe2O3 nanoparticles does not alter cognitive performances and catecholamine levels, but slightly disrupts plasma iron level and brain iron content in rats. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 50, 73–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2018.06.006 (2018).10.1016/j.jtemb.2018.06.006 ↗
24. Carrey, J., Mehdaoui, B. & Respaud, M. Simple models for dynamic hysteresis loop calculations of magnetic single-domain nanoparticles: Application to magnetic hyperthermia optimization. J. Appl. Phys. 109, 083921, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3551582 (2011).10.1063/1.3551582 ↗
25. Peter, W. J. Debye. Polar Mol. (1921).
26. Shliomis, M. I. & Stepanov, V. I. Theory of the dynamic susceptibility of magnetic fluids. Adv. Chem. Phys., 1–30, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470141465.ch1 (1994).10.1002/9780470141465.ch1 ↗
27. Biase, J. N., Whitehead, E. D., Miller, F. & Hoffman, S. Unilateral unitary inflatable penile prosthesis to correct impaired tumescence and severe penile deformity resulting from traumatic rupture of 1 corpus cavernosum. J. Urol. 152, 2098–2100, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32321-2 (1994).10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32321-2 ↗
28. Dieckhoff, J., Eberbeck, D., Schilling, M. & Ludwig, F. Magnetic-field dependence of Brownian and Néel relaxation times. J. Appl. Phys. 119, 043093, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4940724 (2016).10.1063/1.4940724 ↗
29. Herrero de la Parte, B. et al. Proposal of new safety limits for in vivo experiments of magnetic hyperthermia antitumor therapy. Cancers 14, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14133084 (2022). Pubmed:35804855.10.3390/cancers14133084 ↗
30. Wang, C. et al. Effective heating of magnetic nanoparticle aggregates for in vivo nano-theranostic hyperthermia. Int. J. Nanomed. 12, 6273–6287, https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S141072 (2017). Pubmed:28894366.10.2147/IJN.S141072 ↗
31. Allia, P., Barrera, G. & Tiberto, P. Hysteresis effects in magnetic nanoparticles: A simplified rate-equation approach. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 496, 165927, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165927 (2020).10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165927 ↗
32. Mi, Y., Ma, C., Zheng, W., Li, Z. & Zhang, M. Magnetic losses in single-domain magnetic particles. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 232, 1353–1368, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00763-8 (2023).10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00763-8 ↗
33. Siqueira, E. C. et al. A microscopic approach to heating rate of ferrofluid droplets by a magnetic field. J. Appl. Phys. 125, 045104, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5078648 (2019).10.1063/1.5078648 ↗
34. Fabris, F. et al. Adjusting the Néel relaxation time of Fe3O4/ZnxCo1-xFe2O4core/shell nanoparticles for optimal heat generation in magnetic hyperthermia. Nanotechnology 32, 065703 (2020).10.1088/1361-6528/abc386 ↗
35. Bui, T. Q. et al. I. Advanced characterization of magnetization dynamics in iron oxide magnetic nanoparticle tracers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 9–11, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0077016 (2022).10.1063/5.0077016 ↗
36. Balaji, G., Narayanan, R. A., Weber, A., Mohammad, F. & Kumar, C. S. S. R. Giant magnetostriction in magnetite nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 177, 14–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2011.09.023 (2012).10.1016/j.mseb.2011.09.023 ↗
37. Yoshida, T. & Enpuku, K. Simulation and quantitative clarification of AC susceptibility of magnetic fluid in nonlinear Brownian relaxation region. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 48, 127002, https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.48.127002 (2009).10.1143/JJAP.48.127002 ↗
38. Chalifour, A. R., Davidson, J. C., Anderson, N. R., Crawford, T. M. & Livesey, K. L. Magnetic relaxation time for an ensemble of nanoparticles with randomly aligned easy axes: A simple expression. Phys. Rev. B 104, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.094433 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevB.104.094433 ↗
39. Muscas, G. et al. The interplay between single particle anisotropy and interparticle interactions in ensembles of magnetic nanoparticles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 28634–28643 (2018).10.1039/C8CP03934H ↗
40. Ring, H. L., Sharma, A., Ivkov, R. & Bischof, J. C. The impact of data selection and fitting on SAR estimation for magnetic nanoparticle heating. Int. J. Hyperthermia 37, 100–107, https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2020.1810332 (2020).10.1080/02656736.2020.1810332 ↗
41. Hoo, C. M., Starostin, N., West, P. & Mecartney, M. L. A comparison of atomic force microscopy (AFM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) methods to characterize nanoparticle size distributions. J. Nanoparticle Res. 10, 89–96, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-008-9435-7 (2008).10.1007/s11051-008-9435-7 ↗
42. Anwar, M. et al. Aqueous phase transfer of oleic acid coated iron oxide nanoparticles: Influence of solvents and surfactants on stability and pharmaceutical applications of ferrofluid. Magnetohydrodynamics 49, 339–343 (2013).10.22364/mhd.49.3-4.16 ↗
43. Cruz-Acuña, M., Maldonado-Camargo, L., Dobson, J. & Rinaldi, C. From oleic acid-capped iron oxide nanoparticles to polyethyleneimine-coated single-particle magnetofectins. J. Nanoparticle Res. 18, 268, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3577-9 (2016).10.1007/s11051-016-3577-9 ↗
44. Trisnanto, S. B. & Kitamoto, Y. Field-dependent Brownian relaxation dynamics of a superparamagnetic clustered-particle suspension. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 90, 1–7 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevE.90.032306 ↗
45. Yin, X., Goudriaan, J., Lantinga, E. A., Vos, J. & Spiertz, H. J. A flexible sigmoid function of determinate growth. Ann. Bot. 91, 361–371, https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcg029 (2003).10.1093/aob/mcg029 ↗
46. Swillens, S., Dessars, B. & Housni, H. E. Revisiting the sigmoidal curve fitting applied to quantitative real-time PCR data. Anal. Biochem. 373, 370–376, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2007.10.019 (2008).10.1016/j.ab.2007.10.019 ↗
47. Dennis, C. L. & Ivkov, R. Physics of heat generation using magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia. Int. J. Hyperthermia 29, 715–729, https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2013.836758 (2013).10.3109/02656736.2013.836758 ↗
48. Gavilán, H. et al. How size, shape and assembly of magnetic nanoparticles give rise to different hyperthermia scenarios. Nanoscale 13, 15631–15646, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1nr03484g (2021).10.1039/d1nr03484g ↗
49. Liu, N. N. et al. The “field or frequency” dilemma in magnetic hyperthermia: The case of Zn–Mn ferrite nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 555, 169379, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169379 (2022).10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169379 ↗
50. Liu, N. N. et al. Optimization of Zn-Mn ferrite nanoparticles for low-frequency hyperthermia: Exploiting the potential of superquadratic field dependence of magnetothermal response. Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 102403, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0082857 (2022).10.1063/5.0082857 ↗
51. Yamamoto, Y. et al. Size dependence study on magnetic heating properties of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles suspension. J. Appl. Phys. 116, 123906, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4896369 (2014).10.1063/1.4896369 ↗
52. Mohapatra, J. et al. Size-dependent magnetic and inductive heating properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles: Scaling laws across the superparamagnetic size. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 12879–12887, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cp08631h (2018).10.1039/c7cp08631h ↗
53. De La Presa, P. et al. Study of heating efficiency as a function of concentration, size, and applied field in γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 25602–25610, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp310771p (2012).10.1021/jp310771p ↗
54. Wang, B. et al. Multichannel power electronics and magnetic nanoparticles for selective thermal magnetogenetics. J. Neural Eng. 19, 26015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ac5b94 (2022).10.1088/1741-2552/ac5b94 ↗
55. Zhang, Z., You, Y., Ge, M., Lin, H. & Shi, J. Functional nanoparticle-enabled non-genetic neuromodulation. J Nanobiotechnology 21, 319, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-02084-x (2023).10.1186/s12951-023-02084-x ↗
56. López Espejo, M. & David, S. V. A sparse code for natural sound context in auditory cortex. Curr. Res. Neurobiol. 6, 100118 (2024).10.1016/j.crneur.2023.100118 ↗
57. Zhao, K. & Ren, M. An Entorhinal-Hippocampal loop model based on non-negative sparse coding. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. B. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40031-024-01082-3. (2024).10.1007/s40031-024-01082-3 ↗
58. Xu, Z., Shen, C., Hou, Y., Gao, H. & Sun, S. Oleylamine as both reducing agent and stabilizer in a facile synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. Chem. Mater. 21, 1778–1780, https://doi.org/10.1021/cm802978z (2009).10.1021/cm802978z ↗
59. Hou, Y., Xu, Z. & Sun, S. Controlled synthesis and chemical conversions of FeO nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int Ed Engl 46, 6329–6332, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200701694 (2007).10.1002/anie.200701694 ↗
60. Brown, K. R. & Natan, M. J. Colloidal gold: Principles, methods, and applications. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 14 (1996).
61. Cara, C. et al. Dialkylamide as both capping agent and surfactant in a direct solvothermal synthesis of magnetite and titania nanoparticles. Cryst. Growth Des. 15, 2364–2372, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.5b00160 (2015).10.1021/acs.cgd.5b00160 ↗
62. Sharifi Dehsari, H. S. et al. Effect of precursor concentration on size evolution of iron oxide nanoparticles. CrystEngComm 19, 6694–6702, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CE01406F (2017).10.1039/C7CE01406F ↗
63. Mourdikoudis, S. et al. Oleic acid/oleylamine ligand pair: A versatile combination in the synthesis of colloidal nanoparticles. Nanoscale Horiz 7, 941–1015, https://doi.org/10.1039/d2nh00111j (2022).10.1039/d2nh00111j ↗
64. Sun, S. & Zeng, H. Size-controlled synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 8204–8205, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja026501x (2002).10.1021/ja026501x ↗
65. Yan, Z., FitzGerald, S., Crawford, T. M. & Mefford, O. T. Manganese and cobalt substituted ferrite nanoparticles synthesized via a seed-mediated drip method. J. Phys Mater. 4, 034013, https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/abfcd5 (2021).10.1088/2515-7639/abfcd5 ↗
66. Ealias, A. M. & Saravanakumar, M. P. A review on the classification, characterisation, synthesis of nanoparticles and their application. In IOP Conference Series. Mater. Sci. Eng. 263, 032019 (2017).10.1088/1757-899X/263/3/032019 ↗
67. Roy, I. Therapeutic applications of magnetic nanoparticles: Recent advances. Mater. Adv. 3, 7425–7444 (2022).10.1039/D2MA00444E ↗
68. Maazouzi, A. E. L., Masrour, R. & Jabar, A. Magnetic properties of inverse spinel: (Fe3+) A (Fe3+ Fe2+) BO4 2− Magnetite. 2, 3871–3874 (2020).10.1007/s10948-020-05515-0 ↗
69. Skoropata, E. et al. Magnetism of iron oxide based core-shell nanoparticles from interface mixing with enhanced spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B 89, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.024410 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.89.024410 ↗
70. Raikher, Y. L. & Stepanov, V. I. Physical aspects of magnetic hyperthermia: Low-frequency AC field absorption in a magnetic colloid. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 368, 421–427, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.01.070 (2014).10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.01.070 ↗