Unveiling pore size contributions and host-guest interactions in methane adsorption under varying pressure conditions: a semi-empirical adsorption model
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Natural gas, primarily composed of methane (CH 4 ), offers a greener alternative to conventional fuels. Efficient storage through adsorbed natural gas technology necessitates an understanding of CH 4 –adsorbent interactions. This study explored CH 4 adsorption on activated carbons at 1–35 bar and 298 K, determining an efficiency factor ( φ ) as an indicator of optimal pore size. In the given system, φ ranged from 2.0 at 1 bar to 2.5 at 35 bar, indicating an increasing trend with pressure. To gain further insights, quantitative contributions ( $${k}x$$ ) were established based on different micropore sizes ( $${d}_{{\rm{i}}}$$ < 0.76 nm, 0.76 nm < $${d}_{{\rm{ii}}}$$ < 1.14 nm, and 1.14 nm < $${d}_{{\rm{iii}}}$$ < 2 nm). At 1 bar, $${k}_{{\rm{i}}}$$ , $${k}_{{\rm{ii}}}$$ , and $${k}_{{\rm{iii}}}$$ contributed 91, 9, and 1%, respectively. These contribution values shifted to 35, 54, and 11% at 35 bar, suggesting that effective pore sizes increase with increasing pressure. Notably, CH 4 capacity directly correlated with $${d}_{{\rm{ii}}}$$ in the high-pressure adsorption. Atomistic computations were used to elucidate the role of pore sizes in facilitating CH 4 accessibility at different pressures. This comprehensive model provides valuable insights for designing optimal adsorbents, specifically targeting pore size-dependent applications such as gas adsorption and separation, as well as catalyst supports.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Covalent Organic Framework Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Rozyyev, V. et al. High-capacity methane storage in flexible alkane-linked porous aromatic network polymers. Nat. Energy 4, 604–611 (2019).10.1038/s41560-019-0427-x ↗
2. Chen, Z. J. et al. Balancing volumetric and gravimetric uptake in highly porous materials for clean energy. Science 368, 297–303 (2020).10.1126/science.aaz8881 ↗
3. Yu, Y. S., Zhang, X. W., Liu, J. W., Lee, Y. H. & Li, X. S. Natural gas hydrate resources and hydrate technologies: a review and analysis of the associated energy and global warming challenges. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 5611–5668 (2021).10.1039/D1EE02093E ↗
4. Si, X. Q. et al. Catalytic production of low-carbon footprint sustainable natural gas. Nat. Commun. 13, 258 (2022).10.1038/s41467-021-27919-9 ↗
5. Altwala, A. & Mokaya, R. Predictable and targeted activation of biomass to carbons with high surface area density and enhanced methane storage capacity. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 2967–2978 (2020).10.1039/D0EE01340D ↗
6. Lee, S. Y. et al. Recent progress using solid-state materials for hydrogen storage: a short review. Processes 10, 304 (2022).10.3390/pr10020304 ↗
7. Zhang, Y. F. et al. New reticular chemistry of the rod secondary building unit: synthesis, structure, and natural gas storage of a series of three-way rod amide-functionalized metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 12202–12211 (2021).10.1021/jacs.1c04946 ↗
8. Altwala, A. & Mokaya, R. Modulating the porosity of activated carbons via pre-mixed precursors for simultaneously enhanced gravimetric and volumetric methane uptake. J. Mater. Chem. A 10, 13744–13757 (2022).10.1039/D2TA00421F ↗
9. Kim, S. Y. et al. Discovery of high-performing metal-organic frameworks for on-board methane storage and delivery via LNG-ANG Coupling: High-throughput Screening, Machine Learning, and Experimental Validation. Adv. Sci. 9, 2201559 (2022).10.1002/advs.202201559 ↗
10. Li, C. B. et al. Applications of metal-organic frameworks and their derivatives in electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nano-Micro Lett. 15, 113 (2023).10.1007/s40820-023-01092-8 ↗
11. Tian, T. et al. A sol-gel monolithic metal-organic framework with enhanced methane uptake. Nat. Mater. 17, 174–179 (2018).10.1038/nmat5050 ↗
12. Lee, J. H. & Park, S. J. Recent advances in preparations and applications of carbon aerogels: a review. Carbon 163, 1–18 (2020).10.1016/j.carbon.2020.02.073 ↗
13. Mason, J. A. et al. Methane storage in flexible metal-organic frameworks with intrinsic thermal management. Nature 527, 357–361 (2015).10.1038/nature15732 ↗
14. Li, J. R., Kuppler, R. J. & Zhou, H. C. Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1477–1504 (2009).10.1039/b802426j ↗
15. Sun, J., Rood, M. J., RostamAbadi, M. & Lizzio, A. A. Natural gas storage with activated carbon from a bituminous coal. Gas. Sep. Purif. 10, 91–96 (1996).10.1016/0950-4214(96)00009-6 ↗
16. MacDonald, J. A. F. & Quinn, D. F. Adsorbents for methane storage made by phosphoric acid activation of peach pits. Carbon 34, 1103–1108 (1996).10.1016/0008-6223(96)00062-0 ↗
17. AlcanizMonge, J., delaCasaLillo, M. A., CazorlaAmoros, D. & LinaresSolano, A. Methane storage in activated carbon fibres. Carbon 35, 291–297 (1997).10.1016/S0008-6223(96)00156-X ↗
18. Peng, Y. et al. Methane storage in metal-organic frameworks: current records, surprise findings, and challenges. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 11887–11894 (2013).10.1021/ja4045289 ↗
19. Choi, S., Alkhabbaz, M. A., Wang, Y. G., Othman, R. M. & Choi, M. Unique thermal contraction of zeolite-templated carbons enabling micropore size tailoring and its effects on methane storage. Carbon 141, 143–153 (2019).10.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.045 ↗
20. Matranga, K. R., Myers, A. L. & Glandt, E. D. Storage of natural gas by adsorption on activated carbon. Chem. Eng. Sci. 47, 1569–1579 (1992).10.1016/0009-2509(92)85005-V ↗
21. Hlushak, S. Heat of adsorption, adsorption stress, and optimal storage of methane in slit and cylindrical carbon pores predicted by classical density functional theory. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 872–888 (2018).10.1039/C7CP06591D ↗
22. Furukawa, H. & Yaghi, O. M. Storage of hydrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide in highly porous covalent organic frameworks for clean energy applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 8875–8883 (2009).10.1021/ja9015765 ↗
23. El-Kaderi, H. M. et al. Designed synthesis of 3D covalent organic frameworks. Science 316, 268–272 (2007).10.1126/science.1139915 ↗
24. Mendoza-Cortes, J. L., Han, S. S., Furukawa, H., Yaghi, O. M. & Goddard, W. A. Adsorption mechanism and uptake of methane in covalent organic frameworks: theory and experiment. J. Phys. Chem. A 114, 10824–10833 (2010).10.1021/jp1044139 ↗
25. Martin, R. L., Simon, C. M., Smit, B. & Haranczyk, M. In silico design of porous polymer networks: high-throughput screening for methane storage materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 5006–5022 (2014).10.1021/ja4123939 ↗
26. Simon, C. M. et al. The materials genome in action: identifying the performance limits for methane storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1190–1199 (2015).10.1039/C4EE03515A ↗
27. Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
28. Yan, G. et al. Metal-free 2D/2D van der Waals Heterojunction Based on Covalent Organic Frameworks for Highly Efficient Solar Energy Catalysis. Nano-Micro Lett. 15, 132 (2023).10.1007/s40820-023-01100-x ↗
29. Perdew, J. P., Ernzerhof, M. & Burke, K. Rationale for mixing exact exchange with density functional approximations. J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9982–9985 (1996).10.1063/1.472933 ↗
30. Qiu, C. et al. MOF-transformed In2O3-x@C nanocorn electrocatalyst for efficient CO reduction to HCOOH. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 167 (2022).10.1007/s40820-022-00913-6 ↗
31. Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).10.1063/1.3382344 ↗
32. Ding, K. X. et al. Aerophilic triphase interface tuned by carbon dots driving durable and flexible rechargeable Zn-Air batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 15, 28 (2023).10.1007/s40820-022-00994-3 ↗
33. Verlet, L. Computer” experiments” on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical properties of Lennard-Jones molecules. Phys. Rev. 159, 98 (1967).10.1103/PhysRev.159.98 ↗
34. Kumar, K. V., Preuss, K., Titirici, M. M. & Rodriguez-Reinoso, F. Nanoporous materials for the onboard storage of natural Gas. Chem. Rev. 117, 1796–1825 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00505 ↗
35. Sun, J. et al. Direct measurements of volumetric gas storage capacity and some new insight into adsorbed natural gas storage. Energy Fuel 15, 1241–1246 (2001).10.1021/ef010067n ↗
36. Wood, C. D. et al. Microporous organic polymers for methane storage. Adv. Mater. 20, 1916–1921 (2008).10.1002/adma.200702397 ↗
37. Lee, J. W. et al. Methane storage on phenol-based activated carbons at (293.15, 303.15, and 313.15) K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 52, 66–70 (2007).10.1021/je060218m ↗
38. Grau-Marin, D. et al. Evaluation of the textural properties of ultramicroporous carbons using experimental and theoretical methods. Carbon 157, 495–505 (2020).10.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.035 ↗
39. Rouquerol, F., Rouquerol, J., Sing, K. S. W., Llewellyn, P. L., Maurin, G., ProQuest. Adsorption by powders and porous solids: principles, methodology and applications, Second edition. edn. (Academic Press, 2014).
40. Shiratori, N. et al. Pore structure analysis of activated carbon fiber by microdomain-based model. Langmuir 25, 7631 (2009).10.1021/la9000347 ↗
41. Meyer, K. & Klobes, P. Comparison between different presentations of pore size distribution in porous materials. Fresen J. Anal. Chem. 363, 174–178 (1999).10.1007/s002160051166 ↗
42. Schlumberger, C. & Thommes, M. Characterization of hierarchically ordered porous materials by physisorption and mercury porosimetry-a tutorial review. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 8, 2002181 (2021).10.1002/admi.202002181 ↗
43. Lee, S. Y., Lee, J. H., Kim, Y. H., Mahajan, R. L. & Park, S. J. Surface energetics of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide determined by inverse gas chromatographic technique at infinite dilution at room temperature. J. Colloid Inter. Sci. 628, 758–768 (2022).10.1016/j.jcis.2022.07.183 ↗
44. Lee, S. Y., Kim, Y. H., Mahajan, R. L. & Park, S. J. Determination of hydrophobic dispersive surface free energy of activated carbon fibers measured by inverse gas chromatographic technique. Nanomaterials 13, 1113 (2023).10.3390/nano13061113 ↗
45. Rehman, A. & Park, S. J. From chitosan to urea-modified carbons: tailoring the ultra-microporosity for enhanced CO2 adsorption. Carbon 159, 625–637 (2020).10.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.068 ↗
46. Heo, Y. J. & Park, S. J. H2O2/steam activation as an eco-friendly and efficient top-down approach to enhancing porosity on carbonaceous materials: the effect of inevitable oxygen functionalities on CO2 capture. Green. Chem. 20, 5224–5234 (2018).10.1039/C8GC02570C ↗
47. Zhou, M. Y. et al. A molecular foaming and activation strategy to porous N-doped carbon foams for supercapacitors and CO2 capture. Nano-Micro Lett. 12, 58 (2020).10.1007/s40820-020-0389-3 ↗
48. Cheng, G. et al. Characteristics of coal-oxygen chemisorption at the low-temperature oxidation stage: DFT and experimental study. Fuel 315, 123120 (2022).10.1016/j.fuel.2021.123120 ↗
49. Halder, A. et al. Multivariate flexible framework with high usable hydrogen capacity in a reduced pressure swing process. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 8033–8042 (2023).10.1021/jacs.3c00344 ↗
50. He, Y., Zhou, W., Qian, G. & Chen, B. Methane storage in metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 5657–5678 (2014).10.1039/C4CS00032C ↗
51. Alezi, D. et al. MOF crystal chemistry paving the way to gas storage needs: aluminum-based soc-MOF for CH4, O2, and CO2 storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 13308–13318 (2015).10.1021/jacs.5b07053 ↗
52. NIST Chemistry WebBook SRD 69 (National Institute of Standards and Technology); http://webbook.nist.gov (2022).
53. Chaemchuen, S., Kabir, N. A., Zhou, K. & Verpoort, F. Metal-organic frameworks for upgrading biogas via CO2 adsorption to biogas green energy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 9304–9332 (2013).10.1039/c3cs60244c ↗
54. DOE US. Target explanation document: Onboard hydrogen storage for light-duty fuel cell vehicles. (ed Energy USDoE) (2017).
55. Allendorf, M. D. et al. Challenges to developing materials for the transport and storage of hydrogen. Nat. Chem. 14, 1214–1223 (2022).10.1038/s41557-022-01056-2 ↗
56. Presser, V., McDonough, J., Yeon, S. H. & Gogotsi, Y. Effect of pore size on carbon dioxide sorption by carbide derived carbon. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 3059–3066 (2011).10.1039/c1ee01176f ↗
57. Heo, Y. J., Yeon, S. H. & Park, S. J. Defining contribution of micropore size to hydrogen physisorption behaviors: A new approach based on DFT pore volumes. Carbon 143, 288–293 (2019).10.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.019 ↗
58. Kharissova, O. V. & Kharisov, B. I. Variations of interlayer spacing in carbon nanotubes. RSC Adv. 4, 30807–30815 (2014).10.1039/C4RA04201H ↗