C60/Na4FeO3/Li3V2(PO4)3/soft carbon quaternary hybrid superstructure for high-performance battery-supercapacitor hybrid devices
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract To develop battery-supercapacitor hybrid devices with high energy and power densities, we propose a rational design of a quaternary hybrid superstructure by using a high-energy biotemplate. This new superstructure is composed of stable fullerene C60 nanocages, electroactive Na4FeO3, high-energy Li3V2(PO4)3 and soft carbon as well as tubular ordered mesoporous channels. This design takes advantage of the unique properties of each component, resulting in nanocomposites with synergistic effects to improve the charge transfer and energy storage. We found that this quaternary hybrid electrode has both high energy and power densities as well as a long cycling life in a Li/Na mixed-ion electrolyte, outperforming a multitude of other battery-supercapacitor hybrid devices reported thus far. The charge storage mechanisms of this hybrid superstructure are proposed for optimizing the electrode design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Kuno, M. et al. A quantitative and spatially resolved analysis of the performance-bottleneck in high efficiency, planar hybrid perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 960–969 (2018).10.1039/C7EE03654J ↗
2. Lukatskaya, M. R., Dunn, B. & Gogotsi, Y. Multidimensional materials and device architectures for future hybrid energy storage. Nat. Commun. 7, 12647 (2016).10.1038/ncomms12647 ↗
3. Zhu, X., Sun, D., Luo, B., Hu, Y. & Wang, L. A stable high-power Na2Ti3O7/LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 Li-ion hybrid energy storage device. Electrochim. Acta 284, 30–37 (2018).10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.153 ↗
4. Jo, C. H. et al. Bioinspired surface layer for the cathode material of high‐energy‐density sodium‐ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1702942 (2018).10.1002/aenm.201702942 ↗
5. Jo, C. H., Choi, J. U., Yashiro, H. & Myung, S. T. Controllable charge capacity using a black additive for high-energy-density sodium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 3903–3909 (2019).10.1039/C8TA09833F ↗
6. Zuo, W. et al. Battery-supercapacitor hybrid devices: recent progress and future prospects. Adv. Sci. 4, 1600539 (2017).10.1002/advs.201600539 ↗
7. Liu, J. et al. Advanced energy storage devices: basic principles, analytical methods, and rational materials design. Adv. Sci. 5, 1700322 (2018).10.1002/advs.201700322 ↗
8. Zhang, X., Tang, Y., Zhang, F. & Lee, C.-S. A novel aluminum–graphite dual-ion battery. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1–6 (2016).
9. Tong, X., Zhang, F., Ji, B., Sheng, M. & Tang, Y. Carbon-coated porous aluminum foil anode for high-rate, long-term cycling stability, and high energy density dual-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 28, 9979–9985 (2016).10.1002/adma.201603735 ↗
10. Nakano, H. et al. Anion secondary batteries utilizing a reversible BF4 insertion/extraction two-dimensional Si material. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 7588–7592 (2014).10.1039/c4ta00456f ↗
11. Li, J., Ma, C., Chi, M., Liang, C. & Dudney, N. J. Solid electrolyte: the key for high-voltage lithium batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401408 (2015).10.1002/aenm.201401408 ↗
12. Xu, K. Electrolytes and interphases in Li-ion batteries and beyond. Chem. Rev. 114, 11503–11618 (2014).10.1021/cr500003w ↗
13. Hou, Y., Cheng, Y., Hobson, T. & Liu, J. Design and synthesis of hierarchical MnO2 nanospheres/carbon nanotubes/conducting polymer ternary composite for high performance electrochemical electrodes. Nano Lett. 10, 2727 (2010).10.1021/nl101723g ↗
14. Chen, Z. et al. High-performance sodium-ion pseudocapacitors based on hierarchically porous nanowire composites. ACS Nano 6, 4319–4327 (2012).10.1021/nn300920e ↗
15. Yan, W. et al. Lithographically patterned gold/manganese dioxide core/shell nanowires for high capacity, high rate, and high cyclability hybrid electrical energy storage. Chem. Mater. 24, 2382–2390 (2012).10.1021/cm3011474 ↗
16. Guan, D., Gao, X., Li, J. & Yuan, C. Enhanced capacitive performance of TiO2 nanotubes with molybdenum oxide coating. Appl. Surf. Sci. 300, 165–170 (2014).10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.02.029 ↗
17. Qian, T. et al. Interconnected three-dimensional V2O5/polypyrrole network nanostructures for high performance solid-state supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 488–493 (2015).10.1039/C4TA05769D ↗
18. Yu, G. et al. Enhancing the supercapacitor performance of graphene/MnO2 nanostructured electrodes by conductive wrapping. Nano Lett. 11, 4438–4442 (2011).10.1021/nl2026635 ↗
19. Han, G. et al. MnO2 nanorods intercalating graphene oxide/polyaniline ternary composites for robust high-performance supercapacitors. Sci. Rep. 4, 4824 (2014).
20. Kaveevivitchai, W. & Jacobson, A. J. Exploration of vanadium benzenedicarboxylate as a cathode for rechargeable lithium batteries. J. Power Sources 278, 265–273 (2015).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.094 ↗
21. Morozan, A. & Jaouen, F. Metal organic frameworks for electrochemical applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 9269–9290 (2012).10.1039/c2ee22989g ↗
22. Zhang, Z. Y., Yoshikawa, H. & Awaga, K. Monitoring the solid-state electrochemistry of Cu (2,7-AQDC) (AQDC=anthraquinone dicarboxylate) in a lithium battery: coexistence of metal and ligand redox activities in a metal–organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 16112–16115 (2014).10.1021/ja508197w ↗
23. Shin, J. et al. MIL-101 (Fe) as a lithium-ion battery electrode material: a relaxation and intercalation mechanism during lithium insertion. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 4738–4744 (2015).10.1039/C4TA06694D ↗
24. Hu, H., Guan, B., Xia, B. & Lou, X. W. Designed formation of Co3O4/NiCo2O4 double-shelled nanocages with enhanced pseudocapacitive and electrocatalytic properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 5590–5595 (2015).10.1021/jacs.5b02465 ↗
25. Hu, H., Han, L., Yu, M., Wang, Z. & Lou, X. W. Metal–organic-framework-engaged formation of Co nanoparticle-embedded carbon@Co9S8 double-shelled nanocages for efficient oxygen reduction. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 107–111 (2016).10.1039/C5EE02903A ↗
26. Tanabe, K. K. & Cohen, S. M. Postsynthetic modification of metal–organic frameworks—a progress report. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 498–519 (2011).10.1039/C0CS00031K ↗
27. Wang, Z. Q. & Cohen, S. M. Postsynthetic modification of metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1315–1329 (2009).10.1039/b802258p ↗
28. Ferey, G. et al. Mixed-valence Li/Fe-based metal–organic frameworks with both reversible redox and sorption properties. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 46, 3259–3263 (2007).10.1002/anie.200605163 ↗
29. Fateeva, A. et al. Synthesis, structure, characterization, and redox properties of the porous MIL-68 (Fe) solid. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 3789–3794 (2010).10.1002/ejic.201000486 ↗
30. Meilikhov, M. et al. Reduction of a metal–organic framework by an organometallic complex: magnetic properties and structure of the inclusion compound [(η5-C5H5)2Co]0.5@MIL-47(V). Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 49, 6212–6215 (2010).
31. Li, W., Liu, J. & Zhao, D. Mesoporous materials for energy conversion and storage devices. Nat. Rev. Mate. 1, 1–17 (2016).
32. Davis, M. E. Ordered porous materials for emerging applications. Nature 417, 813–821 (2002).10.1038/nature00785 ↗
33. Slater, A. G. & Cooper, A. I. Function-led design of new porous materials. Science 348, 6238 (2015).10.1126/science.aaa8075 ↗
34. Wu, Z. X. & Zhao, D. Y. Ordered mesoporous materials as adsorbents. Chem. Commun. 47, 3332–3338 (2011).10.1039/c0cc04909c ↗
35. Walcarius, A. Mesoporous materials and electrochemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2, 4098–4140 (2013).10.1039/c2cs35322a ↗
36. Linares, N., Silvestre-Albero, A. M., Serrano, E., Silvestre-Albero, J. & Garcia-Martinez, J. Mesoporous materials for clean energy technologies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 7681–7717 (2014).10.1039/C3CS60435G ↗
37. Wan, Y. & Zhao, D. Y. On the controllable soft-templating approach to mesoporous silicates. Chem. Rev. 107, 2821–2860 (2007).10.1021/cr068020s ↗
38. Guo, J. et al. Modular assembly of superstructures from polyphenol-functionalized building blocks. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 1105–1111 (2016).10.1038/nnano.2016.172 ↗
39. Umh, H. N. et al. Lithium metal anode on a copper dendritic superstructure. Electrochem. Commun. 99, 27–31 (2019).10.1016/j.elecom.2018.12.015 ↗
40. Gu, B. et al. Rationally assembled porous carbon superstructures for advanced supercapacitors. Chem. Eng. J., 361, 1296–1303 (2019).10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.007 ↗
41. Yan, Y. et al. Bundled and dispersed carbon nanotube assemblies on graphite superstructures as free-standing lithium-ion battery anodes. Carbon 142, 238–244 (2019).10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.044 ↗
42. Tong, Y. et al. Tube-in-tube tin dioxide superstructures with enhanced lithium storage performance. Chem. Commun. 55, 2222–2225 (2019).10.1039/C8CC08968J ↗
43. Ma, K., Jiang, H., Hu, Y. & Li, C. 2D nanospace confined synthesis of pseudocapacitance-dominated MoS2-in-Ti3C2 superstructure for ultrafast and stable Li/Na-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1804306 (2018).10.1002/adfm.201804306 ↗
44. Zhang, Y. et al. MXene/Si@SiOx@C layer-by-layer superstructure with autoadjustable function for superior stable lithium storage. ACS Nano 132, 2167–2175 (2019).
45. Zuo, Y. et al. A high-capacity O2-type Li-rich cathode material with a single-layer Li2MnO3 superstructure. Adv. Mater. 30, 1707255 (2018).10.1002/adma.201707255 ↗
46. Vimalanathan, K. et al. Surfactant-free fabrication of fullerene C60 nanotubules under shear. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 8398–8401 (2017).10.1002/anie.201608673 ↗
47. Liu, D., Zhao, W., Liu, S., Cen, Q. & Xue, Q. Comparative tribological and corrosion resistance properties of epoxy composite coatings reinforced with functionalized fullerene C60 and grapheme. Surf. Coat. Tech. 286, 354–364 (2016).10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.12.056 ↗
48. Roy, X. et al. Nanoscale atoms in solid-state chemistry. Science 341, 157–160 (2013).10.1126/science.1236259 ↗
49. Ardhi, R. E. A. et al. Self-relaxant superelastic matrix derived from C60 incorporated Sn nanoparticles for ultra-high-performance Li-ion batteries. ACS Nano 12, 5588–5604 (2018).10.1021/acsnano.8b01345 ↗
50. Zhang, X. et al. LiFePO4/NaFe3V9O19/porous glass nanocomposite cathodes for Li+/Na+ mixed-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 22247–22257 (2015).10.1039/C5TA06424D ↗
51. Zhang, X. et al. Fabricating high-energy quantum dots in ultra-thin LiFePO4 nanosheet using a multifunctional high-energy biomolecule—ATP. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 2285–2294 (2014).10.1039/C3EE44187C ↗
52. Jin, Y. et al. Structural and optoelectronic properties of C60 rods obtained via a rapid synthesis route. J. Mater. Chem. 16, 3715–3720 (2006).10.1039/b609074e ↗
53. Cui, C.-X. & Liu, Y.-J. Role of encapsulated metal cation in the reactivity and regioselectivity of the C60 Diels–Alder reaction. J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 3098–3106 (2015).10.1021/acs.jpca.5b00194 ↗
54. Farid, G. & Kruk, M. Silica nanotubes with widely adjustable inner diameter and ordered silicas with ultralarge cylindrical mesopores templated by swollen micelles of mixed pluronic triblock copolymers. Chem. Mater. 29, 4675–4681 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05504 ↗
55. Fan, L. & Lu, B. Reactive oxygen-doped 3D interdigital carbonaceous materials for Li and Na ion batteries. Small 12, 2783–2791 (2016).10.1002/smll.201600565 ↗
56. Luo, W. et al. Electrochemically expandable soft carbon as anodes for Na-ion batteries. ACS Cent. Sci. 1, 516–522 (2015).10.1021/acscentsci.5b00329 ↗
57. Brougham, C. M. et al. Freeze-drying as a novel biofabrication method for achieving a controlled microarchitecture within large, complex natural biomaterial scaffolds. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 6, 1700598 (2017).10.1002/adhm.201700598 ↗