Impact-resistant, haze-free, 3D-printable transparent block copolymer resin via photopolymerization-induced microphase separation
Source abstract
Abstract
Incorporating rubbery domains into glassy polymers is an effective route to improve toughness and impact strength. However, retaining the transparency of the composite material over a wide temperature range with enhanced mechanical attributes is challenging because of a mismatch in refractive indices with changing temperatures, limiting their applications as optical materials. Here, we report photopolymerization-induced microphase separation as a strategy for the fabrication of transparent, temperature-resistant nanostructured polymeric materials. Taking poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) as the glassy component for its renowned high transparency, we perform controlled radical polymerization upon light exposure to transform the whole polymerization mixture into a cross-linked block polymer material, where a bicontinuous nanostructure consisting of PMMA and cross-linked rubbery microdomains spontaneously arises during polymerization in situ. The facile formation of the rubbery domains, smaller than 50 nm yet 3D continuous and cross-linked, is the key to retaining transparency above 120 °C in the visible light wavelength with dimensional stability and allowing efficient stress dissipation through the large interfacial area. We further demonstrate the 3D printability of the nanostructured materials into custom shapes via direct ink writing. Glassy polymers like polystyrene are brittle and not very durable. Researchers have found that adding rubbery polymer domains can make them tougher. However, this often makes the material hazy, which is a problem for optical uses like car windows. Researchers developed a new method using block copolymers to create clear, tough materials without haze. They used a process called polymerization-induced microphase separation (PIMS), which helps keep the rubbery domains small and clear. The researchers mixed different chemicals and used light to start a reaction that created a solid material with tiny, intertwined domains of hard and soft polymers. This new material stayed clear and strong even at high temperatures, unlike traditional materials that become hazy or lose their shape. The team also showed that this material could be used in 3D printing to make complex shapes. This summary was initially drafted using artificial intelligence, then revised and fact-checked by the author. We developed impact-resistant, haze-free poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) by photopolymerization-induced microphase separation. Upon irradiation, a polymerization mixture transforms into a transparent monolithic solid. A nanoscopic bicontinuous morphology of glassy PMMA with rubbery and cross-linked polymer domains retains transparency and dimension stability even at high temperatures. 3D printing via direct ink writing demonstrates the potential of the developed material for advanced optical and structural applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Bucknall, C. B., Partridge, I. K. & Ward, M. V. Rubber toughening of plastics: Part 7 Kinetics and mechanisms of deformation in rubber-toughened PMMA. J. Mater. Sci. 19, 2064–2072 (1984).10.1007/BF00550274 ↗
2. Bucknall, C. B. Applications of microscopy to the deformation and fracture of rubber-toughened polymers. J. Microsc. 201, 221–229 (2001).10.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00838.x ↗
3. Lovell, P. A., McDonald, J., Saunders, D. E. J. & Young, R. J. Studies of rubber-toughened poly(methyl methacrylate): 1. Preparation and thermal properties of blends of poly (methyl methacrylate) with multiple-layer toughening particles. Polymer 34, 61–69 (1993).10.1016/0032-3861(93)90284-H ↗
4. Hill, R. G. The role of microstructure on the fracture toughness and fracture behaviour of rubber-reinforced acrylics. J. Mater. Sci. 29, 3062–3070 (1994).10.1007/BF01117621 ↗
5. Schneider, M., Pith, T. & Lambla, M. Impact modification of thermoplastics by methyl methacrylate and styrene-grafted natural rubber latexes. Polym. Adv. Technol. 6, 326–334 (1995).10.1002/pat.1995.220060511 ↗
6. Cho, K., Yang, J. & Park, C. E. The effect of rubber particle size on toughening behaviour of rubber-modified poly(methyl methacrylate) with different test methods. Polymer 39, 3073–3081 (1998).10.1016/S0032-3861(97)10036-2 ↗
7. Todo, M., Takahashi, K., Jar, P.-Y. B. & Béguelin, P. Toughening mechanisms of rubber toughened PMMA. JSME Int. J. Ser. A 42, 585–591 (1999).10.1299/jsmea.42.585 ↗
8. Conaghan, B. F. & Rosen, S. L. The optical properties of two-phase polymer systems: single scattering in monodisperse, non-absorbing systems. Polym. Eng. Sci. 12, 134–139 (1972).10.1002/pen.760120210 ↗
9. Song, J. Y., Kim, J. W. & Suh, K. D. Poly(methyl methacrylate) toughening with refractive index-controlled core–shell composite particles. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 71, 1607–1614 (1999).10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990307)71:10<1607::AID-APP8>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
10. Wrotecki, C., Heim, P. & Gaillard, P. Rubber toughening of poly(methyl methacrylate). Part I: effect of the size and hard layer composition of the rubber particles. Polym. Eng. Sci. 31, 213–217 (1991).10.1002/pen.760310402 ↗
11. Wrotecki, C., Heim, P. & Gaillard, P. Rubber toughening of poly(methyl methacrylate). Part II: effect of a twin population of particle size. Polym. Eng. Sci. 31, 218–222 (1991).10.1002/pen.760310403 ↗
12. Laatsch, J., Kim, G.-M., Michler, G. H., Arndt, T. & Süfke, T. Investigation of the micromechanical deformation behavior of transparent toughened poly(methyl methacrylate) modified with core–shell particles. Polym. Adv. Technol. 9, 716–720 (1998).10.1002/(SICI)1099-1581(1998100)9:10/11<716::AID-PAT834>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
13. Ren, L., Zhang, M. Y., Han, Y., Gui, Y. & Song, L. X. Core-shell particles for design of high-performance polymeric materials with good transparency and toughness. J. Polym. Res. 21, 1–7 (2014).10.1007/s10965-014-0613-2 ↗
14. Oh, T. et al. Polymerization-induced microphase separation of a polymerization mixture into nanostructured block polymer materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 145, 101738 (2023).10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2023.101738 ↗
15. Lee, K., Corrigan, N. & Boyer, C. Polymerization induced microphase separation for the fabrication of nanostructured materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202307329 (2023).10.1002/anie.202307329 ↗
16. Seo, M. & Hillmyer, M. A. Reticulated nanoporous polymers by controlled polymerization-induced microphase separation. Science 336, 1422–1425 (2012).10.1126/science.1221383 ↗
17. Oh, J. & Seo, M. Photoinitiated polymerization-induced microphase separation for the preparation of nanoporous polymer films. ACS Macro Lett. 4, 1244–1248 (2015).10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00734 ↗
18. Peterson, C. & Hillmyer, M. A. Fast photochromic dye response in rigid block polymer thermosets. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 1, 2778–2786 (2019).10.1021/acsapm.9b00741 ↗
19. Hwang, Y. H., Oh, J., Ahn, H., Kim, D. P. & Seo, M. Synthesis of in situ microphase-separated organic–inorganic block polymer precursors to 3D-continuous mesoporous SiC-based ceramic monoliths. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2, 2802–2809 (2020).10.1021/acsapm.0c00347 ↗
20. Bobrin, V. A., Lee, K., Zhang, J., Corrigan, N. & Boyer, C. Nanostructure control in 3D printed materials. Adv. Mater. 34, 2107643 (2022).10.1002/adma.202107643 ↗
21. Bobrin, V. A. et al. Nano-to macro-scale control of 3D printed materials via polymerization induced microphase separation. Nat. Commun. 13, 3577 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-31095-9 ↗
22. Shi, X. et al. Designing nanostructured 3D printed materials by controlling macromolecular architecture. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202206272 (2022).10.1002/anie.202206272 ↗
23. Xiu, Y., Bobrin, V. A., Corrigan, N., Zhang, J. & Boyer, C. Effect of macromolecular structure on phase separation regime in 3D printed materials. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 44, 2300236 (2023).10.1002/marc.202300236 ↗
24. Shi, X., Yao, Y., Zhang, J., Corrigan, N. & Boyer, C. Polymerization induced microphase separation of ABC triblock copolymers for 3D printing nanostructured materials. Small 20, 2305268 (2024).10.1002/smll.202305268 ↗
25. Xiu, Y. et al. Engineering internal nanostructure in 3D-printed materials via polymer molecular weight distribution. J. Polym. Sci. 62, 766–776 (2024).10.1002/pol.20230634 ↗
26. Wu, D., Dev, V., Bobrin, V. A., Lee, K. & Boyer, C. Nanostructure design of 3D printed materials through macromolecular architecture. Chem. Sci. 15, 19345–19358 (2024).10.1039/D4SC05597G ↗
27. Aniagbaoso, K. I. et al. In situ fabrication of quasi-solid polymer electrolytes for lithium metal battery via photopolymerization-induced microphase separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 17, 3876–3886 (2025).10.1021/acsami.4c15921 ↗
28. Lee, K. et al. 3D printing nanostructured solid polymer electrolytes with high modulus and conductivity. Adv. Mater. 34, 2204816 (2022).10.1002/adma.202204816 ↗
29. Melodia, D. et al. 3D printed solid polymer electrolytes with bicontinuous nanoscopic domains for ionic liquid conduction and energy storage. Small 19, 2206639 (2023).10.1002/smll.202206639 ↗
30. Bobrin, V. A. et al. Customized nanostructured ceramics via microphase separation 3D printing. Adv. Sci. 10, 2304734 (2023).10.1002/advs.202304734 ↗
31. Bobrin, V. A. et al. Design and 3D printing of polyacrylonitrile-derived nanostructured carbon architectures. Small Sci. 4, 2300275 (2024).10.1002/smsc.202300275 ↗
32. Lee, K. et al. 3D printing highly efficient ion-exchange materials via a polyelectrolyte microphase separation strategy. Small Sci. 4, 2400019 (2024).10.1002/smsc.202400019 ↗
33. Bobrin, V. A. et al. Microphase separation 3D printing of binary inorganic polymer precursors to prepare nanostructured carbon-ceramic multimaterials. Adv. Mater. Technol. 9, 2400337 (2024).10.1002/admt.202400337 ↗
34. Moad, G., Rizzardo, E. & Thang, S. H. living radical polymerization by the RAFT process – a third update. Aust. J. Chem. 65, 985–1076 (2012).10.1071/CH12295 ↗
35. Zaquen, N. et al. Alcohol-based PISA in batch and flow: exploring the role of photoinitiators. Polym. Chem. 10, 2406–2414 (2019).10.1039/C9PY00166B ↗
36. Xu, J., Shanmugam, S., Corrigan, N. A. & Boyer, C. Catalyst-free visible light-induced RAFT photopolymerization, In Controlled Radical Polymerization: Mechanisms. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1187, 247–267 (2015).10.1021/bk-2015-1187.ch013 ↗
37. Lu, L., Yang, N. & Cai, Y. Well-controlled reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer radical polymerisation under ultraviolet radiation at ambient temperature. Chem. Commun 41, 5287–5288 (2005).10.1039/b512057h ↗
38. Lu, L., Zhang, H., Yang, N. & Cai, Y. Toward rapid and well-controlled ambient temperature RAFT polymerization under UV−Vis radiation: effect of radiation wave range. Macromolecules 39, 3770–3776 (2006).10.1021/ma060157x ↗
39. Lee, K., Corrigan, N. & Boyer, C. Rapid high-resolution 3D printing and surface functionalization via type I photoinitiated RAFT polymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 8839–8850 (2021).10.1002/anie.202016523 ↗
40. Penzel, E., Ballard, N. & Ausa, J. M. in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Polyacrylate, 1-20 (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2018).10.1002/14356007.a21_157.pub2 ↗
41. Michelas, M., Corrigan, N. & Boyer, C. 3D printing via polymerization-induced microphase separation using acrylate macromonomers instead of macroRAFT agents. Polym. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5PY00226E (2025).10.1039/D5PY00226E ↗
42. Jiang, Z. et al. Extrusion 3D printing of polymeric materials with advanced properties. Adv. Sci. 7, 2001379 (2020).10.1002/advs.202001379 ↗
43. Golhin, A. P., Tonello, R., Frisvad, J. R., Grammatikos, S. & Strandlie, A. Surface roughness of as-printed polymers: a comprehensive review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 127, 987–1043 (2023).10.1007/s00170-023-11566-z ↗
44. Urrios, A. et al. 3D-printing of transparent bio-microfluidic devices in PEG-DA. Lab Chip 16, 2287–2294 (2016).10.1039/C6LC00153J ↗