Combinatorial mechanical gradation and growth factor biopatterning strategy for spatially controlled bone-tendon-like cell differentiation and tissue formation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Engineering scaffolds to augment the repair of hard-to-soft multitissue musculoskeletal tissue units, such as bone-tendon, to simultaneously support tissue healing and functional movement has had limited success. Overcoming this challenge will require not only precise spatial control of bone- and tendon-like biomechanical properties, but also consideration of the resultant biomechanical cues, as well as the embedded biochemical cues imparted by these scaffolds. Here, we report on the effects of a spatially engineered combination of stiffness and growth factor (GF) cues to control bone-tendon-like differentiation in vitro and tissue formation in vivo. This was achieved using mechanically graded, bone- and tendon-like QHM polyurethane (QHM: Q: Quadrol; H: hexamethylene diisocyanate; M: methacrylic anhydride) scaffolds selectively biopatterned with osteogenic bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) and tenogenic fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2). First, material characterization, including porosity, surface roughness, contact angle, and microindentation measurements, was performed. Second, in vitro studies demonstrated that increased material stiffness promoted GF-mediated osteoblast differentiation and reduced tenocyte differentiation. Sustained GF exposure masked this stiffness effect. Third, in vivo studies involving subcutaneous implantation of mechanically graded and biochemically patterned QHM scaffolds (composed of these bone- and tendon-promoting GFs biopatterned on biphasic bone and tendon biomechanically mimicking regions) in mice demonstrated spatial control of bone- and tendon-like tissue formation. Altogether, these data provide new insights for future engineering of scaffolds to augment hard-to-soft multitissue repair.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tendon Structure and Treatment · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Itoi, E. et al. Tensile properties of the supraspinatus tendon. J. Orthop. Res. 13, 578–584 (1995).10.1002/jor.1100130413 ↗
2. Rosenbaum, A. J. et al. Histologic stages of healing correlate with restoration of tensile strength in a model of experimental tendon repair. HSS J. 6, 164–170 (2010).10.1007/s11420-009-9152-5 ↗
3. Spalazzi, J. P. et al. In vivo evaluation of a multiphased scaffold designed for orthopaedic interface tissue engineering and soft tissue-to-bone integration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 86, 1–12 (2008).10.1002/jbm.a.32073 ↗
4. Zhu, C., Pongkitwitoon, S., Qiu, J., Thomopoulos, S. & Xia, Y. Design and fabrication of a hierarchically structured scaffold for tendon-to-bone repair. Adv. Mater. 30, e1707306 (2018).10.1002/adma.201707306 ↗
5. Mozdzen, L. C., Vucetic, A. & Harley, B. A. C. Modifying the strength and strain concentration profile within collagen scaffolds using customizable arrays of poly-lactic acid fibers. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 66, 28–36 (2017).10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.10.017 ↗
6. Lausch, A. J., Chong, L. C., Uludag, H. & Sone, E. D. Multiphasic collagen scaffolds for engineered tissue interfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1804730 (2018).10.1002/adfm.201804730 ↗
7. Li, X. et al. Nanofiber scaffolds with gradations in mineral content for mimicking the tendon-to-bone insertion site. Nano Lett. 9, 2763–2768 (2009).10.1021/nl901582f ↗
8. Phillips, J. E., Burns, K. L., Le Doux, J. M., Guldberg, R. E. & Garcia, A. J. Engineering graded tissue interfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 12170–12175 (2008).10.1073/pnas.0801988105 ↗
9. Ker, D. F. E. et al. Functionally graded, bone- and tendon-like polyurethane for rotator cuff repair. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1707107 (2018).10.1002/adfm.201707107 ↗
10. Lu, H. H. & Thomopoulos, S. Functional attachment of soft tissues to bone: development, healing, and tissue engineering. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 15, 201–226 (2013).10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124656 ↗
11. Rodeo, S. A. Biologic augmentation of rotator cuff tendon repair. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 16, S191–S197 (2007).10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.012 ↗
12. Yang, P. J. & Temenoff, J. S. Engineering orthopedic tissue interfaces. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 15, 127–141 (2009).10.1089/ten.teb.2008.0371 ↗
13. Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L. & Discher, D. E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677–689 (2006).10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 ↗
14. Yuehuei, H. A. & Robert A. D. Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface (CRC Press, 1999).
15. Cooper, G. M. et al. Inkjet-based biopatterning of bone morphogenetic protein-2 to spatially control calvarial bone formation. Tissue Eng. Part A 16, 1749–1759 (2010).10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0650 ↗
16. Ker, E. D. et al. Engineering spatial control of multiple differentiation fates within a stem cell population. Biomaterials 32, 3413–3422 (2011).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.036 ↗
17. Ker, E. D. et al. Bioprinting of growth factors onto aligned sub-micron fibrous scaffolds for simultaneous control of cell differentiation and alignment. Biomaterials 32, 8097–8107 (2011).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.025 ↗
18. Phillippi, J. A. et al. Microenvironments engineered by inkjet bioprinting spatially direct adult stem cells toward muscle- and bone-like subpopulations. Stem Cells 26, 127–134 (2008).10.1634/stemcells.2007-0520 ↗
19. Shanjani, Y., Siebert, S. M., Ker, D. F. E., Mercado-Pagán, A. E. & Yang, Y. P. Acoustic patterning of growth factor for three-dimensional tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part A 26, 602–612 (2020).10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0271 ↗
20. Campbell, P. G., Miller, E. D., Fisher, G. W., Walker, L. M. & Weiss, L. E. Engineered spatial patterns of FGF-2 immobilized on fibrin direct cell organization. Biomaterials 26, 6762–6770 (2005).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.032 ↗
21. Smith, D. M. et al. Precise control of osteogenesis for craniofacial defect repair: the role of direct osteoprogenitor contact in BMP-2-based bioprinting. Ann. Plast. Surg. 69, 485–488 (2012).10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824cfe64 ↗
22. Tomarken, A. J. & Serlin, R. C. Comparison of ANOVA alternatives under variance heterogeneity and specific noncentrality structures. Psychol. Bull. 99, 90–99 (1986).10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.90 ↗
23. Krieghoff, J. et al. Increased pore size of scaffolds improves coating efficiency with sulfated hyaluronan and mineralization capacity of osteoblasts. Biomater. Res. 23, 26 (2019).10.1186/s40824-019-0172-z ↗
24. Di Luca, A. et al. Gradients in pore size enhance the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells in three-dimensional scaffolds. Sci. Rep. 6, 22898 (2016).10.1038/srep22898 ↗
25. Faia-Torres, A. B. et al. Osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in the absence of osteogenic supplements: a surface-roughness gradient study. Acta Biomater. 28, 64–75 (2015).10.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.028 ↗
26. Kim, D.-H. et al. Actin cap associated focal adhesions and their distinct role in cellular mechanosensing. Sci. Rep. 2, 555 (2012).10.1038/srep00555 ↗
27. Gartsman, G. M. Shoulder Arthroscopy (2nd edn). (W.B. Saunders, 2009).10.1016/B978-1-4160-4649-3.00007-7 ↗
28. Andarawis-Puri, N., Flatow, E. L. & Soslowsky, L. J. Tendon basic science: Development, repair, regeneration, and healing. J. Orthop. Res. 33, 780–784 (2015).10.1002/jor.22869 ↗
29. Smith, M. J. et al. Comparison of a novel bone-tendon allograft with a human dermis-derived patch for repair of chronic large rotator cuff tears using a canine model. Arthroscopy 28, 169–177 (2012).10.1016/j.arthro.2011.08.296 ↗
30. Xie, J., Ma, B., Michael, P. L. & Shuler, F. D. Fabrication of nanofiber scaffolds with gradations in fiber organization and their potential applications. Macromol. Biosci. 12, 1336–1341 (2012).10.1002/mabi.201200115 ↗
31. Surmenev, R. A., Surmeneva, M. A. & Ivanova, A. A. Significance of calcium phosphate coatings for the enhancement of new bone osteogenesis-a review. Acta Biomater. 10, 557–579 (2014).10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.036 ↗
32. Sun, Z., Guo, S. S. & Fässler, R. Integrin-mediated mechanotransduction. J. Cell Biol. 215, 445–456 (2016).10.1083/jcb.201609037 ↗
33. Chen, C. S. Mechanotransduction - a field pulling together? J. Cell Sci. 121, 3285–3292 (2008).10.1242/jcs.023507 ↗
34. Yang, C., Tibbitt, M. W., Basta, L. & Anseth, K. S. Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate. Nat. Mater. 13, 645–652 (2014).10.1038/nmat3889 ↗
35. Smith, R. D. J. et al. Characterizing the macro and micro mechanical properties of scaffolds for rotator cuff repair. J. Shoulder Elbow. Surg. 26, 2038–2046 (2017).10.1016/j.jse.2017.06.035 ↗
36. Taipale, J. & Keski-Oja, J. Growth factors in the extracellular matrix. FASEB J. 11, 51–59 (1997).10.1096/fasebj.11.1.9034166 ↗
37. Lin, C. C. & Anseth, K. S. PEG hydrogels for the controlled release of biomolecules in regenerative medicine. Pharm. Res. 26, 631–643 (2009).10.1007/s11095-008-9801-2 ↗
38. Kamkin, A. & Kiseleva, I. in Mechanosensitivity in Cells and Tissues (eds Kamkin, A. & Kiseleva, I.) (Academia, 2005).
39. Hast, M. W., Zuskov, A. & Soslowsky, L. J. The role of animal models in tendon research. Bone Jt. Res. 3, 193–202 (2014).10.1302/2046-3758.36.2000281 ↗
40. Thomopoulos, S. et al. Fibrocartilage tissue engineering: the role of the stress environment on cell morphology and matrix expression. Tissue Eng. Pt A 17, 1039–1053 (2010).10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0499 ↗
41. Molloy, T., Wang, Y. & Murrell, G. The roles of growth factors in tendon and ligament healing. Sports Med. 33, 381–394 (2003).10.2165/00007256-200333050-00004 ↗
42. Rothrauff, B. B., Yang, G. & Tuan, R. S. Tissue-specific bioactivity of soluble tendon-derived and cartilage-derived extracellular matrices on adult mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 8, 133 (2017).10.1186/s13287-017-0580-8 ↗
43. Zhang, J. & Wang, J. H. Mechanobiological response of tendon stem cells: implications of tendon homeostasis and pathogenesis of tendinopathy. J. Orthop. Res. 28, 639–643 (2010).10.1002/jor.21046 ↗